nortex97 said:
I don't really care as long as they aren't taking anti-depressants/HRT etc. This gal may have been a democrat/lesbian or whatever but I don't think that drove her promotion to O-3 or assignment to the 12th Aviation Bn at Fort Belvoir. She was essentially a junior captain assigned to fly blackhawks in a unit whose missions include evacuating senior leaders out of DC in the event of an emergency, regardless of time of day, which meant she needed to be proficient flying at night in the area/up the river.
I'd have preferred they didn't hide her name for a few days etc, or wiped her social media, but we still have zero indication she was selected for Aviation or that assignment as a DEI related matter, let alone that her mental health drove her to take a deliberate action in the crash. Heck, we don't even know if she was the pilot in command at the time.
The Occam's razor answer remains that the pilot/copilot of the Blackhawk just got lazy/distracted looking at the wrong aircraft (probably through NVG's which basically suck with all the lights around them), while going 100-150 or so feet too high, and too far west, at a horrible time.
We will never know and because of the following it should always be suspect:
That is the problem with AA or DEI. We know as a group they are in fact inferior, we just do not know if that particular individual was inferior.
When I was a weekend warrior, I was very junior so I will not comment on the military recruiting and advancement, but I absolutely can on federal LEO hiring and advancement which has the same AA and DEI bs as the rest of the feds and since it was primarily a white male dominate occupation, it became a focal point for AA efforts right as I was starting.
I remember when I was interning with the FBI my senior year of undergrad and I was trying to decide my next moves after graduating to maximize my chances of getting into the FBI after I turned 23 and was eligible. I graduated undergrad right after I turned 21, so too young.
When I met with the FBI recruiters near the end of my internship, I informed them that I planned on attending a T14 law school as my entry path into the Bureau. They laughed at me.
The showed me the stacks of applicants arranged in their office. They said, "you see those stacks of applicants over there?" I was like that doesn't look like that many. They said, "those are women and minorities." "That stack that is 10x the size of those others is all the white male applicants." "And we can only select 1/2 from the white male stack." "What is your fallback plan?" "Is it law and being a lawyer?"
I didn't want to be a lawyer (Comical, because I have been one for 10 years now). I wanted to be in the national guard and a federal agent as my civilian job. "They said to apply to other federal agencies and if I don't get into the bureau later, I am already in my fallback job."
It was both disheartening and great advice. It taught me a valuable lesson that meritocracy is not followed in the federal government.
I ended up becoming a fed Leo 1811 just before I turned 22 and spent 4 years in the national guard. After 16 years in the feds, I left the to go to law school at 38.
While an agent, I watched AA destroy my occupation with inferior agents getting promoted to make some diversity quota. I saw inferior minority applicants get admitted to Georgetown Law that underperformed while in law school. None were at the top of the class. In fact, a couple of Georgetown Law Professors (which were liberals) were fired for lamenting about the plight of the diversity admits and their performance against their "peers."
It is not possibe to socially engineer an occupation by selecting 1/2 of the applicants from 10% of the applicant pool and expecting that group to be as qualified as those chosen based on merit from the 90% pool. And I'll say it. It is compounded by the fact that the 90% is inherently better at the jobs that I was doing anyway. Women have no place there.
It is without question that my previous occupations would be 90% white males if it was based on pure merit. Lawyering not so much, but it would be almost entirely white at the elite law schools if based solely on merit. Like 98% white.
If you want people to not correctly assume this, you should be for entirely merit based recruiting, hiring, and promotions. Until then ...