BQ78 said:

---

I've forgotten, why didn't Comey and the deep state just ignore Hillary's server problem. I don't recall that much pressure on the situation. In hindsight, I think blowing it off like they do most of the time now, would have been a better approach. What they actually did, did not help her and it is patently obvious that mission #1for the deep state was to hurt Trump and by doing that, help her.

---

Her server issue became known in early 2015, before the primaries and before Trump even announced, IIRC. So the FBI was not so inclined to ignore it since she was not the nominee, yet nor was Trump on the scene. She had left the State Department in 2013, I believe.

There were some inklings about this other server during the Benghazi hearings but nothing was fleshed out. Remember when Jason Chaffetz's jaw dropped when Comey said the FBI didn't even review her sworn testimony before his committee because they had not made a direct referral.

But when the emails became public on wikileaks, there was no tamping that down.

So FISA court would not approve ease dropping on Hillary Campaign because they feared it would implicate her.
They had no problem allowing the FBI to do this to Trump campaign though and they uncovered absolutely nothing. pic.twitter.com/N8vA7A4k9x

— Big Fish (@BigFish3000) July 31, 2025

aggiehawg said:

---

Garrelli 5000 said:

---

Not highlighted that jumps out to me is the note that HRC's campaign received regular updates from AG Lynch re: the FBI's plans and intentions.

---

The Bill and Loretta Tango on the Tarmac was a debrief for Bill. That meeting was in late June 2016.

The Comey presser exonerating Hillary was July 5, 2016. Bill and Hill were given the heads up what Comey was about to do.

---

Come on, now. Everyone knows they talked about their grandchildren. There wasn't even a smidgen of corruption in the Obama administration.

Here is the passage that greatly concerns me about the Bernardo emails that everyone is so quickly glomming onto as authentic -- "Office" is the Durham SCO, which had the benefit of lots of other material via Grand Jury subpoenas to authenticate the Bernardo emails. pic.twitter.com/gaHTtHw8P8

— Shipwreckedcrew (@shipwreckedcrew) July 31, 2025

So, as I described them in another post, the best way we can characterize them is "fake but accurate."

But, I do note that it was only the July 25 and July 27 Bernardo emails that Durham concluded were likely not authentic.

— Shipwreckedcrew (@shipwreckedcrew) July 31, 2025

The Crowdstrike (Ukraine, via Alperovich, something of a Russian dissident) tie-in here (as well as the Atlantic Council, a primary champion of foreign wars being funded/run by the US) is also of interest as it threads into the second (Vindman-Ciaramella) impeachment about the call with Zelensky, as well.

So Crowdstrike executives Dmitri Alperovitch and Shawn Henry participated in a Seditious Conspiracy and when they were cited in this article by Ellen. Seems Crowdstrike as a company is liable for this activity even though both exited the company after the deed. https://t.co/HLXMy0RKfj

— TheRand2025 (@TheRand2025) July 31, 2025

Still at it today, fwiw;

Dmitri Alperovitch was also the Atlantic Council’s DFRLAB which was also part of the EIP portal.

Dmitri Alperovitch also had a VP position at McAfee.

Video: Dmitri Alperovitch and Nina Jankowicz.

pic.twitter.com/0DMsVgONZx

— Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻 (@pepesgrandma) July 19, 2024

Oh, look, the guy who couldn't recall if he concocted this scheme is now…a Soros VP. Weird, right?

Leonard needs to be in prison! https://t.co/0ptBu4fy7f

— TheRand2025 (@TheRand2025) July 31, 2025

Ukraine was the slush fund for excessive money laundering for years and years. Yanukovych began to balk at the terms and conditions the IMF was seeking to impose upon him, so he had to go, courtesy of our State Department and a color revolution.

Biden, as VP was up to his eyeballs in the money laundering and it was not restricted to Hunter. He also provided a 20 million federal loan to his good buddy and lifelong donor to build luxury car dealerships in Ukraine.

True. But Ukraine in their defense (gasp) was just a tool (since at least 2014). Crowdstrike was a democrat party projection racket, full stop.

https://t.co/Ujqu8Q438k https://t.co/Nkob53hus0

— The Researcher (@listen_2learn) July 31, 2025

Similarly, Russia wasn't selected as a foe for any kind of personal/ethnic hatred (certainly HRC had no animosity there, she and Bill were happy to take Russian money, as was Biden), but because it was a convenient foil.

Quote:

---

Similarly, Russia wasn't selected as a foe for any kind of personal/ethnic hatred (certainly HRC had no animosity there, she and Bill were happy to take Russian money, as was Biden), but because it was a convenient foil.

---

Putin has never cared what people say about him as long as the gravy train continued and they did what he wanted them to do. It was Hillary with famous faux pas of the Reset button. A new agreement.

Leavitt about to give her daily briefing and the latest declassed docs appear to be on the agenda per Lil Doocy.

Some might find this amusing...

Shot:

Time travel is fun.
Or....

— Ingersoll Lockwood, Inc. (@IngLockwoodInc) July 30, 2025

I was the anon Q responded to 6 years ago by saying,

Time travel is fun.
Or....
Q pic.twitter.com/KDnasjPL06

— elENoCHle (@NewsBlast17) July 30, 2025

Chaser:

Yesterday Ingersoll Lockwood quoted the 'Time travel is fun. Or....' from my Q post.

Today they post the Space Force recruitment image of 'Enoch'. https://t.co/SioWURsX2E

— elENoCHle (@NewsBlast17) July 31, 2025

Take out the space... curse words.

https://x.com/ MikeBenzCyber/status/1950992648929714376

The Classified Durham report sure is interesting reading. On Jake Sullivan:

"Sullivan could not recall anyone articulating a strategy or 'plan' to distract negative attention away from Clinton by tying Trump to Russia, but could not conclusively rule out the possibility." pic.twitter.com/4POEecYmYx

— Matt Taibbi (@mtaibbi) July 31, 2025

will25u said:

---

The Classified Durham report sure is interesting reading. On Jake Sullivan:

"Sullivan could not recall anyone articulating a strategy or 'plan' to distract negative attention away from Clinton by tying Trump to Russia, but could not conclusively rule out the possibility." pic.twitter.com/4POEecYmYx

— Matt Taibbi (@mtaibbi) July 31, 2025

---

Sullivan is a high value target for scapegoat. He's up to his eyeballs and everything.

So basically, newly declassified documents prove that Hillary Clinton concocted the Russia Gate collusion hoax, and Crowdstrike was to act as the media mouthpiece "in the absence of actual evidence."

Look at CrowdStrike's CEO lying directly into the camera, claiming that Russia… pic.twitter.com/82mlZ6rW4b

— Green Lives Matter (@Ultrafrog17) July 31, 2025

Correct -- that was the actual origin. If the effort was underway as early as Jan. 2016, it had nothing to do with Trump-Russia. The GOP primaries hadn't even started yet.

And Clinton had not yet "put away" Bernie Sanders.

But the DNC -- which we have known for a long… https://t.co/dlp2hQIPWM

— Shipwreckedcrew (@shipwreckedcrew) July 31, 2025

The rest:

Quote:

---

But the DNC -- which we have known for a long time -- and Obama were determined in the early weeks/months of 2016 to not allow Clinton's campaign to be derailed by the controversy over her emails and home server.

---

As I stated earlier, the email stuff came to light in 2015 when the FBI had no reason to just bury it. Further, if memory serves it was August or September of 2015 when the server, in FBI custody at the time, went missing from evidence room for several days.

Everyone judges others.

I try not to, but when it comes to J Sullivan, his actions in the last four years are exactly what he looks like. If I'd never heard of, or seen the man, I'd be hesitant.

Not that I've been exposed to him, but he's an incredible wanker.

For us "ole" Ags who's time is growing short...IS ANYONE going to be prosecuted ANY TIME soon?????

TIA!

whatthehey78 said:

---

For us "ole" Ags who's time is growing short...IS ANYONE going to be prosecuted ANY TIME soon?????

TIA!

---

Probably not.

Keep the faith.

If you don't have any, get some.

IMO, and I know this part is incorrect, but the ONLY way they'll get the people we want is by conspiracy, which appears to still be going on, which is the way they can be indicted. However, this HAS to be fully and thoroughly investigated. Yes, we're PRETTY sure we know what happened, who did it, when, and how, but we need more than that.

Nothing about this is going to be easy. To me, the most important part is going to be where the venue is. If it's in DC, those judges AND the juries wouldn't have convicted Lee Harvey Oswald knowing he was a Democrat.

Plus, the DOJ doesn't start a Task Force and have it ready to indict people in 3-4 months. I suspect they may have some ready to go by October, but we'll get there. Candidly, it's GOT to be a slam dunk since January of '26 starts the election season and it can be good PR for the good guys, I'm sorry to say, but it hopefully will.

Hoping and a praying for justice, Lord. AMEN!

ETA - regardless of political affiliation. "Book em, Dano"...I mean Donald.

You'll have to educate me on "tolls". If I've heard of it, I didn't learn it.

Secondly, Lot's of print in the last 3-4 days about the number of folks still in all of the intel agencies still working for the bad buys.

Pretty decent reading. I knew that was going to be the case, as it was impossible to scrape the cancer in 6 months to a year.

Quote:

---

https://andmagazine.substack.com/p/are-senior-cia-personnel-still-taking

---

And BTW, I found this earlier. I haven't read anything by him in a long time. Decent read.

Quote:

---

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1950922948736418289.html

---

Quote:

---

You'll have to educate me on "tolls". If I've heard of it, I didn't learn it.

---

It is not unheard of for the SOL not to run until something else happens to trigger them. In civil law for instance, fraud SOL don't run until the fraud is or could have been discovered by a reasonable person.

Now when discussing conspiracy charges, including RICO, the SOL keeps running as long as the conspiracy is in existence. So, if Brennan and Clapper had cut off all communication and said nothing since 2016, they would no longer have been active since that time.

But for other potential crimes, a judge can toll the SOL from expiring in an emergency. As happened with Manafort. The SOL was about to expire so Team Mueller went to federal judge to have it tolled.

Gracias!

aggiehawg said:

---

Now when discussing conspiracy charges, including RICO, the SOL keeps running as long as the conspiracy is in existence. So, if Brennan and Clapper had cut off all communication and said nothing since 2016, they would no longer have been active since that time.

---

Since you mentioned the R-word, what are your thoughts on qualfiying as as RICO conspiracy?

benchmark said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Now when discussing conspiracy charges, including RICO, the SOL keeps running as long as the conspiracy is in existence. So, if Brennan and Clapper had cut off all communication and said nothing since 2016, they would no longer have been active since that time.

---

Since you mentioned the R-word, what are your thoughts on qualfiying as as RICO conspiracy?

---

I personally think RICO would be an overcharge like they did with Diddy and then be a bunch of Cliensmith style deals come out of it and nothing really happens.

benchmark said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Now when discussing conspiracy charges, including RICO, the SOL keeps running as long as the conspiracy is in existence. So, if Brennan and Clapper had cut off all communication and said nothing since 2016, they would no longer have been active since that time.

---

Since you mentioned the R-word, what are your thoughts on qualfiying as as RICO conspiracy?

---

Those are very hard cases to put together outside of the Mafia type scenario, which RICO was designed to be able to prosecute the kingpins.

So I do not have high expectations of RICO being invoked here, maybe for discrete parts of it but not the overarching issues. Much of this was segregated into discrete groups.

Which is why I posited that getting to Marc Elias and others at Perkins, Coie can be the lynchpin for a lot.

akm91 said:

---

This smells like a giant conspiracy...

---

Some might even call it a rico

whatthehey78 said:

---

For us "ole" Ags who's time is growing short...IS ANYONE going to be prosecuted ANY TIME soon?????

TIA!

---

I have a sneaking suspicion that I will make this exact post in 23 years when I'm your age.

Bazooka Joe said:

---

whatthehey78 said:

---

For us "ole" Ags who's time is growing short...IS ANYONE going to be prosecuted ANY TIME soon?????

TIA!

---

I have a sneaking suspicion that I will make this exact post in 23 years when I'm your age.

---

Whippersnapper.

FYI: Limitations on Manafort were tolled because there was (allegedly) evidence in a foreign country the Feds needed to obtain. 18 USC 3292

Could there be evidence in Britain through Steele here? Spitballing. Still, it's only tolled 3 years maximum.