DOJ: Epstein killed himself, no client list

588,512 Views | 6776 Replies | Last: 3 hrs ago by Zachary Klement
flown-the-coop
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Tea Party • 10:27a, 2/12/26
AG
Tea Party said:
flown-the-coop said:
Tea Party said:
You want Congress to do the job of the DOJ?

Cheap deflection, see above.

You said why aren't Massie and Ro creating a list, investigating, and prosecuting. I can quote your own words for you if you like , though I know what you meant and am just pointing out your excessive hatred towards Massie when it's somewhat misguided.

And to go along with your non sequitur above, you have proof that Massie is not asking the DOJ to do those things?

No, but he had an opportunity to ask her just recently, didn't he

My hatred is Massie is well placed. And it's good to see more and more are recognizing him for the fraud he is.

You lean libertarian so he's your boy. Enjoy. I think your support of him is laughably misguided.
Reply Quote
flown-the-coop
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Less Evil Hank Scorpio • 10:28a, 2/12/26
AG
I didn't defend her answers. See the thread on the hearing, then get back to me.
Reply Quote
1981 Monte Carlo
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:32a, 2/12/26
I don't care about hookers being banged by rich and famous perverts. I want our supposed "leaders" to investigate the horrific stuff. i.e. Epstein mocking a girl who said that Jesus would protect her by saying "whoops". Other talk about young children and crazy deviant sexually perverted acts.

Why isn't Massie or anyone else reading those emails?
Reply Quote
1
David_Puddy
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to 1981 Monte Carlo • 10:39a, 2/12/26
AG
1981 Monte Carlo said:
I don't care about hookers being banged by rich and famous perverts. I want our supposed "leaders" to investigate the horrific stuff. i.e. Epstein mocking a girl who said that Jesus would protect her by saying "whoops". Other talk about young children and crazy deviant sexually perverted acts.

Why isn't Massie or anyone else reading those emails?


Totally agree and I can't quite figure him out. Some days I think he's doing good, but others make it completely seem like he's bought and paid for to push a narrative. You bring up a lot of good points about the guy, and until he starts naming some names of the unredacted people that he supposedly saw who are elites in the files, I'm going to take everything he does and says with a grain of salt. Until someone stands up to the elites, this is all a charade to me. People want justice and consequences........well at least the normal people do. The libs are still too brainwashed and on the Trump witch hunt to ever unite with the middle of the road American citizens who want these people to suffer the consequences for the horrendous acts that they brought upon innocent children.
Reply Quote
1
DeschutesAg
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to David_Puddy • 10:44a, 2/12/26
Massie and Ro have named names.

They also stated that the unredacted files are still heavily redacted. And dozens of Congress members confirmed this.
Reply Quote
13
1981 Monte Carlo
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to DeschutesAg • 10:53a, 2/12/26
DeschutesAg said:
Massie and Ro have named names.

They also stated that the unredacted files are still heavily redacted. And dozens of Congress members confirmed this.

The ONLY way to get mainstream Americans to really focus on this is to induce this type of reaction from them. They need to be shocked...made extremely uncomfortable.



Spotlight only the most gruesome and horrific emails that seem to HEAVILY IMPLY sexual crimes including possible torture and murder of innocent young children. Pressure Bondi to pursue this stuff. Force her hand, and if she wants to hang herself, she can. Maybe she will even say that forensic investigations have determined that some of these emails were fake, and purposefully over-the-top, as a means to discredit the rest...I am open to that as a very distant possibility. BUT PUT THE FOCUS ON THE MOST HORRIFIC.

Anyone who has ever lived in a city knows that sex trafficking of young adult women and 16-17 year olds has always happened. It is very wrong, but it doesn't move the needle for most. After hours mexican and central american night clubs are crawling with this type of stuff.

We need Massie to read the emails of Epstein taunting his young victims for their faith in Jesus. We need him to showcase the "i enjoyed the torture video" stuff.

Even without names, that rattles the bones and stirs the gut of every normal sane person.
Reply Quote
5 edits
PaulsBunions
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:08a, 2/12/26
AG


DJT simply does not understand how badly he is losing on this issue
Reply Quote
24
PaulsBunions
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:10a, 2/12/26
AG
Reply Quote
2
1981 Monte Carlo
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to PaulsBunions • 11:12a, 2/12/26
PaulsBunions said:


DJT simply does not understand how badly he is losing on this issue

It's crazy. I have seen quite a few MAGA buddies just about completely flip on him over the issue. I have to believe he is either (a) protecting some buddies, or (b) has been put on notice that they won't miss 'next time' by the CIA or something. Any other rational/reasonable hypothetical explanations anyone can come up with, I'm all ears.

It makes no sense to me. If Trump is going to ridicule people for focusing on these disgusting crimes, he needs to explain himself. Just blasting people for their interest in this AFTER THAT IS ONE OF THE MAJOR THINGS YOU RAN ON, is not enough. It's absurd...it's angering the base. He needs to explain himself...why we need to move on...unfortunately that is one area he has traditionally sucked.
Reply Quote
15
1 edit
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to 1981 Monte Carlo • 11:14a, 2/12/26
This was not a major thing he ran on. In fact, he would never commit on if he would be willing to release all the files.

I'm Gipper
Reply Quote
Yukon Cornelius
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to 1981 Monte Carlo • 11:15a, 2/12/26
AG
Probably has something to do with a certain foreign leader constantly coming to the WH. Seven times to be exact. No one else has been to visit as frequently.
Reply Quote
7
1 edit
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Yukon Cornelius • 11:16a, 2/12/26
Yukon Cornelius said:
Probably has something to do with a certain foreign leader constantly coming to the WH.


The Jews! I knew it!!

I'm Gipper
Reply Quote
1
1981 Monte Carlo
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Im Gipper • 11:17a, 2/12/26
Im Gipper said:
This was not a major thing he ran on. In fact, he would never commit on if he would be willing to release all the files.

I disagree...along with the below, I have my memory of it...

Quote:
While campaigning in 2024, Trump said he would release the files

In June 2024, Fox and Friends co-host Rachel Campos-Duffy asked Trump if he would declassify various files, including those related to 9/11 and former President John F Kennedy.

"Would you declassify the Epstein files?" Campos-Duffy said.

"Yeah, yeah, I would," Trump said.

The clip spread on social media, and Trump's campaign account also shared it.


Also, remember the "Binders" charade?

Reply Quote
13
1 edit
Yukon Cornelius
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Im Gipper • 11:17a, 2/12/26
AG
Well Epstein didn't flee to Russia or China to negotiate his plea deal extradition free from haha
Reply Quote
6
PaulsBunions
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Im Gipper • 11:18a, 2/12/26
AG
Im Gipper said:
This was not a major thing he ran on. In fact, he would never commit on if he would be willing to release all the files.


50 weeks now since he sent his little sycophants out of the White House with these binders lol

Reply Quote
16
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to 1981 Monte Carlo • 11:20a, 2/12/26
Why did you leave out the key parts? Be better.

Campos-Duffy: Would you declassify the Epstein files?
Trump: Yeah, yeah, I would.

Campos-Duffy: All right.
Trump: I guess I would. I think that less so because, you don't know, you don't want to affect people's lives if it's phony stuff in there, because it's a lot of phony stuff with that whole world. But I think I would, or at least

Campos-Duffy: Do you think that would restore trust help restore trust.
Trump: Yeah. I don't know about Epstein so much as I do the others. Certainly about the way he died. It'd be interesting to find out what happened there, because that was a weird situation and the cameras didn't happen to be working, etc., etc. But yeah, I'd go a long way toward that one.





I'm Gipper
Reply Quote
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to PaulsBunions • 11:22a, 2/12/26
Quote:
50 weeks now since he sent his little sycophants out of the White House with these binders lo


Yep. And I have made fun of that as much as anyone here.


Yet, that has nothing to do with the campaign. It was never a "major issue" for him. It's a complete fabrication to say it was.

I'm Gipper
Reply Quote
1 edit
1981 Monte Carlo
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Im Gipper • 11:25a, 2/12/26
Im Gipper said:
Why did you leave out the key parts? Be better.

Campos-Duffy: Would you declassify the Epstein files?
Trump: Yeah, yeah, I would.

Campos-Duffy: All right.
Trump: I guess I would. I think that less so because, you don't know, you don't want to affect people's lives if it's phony stuff in there, because it's a lot of phony stuff with that whole world. But I think I would, or at least

Campos-Duffy: Do you think that would restore trust help restore trust.
Trump: Yeah. I don't know about Epstein so much as I do the others. Certainly about the way he died. It'd be interesting to find out what happened there, because that was a weird situation and the cameras didn't happen to be working, etc., etc. But yeah, I'd go a long way toward that one.

Bro, he has reversed HARD.

But let's set aside the hair splitting.

Numerous emails that have surfaced WHICH ARE ON THE DOJ SITE...are highly disturbing and reference child rape, torture etc etc. Lot's of talk about children.

Trump needs to convince us that those were entirely fake and explain the reasoning behind that or this never goes away.

Bashing his base for caring about this is f'n ******ed. The nerve.
Reply Quote
11
1 edit
ETFan
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to 1981 Monte Carlo • 11:28a, 2/12/26
1981 Monte Carlo said:
PaulsBunions said:


DJT simply does not understand how badly he is losing on this issue

It's crazy. I have seen quite a few MAGA buddies just about completely flip on him over the issue. I have to believe he is either (a) protecting some buddies, or (b) has been put on notice that they won't miss 'next time' by the CIA or something. Any other rational/reasonable hypothetical explanations anyone can come up with, I'm all ears.

It makes no sense to me. If Trump is going to ridicule people for focusing on these disgusting crimes, he needs to explain himself. Just blasting people for their interest in this AFTER THAT IS ONE OF THE MAJOR THINGS YOU RAN ON, is not enough. It's absurd...it's angering the base. He needs to explain himself...why we need to move on...unfortunately that is one area he has traditionally sucked.


I reckon it's A, B, and C. He's also involved.

Or he's squeaky clean, if only Pam wasnt redacting the perpetrators names...
Reply Quote
6
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to 1981 Monte Carlo • 11:29a, 2/12/26
Bro: he has always maintained from the beginning that he was hesitant to release all the files. That is a fact. He has not reversed anything.

It is not splitting hairs to set the record straight.

However, he has handled this abysmally from the get go. It seems to be getting even worse!

I'm Gipper
Reply Quote
1 edit
1981 Monte Carlo
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Im Gipper • 11:39a, 2/12/26
Im Gipper said:
Bro: he has always maintained from the beginning that he was hesitant to release all the files. That is a fact. He has not reversed anything.

It is not splitting hairs to set the record straight.

However, he has handled this abysmally from the get go. It seems to be getting even worse!

No one cares about the mundane stuff aka ALL of the files. It's the stuff about sex with children, torture etc. Also the deep state corrupt activities that Mike Benz has laid out, which has been going on for decades. All of us have been metaphorically raped, and that needs to be exposed to the masses too.

Trump just wants us to pretend we didn't see an email from Epstein mocking one of his victims for beliving Jesus was watching over her..."Whoops" mocked Epstein. Or an email from a Sultan talking about torture vids. Or to pretend it doesn't matter, because he is doing other things for the country.

He better have a damn good reason for ridiculing us for caring about such unimaginable heinous and evil stuff. But just "nuh uh! stop! you're crazy!" doesn't cut it.
Reply Quote
5
2 edits
1981 Monte Carlo
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to ETFan • 11:44a, 2/12/26
ETFan said:
1981 Monte Carlo said:
PaulsBunions said:


DJT simply does not understand how badly he is losing on this issue

It's crazy. I have seen quite a few MAGA buddies just about completely flip on him over the issue. I have to believe he is either (a) protecting some buddies, or (b) has been put on notice that they won't miss 'next time' by the CIA or something. Any other rational/reasonable hypothetical explanations anyone can come up with, I'm all ears.

It makes no sense to me. If Trump is going to ridicule people for focusing on these disgusting crimes, he needs to explain himself. Just blasting people for their interest in this AFTER THAT IS ONE OF THE MAJOR THINGS YOU RAN ON, is not enough. It's absurd...it's angering the base. He needs to explain himself...why we need to move on...unfortunately that is one area he has traditionally sucked.


I reckon it's A, B, and C. He's also involved.

Or he's squeaky clean, if only Pam wasnt redacting the perpetrators names...

So you are one of the ones that believe he is unimaginably evil, but also very brilliant. That he reported Epstein two decades ago and called Ghislaine "evil" as a pre-emptive diversion tactic to give himself cover for raping and abusing children many years later. Banned them from Mar-a-Lago on top of that to shake everyone off his scent.

500D chess is what you're going with right? Oh, and he's also extremely patient and deliberate and really good at playing the long game. That's your claim?
Reply Quote
2
3 edits
FWTXAg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to PaulsBunions • 11:51a, 2/12/26
AG
PaulsBunions said:


DJT simply does not understand how badly he is losing on this issue



Trump is hanging on by a thread at this point. Him and his cabinet, JD Vance, etc are all finished.

This is the biggest crack in the Deep State that we've ever seen.

Remember when aginlakeway and other defenders said nobody cared about this? Ahahahahahahaha
Reply Quote
19
Zachary Klement
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to FWTXAg • 12:20p, 2/12/26
AG
Dude is off his rocker. I think he has lost the goodwill of most, if not all, of the people that voted for him that are not hardcore MAGA.
Reply Quote
20
AgDev01
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to PaulsBunions • 12:26p, 2/12/26
AG
PaulsBunions said:
From the tweet -

"Actually, it is the SLIMEBALL Democrats, many of the big Donors and Politicians, that have been proven GUILTY!"


There are a lot of Democrats that certainly need to be investigated based on what has been released, and if he believes there is information that proves them guilty, why has the Trump DOJ not arrested anyone? Why are they stating there are no on-going investigations and why in the **** is he calling it a hoax?
Reply Quote
10
1 edit
ETFan
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to 1981 Monte Carlo • 12:41p, 2/12/26
1981 Monte Carlo said:
ETFan said:
1981 Monte Carlo said:
PaulsBunions said:


DJT simply does not understand how badly he is losing on this issue

It's crazy. I have seen quite a few MAGA buddies just about completely flip on him over the issue. I have to believe he is either (a) protecting some buddies, or (b) has been put on notice that they won't miss 'next time' by the CIA or something. Any other rational/reasonable hypothetical explanations anyone can come up with, I'm all ears.

It makes no sense to me. If Trump is going to ridicule people for focusing on these disgusting crimes, he needs to explain himself. Just blasting people for their interest in this AFTER THAT IS ONE OF THE MAJOR THINGS YOU RAN ON, is not enough. It's absurd...it's angering the base. He needs to explain himself...why we need to move on...unfortunately that is one area he has traditionally sucked.


I reckon it's A, B, and C. He's also involved.

Or he's squeaky clean, if only Pam wasnt redacting the perpetrators names...

So you are one of the ones that believe he is unimaginably evil, but also very brilliant. That he reported Epstein two decades ago and called Ghislaine "evil" as a pre-emptive diversion tactic to give himself cover for raping and abusing children many years later. Banned them from Mar-a-Lago on top of that to shake everyone off his scent.

500D chess is what you're going with right? Oh, and he's also extremely patient and deliberate and really good at playing the long game. That's your claim?


This is a Wendy's sir, I said none of that. If anyone is playing 500D chess it's his last few defenders. "If we can just just get this red piece near the queen..."
Reply Quote
4
Rapier108
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Zachary Klement • 12:45p, 2/12/26
Zachary Klement said:
Dude is off his rocker. I think he has lost the goodwill of most, if not all, of the people that voted for him that are not hardcore MAGA.

Most people simply do not care about Epstein. Trump hurts himself far more with random stupid **** he says.

While you and most others on this thread see it as the only issue in the entire world, the vast majority of voters are concerned about the economy, immigration, and foreign issues like Iran and Russia/Ukraine. The only people who focus on it are those on the left who want to get Trump, and those on the right who see it as Q 2.0. If voters have to base their votes on being able to provide food, or see more convoluted Epstein files; all but the obsessed diehards will pick #1 every single time.

As long as you Epsteiners live in your own feedback bubble, you're always going to think the rest of the country feels just like you. News flash, it does not.

And no matter what you claim, most of the Epsteiners here only care about this issue because they want to get Trump, and it is easy to see because posting history does not lie. Hell, many of you Epsteiners rarely if ever posted on F16 before (other than the occasional drive by post filled with leftist talking points) until you found this thread and decided it was the best way to "get Trump."
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Reply Quote
1
Tea Party
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Rapier108 • 12:51p, 2/12/26
Rapier108 said:
Zachary Klement said:
Dude is off his rocker. I think he has lost the goodwill of most, if not all, of the people that voted for him that are not hardcore MAGA.

Most people simply do not care about Epstein. Trump hurts himself far more with random stupid **** he says.

While you and most others on this thread see it as the only issue in the entire world, the vast majority of voters are concerned about the economy, immigration, and foreign issues like Iran and Russia/Ukraine. The only people who focus on it are those on the left who want to get Trump, and those on the right who see it as Q 2.0. If voters have to base their votes on being able to provide food, or see more convoluted Epstein files; all but the obsessed diehards will pick #1 every single time.

As long as you Epsteiners live in your own feedback bubble, you're always going to think the rest of the country feels just like you. News flash, it does not.

And no matter what you claim, most of the Epsteiners here only care about this issue because they want to get Trump, and it is easy to see because posting history does not lie. Hell, many of you Epsteiners rarely if ever posted on F16 before (other than the occasional drive by post filled with leftist talking points) until you found this thread and decided it was the best way to "get Trump."

Irony
Learn about the Texas Nationalist Movement
https://tnm.me
Reply Quote
17
Line Ate Member
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Rapier108 • 12:55p, 2/12/26
AG
Rapier108 said:
Zachary Klement said:
Dude is off his rocker. I think he has lost the goodwill of most, if not all, of the people that voted for him that are not hardcore MAGA.

Most people simply do not care about Epstein. Trump hurts himself far more with random stupid **** he says.

While you and most others on this thread see it as the only issue in the entire world, the vast majority of voters are concerned about the economy, immigration, and foreign issues like Iran and Russia/Ukraine. The only people who focus on it are those on the left who want to get Trump, and those on the right who see it as Q 2.0. If voters have to base their votes on being able to provide food, or see more convoluted Epstein files; all but the obsessed diehards will pick #1 every single time.

As long as you Epsteiners live in your own feedback bubble, you're always going to think the rest of the country feels just like you. News flash, it does not.

And no matter what you claim, most of the Epsteiners here only care about this issue because they want to get Trump, and it is easy to see because posting history does not lie. Hell, many of you Epsteiners rarely if ever posted on F16 before (other than the occasional drive by post filled with leftist talking points) until you found this thread and decided it was the best way to "get Trump."
This. Put out the huge freaking infernos in our country first and then we can focus on these issues.

Very fitting for Democrats to cry bloody murder about this when the same files were more than abled to be declassified with Biden.

I freaking hate politics sometimes.
Reply Quote
1
DeschutesAg
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to 1981 Monte Carlo • 12:57p, 2/12/26
1981 Monte Carlo said:
PaulsBunions said:


DJT simply does not understand how badly he is losing on this issue

It's crazy. I have seen quite a few MAGA buddies just about completely flip on him over the issue. I have to believe he is either (a) protecting some buddies, or (b) has been put on notice that they won't miss 'next time' by the CIA or something. Any other rational/reasonable hypothetical explanations anyone can come up with, I'm all ears.

It makes no sense to me. If Trump is going to ridicule people for focusing on these disgusting crimes, he needs to explain himself. Just blasting people for their interest in this AFTER THAT IS ONE OF THE MAJOR THINGS YOU RAN ON, is not enough. It's absurd...it's angering the base. He needs to explain himself...why we need to move on...unfortunately that is one area he has traditionally sucked.


It makes total sense if we accept he has things to hide and his name is found many many thousands of times in these files. He was one of Epstein's closest friends for 15 years. At a minimum, he knew what Epstein was doing, and he kept on partying and socializing with him. Trump may even have been directly involved in some of those things.

The birthday card to Epstein, which Trump denied drawing and authoring, has been verified. The secret meetings between Ghislaine and Trump lawyer Todd Blanche, followed by Ghislaine being moved to a Club Fed minimum security prison. The 12 months, and still counting, of obstructing the release of the files. Trump telling all his supporters and his podcaster groupies to "move on". Mike Johnson and 95% of the GOP Congress obstructing the release of the files.

How much smoke does a person need to see before they realize there is a fire?
Reply Quote
16
Pichael Thompson
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:02p, 2/12/26
Epstein was a huge pedo perv that hung out with a bunch of liberal entertainers & politicians

Lib voters - "this is damning for Trump & the republicans party"



Lolz

Please never change, Libs
Reply Quote
3
Zachary Klement
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Rapier108 • 1:07p, 2/12/26
AG
Rapier108 said:
Zachary Klement said:
Dude is off his rocker. I think he has lost the goodwill of most, if not all, of the people that voted for him that are not hardcore MAGA.

Most people simply do not care about Epstein. Trump hurts himself far more with random stupid **** he says.

While you and most others on this thread see it as the only issue in the entire world, the vast majority of voters are concerned about the economy, immigration, and foreign issues like Iran and Russia/Ukraine. The only people who focus on it are those on the left who want to get Trump, and those on the right who see it as Q 2.0. If voters have to base their votes on being able to provide food, or see more convoluted Epstein files; all but the obsessed diehards will pick #1 every single time.

As long as you Epsteiners live in your own feedback bubble, you're always going to think the rest of the country feels just like you. News flash, it does not.

And no matter what you claim, most of the Epsteiners here only care about this issue because they want to get Trump, and it is easy to see because posting history does not lie. Hell, many of you Epsteiners rarely if ever posted on F16 before (other than the occasional drive by post filled with leftist talking points) until you found this thread and decided it was the best way to "get Trump."

This is hilarious. I have been old enough to vote in three elections. In all three elections, I have voted for Trump. I was rocking a MAGA hat on campus during my freshman year of college. I don't want to "get" Trump. I do not think that Trump engaged in illicit acts with minors. I do think he has handled this issue horribly and communicated about it incredibly poorly, as he often does. I do think it is apparent that many people in our government or in positions of power are being covered for by our government.

Most of the people that I know that are around my age, care about the Epstein files. I think the people that do not care about them are either 1) people who are not plugged in and do not follow politics generally 2) diehard MAGA fanboys 3) those that continue to eat up Fox News mainstream media slop and believe that their politicians care about them.

There are other issues in the world. How is the economy doing? Thriving? Everyone is able to afford groceries? Starter homes aren't half a million dollars? The Dow is over 50,000!

Immigration? Sure, we are more secure now than under Biden, but Trump continues to scale back on deportations and his rhetoric about them. At the rate things are going, we are not going to come close to deporting those who immigrated here illegally during the Biden admin alone.

Trump has said he could solve the Ukraine-Russia war in 24 hours, yet here we are, year four of the conflict!

We are about to get involved in Iran again. Do you think that is what a majority off Americans want?

You say "Epsteiners" live in their own feedback bubble, take a look in the mirror. The diehard Trump guys on here embody that.
Reply Quote
16
1 edit
Zachary Klement
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Line Ate Member • 1:13p, 2/12/26
AG
Line Ate Member said:
Rapier108 said:
Zachary Klement said:
Dude is off his rocker. I think he has lost the goodwill of most, if not all, of the people that voted for him that are not hardcore MAGA.

Most people simply do not care about Epstein. Trump hurts himself far more with random stupid **** he says.

While you and most others on this thread see it as the only issue in the entire world, the vast majority of voters are concerned about the economy, immigration, and foreign issues like Iran and Russia/Ukraine. The only people who focus on it are those on the left who want to get Trump, and those on the right who see it as Q 2.0. If voters have to base their votes on being able to provide food, or see more convoluted Epstein files; all but the obsessed diehards will pick #1 every single time.

As long as you Epsteiners live in your own feedback bubble, you're always going to think the rest of the country feels just like you. News flash, it does not.

And no matter what you claim, most of the Epsteiners here only care about this issue because they want to get Trump, and it is easy to see because posting history does not lie. Hell, many of you Epsteiners rarely if ever posted on F16 before (other than the occasional drive by post filled with leftist talking points) until you found this thread and decided it was the best way to "get Trump."

This. Put out the huge freaking infernos in our country first and then we can focus on these issues.

Very fitting for Democrats to cry bloody murder about this when the same files were more than abled to be declassified with Biden.

I freaking hate politics sometimes.

I am not a democrat.

I did not have any faith in the Biden admin, nor did Biden and his admin make numerous comments about releasing the files and how horrible the conspiracy was.

Why are people shocked that a number of Trump voters that care about this issue are upset that they were gaslit?
Reply Quote
11
B-1 83
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TA-OP • 1:23p, 2/12/26
AG
TA-OP said:
RogerFurlong said:
Trump's DOJ is slowly leaking this out. They'll release something to bury the democrats or exonerate Trump right before mid terms. They're going to make the democrats and Massie fight for it first though.

Also, why is Bondi getting so much heat for releasing the files when Obama and Biden did nothing about it? I'm sure that questions been asked and dodged in this thread a million times before though.

The whataboutism is just a way for the right to shirk responsibility. President Trump promised exposure and accountability. Congress passed a law mandating Bondi's DOJ release the files. Previous admins deserve all the criticism you want to give, but this one promised and then was compelled by law and still thinks the play is to protect pedophiles. And, everyone goaltending for them is a hypocrite.

26 people starred this, but perhaps you can explain exactly how they are "protecting" pedophiles and the indisputable evidence out there that could make an iron-clad case against any of the accused. This #$&@ has to go to trial, and with all of the absolute BS floating around about child sacrifices, bodies on Trump's golf course he didn't own, pickled kid's feet, etc…….your obvious legal expertise is waiting to shine. How would you put together the cases for the prosecution, and what evidence and witnesses would you present?
Being in TexAgs jail changes a man……..no, not really
Reply Quote
1
AgDev01
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to B-1 83 • 1:28p, 2/12/26
AG
B-1 83 said:
26 people starred this, but perhaps you can explain exactly how they are "protecting" pedophiles and the indisputable evidence out there that could make an iron-clad case against any of the accused. This #$&@ has to go to trial, and with all of the absolute BS floating around about child sacrifices, bodies on Trump's golf course he didn't own, pickled kid's feet, etc…….your obvious legal expertise is waiting to shine. How would you put together the cases for the prosecution, and what evidence and witnesses would you present?


Look a few posts up where the President just said there are folks who are PROVEN to be guilty. IF that is the case it seems like it should be easy for his DOJ to prosecute them.
Reply Quote
6
1 edit
First Page Last Page
Page 191 of 194 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.