DOJ: Epstein killed himself, no client list

594,501 Views | 6826 Replies | Last: 2 min ago by Keyno
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Zachary Klement said:

It is impressive how sloppy many of the redactions are.


Zachary Klement
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It appears everyone was doing it.
Zachary Klement
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Zachary Klement
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wildmen03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Zachary Klement said:

It is impressive how sloppy many of the redactions are.

That's what happens when you put a month deadline on something that would take years to do. Millions of documents is an absurd amount.
Zachary Klement
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Epstein should have taken a typing class. The dude had typos galore and somehow seemed to always find his way to the "=" key.
Zachary Klement
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Zachary Klement
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wildmen03 said:

Zachary Klement said:

It is impressive how sloppy many of the redactions are.

That's what happens when you put a month deadline on something that would take years to do. Millions of documents is an absurd amount.

Womp womp.

ETA: The month deadline is largely their own fault they campaigned on releasing this stuff, so they could have been working on redactions and releasing things a year ago. They knew people were clamoring to see the files back in July. Those campaign promises were lies and they chose to lie last summer too, so this clearly wasn't looked into until after they were compelled to do so. If the Trump admin were more forthcoming from the get go and said something along the lines of, "We have X number of files, it will take us X amount of time to get through them, we will release X amount of files every month/quarter/whatever." We would not be where we are currently.
zag213004
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
As Pam bondi stated in march (page 1) the list was on her desk for review.
AgDev01
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
zag213004 said:

As Pam bondi stated in march (page 1) the list was on her desk for review.


She even had binders made for them.

t_J_e_C_x
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Zachary Klement said:




C/O 2013 - Company E2
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Zachary Klement said:

It is impressive how sloppy many of the redactions are.

Well, when they were given 30 days to review and scrub as much material as they had to, wtf do you expect?

(Yes I know they were 30 days late with the last stuff...my point still stands).
You can turn off signatures, btw
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PaulsBunions said:

Zachary Klement said:

It is impressive how sloppy many of the redactions are.




JFC...

That means Merrick Garland ALSO covering up them up...

Can we prosecute his ass?
You can turn off signatures, btw
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You can't prosecute Pam Bondi over it. What law has she violated? And the Transparency Act doesn't count as it has no penalty AND DOJ is in active compliance.

Ro Khanna is dumb, but at least he is playing towards the opponents goal. Massie keeps turning around to score on team R.

BTW- the posts over the last few days trotting fantastical stories of Jee Vacationz should a lot of folks gave exactly zero ****s about justice for victims, particularly Ro and Massie.
Old McDonald
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop said:

You can't prosecute Pam Bondi over it. What law has she violated? And the Transparency Act doesn't count
if you don't count the law she's breaking, she's not breaking the law! genius analysis there friend
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The law with no penalty? And you mock me?

So the broke the Transparency Act of Saint Massie Ro Year of Our Lord 2025. As punishment, ye shall… ye shall… oh dammit, who forgot to add any teeth to our bill!
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Old McDonald said:

flown-the-coop said:

You can't prosecute Pam Bondi over it. What law has she violated? And the Transparency Act doesn't count

if you don't count the law she's breaking, she's not breaking the law! genius analysis there friend

She's not breaking a law.
You can turn off signatures, btw
Swan Song
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
My problem is I have zero trust in the FBI. How do we even know what in here files is legit and not planted. Videos? Even if they're there, how to we know they're real and not ai?
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Swan Song said:

My problem is I have zero trust in the FBI. How do we even know what in here files is legit and not planted. Videos? Even if they're there, how to we know they're real and not ai?

Here's the problem with this whole thing...

No matter what happens, you will have people that will complain or come up with new conspiracy theories.

Even if they released every single thing completely unredacted you would have:

a) The people that claim the government is still hiding information and didn't release everything
b) The people that claim the stuff proves completely inane theories
c) The people that claim that stuff is fake and not legit (see above)
You can turn off signatures, btw
Dirty_Mike&the_boys
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Here's something else, remember when that huge group of victims stood on the Capitol Steps with a bunch of members of congress, threatening to put together their own list demanding the DOJ release all the files.

Now those same people have filed a lawsuit to get the documents pulled down off the DOJ website....


"We're going to turn this red Prius into a soup kitchen!"
Zachary Klement
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag with kids said:

Zachary Klement said:

It is impressive how sloppy many of the redactions are.

Well, when they were given 30 days to review and scrub as much material as they had to, wtf do you expect?

(Yes I know they were 30 days late with the last stuff...my point still stands).
If they weren't trying so hard to cover stuff up last year and were more transparent about working on getting stuff out, they wouldn't be in such a time crunch.
Dirty_Mike&the_boys
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zachary Klement said:

Ag with kids said:

Zachary Klement said:

It is impressive how sloppy many of the redactions are.

Well, when they were given 30 days to review and scrub as much material as they had to, wtf do you expect?

(Yes I know they were 30 days late with the last stuff...my point still stands).

If they weren't trying so hard to cover stuff up last year and were more transparent about working on getting stuff out, they wouldn't be in such a time crunch.

OH BS

You would have to read and redact 9600 pages a day for a YEAR in this dump alone. Trump has only been in office a year.
"We're going to turn this red Prius into a soup kitchen!"
J. Walter Weatherman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dirty_Mike&the_boys said:

Here's something else, remember when that huge group of victims stood on the Capitol Steps with a bunch of members of congress, threatening to put together their own list demanding the DOJ release all the files.

Now those same people have filed a lawsuit to get the documents pulled down off the DOJ website....





Assuming it's not the same group considering they're already public. Sounds like it's coming from victims now exposed thanks to the government's sloppiness. If only they had started working on the files back when they had binders of them ready to share.
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dirty_Mike&the_boys said:

Zachary Klement said:

Ag with kids said:

Zachary Klement said:

It is impressive how sloppy many of the redactions are.

Well, when they were given 30 days to review and scrub as much material as they had to, wtf do you expect?

(Yes I know they were 30 days late with the last stuff...my point still stands).

If they weren't trying so hard to cover stuff up last year and were more transparent about working on getting stuff out, they wouldn't be in such a time crunch.

OH BS

You would have to read and redact 9600 pages a day for a YEAR in this dump alone. Trump has only been in office a year.


But they weren't working on it. They had a dog and pony show with stupid ass binders. The AG claimed she had the files to be released then crawfished bigly.
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FWTXAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
[We removed your last post where you were trolling the board. You should have caught a clue. Keep the conversation focused on the thread material and not trying to provoke other posters -- Staff]
AgDev01
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GAC06 said:


But they weren't working on it. They had a dog and pony show with stupid ass binders. The AG claimed she had the files to be released then crawfished bigly.


Don't forget the head of the FBI going before congress and on Joe Rogan and saying Epstein acted alone and there was no one else, forgetting the fact that his own agency has a list of 10 co-conspirators
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's all a "hoax"
Zachary Klement
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dirty_Mike&the_boys said:

Zachary Klement said:

Ag with kids said:

Zachary Klement said:

It is impressive how sloppy many of the redactions are.

Well, when they were given 30 days to review and scrub as much material as they had to, wtf do you expect?

(Yes I know they were 30 days late with the last stuff...my point still stands).

If they weren't trying so hard to cover stuff up last year and were more transparent about working on getting stuff out, they wouldn't be in such a time crunch.

OH BS

You would have to read and redact 9600 pages a day for a YEAR in this dump alone. Trump has only been in office a year.
If they were transparent from the get go, I think people would've more understanding of this taking a longer time to get put out.
Old McDonald
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GAC06 said:

Dirty_Mike&the_boys said:

Zachary Klement said:

Ag with kids said:

Zachary Klement said:

It is impressive how sloppy many of the redactions are.

Well, when they were given 30 days to review and scrub as much material as they had to, wtf do you expect?

(Yes I know they were 30 days late with the last stuff...my point still stands).

If they weren't trying so hard to cover stuff up last year and were more transparent about working on getting stuff out, they wouldn't be in such a time crunch.

OH BS

You would have to read and redact 9600 pages a day for a YEAR in this dump alone. Trump has only been in office a year.


But they weren't working on it. They had a dog and pony show with stupid ass binders. The AG claimed she had the files to be released then crawfished bigly.
this is untrue, they worked very hard on it. maybe harder than anything else they've worked on.

it's just that the work they were doing was to gaslight everyone into believing there's nothing to see here, it's all a hoax, there are no files, you're a traitor for even caring, move on, ignore anything you see about dear leader in th files
austinAG90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This whole thing is nothing but a bunch of horny ****** bags that got blackmailed after sleeping with young girls and some pros when they shouldn't have. No Mossad or government sponsored spying. In terms of of intelligence or information this is a hoax and nothing but a list of guys we could do without.
Old McDonald
How long do you want to ignore this user?
austinAG90 said:

This whole thing is nothing but a bunch of horny ****** bags that got blackmailed after sleeping with young girls and some pros when they shouldn't have. No Mossad or government sponsored spying. In terms of of intelligence or information this is a hoax and nothing but a list of guys we could do without.
that sure is an interesting way to describe pedophilia
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

No Mossad or government sponsored spying.


Well that settles it
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Old McDonald said:

austinAG90 said:

This whole thing is nothing but a bunch of horny ****** bags that got blackmailed after sleeping with young girls and some pros when they shouldn't have. No Mossad or government sponsored spying. In terms of of intelligence or information this is a hoax and nothing but a list of guys we could do without.
that sure is an interesting way to describe pedophilia


Do we really need to keep doing this? Is there anything at all pointing to pedophilia? Words mean things.
First Page Last Page
Page 177 of 196
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.