James Comey 86 47

68,347 Views | 740 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by Im Gipper
TexasAggie81
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The System said:

13B said:

torrid said:

Oh, unlike all the 86 46 stuff I saw before the last election?
Show me.

Right? I hated Biden but I never saw or heard of 8646 anywhere. I had to google it. It guess it was a thing. And I would have condemned that too if and when I ever saw it.

But this is from the former Director of the FBI. It's nuts.


None of us would have contemplated doing this. A lot of us didn't think he was going to physically or mentally make it through his term.
ironmanag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That is a threat and a call to violence.
Marvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Comey claims that he thought it was a political statement, but not a violent one? I mean, the guy had no credibility in the first place, but he's sunk beyond liar and into weasel category. Just a disingenuous human being.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Im Gipper said:

The optics of former FBI posting that is how many degrees worse than Posobeic doing it.


However, if you are one that believes this was a true threat, both of them are guilty. All makes no distinction in that regard for someone being a former FBI director. ( note: neither of these was an illegal threat)
I certainly do not believe it is a true threat, but it IS gaslighting.

We know there were conspiracies within his FBI to prevent Trump from governing. We know there are still people within the FBI working against him, because all of Comey's comrades are not gone from the agency. We also know that Trump almost got killed because federal agents allowed it to happen (at best), and the FBI would have you believe that they had no clue it was coming.

People are right to condemn Comey as the left is completely unhinged and is willing to kill again to advance their political agenda. Comey is an ******* with ZERO integrity, but he isn't stupid.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bobbranco said:

Comey received a visit and is being investigated. It's another cowardly act by Comey but here we are, people celebrating and defending such threats.
It is truly amazing what some people will defend.
usmcbrooks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
torrid said:

Oh, unlike all the 86 46 stuff I saw before the last election?
t_J_e_C_x
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
schmendeler said:

Uh oh



I like how this was conveniently ignored by all the posters on pages 1-5 demanding proof. Once given, it's suddenly "not the same".
usmcbrooks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
schmendeler said:

Uh oh

Some Junkie Cosmonaut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
t_J_e_C_x said:

schmendeler said:

Uh oh



I like how this was conveniently ignored by all the posters on pages 1-5 demanding proof. Once given, it's suddenly "not the same".


Think harder.
usmcbrooks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
t_J_e_C_x said:

schmendeler said:

Uh oh



I like how this was conveniently ignored by all the posters on pages 1-5 demanding proof. Once given, it's suddenly "not the same".
This guy a former Director of the FBI?
t_J_e_C_x
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
usmcbrooks said:

t_J_e_C_x said:

schmendeler said:

Uh oh



I like how this was conveniently ignored by all the posters on pages 1-5 demanding proof. Once given, it's suddenly "not the same".
This guy a former Director of the FBI?


Asked for proof, proof was given. Something something goalposts.

Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:



I like how this was conveniently ignored by all the posters on pages 1-5 demanding proof. Once given, it's suddenly "not the same".
It isn't the same. At all.

Stop defending Comey. He should have been in prison years ago.
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
t_J_e_C_x said:

usmcbrooks said:

t_J_e_C_x said:

schmendeler said:

Uh oh



I like how this was conveniently ignored by all the posters on pages 1-5 demanding proof. Once given, it's suddenly "not the same".
This guy a former Director of the FBI?


Asked for proof, proof was given. Something something goalposts.



You don't see the difference?
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
t_J_e_C_x said:

schmendeler said:

Uh oh



I like how this was conveniently ignored by all the posters on pages 1-5 demanding proof. Once given, it's suddenly "not the same".

No body ignored your whataboutism. Besides the Secret Service was probably too busy doting on Jill to care at that time. Otherwise, threats should be investigated.
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
t_J_e_C_x said:

usmcbrooks said:

t_J_e_C_x said:

schmendeler said:

Uh oh



I like how this was conveniently ignored by all the posters on pages 1-5 demanding proof. Once given, it's suddenly "not the same".
This guy a former Director of the FBI?


Asked for proof, proof was given. Something something goalposts.




Try being smarter. Seriously.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:


You don't see the difference?
Sure he does. Just add it to the list of things democrats will defend in 2025.
t_J_e_C_x
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ellis Wyatt said:

Quote:



I like how this was conveniently ignored by all the posters on pages 1-5 demanding proof. Once given, it's suddenly "not the same".
It isn't the same. At all.

Stop defending Comey. He should have been in prison years ago.


I'm not defending Comey. Anyone that advocates for harm done to an elected official deserves punitive measures. I also just don't appreciate hypocrisy, too.

Jack P. deserves punitive measures as well.

bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
t_J_e_C_x said:

usmcbrooks said:

t_J_e_C_x said:

schmendeler said:

Uh oh



I like how this was conveniently ignored by all the posters on pages 1-5 demanding proof. Once given, it's suddenly "not the same".
This guy a former Director of the FBI?


Asked for proof, proof was given. Something something goalposts.


Yet you overlook the 8645 trend promoted by Whitmer.
Red Dane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You are talking about a fringe social media poster (I think) and comparing it to a well know national figure that was the head of our FBI for years involved in several national issues and you think that's even on the same field where it would share a goalpost? I hope that you weren't being serious.
NU '95 Texas A&M '97
t_J_e_C_x
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bobbranco said:

t_J_e_C_x said:

usmcbrooks said:

t_J_e_C_x said:

schmendeler said:

Uh oh



I like how this was conveniently ignored by all the posters on pages 1-5 demanding proof. Once given, it's suddenly "not the same".
This guy a former Director of the FBI?


Asked for proof, proof was given. Something something goalposts.


Yet you overlook the 8645 trend promoted by Whitmer.


Nice try, but if he did it then he deserves punitive measures.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
t_J_e_C_x said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

Quote:



I like how this was conveniently ignored by all the posters on pages 1-5 demanding proof. Once given, it's suddenly "not the same".
It isn't the same. At all.

Stop defending Comey. He should have been in prison years ago.


I'm not defending Comey. Anyone that advocates for harm done to an elected official deserves punitive measures. I also just don't appreciate hypocrisy, too.

Jack P. deserves punitive measures as well.



Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
t_J_e_C_x said:

usmcbrooks said:

t_J_e_C_x said:

schmendeler said:

Uh oh



I like how this was conveniently ignored by all the posters on pages 1-5 demanding proof. Once given, it's suddenly "not the same".
This guy a former Director of the FBI?


Asked for proof, proof was given. Something something goalposts.


What proof were you talking about?
DannyDuberstein
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Defend it however you want, but the former director of the fbi posting that is one of the most dumbass and deranged things I've seen. Violence or just political, it's idiotic given the position and power he held. He's a dumb mother****er and was an enemy of the people when he had that job. I hope he gets ass cancer
Anonymous Source
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
Gig 'Em
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Not only did Biden not have any assassination attempts prior to Jack's tweet, Biden didn't have the legacy media calling him literally Hitler for the past decade, no celebrities held up a bloody severed head of Joe, no Shakespeare troupe ever held public performances of Biden being stabbed like Julius Caesar. Nope none of it.

Oh yeah, and Jack was never the Director of the FBI.

Other than that, they are EXACTLY THE SAME.
Pepe SiIvia
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The right pigs are squealing.
t_J_e_C_x
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag with kids said:

t_J_e_C_x said:

usmcbrooks said:

t_J_e_C_x said:

schmendeler said:

Uh oh



I like how this was conveniently ignored by all the posters on pages 1-5 demanding proof. Once given, it's suddenly "not the same".
This guy a former Director of the FBI?


Asked for proof, proof was given. Something something goalposts.


What proof were you talking about?


There was a poster on page 1 who claimed that people had advocated for harm done to Biden the same as Comey had posted about for Trump. Others then demanded proof. Then on page 6 it was posted, but mostly ignored. Whoever did interact with it, said it was different. Although posted by different individuals with varying levels of former or current influence or roles in government, they're both saying the exact same thing.

If we're applying this standard to one, it should be applied to all.

Comey is wrong. Jack P. is wrong. Whitmore was wrong.

*edit: the original picture was on page 6, not 7
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Agent Self, if he's truly not a bot and is an FBI agent, outed himself and should be fired.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
t_J_e_C_x said:

Ag with kids said:

t_J_e_C_x said:

usmcbrooks said:

t_J_e_C_x said:

schmendeler said:

Uh oh



I like how this was conveniently ignored by all the posters on pages 1-5 demanding proof. Once given, it's suddenly "not the same".
This guy a former Director of the FBI?


Asked for proof, proof was given. Something something goalposts.


What proof were you talking about?


There was a poster on page 1 who claimed that people had advocated for harm done to Biden the same as Comey had posted about for Trump. Others then demanded proof. Then on page 6 it was posted, but mostly ignored. Whoever did interact with it, said it was different. Although posted by different individuals with varying levels of former or current influence or roles in government, they're both saying the exact same thing.

If we're applying this standard to one, it should be applied to all.

Comey is wrong. Jack P. is wrong. Whitmore was wrong.

*edit: the original picture was on page 6, not 7

You moving the goalposts now?
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?

I don't believe it was a direct threat by Comey. The motivation for Comey is to convince one of his fellow libs to try to kill Trump.
doubledog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Marvin said:

Comey claims that he thought it was a political statement, but not a violent one? I mean, the guy had no credibility in the first place, but he's sunk beyond liar and into weasel category. Just a disingenuous human being.
I thought he said he did not know what 8647 meant.
t_J_e_C_x
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bobbranco said:

t_J_e_C_x said:

Ag with kids said:

t_J_e_C_x said:

usmcbrooks said:

t_J_e_C_x said:

schmendeler said:

Uh oh



I like how this was conveniently ignored by all the posters on pages 1-5 demanding proof. Once given, it's suddenly "not the same".
This guy a former Director of the FBI?


Asked for proof, proof was given. Something something goalposts.


What proof were you talking about?


There was a poster on page 1 who claimed that people had advocated for harm done to Biden the same as Comey had posted about for Trump. Others then demanded proof. Then on page 6 it was posted, but mostly ignored. Whoever did interact with it, said it was different. Although posted by different individuals with varying levels of former or current influence or roles in government, they're both saying the exact same thing.

If we're applying this standard to one, it should be applied to all.

Comey is wrong. Jack P. is wrong. Whitmore was wrong.

*edit: the original picture was on page 6, not 7

You moving the goalposts now?


No, I said here that Comey was wrong. https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3542823/replies/70237177
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
doubledog said:

Marvin said:

Comey claims that he thought it was a political statement, but not a violent one? I mean, the guy had no credibility in the first place, but he's sunk beyond liar and into weasel category. Just a disingenuous human being.
I thought he said he did not know what 8647 meant.

He's a moron or a liar. I will pick both options.
IndividualFreedom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

What a time we are living in. A recent former Director of the FBI causally alluding to killing the President of the United States of America, after multiple assassination attempts have already been made.
We have been living in a novel for some time....

I hope Dan has agents combing that beach with a fine tooth comb looking for those shells. A partial will do it.

Comey and his boyfriend were drunk, walking on the beach holding hands, when they came across these perfectly matching shells. They were even buffed to shine by nature. In a playful drunken way, Comey regretfully took an image and posted about it.

They better start minimizing damages. I got a feeling he is in big trouble. This is why you don't throw rocks in a room made of thin glass.
Anonymous Source
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
bobbranco said:

Agent Self, if he's truly not a bot and is an FBI agent, outed himself and should be fired.
Awwww...not a fan of being called out on double standards?
Gig 'Em
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.