The admin is not ignoring the law. Thats a laughable lie.

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

TA-OP said:

---

B-1 83 said:

---

How would you put together the cases for the prosecution, and what evidence and witnesses would you present?

---

Not sure why you felt the need to single me out when there's plenty others arguing the exact same thing. We're being lied to and gaslit and the best the self-proclaimed conservatives here can do is goal tend.

Regarding your question… it's impossible to put together any sort of case because the GOP-controlled government, the ones calling middle Americans like me false Christians and a worshiper of evil, will not comply with the letter of the law and actually release the un-redacted files. But, you know that already.

---

Why didn't Biden or team blue ever go after Trump? Lord knows they tried everything else...spying, fake hoaxes, impeachment, imprisonment, assasinations etc etc.

---

Doesn't matter at this point, there's a law, signed by Trump himself.

There are legitimate answers to your question, but again, really irrelevant at this point.

ETFan said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

The admin is not ignoring the law. Thats a laughable lie.

---

Breaking my own rule here since youre brazenly lying. The administration is breaking the law. The end.


This can not be argued.

---

Actively complying with is not ignoring.

Have files been released? Okay, then they are not ignoring.

You can say they have not fully complied, timely complied, etc.

But it is an absolute lie to say they are ignoring. They are ignoring it about as effectively as your promise to ignore me.

TA-OP said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

ETFan said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

The admin is not ignoring the law. Thats a laughable lie.

---

Breaking my own rule here since youre brazenly lying. The administration is breaking the law. The end.


This can not be argued.

---

Actively complying with is not ignoring.

Have files been released? Okay, then they are not ignoring.

You can say they have not fully complied, timely complied, etc.

But it is an absolute lie to say they are ignoring. They are ignoring it about as effectively as your promise to ignore me.

---

You want to go semantics? Fine. They're not ignoring the law, just flat out breaking it. There. Reframe that.

---

You would get no impartial court to agree with you. None.

They timeline was ludicrous, the redaction and reasons for were never going to happen within that deadline, and the put nothing in the bill to address non compliance or delayed compliance. I will again ask why is that.

It's not semantics. It's just the state of things. Why are they talking impeachment of Bondi and not contempt? See above for why.

Purely political, not legal.

AgDev01 said:

---

B-1 83 said:

---

26 people starred this, but perhaps you can explain exactly how they are "protecting" pedophiles and the indisputable evidence out there that could make an iron-clad case against any of the accused. This #$&@ has to go to trial, and with all of the absolute BS floating around about child sacrifices, bodies on Trump's golf course he didn't own, pickled kid's feet, etc…….your obvious legal expertise is waiting to shine. How would you put together the cases for the prosecution, and what evidence and witnesses would you present?

---

Look a few posts up where the President just said there are folks who are PROVEN to be guilty. IF that is the case it seems like it should be easy for his DOJ to prosecute them.

---

Nobody is proven guilty until they go through court……there is the problem……lawyers.

I saw this email at DOJ today. This is a political figure who shouldn't have been redacted. It’s a direct violation of @RepThomasMassie and my Epstein Files Transparency Act. @TheJusticeDept should unredact it immediately. https://t.co/AAKxDtbCZW pic.twitter.com/0oRvNrW9EE

— Rep. Ro Khanna (@RepRoKhanna) February 12, 2026

PaulsBunions said:

---

I saw this email at DOJ today. This is a political figure who shouldn't have been redacted. It’s a direct violation of @RepThomasMassie and my Epstein Files Transparency Act. @TheJusticeDept should unredact it immediately. https://t.co/AAKxDtbCZW pic.twitter.com/0oRvNrW9EE

— Rep. Ro Khanna (@RepRoKhanna) February 12, 2026

---

WTF is it with uber rich elites writing borderline incoherent emails and sounding like a bunch of half-literates? Is it a "lizard people" thing?

Has anyone else noticed the bad gramar and lazy nonsensical writing patterns?

Created a Py script and used a modified agent in @Agent0ai .

Here you go:

The Sender: Gwendolyn Beck — A Forensic Deduction
The redacted sender of this email — document EFTA_R1_00605090 from the Epstein Files Transparency Act release — is almost certainly Gwendolyn Joyce Beck,…

— Michai Mathieu Morin (@MichaiMorin) February 12, 2026

Would.

🔺PAM BONDI JUST PLAYED THE GREATEST TRAP IN POLITICAL HISTORY.

And Congress walked right into it.

Yesterday, Attorney General Pam Bondi sat before the House Judiciary Committee. Standard oversight hearing. Routine questions.

Then she pulled out a document.

Labeled: "Jayapal…

— Mr. Pool (@MrPool_QQ) February 12, 2026

Lol
I'm not a buyer that's what happened

PaulsBunions said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

ETFan said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

The admin is not ignoring the law. Thats a laughable lie.

---

Breaking my own rule here since youre brazenly lying. The administration is breaking the law. The end.


This can not be argued.

---

Actively complying with is not ignoring.

Have files been released? Okay, then they are not ignoring.

You can say they have not fully complied, timely complied, etc.

But it is an absolute lie to say they are ignoring. They are ignoring it about as effectively as your promise to ignore me.

---

"Hey Mr IRS man i'm paying my taxes $1 at a time I'm complying even though I'm technically 4 months late"

The length of the leash you are willing to give Incompetent DC bureaucrats is amazing lol

---

There are fines for not paying your taxes on time. Its written into the code. Next time you want to make a poor comparison, know your facts.

Why did Ro/Massie forget the important part?

BTW - Massie is getting destroyed on The Five. By all five.

Please tell me that's satire

I would guess so but I have no idea. I just read it.

I guess this really is the hill trump's willing to die on

Trump: "I don't understand why the Jeffrey Epstein case would be of interest to anybody. It's pretty boring stuff. I think really only pretty bad people, including fake news, want to keep something like that going." pic.twitter.com/5oGlqg61QN

— AlexandruC4 (@AlexandruC4) February 12, 2026

so what? Bandi going to prosecute a congress person for looking up their own name?

That video was from July.

The laugh by Lutnick is even creepier now than it was then.

Yukon Cornelius said:

---

so what? Bandi going to prosecute a congress person for looking up their own name?

---

They tracked searches so they could try to come up with defenses for specific redactions I would assume. Nothing more.

Unfortunately for them they failed, and will continue to.

I think a multitude of things are coexisting.
1. Democrats most certainly only care about the Epstein case to "get Trump".
2. Trump for whatever reason, I have my speculations, wants the Epstein case to go away.
3. Which in turns fuels the democrats newly found position of protecting minors. Nevermind they still groom and mutilate their genitals.
4. The Republican Party is split between those who have always cared about Epstein and those who only support Trump
5 and I hope there is emerging a base of people who are recognizing the moral faults of both parties and seek a new open in the future.

Yukon Cornelius said:

---

I think a multitude of things are coexisting.
1. Democrats most certainly only care about the Epstein case to "get Trump".
2. Trump for whatever reason, I have my speculations, wants the Epstein case to go away.
3. Which in turns fuels the democrats newly found position of protecting minors. Nevermind they still groom and mutilate their genitals.
4. The Republican Party is split between those who have always cared about Epstein and those who only support Trump
5 and I hope there is emerging a base of people who are recognizing the moral faults of both parties and seek a new open in the future.

---

I don't care whatever which party, Dems or Reps, bloviates about Epstein. As a middle of the road American, I want this exposed. I have no "got him" motive.

I'm not saying you do. But there was zero effort by democrats to expose anything until Trump didn't want to.

Nvmd

TA-OP said:

---

Yukon Cornelius said:

---

I think a multitude of things are coexisting.
1. Democrats most certainly only care about the Epstein case to "get Trump".
2. Trump for whatever reason, I have my speculations, wants the Epstein case to go away.
3. Which in turns fuels the democrats newly found position of protecting minors. Nevermind they still groom and mutilate their genitals.
4. The Republican Party is split between those who have always cared about Epstein and those who only support Trump
5 and I hope there is emerging a base of people who are recognizing the moral faults of both parties and seek a new open in the future.

---

I don't care whatever which party, Dems or Reps, bloviates about Epstein. As a middle of the road American, I want this exposed. I have no "got him" motive.

---

I think the majority of America could be considered middle of the road. However, with all of the trans craziness, supporting illegals getting our hard earn tax dollars, defending fraud. etc......middle of the road people are now considered "far right." I mean how in the hell are people opposed to showing a valid U.S. ID to vote. What world are we living in? The only reason democrats care about illegals is for the upcoming census and ensuring that Republicans never have the House again. If Gavin gets elected, the border will be wide open again until the 2030 census.

The Democrat party has been hijacked by crazy people and we can think Obama for that. The Republican party is in a battle between the representatives wanting to be left alone and our tax dollars going to better our country and the old war mongering neo cons like Mitch McConnell and Lindsey Graham. There is very little reason we should be involved in any war and our military could wipe any country out, but until representatives on both sides stop their money laundering schemes through wars, it's a moot point. Why was so much of our hard earned money going to Ukraine when we've got hundreds of thousands of vets out on the streets and sh-tty roads in a lot of places?

Take Charlie Kirk for instance. He was making a massive impact across the young voting population at colleges around the country. He was also probably the biggest ally of Trump, besides Trump's own family. He was simply opening people's minds to ideas that were the opposite of these liberally indoctrinated colleges all over the place. And most importantly he was leading a lot of people to Jesus Christ. And he was shot for it. This Epstein stuff being exposed should be a complete eye opening, turning point in our country. These people are satanic and evil and must be stopped.

TA-OP said:

---

Yukon Cornelius said:

---

I'm not saying you do. But there was zero effort by democrats to expose anything until Trump didn't want to.

---

And? What's more important, constantly drilling the failure of President Biden's administration or doing something about it now? There's no reason child abusers should need pages on pages of what-about. Everything is right there. Don't gas-light America, President Trump. This isn't a "Democratic hoax."

---

I think pretty much all conservatives, and even some democrats (at least the ones who don't push the "minor attracted persons" crap), want anyone proven to be involved in harming children tortured and put to death.

Doesn't matter if it's Trump, my youth group leader, my uncle, my favorite coworker...kill all pedos. But there needs to be proof.

Just because some people don't believe, or don't want to believe that someone they support or voted for harmed children, doesn't mean they are "protecting" that person, or whatever the accusations are.

TA-OP said:

---

Yukon Cornelius said:

---

I'm not saying you do. But there was zero effort by democrats to expose anything until Trump didn't want to.

---

And? What's more important, constantly drilling the failure of President Biden's administration or doing something about it now? There's no reason child abusers should need pages on pages of what-about. Everything is right there. Don't gas-light America, President Trump. This isn't a "Democratic hoax."

---

I'm able to understand nuanced ideas. It can be true the democrats are pushing for transparency on Epstein which is a good thing but also true they have no moral high ground in doing so. They are not motivated by justice but political gain.

Inevitably, people who are not in the Epstein files will share names with people who are in the Epstein files.

I have good reason to believe the Nicola Caputo in EFTA00077895 is NOT the same Nicola Caputo who served as a Member of European Parliament from Italy.

The redacted…

— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) February 12, 2026

sips gonna sip

In August 2015, @UTAustin Professor Thomas K Hubbard, who taught classes about "Child and Adolescent Sexuality" and "Mythology of Rape", sent Jeffrey Epstein a letter requesting $10,000-$20,000 for a planned 2016 conference. pic.twitter.com/5Me0OL3lUq

— Austin Videos (@ATXVideos) February 12, 2026