Mueller dismisses top FBI agent in Russia probe for anti-Trump texts

8,684,818 Views | 50509 Replies | Last: 4 days ago by flown-the-coop
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I know, I know, 'show me the charges' etc, but at least we have the FBI director talking about this, now.
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He accurately points out that half the people in this country flat out do not care about the facts.
VegasAg86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Schiff should be in prison, not the senate.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
lcraggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:


I am not hopefully on this ever seeing the light of day. The media is the voice of the democrats and will not ever cover the details of this if released to Congressional investigators.
Rangers Lead the Way, NSDQ


will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?


WolfCall
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So glad to see this out there. Glad Miranda Devine is on top of this.

https://nypost.com/2025/07/02/us-news/obamas-trump-russia-collusion-report-was-corrupt-from-start-cia-review/
Quote:

Obama's Trump-Russia collusion report was corrupt from start: CIA review
By Miranda Devine Published July 2, 2025, 12:13 p.m. ET

A bombshell new CIA review of the Obama administration's spy agencies' assessment that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election to help Donald Trump was deliberately corrupted by then-CIA Director John Brennan, FBI Director James Comey and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, who were "excessively involved" in its drafting, and rushed its completion in a "chaotic," "atypical" and "markedly unconventional" process that raised questions of a "potential political motive."

Further, Brennan's decision to include the discredited Steele dossier, over the objections of the CIA's most senior Russia experts, "undermined the credibility" of the assessment.

The "Tradecraft Review of the 2016 Intelligence Community Assessment [ICA] on Russian Election Interference" was conducted by career professionals at the CIA's Directorate of Analysis and was commissioned by CIA Director John Ratcliffe in May. ....

...Brennan handpicked the CIA analysts to compile the ICA and involved only the ODNI, CIA, FBI and NSA, excluding 13 of the then-17 intelligence agencies.

He sidelined the National Intelligence Council and forced the inclusion of the discredited Steele dossier despite objections of the authors and senior CIA Russia experts, so as to push a false narrative that Russia secured Trump's 2016 victory.

"This was Obama, Comey, Clapper and Brennan deciding 'We're going to screw Trump,'" said Ratcliffe in an exclusive interview. ....
....

captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Spies who lie and dirty cops
BQ78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Brennan should be in prison. But he never will, that is the tragedy behind this . Given another opportunity to do something like this, the Democrats will.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Putting this here from another thread as it's probably more relevant to this one;

And Pientka apparently works (at least part time) for Swalwell nowadays, who paid him $9K for his work in Feb and March of 2025.

Mike Howell and Oversight project are good follows, fwiw.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Will anything happen in those 49 days... not likely.

Owlagdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:

Will anything happen in those 49 days... not likely.


You are correct. Government does what the heck it wants to.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This whole operation was an Obama-Jarrett smear designed to take down 45.

And the media were ready/willing/able participants in the propaganda of lies, along with the FBI/CIA.

Quote:

The newly released CIA document confirming the fraudulent nature of the Intelligence Community Assessment notes that on December 9, 2016, the Washington Post claimed to know the outcome of the assessment before the work had even begun. But that's only half the story.

Around noon that day, the Washington Post published a routine article announcing that the Intelligence Community Assessment was just getting underway. A few hours later, without notice, they quietly edited not just the headline but the entire article, including the bylines. Suddenly, the revised piece asserted as fact that Vladimir Putin had orchestrated Trump's election.

It is almost certain that corrupt intelligence officials were dissatisfied with the original reporting which wasn't tailored to the narrative. They needed to preemptively sabotage Trump's presidency, so they told the Washington Post to publish a version that reflected the Intelligence Community's preferred narrative.

To this day, no one has been held accountable for this fraudneither at the Washington Post, which later won Pulitzers for their lies, nor within the Intelligence Community, which orchestrated the deception.

You can see both versions of the article below. These are not two separate piecesone is the original, and the other was inserted a few hours later using the exact same URL. They replaced the story entirely without acknowledging the change.

nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sorry for double post but putting Tulsi's full text here (I embedded it in the tweet above sort of by mistake, groggy sorry).
Quote:

It has come to my attention that Washington Post reporter @nakashimae appears to be actively harassing ODNI staff. Instead of reaching out to my press office, she is calling high level Intelligence Officers from a burner phone, refusing to identify herself, lying about the fact that she works for the Washington Post, and then demanding they share sensitive information.

Apparently, publishing leaked classified material wasn't enough for the Washington Post, so now they've decided to go after the Intelligence professionals charged to protect it.

This is a clear political op by the same outlet and the same reporter who harassed and stalked my family in Hawaii.

This kind of deranged behavior reflects a media establishment so desperate to sabotage @POTUS's successful agenda that they've abandoned even a facade of journalistic integrity and ethics. The Washington Post should be ashamed, and they should put an end to this immediately.
Ellen also pimped the Russian DNC hack, and Hunter laptop "Russian disinformation" lies. Dastardly Russians behind every corner when Dems need them to be.

Atlantic Council, Transition Integrity Project. All involved heavily in Russiagate.


will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?

will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Now DO SOMETHING!

VegasAg86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:

Now DO SOMETHING!


They need to do the double secret tolling of the SoL, like they did to Manafort.
AgDev01
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:

Now DO SOMETHING!




This seems conveniently timed to throw the base some meat to distract from the Epstein debacle. Im sure they will get them this time...
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Anxious to see who they roll on to cut their deals.
Sid Farkas
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Way overdue

That said, the timing is such that there's no doubt in my mind this is clearly red meat for us MAGA's to cover for yesterday's Epstein re-coverup.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pientka and the lovebirds are on alert. Bruce ohr and Susan rice as well.
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Funky Winkerbean said:

Anxious to see who they roll on to cut their deals.
There's only one bigger fish who gave the orders
pacecar02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
it wont matter if the trials are held in DC or Va
BenFiasco14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:

Now DO SOMETHING!




That's great news.

For goodness sake, the Biden admin put Paul Manafort and Steve Bannon IN PRISON (ignoring the J6 prisoners). Turns out is fair play.

John Brennan is an evil, evil person who worships the devil at worst, is a converted Muslim and double agent at best.

Comey, what else needs to be said. Guy needs to see the inside of a cell for at least a few months.
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sam callahan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I hate Brennan.

But the dude should've taken out some Epstein insurance
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
As to real investigations not being disclosed, that used to be DOJ policy before Obama.

So goose/gander situation.
Garrelli 5000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What is required for the clock to reset on soon to expire SOL?

Is it possible that announcing the criminal investigation is a tactic to get them to do something that resets the clock?
Staff - take out the trash.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Garrelli 5000 said:

What is required for the clock to reset on soon to expire SOL?

Is it possible that announcing the criminal investigation is a tactic to get them to do something that resets the clock?
Possible. Also possible that SOLs can be tolled and tolled secretly. Which seems odd as hell to me but it happens.

Absent Seth Rich's or someone's else murder, with no SOL, that is.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
An act to further the criminal activity, a sealed indictment.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

Yes.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:


I find his deflection amusing since he did the SAME ****ING THING he described...
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:


The absolute gall of this guy. Notice he didn't address the allegations
First Page Last Page
Page 1419 of 1444
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.