schmendeler said:

---

Ragoo said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

wangus12 said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Talarico is awful. A complete snake. People are too easily fooled by his "aw shucks-y" howdy doody face and demeanor. He has a bright future, unfortunately.

---

That's every politician.

---

Yeah, just about. But it's worse when it's a politician who wants to take more from you, and also make the city more dangerous for your loved ones. One who says we need to take in unvetted third world bangers because the Bible is against borders and Jesus wouldn't have turned anyone away, or some such completely made up nonsense.

---

Jesus was famously in favor of refusing to help strangers

---

jesus helped strangers and the poor as a metaphor of God's love for all mankind.

Jesus lived in a time where King's ruled over all men in absolute worse conditions that is fathomable today in western society. Yet, he made zero advocacy for contempt against the Kings or revolution to overthrow their rule.

Using piety or religion in general as justification for socialistic ideals is false doctrine.

---

It's only ok to use religion for things like going after trans people, or gay marriage, or putting the ten commandments in classrooms, or banning abortion. Things like helping people in need is totally against the example (sorry, metaphor) of Christ.

---

any other anti-Christian gotchas you want to put out there? Seems to be what interests you the most.

Ragoo said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

wangus12 said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Talarico is awful. A complete snake. People are too easily fooled by his "aw shucks-y" howdy doody face and demeanor. He has a bright future, unfortunately.

---

That's every politician.

---

Yeah, just about. But it's worse when it's a politician who wants to take more from you, and also make the city more dangerous for your loved ones. One who says we need to take in unvetted third world bangers because the Bible is against borders and Jesus wouldn't have turned anyone away, or some such completely made up nonsense.

---

Jesus was famously in favor of refusing to help strangers

---

jesus helped strangers and the poor as a metaphor of God's love for all mankind.

Jesus lived in a time where King's ruled over all men in absolute worse conditions that is fathomable today in western society. Yet, he made zero advocacy for contempt against the Kings or revolution to overthrow their rule.

Using piety or religion in general as justification for socialistic ideals is false doctrine.

---

Yeah, and there's definitely nothing that ultra-conservatives use religion to justify. Nothing at all. Right?

Ervin Burrell said:

---

Ragoo said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

wangus12 said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Talarico is awful. A complete snake. People are too easily fooled by his "aw shucks-y" howdy doody face and demeanor. He has a bright future, unfortunately.

---

That's every politician.

---

Yeah, just about. But it's worse when it's a politician who wants to take more from you, and also make the city more dangerous for your loved ones. One who says we need to take in unvetted third world bangers because the Bible is against borders and Jesus wouldn't have turned anyone away, or some such completely made up nonsense.

---

Jesus was famously in favor of refusing to help strangers

---

jesus helped strangers and the poor as a metaphor of God's love for all mankind.

Jesus lived in a time where King's ruled over all men in absolute worse conditions that is fathomable today in western society. Yet, he made zero advocacy for contempt against the Kings or revolution to overthrow their rule.

Using piety or religion in general as justification for socialistic ideals is false doctrine.

---

Someone tell that to the folks trying to put the Ten Commandments in classrooms. Or is that "different?"

---

what content of the 10 commandments do you - or anyone is civil society - take offense to exactly?

Murder
Theft
Adultery
Coveting
Honoring parents
Etc

Or it is just because it comes from the bible?

Ragoo said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

Ragoo said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

wangus12 said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Talarico is awful. A complete snake. People are too easily fooled by his "aw shucks-y" howdy doody face and demeanor. He has a bright future, unfortunately.

---

That's every politician.

---

Yeah, just about. But it's worse when it's a politician who wants to take more from you, and also make the city more dangerous for your loved ones. One who says we need to take in unvetted third world bangers because the Bible is against borders and Jesus wouldn't have turned anyone away, or some such completely made up nonsense.

---

Jesus was famously in favor of refusing to help strangers

---

jesus helped strangers and the poor as a metaphor of God's love for all mankind.

Jesus lived in a time where King's ruled over all men in absolute worse conditions that is fathomable today in western society. Yet, he made zero advocacy for contempt against the Kings or revolution to overthrow their rule.

Using piety or religion in general as justification for socialistic ideals is false doctrine.

---

It's only ok to use religion for things like going after trans people, or gay marriage, or putting the ten commandments in classrooms, or banning abortion. Things like helping people in need is totally against the example (sorry, metaphor) of Christ.

---

any other anti-Christian gotchas you want to put out there? Seems to be what interests you the most.

---

The hypocrisy is what interests me.

Ragoo said:

---

Ervin Burrell said:

---

Ragoo said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

wangus12 said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Talarico is awful. A complete snake. People are too easily fooled by his "aw shucks-y" howdy doody face and demeanor. He has a bright future, unfortunately.

---

That's every politician.

---

Yeah, just about. But it's worse when it's a politician who wants to take more from you, and also make the city more dangerous for your loved ones. One who says we need to take in unvetted third world bangers because the Bible is against borders and Jesus wouldn't have turned anyone away, or some such completely made up nonsense.

---

Jesus was famously in favor of refusing to help strangers

---

jesus helped strangers and the poor as a metaphor of God's love for all mankind.

Jesus lived in a time where King's ruled over all men in absolute worse conditions that is fathomable today in western society. Yet, he made zero advocacy for contempt against the Kings or revolution to overthrow their rule.

Using piety or religion in general as justification for socialistic ideals is false doctrine.

---

Someone tell that to the folks trying to put the Ten Commandments in classrooms. Or is that "different?"

---

what content of the 10 commandments do you - or anyone is civil society - take offense to exactly?

Murder
Theft
Adultery
Coveting
Honoring parents
Etc

Or it is just because it comes from the bible?

---

Half of them are about protecting God's ego. The other half are already against the law.

Ragoo said:

---

Ervin Burrell said:

---

Ragoo said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

wangus12 said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Talarico is awful. A complete snake. People are too easily fooled by his "aw shucks-y" howdy doody face and demeanor. He has a bright future, unfortunately.

---

That's every politician.

---

Yeah, just about. But it's worse when it's a politician who wants to take more from you, and also make the city more dangerous for your loved ones. One who says we need to take in unvetted third world bangers because the Bible is against borders and Jesus wouldn't have turned anyone away, or some such completely made up nonsense.

---

Jesus was famously in favor of refusing to help strangers

---

jesus helped strangers and the poor as a metaphor of God's love for all mankind.

Jesus lived in a time where King's ruled over all men in absolute worse conditions that is fathomable today in western society. Yet, he made zero advocacy for contempt against the Kings or revolution to overthrow their rule.

Using piety or religion in general as justification for socialistic ideals is false doctrine.

---

Someone tell that to the folks trying to put the Ten Commandments in classrooms. Or is that "different?"

---

what content of the 10 commandments do you - or anyone is civil society - take offense to exactly?

Murder
Theft
Adultery
Coveting
Honoring parents
Etc

Or it is just because it comes from the bible?

---

I think you're missing a couple. Where did they go?

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Quad Dog said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

M.C. Swag said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Talarico is awful. A complete snake. People are too easily fooled by his "aw shucks-y" howdy doody face and demeanor. He has a bright future, unfortunately.

---

lol based on what? Was he caught on a hot mic bragging about assaulting a woman? Was he found civilly liable for misappropriating charity funds? Or you just don't like his opinions so you think that makes him a snake?

---

He is constantly lying and using twisted Christian doctrine to support things like erasing our borders...and paint anyone who believes in borders and an actual legal immigration process as bigoted and "unchristian". If you start to pick up on his lies, you can see that his pious act is just an act. He's brilliant and cunning though, and has a very bright future...I genuinely think he may be the face of the democrat party within the next 10 years.

He is marketing himself as a moderate and as a civil person who "loves everyone from both sides". It's brilliant and it will work. Fully expect him to be president in my lifetime. Congrats on that, even though I detest him and everything he truly stands for.

---

"erasing borders" is a pretty big mischaracterization of his opinions on immigration.
https://jamestalarico.com/issue/immigration-border-security/

---

Yeah ok...I mean obviously no one is going to run on literally erasing all borders. Listen to his podcast with Rogan. He advocates for very very open borders. Cloaked in "what would Jesus do" compassion as the prime motivator.

He knows that liberals aren't hardly breeding at all, and that many are taking themselves out of the gene pool altogether with their lifestyles...that the ONLY way for the democrat party to survive is to hammer people while young in the education system, but also flood the country with poor immigrants and get them hooked on the government teet in hopes of making them generational democrats. This is the playbook. He is just way better at not revealing his hand, while the screaming AOC's and Ilhan Omar's of the world are so obvious and loud, they scare many more reasonable people away.

Anyways, Talarico is a rising star and will be POTUS someday and congrats. I'm out.

---

So you were caught in a lie about his border policy and are now changing your statement...

Not going to watch a 2.5 hour interview with Rogan. Do you have 3-5 minutes of the interview you can recommend to make your point?

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Quad Dog said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

M.C. Swag said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Talarico is awful. A complete snake. People are too easily fooled by his "aw shucks-y" howdy doody face and demeanor. He has a bright future, unfortunately.

---

lol based on what? Was he caught on a hot mic bragging about assaulting a woman? Was he found civilly liable for misappropriating charity funds? Or you just don't like his opinions so you think that makes him a snake?

---

He is constantly lying and using twisted Christian doctrine to support things like erasing our borders...and paint anyone who believes in borders and an actual legal immigration process as bigoted and "unchristian". If you start to pick up on his lies, you can see that his pious act is just an act. He's brilliant and cunning though, and has a very bright future...I genuinely think he may be the face of the democrat party within the next 10 years.

He is marketing himself as a moderate and as a civil person who "loves everyone from both sides". It's brilliant and it will work. Fully expect him to be president in my lifetime. Congrats on that, even though I detest him and everything he truly stands for.

---

"erasing borders" is a pretty big mischaracterization of his opinions on immigration.
https://jamestalarico.com/issue/immigration-border-security/

---

Anyways, Talarico is a rising star and will be POTUS someday and congrats. I'm out.

---

I bet you aren't.

Ragoo said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

Ragoo said:

---

Ervin Burrell said:

---

Ragoo said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

wangus12 said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Talarico is awful. A complete snake. People are too easily fooled by his "aw shucks-y" howdy doody face and demeanor. He has a bright future, unfortunately.

---

That's every politician.

---

Yeah, just about. But it's worse when it's a politician who wants to take more from you, and also make the city more dangerous for your loved ones. One who says we need to take in unvetted third world bangers because the Bible is against borders and Jesus wouldn't have turned anyone away, or some such completely made up nonsense.

---

Jesus was famously in favor of refusing to help strangers

---

jesus helped strangers and the poor as a metaphor of God's love for all mankind.

Jesus lived in a time where King's ruled over all men in absolute worse conditions that is fathomable today in western society. Yet, he made zero advocacy for contempt against the Kings or revolution to overthrow their rule.

Using piety or religion in general as justification for socialistic ideals is false doctrine.

---

Someone tell that to the folks trying to put the Ten Commandments in classrooms. Or is that "different?"

---

what content of the 10 commandments do you - or anyone is civil society - take offense to exactly?

Murder
Theft
Adultery
Coveting
Honoring parents
Etc

Or it is just because it comes from the bible?

---

I think you're missing a couple. Where did they go?

---

they are in etc. maybe you can point out the ones you hate, for clarity.

---

I don't hate any of the commandments. I just don't think pretending that there aren't any explicitly Christian/Jewish ones in there is an honest way to discuss them.

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Ervin Burrell said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Quad Dog said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

M.C. Swag said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Talarico is awful. A complete snake. People are too easily fooled by his "aw shucks-y" howdy doody face and demeanor. He has a bright future, unfortunately.

---

lol based on what? Was he caught on a hot mic bragging about assaulting a woman? Was he found civilly liable for misappropriating charity funds? Or you just don't like his opinions so you think that makes him a snake?

---

He is constantly lying and using twisted Christian doctrine to support things like erasing our borders...and paint anyone who believes in borders and an actual legal immigration process as bigoted and "unchristian". If you start to pick up on his lies, you can see that his pious act is just an act. He's brilliant and cunning though, and has a very bright future...I genuinely think he may be the face of the democrat party within the next 10 years.

He is marketing himself as a moderate and as a civil person who "loves everyone from both sides". It's brilliant and it will work. Fully expect him to be president in my lifetime. Congrats on that, even though I detest him and everything he truly stands for.

---

"erasing borders" is a pretty big mischaracterization of his opinions on immigration.
https://jamestalarico.com/issue/immigration-border-security/

---

Anyways, Talarico is a rising star and will be POTUS someday and congrats. I'm out.

---

I bet you aren't.

---

You're such an online tough guy. I refuse to engage with you or schemdeler any further. Zero minds will get changed and there is a very good chance I'll end up getting flagged and hit with a 3-7 day ban.

---

Sounds like somebody needs a safe space. Also, please don't leave without one of your patented "everyone who doesn't vote the way I do wants grown men to shower with my daughter" posts.

I assume the FCC will be properly investigating all of those AM talk radio stations too, right?

Ervin Burrell said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Ervin Burrell said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Quad Dog said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

M.C. Swag said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Talarico is awful. A complete snake. People are too easily fooled by his "aw shucks-y" howdy doody face and demeanor. He has a bright future, unfortunately.

---

lol based on what? Was he caught on a hot mic bragging about assaulting a woman? Was he found civilly liable for misappropriating charity funds? Or you just don't like his opinions so you think that makes him a snake?

---

He is constantly lying and using twisted Christian doctrine to support things like erasing our borders...and paint anyone who believes in borders and an actual legal immigration process as bigoted and "unchristian". If you start to pick up on his lies, you can see that his pious act is just an act. He's brilliant and cunning though, and has a very bright future...I genuinely think he may be the face of the democrat party within the next 10 years.

He is marketing himself as a moderate and as a civil person who "loves everyone from both sides". It's brilliant and it will work. Fully expect him to be president in my lifetime. Congrats on that, even though I detest him and everything he truly stands for.

---

"erasing borders" is a pretty big mischaracterization of his opinions on immigration.
https://jamestalarico.com/issue/immigration-border-security/

---

Anyways, Talarico is a rising star and will be POTUS someday and congrats. I'm out.

---

I bet you aren't.

---

You're such an online tough guy. I refuse to engage with you or schemdeler any further. Zero minds will get changed and there is a very good chance I'll end up getting flagged and hit with a 3-7 day ban.

---

Sounds like somebody needs a safe space. Also, please don't leave without one of your patented "everyone who doesn't vote the way I do wants grown men to shower with my daughter" posts.

---

Every single democrat US senator supported this. And sharing the same locker room...after they donimate her at sports obviously. Congrats, you should be proud. Very Christ-like. Oh wait, these pro bono bible sermons are just for Christian conservatives lol. Late.

cajunaggie08 said:

---

I assume the FCC will be properly investigating all of those AM talk radio stations too, right?

---

Rush Limbaugh just popped some more pills.

schmendeler said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

M.C. Swag said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Talarico is awful. A complete snake. People are too easily fooled by his "aw shucks-y" howdy doody face and demeanor. He has a bright future, unfortunately.

---

lol based on what? Was he caught on a hot mic bragging about assaulting a woman? Was he found civilly liable for misappropriating charity funds? Or you just don't like his opinions so you think that makes him a snake?

---

He is constantly lying and using twisted Christian doctrine to support things like erasing our borders...and paint anyone who believes in borders and an actual legal immigration process as bigoted and "unchristian". If you start to pick up on his lies, you can see that his pious act is just an act. He's brilliant and cunning though, and has a very bright future...I genuinely think he may be the face of the democrat party within the next 10 years.

---

What are these "constant" lies?

---

right in his website. First issue is about corrupt politicians and their billionaire mega donors buying power - completely ignoring his own backing by the George Soros billionaire PAC. Maybe not a lie, but a clear misrepresentation of this specific issue.

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Ervin Burrell said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Ervin Burrell said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Quad Dog said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

M.C. Swag said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Talarico is awful. A complete snake. People are too easily fooled by his "aw shucks-y" howdy doody face and demeanor. He has a bright future, unfortunately.

---

lol based on what? Was he caught on a hot mic bragging about assaulting a woman? Was he found civilly liable for misappropriating charity funds? Or you just don't like his opinions so you think that makes him a snake?

---

He is constantly lying and using twisted Christian doctrine to support things like erasing our borders...and paint anyone who believes in borders and an actual legal immigration process as bigoted and "unchristian". If you start to pick up on his lies, you can see that his pious act is just an act. He's brilliant and cunning though, and has a very bright future...I genuinely think he may be the face of the democrat party within the next 10 years.

He is marketing himself as a moderate and as a civil person who "loves everyone from both sides". It's brilliant and it will work. Fully expect him to be president in my lifetime. Congrats on that, even though I detest him and everything he truly stands for.

---

"erasing borders" is a pretty big mischaracterization of his opinions on immigration.
https://jamestalarico.com/issue/immigration-border-security/

---

Anyways, Talarico is a rising star and will be POTUS someday and congrats. I'm out.

---

I bet you aren't.

---

You're such an online tough guy. I refuse to engage with you or schemdeler any further. Zero minds will get changed and there is a very good chance I'll end up getting flagged and hit with a 3-7 day ban.

---

Sounds like somebody needs a safe space. Also, please don't leave without one of your patented "everyone who doesn't vote the way I do wants grown men to shower with my daughter" posts.

---

Every single democrat US senator supported this. And sharing the same locker room...after they donimate her at sports obviously. Congrats, you should be proud. Very Christ-like. Oh wait, these pro bono bible sermons are just for Christian conservatives lol. Late.

---

IMO H.R.28 was badly written legislation with no enforcement mechanism, would have killed co-ed sports of all ages but especially before puberty, didn't state how gender would be verified (which leads to all kinds of disgusting suggestions), and was full of unintended consequences (or maybe it was intended?)

and BTW it never mentions locker rooms.

I would have voted against it too in hopes of something more substantive.

But again, I think you are mischaracterizing some Democratic Senators, but not all, reasons for opposition.

Quad Dog said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Ervin Burrell said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Ervin Burrell said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Quad Dog said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

M.C. Swag said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Talarico is awful. A complete snake. People are too easily fooled by his "aw shucks-y" howdy doody face and demeanor. He has a bright future, unfortunately.

---

lol based on what? Was he caught on a hot mic bragging about assaulting a woman? Was he found civilly liable for misappropriating charity funds? Or you just don't like his opinions so you think that makes him a snake?

---

He is constantly lying and using twisted Christian doctrine to support things like erasing our borders...and paint anyone who believes in borders and an actual legal immigration process as bigoted and "unchristian". If you start to pick up on his lies, you can see that his pious act is just an act. He's brilliant and cunning though, and has a very bright future...I genuinely think he may be the face of the democrat party within the next 10 years.

He is marketing himself as a moderate and as a civil person who "loves everyone from both sides". It's brilliant and it will work. Fully expect him to be president in my lifetime. Congrats on that, even though I detest him and everything he truly stands for.

---

"erasing borders" is a pretty big mischaracterization of his opinions on immigration.
https://jamestalarico.com/issue/immigration-border-security/

---

Anyways, Talarico is a rising star and will be POTUS someday and congrats. I'm out.

---

I bet you aren't.

---

You're such an online tough guy. I refuse to engage with you or schemdeler any further. Zero minds will get changed and there is a very good chance I'll end up getting flagged and hit with a 3-7 day ban.

---

Sounds like somebody needs a safe space. Also, please don't leave without one of your patented "everyone who doesn't vote the way I do wants grown men to shower with my daughter" posts.

---

Every single democrat US senator supported this. And sharing the same locker room...after they donimate her at sports obviously. Congrats, you should be proud. Very Christ-like. Oh wait, these pro bono bible sermons are just for Christian conservatives lol. Late.

---

IMO H.R.28 was badly written legislation with no enforcement mechanism, would have killed co-ed sports of all ages but especially before puberty, didn't state how gender would be verified (which leads to all kinds of disgusting suggestions), and was full of unintended consequences (or maybe it was intended?)

and BTW it never mentions locker rooms.

I would have voted against it too in hopes of something more substantive.

But again, I think you are mischaracterizing some Democratic Senators, but not all, reasons for opposition.

---

Meh, we can split hairs, but things like men in womens' sports/locker rooms/showers and "not being able to define what a woman is" (like justice Ketanji Jackson), and even support for irreversible hormone therapy and genital surgery for minors, or drag shows or story-time for children, became mainstream cultural positions within the democrat party over the last decade. And also severely punishing people who wanted to opt out of an experimental "vaccine". We could go on and on.

It's gotten so bad and out of control that people like Bill Maher, Fetterman, and this person, are pleading with the party to come back closer to the center.

Quote:

---

"The Democratic Party cannot moderate as long as progressive groups are able to exert control over the state and local party, pushing out moderates like Shawn Thierry and Jason Pizzo. Progressive policies have led to rising crime, uncontrolled spending, recurring fiscal shortfalls, higher taxes, and visible mismanagement. These outcomes do not remain siloed in one particular Democratic-controlled city or state. Instead, they are synthesized in the minds of voters as reflections of Democratic governance as a whole."

---

Why the Democratic Party Can't Moderate | Compact

Most conservatves either (a) haven't really changed in their politics, or (b) have actually become more "liberal" in some areas, but the left has sprinted hard left, so it appears to many of them that we have moved to the right.

Ervin Burrell said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

M.C. Swag said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Talarico is awful. A complete snake. People are too easily fooled by his "aw shucks-y" howdy doody face and demeanor. He has a bright future, unfortunately.

---

lol based on what? Was he caught on a hot mic bragging about assaulting a woman? Was he found civilly liable for misappropriating charity funds? Or you just don't like his opinions so you think that makes him a snake?

---

He is constantly lying and using twisted Christian doctrine to support things like erasing our borders...and paint anyone who believes in borders and an actual legal immigration process as bigoted and "unchristian". If you start to pick up on his lies, you can see that his pious act is just an act. He's brilliant and cunning though, and has a very bright future...I genuinely think he may be the face of the democrat party within the next 10 years.

He is marketing himself as a moderate and as a civil person who "loves everyone from both sides". It's brilliant and it will work. Fully expect him to be president in my lifetime. Congrats on that, even though I detest him and everything he truly stands for.

---

There's no hate like Christian love.

---

How is this not trolling? Dear lord staff

Agree with you that some more extreme parts of the modern Democratic party have completely gone crazy with their trans stuff. But I also think you are painting with too broad a brush if you use terms like "mainstream cultural positions within the democrat party" is in favor of all of the more extreme policies you list. Have any of those things come up on the national stage? or have they all been more local things?

But that seems to be one of the failings of modern online discourse: the complete loss of nuance.

Ragoo said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

M.C. Swag said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Talarico is awful. A complete snake. People are too easily fooled by his "aw shucks-y" howdy doody face and demeanor. He has a bright future, unfortunately.

---

lol based on what? Was he caught on a hot mic bragging about assaulting a woman? Was he found civilly liable for misappropriating charity funds? Or you just don't like his opinions so you think that makes him a snake?

---

He is constantly lying and using twisted Christian doctrine to support things like erasing our borders...and paint anyone who believes in borders and an actual legal immigration process as bigoted and "unchristian". If you start to pick up on his lies, you can see that his pious act is just an act. He's brilliant and cunning though, and has a very bright future...I genuinely think he may be the face of the democrat party within the next 10 years.

---

What are these "constant" lies?

---

right in his website. First issue is about corrupt politicians and their billionaire mega donors buying power - completely ignoring his own backing by the George Soros billionaire PAC. Maybe not a lie, but a clear misrepresentation of this specific issue.

---

This itself is a bit of a misrepresentation. PACs operate independently of candidates. He's pledged not to take any money from corporate PACs for his Senate run. And as of the latest, 98% of his campaign funds are from donations less than $100. Seems pretty in-line with his statements/stance to me.

Quad Dog said:

---

Agree with you that some more extreme parts of the modern Democratic party have completely gone crazy with their trans stuff. But I also think you are painting with too broad a brush if you use terms like "mainstream cultural positions within the democrat party" is in favor of all of the more extreme policies you list. Have any of those things come up on the national stage? or have they all been more local things?

But that seems to be one of the failings of modern online discourse: the complete loss of nuance.

---

Dude, the latest Democrat SCOTUS appointee literally has no clue how to define what a woman is. Or, it's possible, that she knows that defining a woman would be so upsetting to a large portion of her base, that she would be labeled a heretic if she gave an answer. Either way, it's very revealing as to the current state of the dem party.

Prominent democrat politicians have taken up the wackiest causes in recent years and reasonable 'old school' democrat types like Fetterman, Brett Weinstein, Bill Maher etc. are desperately pleading with them to stop with all of the extreme positions and hysterics.

You can believe what you want, but it's been acknowledged by numerous democrats and now-former-democrats that the party just went TOO crazy. Really the number one policy position is this...Hate orange man, and his supporters. That is almost all they got. Not too long ago, they used to support Voter ID, ICE, immigration enforcement, but since Trump or GOP supports such things, they have to flip flop. Hell Trump is the first pro-gay marriage president as an incoming president, which is pretty funny.

I have to believe that deep down you see that the fringe on the left has become far too mainstream.

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Quad Dog said:

---

Agree with you that some more extreme parts of the modern Democratic party have completely gone crazy with their trans stuff. But I also think you are painting with too broad a brush if you use terms like "mainstream cultural positions within the democrat party" is in favor of all of the more extreme policies you list. Have any of those things come up on the national stage? or have they all been more local things?

But that seems to be one of the failings of modern online discourse: the complete loss of nuance.

---

Dude, the latest Democrat SCOTUS appointee literally has no clue how to define what a woman is. Or, it's possible, that she knows that defining a woman would be so upsetting to a large portion of her base, that she would be labeled a heretic if she gave an answer. Either way, it's very revealing as to the current state of the dem party.

Prominent democrat politicians have taken up the wackiest causes in recent years and reasonable 'old school' democrat types like Fetterman, Brett Weinstein, Bill Maher etc. are desperately pleading with them to stop with all of the extreme positions and hysterics.

You can believe what you want, but it's been acknowledged by numerous democrats and now-former-democrats that the party just went TOO crazy. Really the number one policy position is this...Hate orange man, and his supporters. That is almost all they got. Not too long ago, they used to support Voter ID, ICE, immigration enforcement, but since Trump or GOP supports such things, they have to flip flop. Hell Trump is the first pro-gay marriage president as an incoming president, which is pretty funny.

I have to believe that deep down you see that the fringe on the left has become far too mainstream.

---

And what was fringe on the right has taken over in texas. When i talk to local conservatives about state policies for education like the slashes in funding, the roll out of vouchers, and the mandatory display of the 10 commandments, most say that is awful. But they hold their nose and vote for the same because "their" party isnt the democrats. If we got rid of party primaries and went to ranked choice voting, i think the extreme ends of both parties would lose power and thats a good thing.

schmendeler said:

---

Ragoo said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

M.C. Swag said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Talarico is awful. A complete snake. People are too easily fooled by his "aw shucks-y" howdy doody face and demeanor. He has a bright future, unfortunately.

---

lol based on what? Was he caught on a hot mic bragging about assaulting a woman? Was he found civilly liable for misappropriating charity funds? Or you just don't like his opinions so you think that makes him a snake?

---

He is constantly lying and using twisted Christian doctrine to support things like erasing our borders...and paint anyone who believes in borders and an actual legal immigration process as bigoted and "unchristian". If you start to pick up on his lies, you can see that his pious act is just an act. He's brilliant and cunning though, and has a very bright future...I genuinely think he may be the face of the democrat party within the next 10 years.

---

What are these "constant" lies?

---

right in his website. First issue is about corrupt politicians and their billionaire mega donors buying power - completely ignoring his own backing by the George Soros billionaire PAC. Maybe not a lie, but a clear misrepresentation of this specific issue.

---

This itself is a bit of a misrepresentation. PACs operate independently of candidates. He's pledged not to take any money from corporate PACs for his Senate run. And as of the latest, 98% of his campaign funds are from donations less than $100. Seems pretty in-line with his statements/stance to me.

---

How much is from "act blue" which is nothing but a democrat money laundering scheme?

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Quad Dog said:

---

Agree with you that some more extreme parts of the modern Democratic party have completely gone crazy with their trans stuff. But I also think you are painting with too broad a brush if you use terms like "mainstream cultural positions within the democrat party" is in favor of all of the more extreme policies you list. Have any of those things come up on the national stage? or have they all been more local things?

But that seems to be one of the failings of modern online discourse: the complete loss of nuance.

---

Dude, the latest Democrat SCOTUS appointee literally has no clue how to define what a woman is. Or, it's possible, that she knows that defining a woman would be so upsetting to a large portion of her base, that she would be labeled a heretic if she gave an answer. Either way, it's very revealing as to the current state of the dem party.

Prominent democrat politicians have taken up the wackiest causes in recent years and reasonable 'old school' democrat types like Fetterman, Brett Weinstein, Bill Maher etc. are desperately pleading with them to stop with all of the extreme positions and hysterics.

You can believe what you want, but it's been acknowledged by numerous democrats and now-former-democrats that the party just went TOO crazy. Really the number one policy position is this...Hate orange man, and his supporters. That is almost all they got. Not too long ago, they used to support Voter ID, ICE, immigration enforcement, but since Trump or GOP supports such things, they have to flip flop. Hell Trump is the first pro-gay marriage president as an incoming president, which is pretty funny.

I have to believe that deep down you see that the fringe on the left has become far too mainstream.

---

Wasn't too long ago that the GOP's only position was "Obama bad!" That's modern politics unfortunately: love everything your party does no matter how terrible and hate everything the other party does no matter how good. Meanwhile we've been facing the same fundamental problems my entire life no matter who is in office, and it is always the other guy's fault: immigration, taxes, debt, healthcare, Social Security.

agracer said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

Ragoo said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

M.C. Swag said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Talarico is awful. A complete snake. People are too easily fooled by his "aw shucks-y" howdy doody face and demeanor. He has a bright future, unfortunately.

---

lol based on what? Was he caught on a hot mic bragging about assaulting a woman? Was he found civilly liable for misappropriating charity funds? Or you just don't like his opinions so you think that makes him a snake?

---

He is constantly lying and using twisted Christian doctrine to support things like erasing our borders...and paint anyone who believes in borders and an actual legal immigration process as bigoted and "unchristian". If you start to pick up on his lies, you can see that his pious act is just an act. He's brilliant and cunning though, and has a very bright future...I genuinely think he may be the face of the democrat party within the next 10 years.

---

What are these "constant" lies?

---

right in his website. First issue is about corrupt politicians and their billionaire mega donors buying power - completely ignoring his own backing by the George Soros billionaire PAC. Maybe not a lie, but a clear misrepresentation of this specific issue.

---

This itself is a bit of a misrepresentation. PACs operate independently of candidates. He's pledged not to take any money from corporate PACs for his Senate run. And as of the latest, 98% of his campaign funds are from donations less than $100. Seems pretty in-line with his statements/stance to me.

---

How much is from "act blue" which is nothing but a democrat money laundering scheme?

---

I don't know. Your characterization of it as money laundering scheme is interesting, though. How do you feel about the GOP equivalent, WinRed?

Just saw the stats posted (and sourced) for Colbert's run on The Late Show for candidate/elected interviews

176 Democrats

1 Republican

The one Republican was Liz Cheney

maroon barchetta said:

---

M.C. Swag said:

---

Ragoo said:

---

Ervin Burrell said:

---

Ragoo said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

wangus12 said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Talarico is awful. A complete snake. People are too easily fooled by his "aw shucks-y" howdy doody face and demeanor. He has a bright future, unfortunately.

---

That's every politician.

---

Yeah, just about. But it's worse when it's a politician who wants to take more from you, and also make the city more dangerous for your loved ones. One who says we need to take in unvetted third world bangers because the Bible is against borders and Jesus wouldn't have turned anyone away, or some such completely made up nonsense.

---

Jesus was famously in favor of refusing to help strangers

---

jesus helped strangers and the poor as a metaphor of God's love for all mankind.

Jesus lived in a time where King's ruled over all men in absolute worse conditions that is fathomable today in western society. Yet, he made zero advocacy for contempt against the Kings or revolution to overthrow their rule.

Using piety or religion in general as justification for socialistic ideals is false doctrine.

---

Someone tell that to the folks trying to put the Ten Commandments in classrooms. Or is that "different?"

---

what content of the 10 commandments do you - or anyone is civil society - take offense to exactly?

Murder
Theft
Adultery
Coveting
Honoring parents
Etc

Or it is just because it comes from the bible?

---

Half of them are about protecting God's ego. The other half are already against the law.

---

And now you know the basis for the law.

---

My guy, I hate to break it to you but the Bible is not the basis of US law or even western law. Ancient Rome, which pre dates Jesus by centuries, not only had laws for basic human liberties such as murder and theft but civil and contract law administered through trial courts. Ancient Greece and Egypt also had common criminal and civil laws that permeated how western civilization developed under codified law and order. Not some allegory of an old man showing some carvings into stone.

Ervin Burrell said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Ervin Burrell said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Quad Dog said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

M.C. Swag said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Talarico is awful. A complete snake. People are too easily fooled by his "aw shucks-y" howdy doody face and demeanor. He has a bright future, unfortunately.

---

lol based on what? Was he caught on a hot mic bragging about assaulting a woman? Was he found civilly liable for misappropriating charity funds? Or you just don't like his opinions so you think that makes him a snake?

---

He is constantly lying and using twisted Christian doctrine to support things like erasing our borders...and paint anyone who believes in borders and an actual legal immigration process as bigoted and "unchristian". If you start to pick up on his lies, you can see that his pious act is just an act. He's brilliant and cunning though, and has a very bright future...I genuinely think he may be the face of the democrat party within the next 10 years.

He is marketing himself as a moderate and as a civil person who "loves everyone from both sides". It's brilliant and it will work. Fully expect him to be president in my lifetime. Congrats on that, even though I detest him and everything he truly stands for.

---

"erasing borders" is a pretty big mischaracterization of his opinions on immigration.
https://jamestalarico.com/issue/immigration-border-security/

---

Anyways, Talarico is a rising star and will be POTUS someday and congrats. I'm out.

---

I bet you aren't.

---

You're such an online tough guy. I refuse to engage with you or schemdeler any further. Zero minds will get changed and there is a very good chance I'll end up getting flagged and hit with a 3-7 day ban.

---

Sounds like somebody needs a safe space. Also, please don't leave without one of your patented "everyone who doesn't vote the way I do wants grown men to shower with my daughter" posts.

---

Meanwhile, the leaders actively trying to theoretically keep grown men from showering with someone's daughter, are the ones showering with people's daughters or working to cover it up.