The System said:

---

13B said:

---

torrid said:

---

Oh, unlike all the 86 46 stuff I saw before the last election?

---

Show me.

---

Right? I hated Biden but I never saw or heard of 8646 anywhere. I had to google it. It guess it was a thing. And I would have condemned that too if and when I ever saw it.

But this is from the former Director of the FBI. It's nuts.

---

None of us would have contemplated doing this. A lot of us didn't think he was going to physically or mentally make it through his term.

That is a threat and a call to violence.

Comey claims that he thought it was a political statement, but not a violent one? I mean, the guy had no credibility in the first place, but he's sunk beyond liar and into weasel category. Just a disingenuous human being.

Im Gipper said:

---

The optics of former FBI posting that is how many degrees worse than Posobeic doing it.


However, if you are one that believes this was a true threat, both of them are guilty. All makes no distinction in that regard for someone being a former FBI director. ( note: neither of these was an illegal threat)

---

I certainly do not believe it is a true threat, but it IS gaslighting.

We know there were conspiracies within his FBI to prevent Trump from governing. We know there are still people within the FBI working against him, because all of Comey's comrades are not gone from the agency. We also know that Trump almost got killed because federal agents allowed it to happen (at best), and the FBI would have you believe that they had no clue it was coming.

People are right to condemn Comey as the left is completely unhinged and is willing to kill again to advance their political agenda. Comey is an ******* with ZERO integrity, but he isn't stupid.

bobbranco said:

---

Comey received a visit and is being investigated. It's another cowardly act by Comey but here we are, people celebrating and defending such threats.

---

It is truly amazing what some people will defend.

torrid said:

---

Oh, unlike all the 86 46 stuff I saw before the last election?

---

schmendeler said:

---

Uh oh

---

I like how this was conveniently ignored by all the posters on pages 1-5 demanding proof. Once given, it's suddenly "not the same".

schmendeler said:

---

Uh oh

---

t_J_e_C_x said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

Uh oh

---

I like how this was conveniently ignored by all the posters on pages 1-5 demanding proof. Once given, it's suddenly "not the same".

---

Think harder.

t_J_e_C_x said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

Uh oh

---

I like how this was conveniently ignored by all the posters on pages 1-5 demanding proof. Once given, it's suddenly "not the same".

---

This guy a former Director of the FBI?

usmcbrooks said:

---

t_J_e_C_x said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

Uh oh

---

I like how this was conveniently ignored by all the posters on pages 1-5 demanding proof. Once given, it's suddenly "not the same".

---

This guy a former Director of the FBI?

---

Asked for proof, proof was given. Something something goalposts.

Quote:

---

I like how this was conveniently ignored by all the posters on pages 1-5 demanding proof. Once given, it's suddenly "not the same".

---

It isn't the same. At all.

Stop defending Comey. He should have been in prison years ago.

t_J_e_C_x said:

---

usmcbrooks said:

---

t_J_e_C_x said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

Uh oh

---

I like how this was conveniently ignored by all the posters on pages 1-5 demanding proof. Once given, it's suddenly "not the same".

---

This guy a former Director of the FBI?

---

Asked for proof, proof was given. Something something goalposts.

---

You don't see the difference?

t_J_e_C_x said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

Uh oh

---

I like how this was conveniently ignored by all the posters on pages 1-5 demanding proof. Once given, it's suddenly "not the same".

---

No body ignored your whataboutism. Besides the Secret Service was probably too busy doting on Jill to care at that time. Otherwise, threats should be investigated.

t_J_e_C_x said:

---

usmcbrooks said:

---

t_J_e_C_x said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

Uh oh

---

I like how this was conveniently ignored by all the posters on pages 1-5 demanding proof. Once given, it's suddenly "not the same".

---

This guy a former Director of the FBI?

---

Asked for proof, proof was given. Something something goalposts.

---

Try being smarter. Seriously.

Quote:

---

You don't see the difference?

---

Sure he does. Just add it to the list of things democrats will defend in 2025.

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Quote:

---

I like how this was conveniently ignored by all the posters on pages 1-5 demanding proof. Once given, it's suddenly "not the same".

---

It isn't the same. At all.

Stop defending Comey. He should have been in prison years ago.

---

I'm not defending Comey. Anyone that advocates for harm done to an elected official deserves punitive measures. I also just don't appreciate hypocrisy, too.

Jack P. deserves punitive measures as well.

t_J_e_C_x said:

---

usmcbrooks said:

---

t_J_e_C_x said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

Uh oh

---

I like how this was conveniently ignored by all the posters on pages 1-5 demanding proof. Once given, it's suddenly "not the same".

---

This guy a former Director of the FBI?

---

Asked for proof, proof was given. Something something goalposts.

---

Yet you overlook the 8645 trend promoted by Whitmer.

You are talking about a fringe social media poster (I think) and comparing it to a well know national figure that was the head of our FBI for years involved in several national issues and you think that's even on the same field where it would share a goalpost? I hope that you weren't being serious.

bobbranco said:

---

t_J_e_C_x said:

---

usmcbrooks said:

---

t_J_e_C_x said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

Uh oh

---

I like how this was conveniently ignored by all the posters on pages 1-5 demanding proof. Once given, it's suddenly "not the same".

---

This guy a former Director of the FBI?

---

Asked for proof, proof was given. Something something goalposts.

---

Yet you overlook the 8645 trend promoted by Whitmer.

---

Nice try, but if he did it then he deserves punitive measures.

t_J_e_C_x said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Quote:

---

I like how this was conveniently ignored by all the posters on pages 1-5 demanding proof. Once given, it's suddenly "not the same".

---

It isn't the same. At all.

Stop defending Comey. He should have been in prison years ago.

---

I'm not defending Comey. Anyone that advocates for harm done to an elected official deserves punitive measures. I also just don't appreciate hypocrisy, too.

Jack P. deserves punitive measures as well.

---

t_J_e_C_x said:

---

usmcbrooks said:

---

t_J_e_C_x said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

Uh oh

---

I like how this was conveniently ignored by all the posters on pages 1-5 demanding proof. Once given, it's suddenly "not the same".

---

This guy a former Director of the FBI?

---

Asked for proof, proof was given. Something something goalposts.

---

What proof were you talking about?

MAGA Logic:

8646 = Impeach Biden

8647 = kill Trump pic.twitter.com/TlZuaGUlLM

— Agent Self FBI (@RetroAgent12) May 16, 2025

Not only did Biden not have any assassination attempts prior to Jack's tweet, Biden didn't have the legacy media calling him literally Hitler for the past decade, no celebrities held up a bloody severed head of Joe, no Shakespeare troupe ever held public performances of Biden being stabbed like Julius Caesar. Nope none of it.

Oh yeah, and Jack was never the Director of the FBI.

Other than that, they are EXACTLY THE SAME.

The right pigs are squealing.

Ag with kids said:

---

t_J_e_C_x said:

---

usmcbrooks said:

---

t_J_e_C_x said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

Uh oh

---

I like how this was conveniently ignored by all the posters on pages 1-5 demanding proof. Once given, it's suddenly "not the same".

---

This guy a former Director of the FBI?

---

Asked for proof, proof was given. Something something goalposts.

---

What proof were you talking about?

---

There was a poster on page 1 who claimed that people had advocated for harm done to Biden the same as Comey had posted about for Trump. Others then demanded proof. Then on page 6 it was posted, but mostly ignored. Whoever did interact with it, said it was different. Although posted by different individuals with varying levels of former or current influence or roles in government, they're both saying the exact same thing.

If we're applying this standard to one, it should be applied to all.

Comey is wrong. Jack P. is wrong. Whitmore was wrong.

*edit: the original picture was on page 6, not 7

Agent Self, if he's truly not a bot and is an FBI agent, outed himself and should be fired.

t_J_e_C_x said:

---

Ag with kids said:

---

t_J_e_C_x said:

---

usmcbrooks said:

---

t_J_e_C_x said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

Uh oh

---

I like how this was conveniently ignored by all the posters on pages 1-5 demanding proof. Once given, it's suddenly "not the same".

---

This guy a former Director of the FBI?

---

Asked for proof, proof was given. Something something goalposts.

---

What proof were you talking about?

---

There was a poster on page 1 who claimed that people had advocated for harm done to Biden the same as Comey had posted about for Trump. Others then demanded proof. Then on page 6 it was posted, but mostly ignored. Whoever did interact with it, said it was different. Although posted by different individuals with varying levels of former or current influence or roles in government, they're both saying the exact same thing.

If we're applying this standard to one, it should be applied to all.

Comey is wrong. Jack P. is wrong. Whitmore was wrong.

*edit: the original picture was on page 6, not 7

---

You moving the goalposts now?

I don't believe it was a direct threat by Comey. The motivation for Comey is to convince one of his fellow libs to try to kill Trump.

Marvin said:

---

Comey claims that he thought it was a political statement, but not a violent one? I mean, the guy had no credibility in the first place, but he's sunk beyond liar and into weasel category. Just a disingenuous human being.

---

I thought he said he did not know what 8647 meant.

bobbranco said:

---

t_J_e_C_x said:

---

Ag with kids said:

---

t_J_e_C_x said:

---

usmcbrooks said:

---

t_J_e_C_x said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

Uh oh

---

I like how this was conveniently ignored by all the posters on pages 1-5 demanding proof. Once given, it's suddenly "not the same".

---

This guy a former Director of the FBI?

---

Asked for proof, proof was given. Something something goalposts.

---

What proof were you talking about?

---

There was a poster on page 1 who claimed that people had advocated for harm done to Biden the same as Comey had posted about for Trump. Others then demanded proof. Then on page 6 it was posted, but mostly ignored. Whoever did interact with it, said it was different. Although posted by different individuals with varying levels of former or current influence or roles in government, they're both saying the exact same thing.

If we're applying this standard to one, it should be applied to all.

Comey is wrong. Jack P. is wrong. Whitmore was wrong.

*edit: the original picture was on page 6, not 7

---

You moving the goalposts now?

---

No, I said here that Comey was wrong. https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3542823/replies/70237177

doubledog said:

---

Marvin said:

---

Comey claims that he thought it was a political statement, but not a violent one? I mean, the guy had no credibility in the first place, but he's sunk beyond liar and into weasel category. Just a disingenuous human being.

---

I thought he said he did not know what 8647 meant.

---

He's a moron or a liar. I will pick both options.

Quote:

---

What a time we are living in. A recent former Director of the FBI causally alluding to killing the President of the United States of America, after multiple assassination attempts have already been made.

---

We have been living in a novel for some time....

I hope Dan has agents combing that beach with a fine tooth comb looking for those shells. A partial will do it.

Comey and his boyfriend were drunk, walking on the beach holding hands, when they came across these perfectly matching shells. They were even buffed to shine by nature. In a playful drunken way, Comey regretfully took an image and posted about it.

They better start minimizing damages. I got a feeling he is in big trouble. This is why you don't throw rocks in a room made of thin glass.

bobbranco said:

---

Agent Self, if he's truly not a bot and is an FBI agent, outed himself and should be fired.

---

Awwww...not a fan of being called out on double standards?