"God is between her legs." - Forgetting Sara Marshall. I hope this post is clean enough for TexAgs. It makes the point, though. A lot of men lose all sense of integrity when a young and attractive woman walks in the room. The Epstein case is exhibit A. Presidents and CEOs literally exposing themselves to public ridicule when young women are made available to them. As if cameras don't exist. Everyone knows why these men "hung out" with their good friend, Jeffrey Epstein. To meet God….

I believe in God's justice so not Scott free!

FTAG 2000 said:

---

Critical thinking exercise for the day.

Does anyone think there was anything really damning for the Dems in Congress left after about 48 hours after the election?

Anything incriminating is tucked away somewhere safe for Xi, Schwab, and Mossad to use at a time of their choice.

---

Don't know.

What is known is that what was told to be done, namely the Epstein files to be released, hasn't been done the way it needs to be.

My question is: Should rapists and criminals who the files could bring to justice be allowed to live without consequences because all non victim information won't be released?

I mean, at the end of the day, those on the right enjoying the files not being fully released must know that in doing so the men who raped minors are loving these redactions as much as those on the right who are enjoying seeing them there.

Strange times indeed.

Whoop2 said:

---

I believe in God's justice so not Scott free!

---

I hear you, but that aside, are you good with the men who raped girls who were minors, living their best life without any consequence while they live?

I mean, by that logic, no one should be held accountable while they're alive since they'll get justice by God when they're dead.

🫩 pic.twitter.com/chtW0TAk9c

— _NamrokNamrok_ (@_NamrokNamrok_) December 20, 2025

Psycho Bunny said:

---

Meh, who cares. Nothing will be done, no one will go to jail. This is just one big circle jerk of pointing fingers from both sides. Zero, zilsh, nada will anyone be held accountable.

---

"Meh... who cares that the government is hiding the truth about a convicted billionaire pedophile's relationship with the political elites in our country"

If you don't care why even click into this thread? Odd post tbqh

J. Stanley Pottinger, who worked with Epstein in the 1980s, ends up representing Virginia Giuffre and a bunch of other Epstein victims, volunteering to do so.

Here is an email Pottinger sent Epstein in 2006 expressing his sympathy over Epstein's legal trouble, adding “I hope it… https://t.co/cNuPMiFApM pic.twitter.com/d7HIFG5UBd

— Harrison Berger (@BergerPosts) December 19, 2025

Ghislaine and Andres Pastrana Arango, the former President of Colombia. pic.twitter.com/LkNQuQwEyv

— Autism Capital 🧩 (@AutismCapital) December 20, 2025

PaulsBunions said:

---

OPAG said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

Who?mikejones! said:

---

Its not about only trump. If you think that its only about trump, then youre missing almost everything

And here is a perfect example.

You really have put on you while knight suit over this one issue.

And when did you put it on?

When did it become THE PRIMARY CAUSE for you to get on that white horse and ride?

You already said, when Trump 'campaigned on it! So again it is about Trump.

I live in a real world, I know that any evidence that nails the elites and powerful has long since been destroyed or altered.

That's just the way evil works when they have the power and ability to do so.

So the end result is this is as I said another red herring too divide the majority of conservative\moderate Americans.

Getting them to focus on a single issue that they don't support Trump on.

i.e a psyop.

And you are falling for it hook line and "sinker" and that is what will happen the US will sink, while the white knights go on their righteous crusade that yields absolutely nothing of substance.

This is about our State protecting rich pedos. Its about ill behavior by our security services and potentially our allies.

Its about the victims and justice for them. Its about trumps promises.

thinking this is only about "get trump"," especially from Republicans is odd

---

If people care about justice for the victims and not about Trump they would not have lined up 81 million deep to vote for the pedo in chief who showered with his daughter, bankrolled his son's sex trafficking, and condoned his son banging his underage granddaughter.

And I know its also not about the victims because people show essentially zero interest in the tens of thousands of missing children from the Biden administration and the millions of women, including many underage, who were abused, trafficked, raped and killed during the Biden open borders saga.

So hen folks look past all that to post page after page of "updates" about how Trump somehow blocked the release of files, then saying it's not about Trump just doesn't ring true.

Does the state protect rich pedos? Not overtly. But rich people have connections and… money. Money means influence, more connections, and high powered attorneys who are also connected.

Any allegation of involvement of "security services" being the reason files are not released is tenuous at best and like noise / nonsense.

No, I think it's pretty fair to say that if Trump was not involved then no one would be clamoring for this. In fact, any coverage of this and release of files is the direct result of Trump, not in spite of.

If you think this is about anything other than Trump, then you are falling for a false narrative.

Keep watching. When nothing damning comes out pointing at Trump, see how fast those seeking nothing but justice fade away or simply jump to the next Trump attack plan.

---

100%.

The whole thing is just a massive red herring, They just want to keep TDS at a fevor pitch, that is all. Thus the lying and redacted photos, and on and on. It is nothing but a distraction. to divide, red meat in front of a bunch of rapid dogs, It is actually a psyop. Goebbels tactics.

It is he who said, "Make the lie big, make it simple, keep repeating it over and over again and people will believe it. "

He also said the media is a giant keyboard in the hands of the government that it can play and use to manipulate the masses.

Some of you really need to study up on 'social engineering' and how psyops work. Cause many here are getting absolutely snickered!

And once snickered, pride kicks in and as one said "It is easier to bambozzle someone, then debambozzle them."

The whole Epstein affair is a psyop, It is red meat to feed the TDS. While important things like getting election laws passed, and getting judges that are not anti white, USA citizen in place falls to way side.

This is psyop war and the normal US citizen is losing it, especially the white women.

---

Forcing the government to be transparent about an alleged group of pedophiles is a psyop now? Trump simply could have told his DOJ to release it all at the beginning of the year and then he cried hoax, he's the one who made this a distraction.

---

BREAKING: In a newly unsealed 2023 deposition of Stacey Plaskett released in the Epstein files, Plaskett says she was aware Epstein traveled to the Virgin Islands with young girls, visited his office in St. Thomas more than once, called him at least five times, and went to his… pic.twitter.com/gUp6sleOHl

— Bad Hombre (@Badhombre) December 20, 2025

Here is somebody who converted 4000 pdfs to scrollable pics. Lot of redactions but also a lot of ….

If anyone asks what I did today:

I turned 4,000 Epstein PDFs into scrollable images.
& One single video in \VOL00002\NATIVES\0001
Converted to a scrollable Google Album
Full Dataset : https://t.co/tNzz2q9vqa pic.twitter.com/5m5oyhcaVj

— Mo Ghaoui (@moghaoui) December 20, 2025

BREAKING: Articles of Impeachment are now being drafted against AG Pam Bondi by Reps. Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie after they claim not enough Epstein Files were released.

— Leading Report (@LeadingReport) December 20, 2025

NEW: US government deletes Epstein file 468 that contained an image of President Trump.

— Dominic Michael Tripi (@DMichaelTripi) December 20, 2025

Embarassing if true

Where are the pics of Clinton in women's clothing as mentioned today on CNN?

There is a painting of bill in a blue dress laid out on a couch at epstein island

Here is the image from the file that was removed. pic.twitter.com/e3MCbJ56Hf

— Dominic Michael Tripi (@DMichaelTripi) December 20, 2025

Thats the smoking gun you all have been waiting on!

The walls are closing in!!!

PaulsBunions said:

---

NEW: US government deletes Epstein file 468 that contained an image of President Trump.

— Dominic Michael Tripi (@DMichaelTripi) December 20, 2025

Embarassing if true

---

Curious how this guy knows this. File number known, contents known (some other all), and know it has been deleted/destroyed? How could this be confirmed? If this were a possibility, how would these files not have been destroyed long ago?

The worst of all of this will never see the light of day regardless who is in office. We will get more theatrics, more selective leaks, and maybe a few scape goats until it fizzles out or an "event" takes over.

Pretty sure the Epstien saga is (1) not the only, and (2) not the most disgusting / depraved thing our 3 letter agencies are (actively) involved in.

Is that Trump an Melania and Trump with Hawaiin Tropic team?

Slwdsm said:

---

Here is the image from the file that was removed. pic.twitter.com/e3MCbJ56Hf

— Dominic Michael Tripi (@DMichaelTripi) December 20, 2025

Thats the smoking gun you all have been waiting on!

The walls are closing in!!!

---

Yes the pictures are innocuous, the point is that its embarassing to delete after the fact.

Also, seeing as the law states that no files can be redacted on the basis of embarassment, it will be interesting to see their explanation for redacting this one. Seems to be more incompetence from the Bondi DOJ

(b) Prohibited Grounds for Withholding.
(1) No record shall be withheld, delayed, or redacted on the basis of embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity, including to any government official, public figure, or foreign dignitary.

Was it deleted? Or is it some hack lying only for the usefuls enjoyment ? Lol.

We fixed the keg said:

---

PaulsBunions said:

---

NEW: US government deletes Epstein file 468 that contained an image of President Trump.

— Dominic Michael Tripi (@DMichaelTripi) December 20, 2025

Embarassing if true

---

Curious how this guy knows this. File number known, contents known (some other all), and know it has been deleted/destroyed? How could this be confirmed? If this were a possibility, how would these files not have been destroyed long ago?

The worst of all of this will never see the light of day regardless who is in office. We will get more theatrics, more selective leaks, and maybe a few scape goats until it fizzles out or an "event" takes over.

Pretty sure the Epstien saga is (1) not the only, and (2) not the most disgusting / depraved thing our 3 letter agencies are (actively) involved in.

---

People probably archived the original release, plus that file specifically was getting shared before they took it down.

bobbranco said:

---

Was it deleted? Or is it some hack lying only for the usefuls enjoyment ? Lol.

---

Feel free to look for it yourself if you don't believe it. This guy has an original copy of the files so you can compare.

1/6

PROOF: The DoJ just *DELETED* one of the files they released that contained Trump!

Yesterday, file 468 was shown to have a picture of Trump that they missed.

We know this because it was downloadable yesterday - as can be seen in my local copy. pic.twitter.com/nCXWPEzT4i

— Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth) (@adamscochran) December 20, 2025

We fixed the keg said:

---

Is that Trump an Melania and Trump with Hawaiin Tropic team?

---

Got him!

This is hilarious.

Compare

Language of Epstein Files Transparency Act directing DOJ to provide internal communications regarding their decisions

Versus

DOJ letter to Congress asserting privilege to omit materials related to decisions, because they weren’t specified by law

THEY ARE FLAUNTING LAW pic.twitter.com/O8ydW5XOnq

— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) December 20, 2025

PaulsBunions said:

---

bobbranco said:

---

Was it deleted? Or is it some hack lying only for the usefuls enjoyment ? Lol.

---

Feel free to look for it yourself if you don't believe it. This guy has an original copy of the files so you can compare.

1/6

PROOF: The DoJ just *DELETED* one of the files they released that contained Trump!

Yesterday, file 468 was shown to have a picture of Trump that they missed.

We know this because it was downloadable yesterday - as can be seen in my local copy. pic.twitter.com/nCXWPEzT4i

— Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth) (@adamscochran) December 20, 2025

---

lol.

Melania with Trump and another that shows some models with Trump.


This is pure delusional madness on full display.

bobbranco said:

---

PaulsBunions said:

---

bobbranco said:

---

Was it deleted? Or is it some hack lying only for the usefuls enjoyment ? Lol.

---

Feel free to look for it yourself if you don't believe it. This guy has an original copy of the files so you can compare.

1/6

PROOF: The DoJ just *DELETED* one of the files they released that contained Trump!

Yesterday, file 468 was shown to have a picture of Trump that they missed.

We know this because it was downloadable yesterday - as can be seen in my local copy. pic.twitter.com/nCXWPEzT4i

— Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth) (@adamscochran) December 20, 2025

---

lol.

Melania with Trump and another that shows some models with Trump.


This is pure delusional madness on full display.

---

If you scroll up you will see I called the pictures innocuous. Good job ignoring my points.

The point is the law states they aren't allowed to redact files on the basis of embarassment. So whats the reason they redacted that picture? There is nothing illegal in it, the picture is literally nothing.

No Spin Ag said:

---

FTAG 2000 said:

---

Critical thinking exercise for the day.

Does anyone think there was anything really damning for the Dems in Congress left after about 48 hours after the election?

Anything incriminating is tucked away somewhere safe for Xi, Schwab, and Mossad to use at a time of their choice.

---

Don't know.

What is known is that what was told to be done, namely the Epstein files to be released, hasn't been done the way it needs to be.

My question is: Should rapists and criminals who the files could bring to justice be allowed to live without consequences because all non victim information won't be released?

I mean, at the end of the day, those on the right enjoying the files not being fully released must know that in doing so the men who raped minors are loving these redactions as much as those on the right who are enjoying seeing them there.

Strange times indeed.

---

Were you under the impression that releasing these files was about bringing justice? These files have been seen by law enforcement. What makes you think releasing them would result in charges being filed?

It's delusional for anyone to make an issue about the photo whether it was removed or not. Keep revealing the rabid loss of sound reasoning.

bobbranco said:

---

It's delusional for anyone to make an issue about the photo whether it was removed or not. Keep revealing the rabid loss of sound reasoning.

---

This is cope. Is the DOJ violating the law? Yes or No. "haha why do you even care bro the picture is nbd" is not an argument.

PaulsBunions said:

---

bobbranco said:

---

It's delusional for anyone to make an issue about the photo whether it was removed or not. Keep revealing the rabid loss of sound reasoning.

---

This is cope. Is the DOJ violating the law? Yes or No. "haha why do you even care bro the picture is nbd" is not an argument.

---

100%

Clown. Show.

Except it breaks the law

PaulsBunions said:

---

bobbranco said:

---

It's delusional for anyone to make an issue about the photo whether it was removed or not. Keep revealing the rabid loss of sound reasoning.

---

This is cope. Is the DOJ violating the law? Yes or No. "haha why do you even care bro the picture is nbd" is not an argument.

---

Was it removed? Don't know if true or not but I will let you keep up to date on internet postings. Internet always contains facts. You can return to your gullible travels.

bobbranco said:

---

PaulsBunions said:

---

bobbranco said:

---

It's delusional for anyone to make an issue about the photo whether it was removed or not. Keep revealing the rabid loss of sound reasoning.

---

This is cope. Is the DOJ violating the law? Yes or No. "haha why do you even care bro the picture is nbd" is not an argument.

---

Was it removed? Don't know if true or not but I will let you keep up to date on internet postings. Internet always contains facts. You can return to your gullible travels.

---

Not an answer. You can choose to bury your head in the sand and deny that it was deleted if you wish. Calling me gullible while choosing to do zero research yourself is hilarious though.