Mueller dismisses top FBI agent in Russia probe for anti-Trump texts

8,685,408 Views | 50509 Replies | Last: 4 days ago by flown-the-coop
Ulysses90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yes, the irony is ironic, indeed. He was never a principled 'protect the American people from the Russians' guy/actor, he was always a crook just play acting to support 'his team' to benefit his career/financial interests. Same could be said for all of Comey's homey's in the Hoover Bldg apparatus. Which is why it's disgusting Kash/Bongino have arrested nor fired anyone of substance and have actually managed to promote some of the actual ringleaders.
Sid Farkas
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:


God sessions was such a traitor.
Zapata23
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not buying Lee Smith's theory that the UK was innocent in this because FVEY was all over this. Between the Australian diplomat knee deep in it, and Gina Haspel on the British Desk for the CIA.

Just not buying it
It’s never too late
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:


Trump wasn't POTUS in May 2016. Obama was.
VegasAg86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag with kids said:

will25u said:


Trump wasn't POTUS in May 2016. Obama was.
It's a typo/mistake. Sessions wasn't AG then, either. He clearly meant 2017.
fasthorse05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nortex97 said:

Yes, the irony is ironic, indeed. He was never a principled 'protect the American people from the Russians' guy/actor, he was always a crook just play acting to support 'his team' to benefit his career/financial interests. Same could be said for all of Comey's homey's in the Hoover Bldg apparatus. Which is why it's disgusting Kash/Bongino have arrested nor fired anyone of substance and have actually managed to promote some of the actual ringleaders.
You know, it's possible (and I'm trying to be optimistic) they're attempting to make a rock solid case to indict and screw these guys to the wall.

I have NO idea what they were thinking elevating the guy who was in charge of the J6 arrest, indictments, and prosecutions. Especially a guy who said "all J6 participants are terrorists".

I damned sure want an explanation on that.

And Sid, I think Sessions was just damned incompetent. He could be a traitor to us, but I think he just sucked in a sea of sharks.
Hate is how progressives sustain themselves. Without hate, introspection begins to slip into the progressive's consciousness, threatening the progressive with the truth: that their ideas and opinions are illogical, hypocritical, dangerous, and asinine.
This is backed by data.
Ulysses90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:


Oddly this tweet seems to have bee deleted.

Assuming that Sperry is correct and that he made a typo and it was May 2017, that casts the loyalty and intentions of John Kelly in a very harsh light. It raises a question as to why Kelly sought to be part of the Trump inner circle in the first place. When did he become a "Trump guy," if he ever was, and when did he decide to stick a knife in Caesar?

Let's take a look at a timeline for John Kelly.

Dec 2016 Nominated by Trump to be Secretary of DHS
(March 15 The Ides of March)
May 2017 Signs on to support a 25th Amendment coup d'etat against Trump
July 2017 Succeeds Reince Priebus to be White House Chief of Staff
Nov 2018 Accompanies President Trump on Memorial Day observances in France
Sept 2020 Jeff Goldberg attributes John Kelly as the source of the alleged "suckers and losers" quote to Trump from the 2018 trip

It appears that John Kelly was either a hostile agent inside the Trump administration from the moment he interviewed to be Sec DHS or he changed colors completely in the space of five months to betray Trump to Rosenstein and later to sabotage his reelection campaign by smearing him to Jeff Goldberg.



American Hardwood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:

Again...

Corrupt Government is Corrupt.





Who is 'blaming' them for this? This coup was orchestrated by Americans. Does anyone doubt that? There certainly isn't anyone here excusing Americans.

But that doesn't mean there wasn't foreign involvement and we should ignore their role.
The best way to keep evil men from wielding great power is to not create great power in the first place.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No one should 'blame' the Brits, imho. Steele et al. Took the FBI money after saying they were just worried how Trump would harm the UK.

This is about the FBI, ultimately, as both an institution and the people at the time. Of course, the new people apparently don't care about accountability, which is also a huge problem. It just needs to be legislatively abolished and functions rolled into other investigative agencies/bodies, imho.

Just to add yet another pathetic post-mortem on this all-time scandal, remember James Comey would go on to teach an ethical leadership class at a prestigious law school near DC (no doubt to inspire yet another generation of lovely FBI agents).

This should all be in government records and not take years to 'investigate,' and then indict/prosecute, nor should it be limited to DC circuit clown judges for jurisdiction:
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unfortunately, unless they can come up with treason charges, the only thing that will happen is light shines on this whole sordid deal.

Doubtful we get any skins for all this corruption.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Par for the coursebut no less sickeningthat Goldman and the New York Times would frame Auten's suspension as somehow tied to @FBIDirectorKash's so-called enemies list, rather than what it obviously is: accountability, however minimal, for the fanatically anti-Trump FBI agent who played a central role in every facet of the fraudulent Trump-Russia investigation.

-He "vetted" the Carter Page warrant
-He co-drafted the fraudulent ICA
-He concealed that Danchenko disavowed Steele
-He concealed Danchenko's existence
-He was a central player in the framing of
@GenFlynn

Because he wasn't fired for his Russia collusion lies, he was still around in 2020when he helped shut down the Hunter Biden laptop investigation by falsely labeling it Russian disinformation.

Worst of all, the FBI went to great lengths to hide this guy's identity and he'd probably still be operating in the shadows if @ClimateAudit hadn't pieced together the puzzle to expose him.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We were saying it from the beginning. Either gross incompetence or willful accomplices. I am 100% it is the latter, but they will claim former and nothing will happen.

But if it is the former, I don't know why we have an FBI if they are this STUPID. Hollow out the FBI of ALL the political and incompetent people. Then get people who will actually do their jobs and uphold the constitution.

Need more than 4 years though to REALLY effect any change.

Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Evil actors. And we paid for it all.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Quote:

On November 7, 2016, Lisa Page reacted to a New York Times article about Russian propaganda efforts tied to the 2016 election, specifically mentioning "lots of HRC-related emails."

Her response in a message to colleagues"if they start digging deep, we are screwed"suggests the FBI team was hiding something explosive that couldn't withstand scrutiny, possibly evidence of their own misconduct in targeting Trump.

Page also emphasized the need to maintain the FBI's "good guys" image, "To remind people that we are STILL the good guys trying to keep America safe, and not political operatives who sway elections."

This admission of public perception shows at a deliberate cover-up, a plot to sway the election aftermath against Trump.
ETA: I have to wonder if these messages were part of the ones that the FBI said were "lost"?
Zapata23
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It’s never too late
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't remember exactly, but I feel like we had already seen that text message. Or maybe I am remembering their sentiment about getting found out and not that specific text.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
More:
Quote:

(Line 148, 10/21/16)
The suggestion that Obama might have used a Yahoo accountan insecure platform that had been compromised in a massive 2014 breachraises serious national security concerns, as it implies that foreign actors who were behind the Podesta hack, could have accessed sensitive communications involving the sitting U.S. president.

From a conspiratorial perspective, the FBI's casual mention of this issue, with no apparent follow-up, except from the same person saying

"sounds like a good question for the 7th FLOOR to handle", suggests a potential cover-up or deliberate inaction to protect Obama and the Clinton campaign.

While Crossfire Hurricane aggressively pursued alleged ties between Trump associates and Russia, the FBI completely failed tio investigate Obama's email practices.

The possibility that Russia had leverage over Obama through a compromised Yahoo account is spicy AF

LOOK AT THE 17 DROPS…

Why wasn't HRC prosecuted for the emails? Put simply, OBAMA ultimately OK'd by using the non govt email addy to communicate w/ Clinton. OBAMA also had an ALIAS (YAHOO????) along with each of his cabinet members. Therefore indicting HRC would lead to indicting OBAMA & his cabinet etc which could never happen. Remember he lied about knowing but that ultimately came out in the dump. Poof!

They also talks about the 7th floor being used to illegal spy on Trump, but was dismantled.
Mr.Milkshake
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is anyone ever going to get in trouble over this stuff? WTF are bondi and kash doing?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mr.Milkshake said:

Is anyone ever going to get in trouble over this stuff? WTF are bondi and kash doing?
There are statute of limitations issues. Wray and Bill Barr allowed Comey et.al. to run out the clock, is my guess.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EVERYONE at upper(maybe all?) levels of our government are corrupt. Our government is wholly inefficient and incestuous.

Corrupt Government is Corrupt.

Only thing available is Treason. Though that fits the crime, it will go totally unused.

Only thing to do is shine a spotlight on it, and hopefully the electorate will be more intelligent on who they elect. Not likely though.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And another thing....

The government will never be fixed if one side plays by the rules while the other side breaks the rules.

The rule breakers will almost always win, unless the other side also falls to immoral rule breaking.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:

And another thing....

The government will never be fixed if one side plays by the rules while the other side breaks the rules.

The rule breakers will almost always win, unless the other side also falls to immoral rule breaking.
And it continued with the FBI and Arctic Frost. Short 13 minute stream from Gouveia.

Zapata23
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It’s never too late
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It would be awesome if he faced charges of sedition. People have not been punished for their treachery yet.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Marc Elias is 56. I want him at the very least bankrupted trying to defend himself. Bring the unlimited resources of the DoJ against these swine. Force him to fight everything related to motions, discovery, etc.

This is his game, make him play defense.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ellis Wyatt said:

It would be awesome if he faced charges of sedition. People have not been punished for their treachery yet.


5 year SOL. But has anything been done since extend the time for SOL? No idea.

Treason is no SOL, but is there appetite for that? Not sure I believe there is, unfortunately.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

More. Her connection to Hunter laptop suppression is also notable:

Another UC Berkeley piece of human garbage. Highly regarded by CCP-Democrats:
Quote:

On 10 April 2024, Nakashima was among the guests invited to the state dinnerhosted by U.S. President Joe Biden in honor of Prime Minister Fumio Kishida at the White House.
Long-time Jones Day, Michael Chertoff connections as well.
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
At the very least should the Pulitzer be revoked?
Zapata23
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It’s never too late
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


So infuriating!
whatthehey78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hang em high and leave em there for the birds.
Alexander, Caesar, Charlemagne, and myself founded empires; but upon what foundation did we rest the creations of our genius? Upon force! But Jesus Christ founded His upon love; and at this hour millions of men would die for Him. - Napoleon Bonaparte

“To do evil a human being must first of all believe that what he's doing is good” - Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Possible Chinese connection to Mueller legal team-member Zelinsky (no, not that one): DA wants to have a chat with him.
Quote:

Martin is interested in two particular episodes. One of the episodes most RedState readers are familiar with from Russiagate days. That is the persecution of George Papadopoulos and Zelinsky's lying to a federal judge just to send Papadopoulos to prison. "You then noted that [Professor Joseph] Mifsud was able to leave the United States and avoid a confrontation with authorities due to Papadopoulos' dishonesty," writes Martin. "Due to your false statements, it appears you sent an innocent man to jail in an attempt to advance the false narrative that the campaign of a serving President had colluded with Russia to win the presidency. It also appears you knew this narrative to be false."
Quote:

Curiously, Martin is interested in another episode in Zelinsky's life. "We would also like to speak with you about your 2012 service to the Peking University Transnational School of Law, including what Chinese national contacts you made during that period and those you remained in contact with during the Mueller investigation and since."
We must assume that Martin knows much about Zelinsky's ties to China, otherwise he wouldn't have asked the question. We can also be sure that he has more substantive questions to ask than if he and Eric Swalwell were rogering Fang Fang at the same time. If the Chinese were embedded in Mueller's investigation, it potentially invalidates the Russiagate narrative as we know it, introduces another foreign player, and possibly leads in directions that Hillary Clinton and her cronies would rather not see it go.
Martin cites his authority for the investigation, President Trump's executive order titled "Ending The Weaponization Of The Federal Government." He also invites Zelinsky to "voluntarily meet with me and representatives of my office to discuss these discrepancies."
The wheels of justice turn slowly, the old adage goes, but grind exceedingly fine. Martin is going after Zelinsky because his goose is cooked. He submitted a false statement to try to get Roger Stone a 7-to-9-year sentence for being less than candid with Congress. It was a petty and vindictive act, much like lying to a judge to get Papadopoulos thrown in the slammer. Maybe we will eventually unravel the origins of Russiagate and take righteous vengeance on the perpetrators.
More at the link.
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just checking in every so often. The US still has a two tier justice system right?
VegasAg86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I know this thread discussed the claim on Mifsud. I believe the consensus was it was a BS claim.
First Page Last Page
Page 1416 of 1444
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.