DOJ: Epstein killed himself, no client list

610,568 Views | 7084 Replies | Last: 16 min ago by J. Walter Weatherman
Silent For Too Long
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Zachary Klement • 2:24p, 2/15/26
Zachary Klement said:
1981 Monte Carlo said:
Zachary Klement said:
Did y'all hear about the two hour interview that Bannon worked on with Epstein in 2019 in an effort to rehabilitate his public image?


Yes but can we focus on the massive money laundering operations and pedophilia instead of trying to "get" people we don't like for just making contact or conversing with the guy?

Working on a documentary to repair the perception of a sex trafficker isn't the same as just chatting with the guy lol


Have you actually watched the interview? The one where he tells Epstein that he's "****ed up" and asks if he's "the devil."

I don't know what the hell Bannon was up to, but I do know the media is deliberately lying when they say Bannon was trying to rehabilitate his image
Reply Quote
1 edit
Jugstore Cowboy
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Silent For Too Long • 2:26p, 2/15/26
AG
Where can I watch it?
Reply Quote
Silent For Too Long
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:27p, 2/15/26
Reply Quote
1
Keyno
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Zachary Klement • 2:29p, 2/15/26
What the heck is the King, ELVIS PRESLEY, doing in there
Reply Quote
AggieVictor10
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Keyno • 3:59p, 2/15/26
AG
I'm waiting on Candace Owens to tell us.
Reply Quote
5
DeschutesAg
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Silent For Too Long • 4:34p, 2/15/26
Silent For Too Long said:
I don't know what the hell Bannon was up to, but I do know the media is deliberately lying when they say Bannon was trying to rehabilitate his image
The hundreds of email chains and phone texting conversations between Bannon and Epstein tell a different story.
Reply Quote
4
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:05p, 2/15/26

I'm Gipper
Reply Quote
6
Silent For Too Long
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to DeschutesAg • 5:10p, 2/15/26
DeschutesAg said:
Silent For Too Long said:
I don't know what the hell Bannon was up to, but I do know the media is deliberately lying when they say Bannon was trying to rehabilitate his image
The hundreds of email chains and phone texting conversations between Bannon and Epstein tell a different story.


Yes, but watch the actual interview.
Reply Quote
Silent For Too Long
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Im Gipper • 5:13p, 2/15/26
David Frost likely sold his interview to Nixon in a similar way.

Bannon had ulterior motives, no question. It's his MO. But if you are just using those texts to paint your entire narrative without watching the actual interview you are not looking at the complete picture.
Reply Quote
5
2 edits
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Silent For Too Long • 7:12a, 2/16/26
That does not appear to be an accurate description of this being just an "interview" in which Bannon pretended to be friendly.

There are over 15 hours of tape. This is all we have seen. Bannon did this to help Epstein prepare for an interview with 60 minutes and to repair his image. That is why Bannon comes across as adversarial. This interview was not meant to public consumption.

I did watch the video. If you are looking at just this video and not understanding that this was part of training exercise and not just an isolated journalist interview, then you are not seeing the whole picture.


Bannon's "ulterior motive" seems to be learn from Epstein how to blackmail people. That would certainly explain the deafening silence from so many "twitter warriors" on Epstein about Bannon.


I'm Gipper
Reply Quote
13
1 edit
unimboti nkum
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:49a, 2/16/26
AG
Just a friendly reminder that Howard Lutnick, who lied to congress about his Epstein ties, was in business with Epstein, and visited his island, is still Commerce Secretary.

Soso nikinombiki maaki dii.
Reply Quote
16
flown-the-coop
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to unimboti nkum • 9:58a, 2/16/26
AG
Give him a shout and ask him to resign.
Reply Quote
1
Zachary Klement
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:23a, 2/16/26
AG
Reply Quote
5
flown-the-coop
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Zachary Klement • 11:42a, 2/16/26
AG
Welcome to Saturday. Tell homeboy to turn his tweet sirens off.
Reply Quote
5
AgDev01
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to flown-the-coop • 12:42p, 2/16/26
AG
flown-the-coop said:
Give him a shout and ask him to resign.



Do you believe he should resign?
Reply Quote
5
flown-the-coop
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to AgDev01 • 12:53p, 2/16/26
AG
I think Lutnick owes some answers.
Reply Quote
PaulsBunions
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Zachary Klement • 4:18p, 2/16/26
AG
Zachary Klement said:


One might say they are no longer working to comply with the law
Reply Quote
14
Queso1
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to PaulsBunions • 4:28p, 2/16/26
AG
Yeah, I don't think this is going to fly.
They paid for their wars with your tax dollars and also with your untaxed dollars. Inflation is theft.
Reply Quote
9
flown-the-coop
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to PaulsBunions • 4:35p, 2/16/26
AG
Or one could tell the truth in that Bondi represented to Grassley that the process was completed.

When Massie and Ro get released from their partying ways I. Marshall Texas they can go through and assess where they think the DOJ did not comply.

But to say they "broke the law" is just lazy.
Reply Quote
David_Puddy
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:03p, 2/16/26
AG
Check out this post from Ellen just 4 days ago. The comments roasted her.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DUq8RR7kRvB/?igsh=MTdvOWllYzhzMHdncQ
Reply Quote
PaulsBunions
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:07p, 2/16/26
AG
Reply Quote
9
flown-the-coop
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:35p, 2/16/26
AG
Yea, but Massie-Ro still look like dumbarses over this ***** Guys past retirement age retiring vs spending money on PR firms and lawyers is not quite the justice for victims people claimed they supported.

Reply Quote
Silent For Too Long
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Im Gipper • 2:20a, 2/17/26
Im Gipper said:
That does not appear to be an accurate description of this being just an "interview" in which Bannon pretended to be friendly.

There are over 15 hours of tape. This is all we have seen. Bannon did this to help Epstein prepare for an interview with 60 minutes and to repair his image. That is why Bannon comes across as adversarial. This interview was not meant to public consumption.

I did watch the video. If you are looking at just this video and not understanding that this was part of training exercise and not just an isolated journalist interview, then you are not seeing the whole picture.


Bannon's "ulterior motive" seems to be learn from Epstein how to blackmail people. That would certainly explain the deafening silence from so many "twitter warriors" on Epstein about Bannon.



Are you aware that the single, solitary source of your narrative is Michael Wolff?
Are you aware that Wolff is a lifelong Democrat?
Are you aware that he has dedicated the last 10 years of his life to profiting off of books about the Trump administration?
Are you aware that these books are filled with outright lies?

Just things you might want to be aware of if you want to appraise the whole picture.
Reply Quote
1
1 edit
Dirty_Mike&the_boys
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:25a, 2/17/26
The ease at which this sociopath sits there with a straight face and says this is beyond the pale. Epstein visited the Clinton White House 17 times and 5 of them he stayed overnight. It's in the national archives WH VISITORS LOGS! Hillary Clinton claims she doesn't recall meeting Jeffrey Epstein despite going to his island at least 6 times and taking regular family trips to his Zorro Ranch all on the Epstein Jet.

"We're going to turn this red Prius into a soup kitchen!"
Reply Quote
3
2 edits
Zachary Klement
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:13a, 2/17/26
AG
Reply Quote
2
Gig em G
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Zachary Klement • 8:29a, 2/17/26
AG
Could some of these accounts possibly been transferred to his estate beneficiaries? Like his brother or his former girlfriend (that's not in prison?)

I have a hard time believing that he's alive but God knows honestly at this point.
Reply Quote
flown-the-coop
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Gig em G • 9:33a, 2/17/26
AG
Use of a FedEx account is not proof of life. It's someone using a number as FedEx keeps those things going unless something comes up for them to look at if.

I worked for one of their OpCos 20 years ago and had a sweet employee discount that I used for 10 years after I worked there. Until the wife called to complain about the salsa and chips she overnighted to her mother got broke and messed up. And she was adamant that her husband no longer worked for FedEx when asked.

Jeffrey Epstein is dead.
Reply Quote
2
Ag with kids
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to flown-the-coop • 9:48a, 2/17/26
AG
flown-the-coop said:
Yea, but Massie-Ro still look like dumbarses over this ***** Guys past retirement age retiring vs spending money on PR firms and lawyers is not quite the justice for victims people claimed they supported.


Who are these 4 people they're referring to?
You can turn off signatures, btw
Reply Quote
flown-the-coop
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ag with kids • 9:53a, 2/17/26
AG
Massie was going off about some names that were released and it was pointed out to him those names were randoms included in a photo lineup.

Massie got butthurt about this revelation and claimed the DOJ should have added that context.

Shipwrecked and Harmeet are pointing out their stupid act did not allow for such.

For those who actually read the bill, it was poorly done to the point it had to be intentional. Or Massie is on of the MIT students who fail at making change from a dollar.

Quote:
The names of the individuals in the line-up cards created for some ID purpose are part of an common "investigatory material."
Reply Quote
3
ETFan
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to flown-the-coop • 10:59a, 2/17/26
flown-the-coop said:
Massie was going off about some names that were released and it was pointed out to him those names were randoms included in a photo lineup.

Massie got butthurt about this revelation and claimed the DOJ should have added that context.

Shipwrecked and Harmeet are pointing out their stupid act did not allow for such.

For those who actually read the bill, it was poorly done to the point it had to be intentional. Or Massie is on of the MIT students who fail at making change from a dollar.

Quote:
The names of the individuals in the line-up cards created for some ID purpose are part of an common "investigatory material."



"Yeah well the stupid idiot should have done better, can we move on?"

Meanwhile the DOJ is explicitly covering this up. That's no longer debatable.

Reply Quote
12
David_Puddy
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Gig em G • 11:01a, 2/17/26
AG
Gig em G said:
Could some of these accounts possibly been transferred to his estate beneficiaries? Like his brother or his former girlfriend (that's not in prison?)

I have a hard time believing that he's alive but God knows honestly at this point.


I don't have a hard time believing he's alive at all. With as many powerful people as he was connected to and as much blackmail as he had on a lot of very powerful people, to think that they paid off some security guards and arranged to stage a body double to fake his death isn't all that far fetched. Especially with that post from the employee of the prison indicating as much. If nothing else, this at minimum proves without a shadow of a doubt that he didn't kill himself.

"Hey security guards (making $100k/year), do you and your 5 buddies watching over this place want to make life changing money to set you and your family up for life and never have to work again?" Is that really hard to believe that a) the elites he was connected to would arrange that and b) the security guards woudln't take that type of a deal?
Reply Quote
3
Ag with kids
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to ETFan • 11:30a, 2/17/26
AG
ETFan said:
flown-the-coop said:
Massie was going off about some names that were released and it was pointed out to him those names were randoms included in a photo lineup.

Massie got butthurt about this revelation and claimed the DOJ should have added that context.

Shipwrecked and Harmeet are pointing out their stupid act did not allow for such.

For those who actually read the bill, it was poorly done to the point it had to be intentional. Or Massie is on of the MIT students who fail at making change from a dollar.

Quote:
The names of the individuals in the line-up cards created for some ID purpose are part of an common "investigatory material."




"Yeah well the stupid idiot should have done better, can we move on?"

Meanwhile the DOJ is explicitly covering this up. That's no longer debatable.


Why did the DOJ cover it up for the 4 years Biden was in office. What were the Democrats hiding????

Better yet, what did they destroy?
You can turn off signatures, btw
Reply Quote
6
flown-the-coop
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to ETFan • 11:31a, 2/17/26
AG
ETFan said:
flown-the-coop said:
Massie was going off about some names that were released and it was pointed out to him those names were randoms included in a photo lineup.

Massie got butthurt about this revelation and claimed the DOJ should have added that context.

Shipwrecked and Harmeet are pointing out their stupid act did not allow for such.

For those who actually read the bill, it was poorly done to the point it had to be intentional. Or Massie is on of the MIT students who fail at making change from a dollar.

Quote:
The names of the individuals in the line-up cards created for some ID purpose are part of an common "investigatory material."




"Yeah well the stupid idiot should have done better, can we move on?"

Meanwhile the DOJ is explicitly covering this up. That's no longer debatable.


Can you tell us what is being covered up?
Reply Quote
5
Watermelon Man
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to flown-the-coop • 11:50a, 2/17/26
flown-the-coop said:
ETFan said:
flown-the-coop said:
Massie was going off about some names that were released and it was pointed out to him those names were randoms included in a photo lineup.

Massie got butthurt about this revelation and claimed the DOJ should have added that context.

Shipwrecked and Harmeet are pointing out their stupid act did not allow for such.

For those who actually read the bill, it was poorly done to the point it had to be intentional. Or Massie is on of the MIT students who fail at making change from a dollar.

Quote:
The names of the individuals in the line-up cards created for some ID purpose are part of an common "investigatory material."




"Yeah well the stupid idiot should have done better, can we move on?"

Meanwhile the DOJ is explicitly covering this up. That's no longer debatable.


Can you tell us what is being covered up?

Does that really matter?

Isn't the fact that they are covering up something while, at the same time, telling you they are the most transparent group ever give you cause?

Reply Quote
10
techno-ag
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Watermelon Man • 11:51a, 2/17/26
AG
Watermelon Man said:
flown-the-coop said:
ETFan said:
flown-the-coop said:
Massie was going off about some names that were released and it was pointed out to him those names were randoms included in a photo lineup.

Massie got butthurt about this revelation and claimed the DOJ should have added that context.

Shipwrecked and Harmeet are pointing out their stupid act did not allow for such.

For those who actually read the bill, it was poorly done to the point it had to be intentional. Or Massie is on of the MIT students who fail at making change from a dollar.

Quote:
The names of the individuals in the line-up cards created for some ID purpose are part of an common "investigatory material."




"Yeah well the stupid idiot should have done better, can we move on?"

Meanwhile the DOJ is explicitly covering this up. That's no longer debatable.


Can you tell us what is being covered up?

Does that really matter?

Isn't the fact that they are covering up something while, at the same time, telling you they are the most transparent group ever give you cause?

I'm more concerned about what the Dems were hiding. They literally had full access to these files for years.
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
Reply Quote
3
First Page Last Page
Page 196 of 203 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.