BOMBSHELL: Kash Patel Uncovers Obama Deputy AG Sally Yates’ Email Ordering FBI Agents to Shut Down Clinton Foundation Corruption Investigation — “SHUT IT DOWN” https://t.co/8udZCsVZeC
— The Gateway Pundit (@gatewaypundit) August 13, 2025
BOMBSHELL: Kash Patel Uncovers Obama Deputy AG Sally Yates’ Email Ordering FBI Agents to Shut Down Clinton Foundation Corruption Investigation — “SHUT IT DOWN” https://t.co/8udZCsVZeC
— The Gateway Pundit (@gatewaypundit) August 13, 2025
Developing:
— Catherine Herridge (@C__Herridge) August 14, 2025
I understand there is renewed investigative interest in Comey's 2017 testimony about his role in media leaks to the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Under oath, the former FBI Director answered direct questions from Senator Grassley@ChuckGrassley “Have you ever… https://t.co/0BFR73HvIE pic.twitter.com/iIBUUrAtG0
Exclusive: I have obtained a June 2017 memorandum documenting a phone call with Columbia Professor Daniel Richman and @ChuckGrassley investigative staff.
— Catherine Herridge (@C__Herridge) August 15, 2025
Investigators wanted a status update on a bi-partisan request for Richman to provide copies of the so-called “Comey memos”… https://t.co/0BFR73HvIE pic.twitter.com/JUmx2xGyWl
Kash Patel just went on Hannity to discuss the Grand Conspiracy and he assured the American people that accountability is coming 🇺🇸
— TheStormHasArrived (@TheStormRedux) August 15, 2025
“We are educating the American public as we build through this transparency initiative. And where the investigation goes, I can assure you of this,… pic.twitter.com/NL7N3SRnHR
NEW: In a Dec. 22, 2016 email, NSA chief Mike Rogers warned Comey, Clapper & Brennan he doubted both the "Russian attribution and intent for the DNC/DCCC hacks" b/c they lacked "underlying intelligence." He'd know: NSA had no SIGINT to back it up. Yet Rogers still signed onto ICA
— Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) August 17, 2025
REVEALED: The Clapper deputy who "pressured" the ICA whistleblower to support fake Putin-Trump conclusions has been ID'd as Vinh Nguyen, a onetime McCain campaign worker + member of the McCain Alumni Club who incorporated Crowdstrike's bogus report on Russian hacking into the ICA pic.twitter.com/5IXpCXo32T
— Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) August 17, 2025
Regarding proving-up the DNC/DCCC hack and leak -
— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) July 31, 2025
"In absence of direct evidence, Crowdstrike and ThreatConnect will supply the media" with info.
Crowdstrike will feed the info to the FBI and then the info "would then be disseminated through leading US publications." pic.twitter.com/zT7T4REqIt
UPDATE: House Oversight is withdrawing its subpoena for Mueller due to "health issues" that prevent him from testifying https://t.co/zgirJU3IV8
— Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) August 18, 2025
jimmo said:
"Crowdstrike's bogus report..."
this report is known to be bogus?
don't remember that, but it has been awhile.
On the Flynn leak - emails we obtained from ODNI show they suspected the Obama White House or Senate Democrats.
— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) August 18, 2025
The WaPo reporter told me his "sources" had seen the "transcripts".
Certainly narrows it down. https://t.co/nh70ecojOL pic.twitter.com/FdgGapynzm
BREAKING: FBI never obtained any gmail records for the prime Schiff suspect in its classified leak investigation during the 2017 period when the leaks were made to the WaPo. A sr. staffer on Schiff's "Russia Team," he accessed the Russiagate docs from "read room" before the leaks
— Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) August 18, 2025
jimmo said:
"Crowdstrike's bogus report..."
this report is known to be bogus?
don't remember that, but it has been awhile.
John Solomon says he will be releasing more documents in the next 48 hours pertaining to another investigation into the Clinton Foundation that was shut down…
— TheStormHasArrived (@TheStormRedux) August 18, 2025
Here’s the kicker: It was the IRS investigating the CF foundation and it was shut down by someone in the first Trump… pic.twitter.com/SvDksa0Ff8
Quote:
In retrospect, nearly all of it was false. Inspector General reports, the Durham probe, and congressional investigations have since revealed that Trump never demanded a loyalty oath and never ordered Comey to drop the Flynn matter. What the record shows instead is an FBI hierarchy that had targeted Flynn, that misused FISA warrants, and that relied on Clinton campaign-funded opposition research. Schmidt, far from digging independently, functioned as Comey's conduit. He was the journalist equivalent of what Lenin once called a "useful idiot."
Wallace's bias against Trump hardened in this crucible. Night after night, Schmidt appeared on her show, repeating leaks that he himself had not fully vetted. He was amplifying Comey's narrative, and Wallace was amplifying Schmidt. It was the perfect disinformation loop: FBI officials leaked to Richman, Richman fed Schmidt, Schmidt fed Wallace, and Wallace's MSNBC megaphone delivered the "news" to millions of viewers. Each step laundered the origin of the information until what began as Comey's personal vendetta against Trump appeared as established fact. For Wallace, her deepening personal relationship with Schmidt reinforced her professional conviction: Trump was dangerous, because the man she would soon marry had built his Pulitzer on portraying him that way.
Schmidt's 2020 book, Donald Trump v. The United States, is the codification of this worldview. He depicts FBI and DOJ officials as reluctant guardians of democracy holding the line against a reckless president. Trump is cast as the villain, the institutions as heroes. But the later revelations of corruption inside those very institutions reveal the book as stenography for the FBI, not journalism. The man who would become Wallace's husband had memorialized, and thereby legitimized, the FBI's perspective. No wonder Wallace treats Trump with such personal vitriol. To admit error now would be to admit that her husband's Pulitzer was the product of manipulation.
This dynamic is not unique to Wallace and Schmidt. Washington is thick with examples of reporters married to political operatives, blurring the line between journalism and power. Christiane Amanpour, CNN's chief international correspondent, was married to James Rubin, who headed the State Department's Global Engagement Center and frequently appeared on her program. Ian Cameron, ABC News producer for This Week, was married to Susan Rice, national security advisor and UN ambassador, a frequent guest on his show. Virginia Moseley, a CNN executive editor, is married to Tom Nides, former Deputy Secretary of State and later vice chairman at Blackstone, also a regular on CNN. Bianna Golodryga, CNN anchor, is married to Peter Orszag, Obama's OMB director. Todd Purdum of Vanity Fair married Dee Dee Myers, Clinton's press secretary and later an advisor to Gavin Newsom. Chuck Todd of Meet the Press is married to Democrat strategist Kristian Denny Todd, who advised Bernie Sanders and DC mayor Muriel Bowser. Claire Shipman of ABC married Jay Carney, Obama's press secretary. Andrea Mitchell of NBC is married to Alan Greenspan, former Fed chair. Ronald Brownstein of CNN is married to Eileen McMenamin, John McCain's former communications director.
The number of reporters and political operatives who are in relationships or married is astounding! They feed off of one another, which enables and perpetuates lies, depending on their deep-seated beliefs.
— Kathy Cauthen (@kathy_cauthen) August 18, 2025
flown-the-coop said:
She is a liberal correct?
FINALLY!
— Svetlana Lokhova (@RealSLokhova) August 19, 2025
US Government officially acknowledges, and the Congress publishes on its website, that Stefan Halper, the man who ruined my life, was an official FBI informer codenamed Mitch. pic.twitter.com/0qOuUnEBVf
Quote:
Some may remember the old email aliases Joe Biden used to comm with Hunter and friends before Trump 1.0.
I suspect many have forgotten about this but the email aliases used a @pci.gov email which I believe stood for Presidential Center for Information along with pitc.gov which is Executive Committee for Presidential Information Technology.
https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2015/03/19/presidential-memorandum-establishing-director-white-house-information-te
I looked at this back in the thick of the Mar-a-Lago raid and subsequent f-nannery about classified docs. Essentially a little known, not discussed White House server for emails and information sharing that I believe went as far as using completely separate networks than standard WH comms - meaning control away form FOIA and other prying eyes.
Trump may be using some of this as about a week or so after election the "whois" information for pci.gov seems to have been changed to "redacted for privacy reasons".
Quote:
The 18A Tiger Team mission is to provide the Presidential Information Technology Community (PITC) with a modernized IT infrastructure that will support information services to the president, vice president, national security staff, United States Secret Service and others, ensuring the ability of each to communicate anywhere, anytime, and by any means to anyone in the world.
aggiehawg said:
There is a shadowy agency n the Pentagon called Office of Net Assessment (IIRC) that had Halper on the payroll. Hundreds of thousands of dollars were paid to him, if memory serves.
Hegseth is dismantling it.
Two days left to charge Brennan.
— Undead FOIA 3.0 (@UndeadFoia) August 20, 2025
We'll see how serious they've been working on Russiagate based on the existence and scope of any indictment. https://t.co/JTVo7ZC3s5
Quote:
For example, in my June 18, 2020, letter, I noted a paper entitled, "On the Nature of Americans as a Warlike People: Workshop Report," which was authored by the Long Term Strategy Group (LTSG).[9] The workshop paper highlighted the "level of American belligerency . . . [which is] the result of the persistence of Scotch-Irish culture in America, with its emphasis on violent responses to challenge[.]"[10] It further stated that "[t]he role of Scotch-Irish culture must also be understood as having been reinforced by slaveholding, and American Protestant religious beliefs," and that the Scotch-Irish culture was "shaped by endemic warfare that placed high value on violent and immediate personal responses to challenges and high loyalty to clan and kin."[11] The paper continued by stating that the Scotch-Irish culture placed value "on violent immediate responses to challenges [which] shaped [their] views, and thus of the United States as a whole, toward war."[12]