James Comey 86 47

68,335 Views | 740 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by Im Gipper
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
1876er said:

flown-the-coop said:

Anonymous Source said:


Which one of those was designed by Kash Patel and posted on his instagram?
Lets simplify the question.

What does this image mean?

Also, Comey is a Bush era Republican.



Did Kash Patel make the sticker and post it on his instagram?

Comey is not a republican and I question if he can be called an American. He should be sent to El Salvador to enjoy his remaining days with the violent thugs, rapists, invaders and terrorists he has worked hard to support over the years.
Sid Farkas
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
usmcbrooks said:

You should really change that username,



Quote:

July 2024 - Mr. Biden said on a private donor call: "I have one job, and that's to beat Donald Trump. I'm absolutely certain I'm the best person to be able to do that. So, we're done talking about the debate. It's time to put Trump in a bullseye."


Assassination attempt number 1, July 13, 2024
Assassination attempt number 2, September 15, 2024
Assassination attempt number 3, Oct 13, 2024 A United States sheriff has said law enforcement officers likely prevented a third assassination attempt against Donald Trump.

January 31, 2025
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries calls for violence as he says people must "fight" President Trump's agenda "in the streets."

February 4, 2025
"Shut down the city! We are at war!" Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-NJ)

February 10, 2025 -
Kweisi Mfume (D-MD) riles his supporters up for a "street fight" against President Trump's agenda on rooting out government waste and corruption



Complaining about Trump's shtick/rhetoric is just another lying tactic...it's their rhetoric that promotes actual lawlessness
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Artimus Gordon said:

Comey needs to be arrested immediately. Investigate while he sits.
Secret Service and FBI will likely be seeing him later today. Poor guy. Hopefully book sales can help with his legal costs.

He was on the beach for a photoshoot to promote his new book and needed a controversy to generate some relevancy and publicity.

He just didn't plan on the legal trouble he now finds himself in, despite how hard libs and CMs work to defend such a stupid, but planned post to cause "outrage".
rgvag11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Prosperdick said:

1876er said:

flown-the-coop said:

Anonymous Source said:


Which one of those was designed by Kash Patel and posted on his instagram?
Lets simplify the question.

What does this image mean?

Also, Comey is a Bush era Republican.

Oh wow! That changes everything!! I believe the left also used the Mueller is a Bush era Republican and therefore everything he states negatively about Trump is the gospel.

Try again.

Yep, that shouldn't matter, because it never has before. There's a huge list of MAGA fallouts from Trump's first administration.

Pence
Bolton
Coats
Esper
Kelly
Mattis
McMaster
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
flown-the-coop said:

Artimus Gordon said:

Comey needs to be arrested immediately. Investigate while he sits.
Secret Service and FBI will likely be seeing him later today. Poor guy. Hopefully book sales can help with his legal costs.

He was on the beach for a photoshoot to promote his new book and needed a controversy to generate some relevancy and publicity.

He just didn't plan on the legal trouble he now finds himself in, despite how hard libs and CMs work to defend such a stupid, but planned post to cause "outrage".

Well I really hate to say it, but he's not in any kind of legal trouble. This is his publicity stunt.
StandUpforAmerica
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SIAP... Language NSFW.

DonHenley
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Who is getting groomed at drag bar or 18 + event? Yea obviously the drag brunch's with kids around and drag queens being around kids are weird but a private venues for adults who really cares? Sounds like you go to Halo in downtown Bryan and are too embarrassed to admit you like it.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rockdoc said:

flown-the-coop said:

Artimus Gordon said:

Comey needs to be arrested immediately. Investigate while he sits.
Secret Service and FBI will likely be seeing him later today. Poor guy. Hopefully book sales can help with his legal costs.

He was on the beach for a photoshoot to promote his new book and needed a controversy to generate some relevancy and publicity.

He just didn't plan on the legal trouble he now finds himself in, despite how hard libs and CMs work to defend such a stupid, but planned post to cause "outrage".

Well I really hate to say it, but he's not in any kind of legal trouble. This is his publicity stunt.
Only a couple years ago a political candidates "stunt" resulted in the FBI knocking on the door of one of my employee's and costing me $25k to retain counsel to tell those ****ers to stick their badges back in their arse and find better things to worry about.

So even if it costs Comey that amount, I support it. But I suspect he is going to have some splaining to do since he created or caused the creation of the message and did not simply take a picture of it.

Comey has long fantasized about putting Trump out to pasture, including 80 miles away and 6 feet deep or whatever he thinks the "86 47" message he made stood for.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
holy ***** the ******s are bringing up Trump's "bloodbath" comment again.
1876er
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
flown-the-coop said:

1876er said:

flown-the-coop said:

Anonymous Source said:


Which one of those was designed by Kash Patel and posted on his instagram?
Lets simplify the question.

What does this image mean?

Also, Comey is a Bush era Republican.



Did Kash Patel make the sticker and post it on his instagram?

Comey is not a republican and I question if he can be called an American. He should be sent to El Salvador to enjoy his remaining days with the violent thugs, rapists, invaders and terrorists he has worked hard to support over the years.


Disregard who made it. What does it mean?
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I didn't write it and never seen it before.

With Comey, we know what he means based on the many times he has called for the exile / removal Trump not just from office, but from society. Good news is he should have the opportunity to further explain his impromptu beach art to the FBI and Secret Service.

For whomever made the sticker, they may need to explain themselves as well.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Well I really hate to say it, but he's not in any kind of legal trouble. This is his publicity stunt.


Astute and wise. As usual.

I'm Gipper
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Im Gipper said:

Quote:

Well I really hate to say it, but he's not in any kind of legal trouble. This is his publicity stunt.


Astute and wise. As usual.


Whose publicity stunt? Comeys? With a new book it seems that is indeed the case.

Did he go to far, probably not. Would most consider the FBI and USSS to be a kind of legal trouble? Most astute and wise folks would usually consider that to be legal trouble.

Don't think anybody thinks he's going to jail, but just stunt is not playing well for him.
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DonHenley said:

Who is getting groomed at drag bar or 18 + event? Yea obviously the drag brunch's with kids around and drag queens being around kids are weird but a private venues for adults who really cares? Sounds like you go to Halo in downtown Bryan and are too embarrassed to admit you like it.
Nobody cares about ******'s at 18+ events and if there are some factions of the right who DO care I don't support them. I don't care what grown adults do in their private lives or at 18+ events as long as they aren't hurting anyone.

I DO care when there is a transvestite story hour for kids. That's wrong and inappropriate. Have you ever heard of transvestites doing a story hour for senior citizens at a retirement home? Nope, they don't go there, I wonder why? There are certainly groups (including kids) that go to retirement homes to read books to the elderly. Interesting the ******'s want nothing to do with them.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DonHenley said:

Who is getting groomed at drag bar or 18 + event? Yea obviously the drag brunch's with kids around and drag queens being around kids are weird but a private venues for adults who really cares? Sounds like you go to Halo in downtown Bryan and are too embarrassed to admit you like it.
The left takes their children to the drag bar. Keep up.

ETA I have no clue about Halo you probably frequent.
DonHenley
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Guess you can't read, I said I have a problem with that as well. Sad!
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop said:

I didn't write it and never seen it before.

With Comey, we know what he means based on the many times he has called for the exile / removal Trump not just from office, but from society. Good news is he should have the opportunity to further explain his impromptu beach art to the FBI and Secret Service.

For whomever made the sticker, they may need to explain themselves as well.
Your statement,"For whomever made the sticker, they may need to explain themselves as well." shows a major difference between democrats and conservative republicans.
One denounces evil hateful rhetoric
The Democratic Party leadership embraces evil hateful rhetoric
  • Clinton, the DNC administrator called for re-education camps
  • Congress members called for getting into conservatives faces in public
  • Congress members & MSM lied about the Charlotteville speech
  • Congress members encouraged the BLM riots
  • Congress members have repeatedly and continue the bull**** calling President Trump Hitler and a facist.
This is a short list of the insanity on the part of the Democratic Party leadership.
We really need to rewrite our laws concerning libel and slander.
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
1876er said:

flown-the-coop said:

Anonymous Source said:


Which one of those was designed by Kash Patel and posted on his instagram?
Lets simplify the question.

What does this image mean?

Also, Comey is a Bush era Republican.





Bill Kristol is a Bush era Republican. Derp.
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DonHenley said:

Guess you can't read, I said I have a problem with that as well. Sad!
I was countering your claim that conservatives care about the over 18 stuff, we don't. Yes, I know you have a problem with drag queens with kids, congratulations. There are plenty on your side who don't...sad!
4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This country really dodged a bullet.

We had a guy with judgment this poor in charge of the FBI.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Prosperdick said:

DonHenley said:

Guess you can't read, I said I have a problem with that as well. Sad!
I was countering your claim that conservatives care about the over 18 stuff, we don't. Yes, I know you have a problem with drag queens with kids, congratulations. There are plenty on your side who don't...sad!
He posted that it's weird. I took that observation as a lukewarm acceptance to drag shows for kids.
4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Prosperdick said:

DonHenley said:

Guess you can't read, I said I have a problem with that as well. Sad!
I was countering your claim that conservatives care about the over 18 stuff, we don't. Yes, I know you have a problem with drag queens with kids, congratulations. There are plenty on your side who don't...sad!

I'm conservative, and I have a problem with all of it.

It contributes to the moral decay of our society, and it's flat out evil. I have a problem with evil, no matter what form it comes in or what age you are when you engage in it.
t_J_e_C_x
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
usmcbrooks said:

t_J_e_C_x said:

Ag with kids said:

t_J_e_C_x said:

Ag with kids said:

t_J_e_C_x said:

usmcbrooks said:

t_J_e_C_x said:

schmendeler said:

Uh oh



I like how this was conveniently ignored by all the posters on pages 1-5 demanding proof. Once given, it's suddenly "not the same".
This guy a former Director of the FBI?


Asked for proof, proof was given. Something something goalposts.


What proof were you talking about?


There was a poster on page 1 who claimed that people had advocated for harm done to Biden the same as Comey had posted about for Trump. Others then demanded proof. Then on page 6 it was posted, but mostly ignored. Whoever did interact with it, said it was different. Although posted by different individuals with varying levels of former or current influence or roles in government, they're both saying the exact same thing.

If we're applying this standard to one, it should be applied to all.

Comey is wrong. Jack P. is wrong. Whitmore was wrong.

*edit: the original picture was on page 6, not 7
Fair enough. Didn't see anything about proof...but I haven't looked back at the beginning...


Starts after this:

https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3542823/replies/70232021

It's your moment, this is it. As big as you're gonna get, so enjoy it


Blitz88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
torrid said:

Im Gipper said:

torrid said:

Oh, unlike all the 86 46 stuff I saw before the last election?
Key difference is those threats* were not from a Former FBI director.




*this is not a threat, nor were those.
I can't decide if it's (D)ifferent or (R)eally different.
Not surprised
eric76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
t_J_e_C_x said:

Ag with kids said:

t_J_e_C_x said:

usmcbrooks said:

t_J_e_C_x said:

schmendeler said:

Uh oh



I like how this was conveniently ignored by all the posters on pages 1-5 demanding proof. Once given, it's suddenly "not the same".
This guy a former Director of the FBI?


Asked for proof, proof was given. Something something goalposts.


What proof were you talking about?


There was a poster on page 1 who claimed that people had advocated for harm done to Biden the same as Comey had posted about for Trump. Others then demanded proof. Then on page 6 it was posted, but mostly ignored. Whoever did interact with it, said it was different. Although posted by different individuals with varying levels of former or current influence or roles in government, they're both saying the exact same thing.

If we're applying this standard to one, it should be applied to all.

Comey is wrong. Jack P. is wrong. Whitmore was wrong.

*edit: the original picture was on page 6, not 7
"86 47" is no more a call to harm for Trump than "86 46" was for Biden. In neither case is anyone advocating murder.
The System
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
eric76 said:

t_J_e_C_x said:

Ag with kids said:

t_J_e_C_x said:

usmcbrooks said:

t_J_e_C_x said:

schmendeler said:

Uh oh



I like how this was conveniently ignored by all the posters on pages 1-5 demanding proof. Once given, it's suddenly "not the same".
This guy a former Director of the FBI?


Asked for proof, proof was given. Something something goalposts.


What proof were you talking about?


There was a poster on page 1 who claimed that people had advocated for harm done to Biden the same as Comey had posted about for Trump. Others then demanded proof. Then on page 6 it was posted, but mostly ignored. Whoever did interact with it, said it was different. Although posted by different individuals with varying levels of former or current influence or roles in government, they're both saying the exact same thing.

If we're applying this standard to one, it should be applied to all.

Comey is wrong. Jack P. is wrong. Whitmore was wrong.

*edit: the original picture was on page 6, not 7
"86 47" is no more a call to harm for Trump than "86 46" was for Biden. In neither case is anyone advocating murder.

Then why did he take it down and delete his account?
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
eric76 said:

t_J_e_C_x said:

Ag with kids said:

t_J_e_C_x said:

usmcbrooks said:

t_J_e_C_x said:

schmendeler said:

Uh oh



I like how this was conveniently ignored by all the posters on pages 1-5 demanding proof. Once given, it's suddenly "not the same".
This guy a former Director of the FBI?


Asked for proof, proof was given. Something something goalposts.


What proof were you talking about?


There was a poster on page 1 who claimed that people had advocated for harm done to Biden the same as Comey had posted about for Trump. Others then demanded proof. Then on page 6 it was posted, but mostly ignored. Whoever did interact with it, said it was different. Although posted by different individuals with varying levels of former or current influence or roles in government, they're both saying the exact same thing.

If we're applying this standard to one, it should be applied to all.

Comey is wrong. Jack P. is wrong. Whitmore was wrong.

*edit: the original picture was on page 6, not 7
"86 47" is no more a call to harm for Trump than "86 46" was for Biden. In neither case is anyone advocating murder.

And you would be wrong. AGAIN.
Fat Black Swan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Comey trying to be Sarah J. Maas for TDS'ers.

Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
4 said:

Prosperdick said:

DonHenley said:

Guess you can't read, I said I have a problem with that as well. Sad!
I was countering your claim that conservatives care about the over 18 stuff, we don't. Yes, I know you have a problem with drag queens with kids, congratulations. There are plenty on your side who don't...sad!

I'm conservative, and I have a problem with all of it.

It contributes to the moral decay of our society, and it's flat out evil. I have a problem with evil, no matter what form it comes in or what age you are when you engage in it.
You can have a problem with it, that's fine. I don't care for it either but if you think it's flat out evil that means eradicating it...how do you propose that happens? You'll soon find yourself on a slippery slope so I say just let them be.

Should they be shunned and ridiculed from society? Good luck with that as there is a significant portion of the country that's perfectly fine with it so I'm not sure how you remove it without getting into dangerous territory.
eric76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rockdoc said:

eric76 said:

t_J_e_C_x said:

Ag with kids said:

t_J_e_C_x said:

usmcbrooks said:

t_J_e_C_x said:

schmendeler said:

Uh oh



I like how this was conveniently ignored by all the posters on pages 1-5 demanding proof. Once given, it's suddenly "not the same".
This guy a former Director of the FBI?


Asked for proof, proof was given. Something something goalposts.


What proof were you talking about?


There was a poster on page 1 who claimed that people had advocated for harm done to Biden the same as Comey had posted about for Trump. Others then demanded proof. Then on page 6 it was posted, but mostly ignored. Whoever did interact with it, said it was different. Although posted by different individuals with varying levels of former or current influence or roles in government, they're both saying the exact same thing.

If we're applying this standard to one, it should be applied to all.

Comey is wrong. Jack P. is wrong. Whitmore was wrong.

*edit: the original picture was on page 6, not 7
"86 47" is no more a call to harm for Trump than "86 46" was for Biden. In neither case is anyone advocating murder.

And you would be wrong. AGAIN.
Are you claiming that when "86 46" was used by Trump supporters, they were calling for the murder of Biden? Or are you saying that it is somehow different when done by Democrats than by Trump supporters?
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How many attempts were made on Biden's life?
Butcher of Bakersfield
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4 said:

Prosperdick said:

DonHenley said:

Guess you can't read, I said I have a problem with that as well. Sad!
I was countering your claim that conservatives care about the over 18 stuff, we don't. Yes, I know you have a problem with drag queens with kids, congratulations. There are plenty on your side who don't...sad!

I'm conservative, and I have a problem with all of it.

It contributes to the moral decay of our society, and it's flat out evil. I have a problem with evil, no matter what form it comes in or what age you are when you engage in it.
eric76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ellis Wyatt said:

How many attempts were made on Biden's life?
Just how is that pertinent to the question?
rgvag11
How long do you want to ignore this user?


The Independent asked Gaetz to explain the difference between his tweet and the post Comey sent, especially as a number of people were calling him out online for hypocrisy. "I was speaking in the past tense about things that had already happened," Gaetz said. "Comey was putting out a call for future action. These are distinct."
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/james-comey-86-gaetz-maga-b2752452.html

flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Thats not mental gymnastics, that is context. Comey has a history of fanaticizing about the demise of Trump and hell even abused his office for this purpose.

Here he CREATED the shell display at a time when Trump has survived 2 assassination attempts and leftist extremism is out of control.

He knew exactly what he created and the message that was being sent. And has Comey offered an explanation for what he meant with creating this display, taking a picture and posting it?

But the good news is the DOJ is after him.

BTW - FBI was already tracking increasing rhetoric from the violent anti-Trump. anti-Musk online groups regarding the specific use of "86 47" to target violence against not just Trump and Musk but any "MAGA supporters".
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.