DOJ: Epstein killed himself, no client list

611,523 Views | 7096 Replies | Last: 27 min ago by ETFan
ETFan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag with kids said:

ETFan said:

flown-the-coop said:

Massie was going off about some names that were released and it was pointed out to him those names were randoms included in a photo lineup.

Massie got butthurt about this revelation and claimed the DOJ should have added that context.

Shipwrecked and Harmeet are pointing out their stupid act did not allow for such.

For those who actually read the bill, it was poorly done to the point it had to be intentional. Or Massie is on of the MIT students who fail at making change from a dollar.

Quote:

The names of the individuals in the line-up cards created for some ID purpose are part of an common "investigatory material."





"Yeah well the stupid idiot should have done better, can we move on?"

Meanwhile the DOJ is explicitly covering this up. That's no longer debatable.



Why did the DOJ cover it up for the 4 years Biden was in office. What were the Democrats hiding????

Better yet, what did they destroy?

At what point does this question become trolling? It's answered on nearly every page.

EDIT: Oh, and man I don't know, but I bet the Trump ran DOJ shutting things down will help get us to the bottom of things!
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Watermelon Man said:

flown-the-coop said:

Can you tell us what is being covered up?

Does that really matter?

Isn't the fact that they are covering up something while, at the same time, telling you they are the most transparent group ever give you cause?



Sort of matters if the answer is they are not covering anything up.

So I will ask again, what do you believe they are covering up? Very simple question.
Hoyt Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
David_Puddy said:

Gig em G said:

Could some of these accounts possibly been transferred to his estate beneficiaries? Like his brother or his former girlfriend (that's not in prison?)

I have a hard time believing that he's alive but God knows honestly at this point.


I don't have a hard time believing he's alive at all. With as many powerful people as he was connected to and as much blackmail as he had on a lot of very powerful people, to think that they paid off some security guards and arranged to stage a body double to fake his death isn't all that far fetched. Especially with that post from the employee of the prison indicating as much. If nothing else, this at minimum proves without a shadow of a doubt that he didn't kill himself.

"Hey security guards (making $100k/year), do you and your 5 buddies watching over this place want to make life changing money to set you and your family up for life and never have to work again?" Is that really hard to believe that a) the elites he was connected to would arrange that and b) the security guards woudln't take that type of a deal?

Absolutely. Remember the Ken Lay sightings in Central America? Certainly possible an energy CEO could pull it off, same with JE.
ETFan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop said:

Watermelon Man said:

flown-the-coop said:

Can you tell us what is being covered up?

Does that really matter?

Isn't the fact that they are covering up something while, at the same time, telling you they are the most transparent group ever give you cause?



Sort of matters if the answer is they are not covering anything up.

So I will ask again, what do you believe they are covering up? Very simple question.

Probably the sign stealing sheets from the 2019 Astros trash-can-gate.


What do you think they're covering up? Are you trolling?
FWTXAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You folks who want this to go away in support/solidarity with this administration shouldn't be so quick to celebrate lol

This is no where close to over and isn't going away.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ETFan said:

flown-the-coop said:

Watermelon Man said:

flown-the-coop said:

Can you tell us what is being covered up?

Does that really matter?

Isn't the fact that they are covering up something while, at the same time, telling you they are the most transparent group ever give you cause?



Sort of matters if the answer is they are not covering anything up.

So I will ask again, what do you believe they are covering up? Very simple question.

Probably the sign stealing sheets from the 2019 Astros trash-can-gate.


What do you think they're covering up? Are you trolling?

Asking someone who claims the DOJ is covering up something what they believe is being covered up is trolling in your book?

I think the trolling is yelling coverup and not engaging in discussion of what is being covered up.

I am not screaming coverup, so why would you be asking me.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FWTXAg said:

You folks who want this to go away in support/solidarity with this administration shouldn't be so quick to celebrate lol

This is no where close to over and isn't going away.

I don't think you have ever posted anything of substance on this entire thread. Just vague innuendo that everyone else is in the dark and you have been enlightened with the truth, but like Joseph Smith you cannot share the real truth - just have to trust you.

For ETFran, maybe they can look to your posts for examples of trolling.
waitwhat?
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Seeing lots on the left be in absolute disbelief that Trump hasn't been shown to have participated in underage sex/trafficking. They seem to desperately, desperately want to find evidence of it in order to force his removal from office.

So to be clear about the American Left... They hope that Trump raped kids. That isn't hyperbole, either. They desperately want there to be women living somewhere in the USA right now that were traumatized by Trump.

That is how demented the Left is. Sickening.
" 'People that read with pictures think that it's simply about a mask' - Dana Loesch" - Ban Cow Gas

"Truth is treason in the empire of lies." - Dr. Ron Paul

Big Tech IS the empire of lies

TEXIT
AgDev01
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag with kids said:

Why did the DOJ cover it up for the 4 years Biden was in office. What were the Democrats hiding????



The same thing the current administration is.

My parents taught me that the proclamation of "they did it first" didn't absolve me of any wrong doing when i was 5, yet many adults have tried to argue it repeatedly on this thread. Just because the Biden administration was wrong doesn't give the Trump administration a free pass. Be better than they are.

Quote:


Better yet, what did they destroy?


I think the same thing can also be asked of the current one.
AgDev01
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
flown-the-coop said:


Can you tell us what is being covered up?


Child sex crimes, sex-trafficking, prostitution not to mention spying and foreign government interference.

There is still 2.5 million files the DOJ said they were not going to release in part due depiction of CSAM (which is good) but also national security and on-going investigations.

Given the fact that Patel went before congress a few month ago and said no one but Epstein and Maxwell were implicated in any crimes and that there were no investigations, how can files be held for investigations that don't exist? if there are investigations why haven't they announced them? it can't all be a "hoax".
Watermelon Man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop said:

Watermelon Man said:

flown-the-coop said:

Can you tell us what is being covered up?

Does that really matter?

Isn't the fact that they are covering up something while, at the same time, telling you they are the most transparent group ever give you cause?



Sort of matters if the answer is they are not covering anything up.

So I will ask again, what do you believe they are covering up? Very simple question.

Ah, yes, a master of propaganda. I gotta remember.

Or, to be a bit more charitable, I guess you forgot why you originally asked your question.

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

flown-the-coop said:
Massie was going off about some names that were released and it was pointed out to him those names were randoms included in a photo lineup.

Massie got butthurt about this revelation and claimed the DOJ should have added that context.

Shipwrecked and Harmeet are pointing out their stupid act did not allow for such.

For those who actually read the bill, it was poorly done to the point it had to be intentional. Or Massie is on of the MIT students who fail at making change from a dollar.

Quote:

+ 1 more quotes (click to expand)



ETFan said:



"Yeah well the stupid idiot should have done better, can we move on?"

Meanwhile the DOJ is explicitly covering this up. That's no longer debatable.



Can you tell us what is being covered up?

You conceded that the debate on whether or not it is a coverup is over, and wanted to know what was being covered up.

Put your mind to work. It has to do with sex, underage girls, money laundering, and the global elite who are above all law. Probably above God, if you'd ask them.

It is corruption at the deepest level. You can't handle it, so you make believe that a man who has cheated on every wife he has had (and many others, I suspect) is of such high moral fibre that he would never be involved is such things.

The conservatives of the future are going to have entire history departments devoted to how a failing Russia was able to knock over the mighty USA.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If you donate $100 to Massie he will send you a newsletter with updates.

Until then, its back to tilting at windmills. But this is not the biggest thing for Trump, his admin or the American people to focused on.

Shenanigans from the 2020 election are much more evidenced and much more destructive to our Country than anything Epstein and Ghislaine ever did.

If this is about minor-sex trafficking, then I have been told repeatedly this is NOT the place to discuss justice for victims of such.
Silent For Too Long
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

The conservatives of the future are going to have entire history departments devoted to how a failing Russia was able to knock over the mighty USA.


Oh that's rich. The guy who still believes in Russia gate after multiple investigations and 50 million dollars in tax payer money exposed was a hoax created by Hillary Clinton to distract from her own crimes. Now wants that same irrational attention placed on Trump's connection to Epstein.

This pretty much proves that no amount of information will be enough for you. Your preconceived TDS infused notions will never be changed.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Silent For Too Long said:

Quote:

The conservatives of the future are going to have entire history departments devoted to how a failing Russia was able to knock over the mighty USA.


Oh that's rich. The guy who still believes in Russia gate after multiple investigations and 50 million dollars in tax payer money exposed was a hoax created by Hillary Clinton to distract from her own crimes. Now wants that same irrational attention placed on Trump's connection to Epstein.

This pretty much proves that no amount of information will be enough for you. Your preconceived TDS infused notions will never be changed.

They have long not been worth responding to. Heck, this cat is back to "Trump cheated on his pregnant wife to he is literally Pedo Hitler!!" trope even though there is no evidence of other than MacDougal's wild imagination about her sex-life with DJT.
Gig em G
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
David_Puddy said:

Gig em G said:

Could some of these accounts possibly been transferred to his estate beneficiaries? Like his brother or his former girlfriend (that's not in prison?)

I have a hard time believing that he's alive but God knows honestly at this point.


I don't have a hard time believing he's alive at all. With as many powerful people as he was connected to and as much blackmail as he had on a lot of very powerful people, to think that they paid off some security guards and arranged to stage a body double to fake his death isn't all that far fetched. Especially with that post from the employee of the prison indicating as much. If nothing else, this at minimum proves without a shadow of a doubt that he didn't kill himself.

"Hey security guards (making $100k/year), do you and your 5 buddies watching over this place want to make life changing money to set you and your family up for life and never have to work again?" Is that really hard to believe that a) the elites he was connected to would arrange that and b) the security guards woudln't take that type of a deal?


Fair enough. But I sure as hell wouldn't believe he would be using his old accounts and continue on with anything linked to his name at all.

If he's alive he has a new identity and living somewhere no where to be seen or heard of again.

flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pays millions in perpetuity to disappear. Outed for using FedEx to save 5% on shipping. Makes sense.
Watermelon Man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop said:

Silent For Too Long said:

Quote:

The conservatives of the future are going to have entire history departments devoted to how a failing Russia was able to knock over the mighty USA.


Oh that's rich. The guy who still believes in Russia gate after multiple investigations and 50 million dollars in tax payer money exposed was a hoax created by Hillary Clinton to distract from her own crimes. Now wants that same irrational attention placed on Trump's connection to Epstein.

This pretty much proves that no amount of information will be enough for you. Your preconceived TDS infused notions will never be changed.

They have long not been worth responding to. Heck, this cat is back to "Trump cheated on his pregnant wife to he is literally Pedo Hitler!!" trope even though there is no evidence of other than MacDougal's wild imagination about her sex-life with DJT.

So, are you saying the stories about Trump cheating on his wives are false?



Zachary Klement
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
flown-the-coop said:

FWTXAg said:

You folks who want this to go away in support/solidarity with this administration shouldn't be so quick to celebrate lol

This is no where close to over and isn't going away.

I don't think you have ever posted anything of substance on this entire thread. Just vague innuendo that everyone else is in the dark and you have been enlightened with the truth, but like Joseph Smith you cannot share the real truth - just have to trust you.

For ETFran, maybe they can look to your posts for examples of trolling.

But this is very much the case whether you think that the government is covering stuff up or not.

The government has no way of proving to us that they have not torched files or have been completely forthcoming and the government has proven that they have a tendency to lie to the American people (Vietnam, Opioid crisis, COVID, Iran Contra, WMDs in the Middle East, etc.).

Either side of the issue is pretty much just "trust me bro" based on whether you think that Jeff was just a greedy guy keeping all the kids to himself or there is a greater conspiracy that the government does not want to let us in on.

I think it is odd that so many on here are so dismissive of people that are dubious of a government that has been proven to lie to us.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I am saying that one is. Are you trolling by trying to expand it to "wives" and not the discredited story of McDougal?
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Zachary Klement said:

flown-the-coop said:

FWTXAg said:

You folks who want this to go away in support/solidarity with this administration shouldn't be so quick to celebrate lol

This is no where close to over and isn't going away.

I don't think you have ever posted anything of substance on this entire thread. Just vague innuendo that everyone else is in the dark and you have been enlightened with the truth, but like Joseph Smith you cannot share the real truth - just have to trust you.

For ETFran, maybe they can look to your posts for examples of trolling.

But this is very much the case whether you think that the government is covering stuff up or not.

The government has no way of proving to us that they have not torched files or have been completely forthcoming and the government has proven that they have a tendency to lie to the American people (Vietnam, Opioid crisis, COVID, Iran Contra, WMDs in the Middle East, etc.).

Either side of the issue is pretty much just "trust me bro" based on whether you think that Jeff was just a greedy guy keeping all the kids to himself or there is a greater conspiracy that the government does not want to let us in on.

I think it is odd that so many on here are so dismissive of people that are dubious of a government that has been proven to lie to us.


Dismissive of whether the government is telling the truth? I don't think that is what anyone is saying. But to keep trotting out aliens are among us theories with no proof gets exhausting.

There are no sides on this. In fact, the only ones talking about sides are the ones picking a side.

I think you do the actual victims of Ghislaine and Jeffrey when you conflate them with muh Mossad innuendo.

And what are you yipping about with "opioid crisis"? I recall big pharma up to their ears in corruption and coverup but what was the government involvement?

WMDs are worthy of another topic. I think the last couple of chapters to that have yet to be written. And I do think that it will involve the Israelis.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Watermelon Man said:

flown-the-coop said:

ETFan said:

flown-the-coop said:

Massie was going off about some names that were released and it was pointed out to him those names were randoms included in a photo lineup.

Massie got butthurt about this revelation and claimed the DOJ should have added that context.

Shipwrecked and Harmeet are pointing out their stupid act did not allow for such.

For those who actually read the bill, it was poorly done to the point it had to be intentional. Or Massie is on of the MIT students who fail at making change from a dollar.

Quote:

The names of the individuals in the line-up cards created for some ID purpose are part of an common "investigatory material."





"Yeah well the stupid idiot should have done better, can we move on?"

Meanwhile the DOJ is explicitly covering this up. That's no longer debatable.



Can you tell us what is being covered up?

Does that really matter?

Isn't the fact that they are covering up something while, at the same time, telling you they are the most transparent group ever give you cause?



So, you have no idea WHAT they're covering up (if anything at all), you just KNOW that they ARE covering it up...

So, I will just repost my prediction of EXACTLY what was going to happen when they were done releasing things...
You can turn off signatures, btw
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ETFan said:

Ag with kids said:

ETFan said:

flown-the-coop said:

Massie was going off about some names that were released and it was pointed out to him those names were randoms included in a photo lineup.

Massie got butthurt about this revelation and claimed the DOJ should have added that context.

Shipwrecked and Harmeet are pointing out their stupid act did not allow for such.

For those who actually read the bill, it was poorly done to the point it had to be intentional. Or Massie is on of the MIT students who fail at making change from a dollar.

Quote:

The names of the individuals in the line-up cards created for some ID purpose are part of an common "investigatory material."





"Yeah well the stupid idiot should have done better, can we move on?"

Meanwhile the DOJ is explicitly covering this up. That's no longer debatable.



Why did the DOJ cover it up for the 4 years Biden was in office. What were the Democrats hiding????

Better yet, what did they destroy?

At what point does this question become trolling? It's answered on nearly every page.

EDIT: Oh, and man I don't know, but I bet the Trump ran DOJ shutting things down will help get us to the bottom of things!

I have not seen the answer to this. Someone has explained exactly what the Dems destroyed?

And what they covered up during those 4 years?

I looked at the past 4 pages and didn't find either answer...

Somehow I think you're FOS...


You can turn off signatures, btw
David_Puddy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
techno-ag said:

Watermelon Man said:

flown-the-coop said:

ETFan said:

flown-the-coop said:

Massie was going off about some names that were released and it was pointed out to him those names were randoms included in a photo lineup.

Massie got butthurt about this revelation and claimed the DOJ should have added that context.

Shipwrecked and Harmeet are pointing out their stupid act did not allow for such.

For those who actually read the bill, it was poorly done to the point it had to be intentional. Or Massie is on of the MIT students who fail at making change from a dollar.

Quote:

The names of the individuals in the line-up cards created for some ID purpose are part of an common "investigatory material."





"Yeah well the stupid idiot should have done better, can we move on?"

Meanwhile the DOJ is explicitly covering this up. That's no longer debatable.



Can you tell us what is being covered up?

Does that really matter?

Isn't the fact that they are covering up something while, at the same time, telling you they are the most transparent group ever give you cause?



I'm more concerned about what the Dems were hiding. They literally had full access to these files for years.


Exactly. If Kamala would have won, these files would have never seen the light of day, just like when she was 2nd in command.
David_Puddy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FWTXAg said:

You folks who want this to go away in support/solidarity with this administration shouldn't be so quick to celebrate lol

This is no where close to over and isn't going away.


I've said it countless times, but something like this should unite the country and intelligent people should finally be able to say that this isn't a political issue any longer. It's a morality issue and if Bondi and the DOJ cannot start putting together some solid evidence to hold these people liable, then what are we doing here? Bring someone in who can actually do their job.

I just wish people who hate Trump could see past said hatred and want justice for the victims, but that is probably asking too much. The billions spent in propaganda brainwashing people who watch the MSM has poisoned people's thinking. I know I said it in my post above, but had Kamala won, these files would have never seen the light of day. People can hate Trump all they want, but at least they can no longer call any of this a conspiracy theory. That's not me being political, because I will say it until I'm blue in the face......if there is evidence in there that Trump was involved, he needs to be one of those people who is served an arrest warrant.
David_Puddy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gig em G said:

David_Puddy said:

Gig em G said:

Could some of these accounts possibly been transferred to his estate beneficiaries? Like his brother or his former girlfriend (that's not in prison?)

I have a hard time believing that he's alive but God knows honestly at this point.


I don't have a hard time believing he's alive at all. With as many powerful people as he was connected to and as much blackmail as he had on a lot of very powerful people, to think that they paid off some security guards and arranged to stage a body double to fake his death isn't all that far fetched. Especially with that post from the employee of the prison indicating as much. If nothing else, this at minimum proves without a shadow of a doubt that he didn't kill himself.

"Hey security guards (making $100k/year), do you and your 5 buddies watching over this place want to make life changing money to set you and your family up for life and never have to work again?" Is that really hard to believe that a) the elites he was connected to would arrange that and b) the security guards woudln't take that type of a deal?


Fair enough. But I sure as hell wouldn't believe he would be using his old accounts and continue on with anything linked to his name at all.

If he's alive he has a new identity and living somewhere no where to be seen or heard of again.




Yeah, I don't think even someone like JE is dumb enough to do that, but I wasn't referring to using those accounts as evidence. I'm mostly drawing my own conclusions from common sense. I realize that I will probably get labeled a conspiracy theorist for not fully believing the guy is dead, and I'm ok with that. He may be dead, and he may not be.......hard to fully believe any scenario at this point.

I mean there are millions of people walking around that still believe that Covid just happened to be unleashed upon the world from some dumbass biting into a bat at a wet market in Wuhan less than a year before one of the most consequential U.S. elections ever. Despite Bill Gates and others openly discussing it 2 years beforehand in the files. A guy who increased his net worth at least 10x from all of a sudden becoming a vaccine expert.
David_Puddy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Watermelon Man said:

flown-the-coop said:

Silent For Too Long said:

Quote:

The conservatives of the future are going to have entire history departments devoted to how a failing Russia was able to knock over the mighty USA.


Oh that's rich. The guy who still believes in Russia gate after multiple investigations and 50 million dollars in tax payer money exposed was a hoax created by Hillary Clinton to distract from her own crimes. Now wants that same irrational attention placed on Trump's connection to Epstein.

This pretty much proves that no amount of information will be enough for you. Your preconceived TDS infused notions will never be changed.

They have long not been worth responding to. Heck, this cat is back to "Trump cheated on his pregnant wife to he is literally Pedo Hitler!!" trope even though there is no evidence of other than MacDougal's wild imagination about her sex-life with DJT.

So, are you saying the stories about Trump cheating on his wives are false?






Cheating in a marriage and trafficking and torturing children are nowhere in the same stratosphere buddy
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag with kids said:

ETFan said:

Ag with kids said:

ETFan said:

flown-the-coop said:

Massie was going off about some names that were released and it was pointed out to him those names were randoms included in a photo lineup.

Massie got butthurt about this revelation and claimed the DOJ should have added that context.

Shipwrecked and Harmeet are pointing out their stupid act did not allow for such.

For those who actually read the bill, it was poorly done to the point it had to be intentional. Or Massie is on of the MIT students who fail at making change from a dollar.

Quote:

The names of the individuals in the line-up cards created for some ID purpose are part of an common "investigatory material."





"Yeah well the stupid idiot should have done better, can we move on?"

Meanwhile the DOJ is explicitly covering this up. That's no longer debatable.



Why did the DOJ cover it up for the 4 years Biden was in office. What were the Democrats hiding????

Better yet, what did they destroy?

At what point does this question become trolling? It's answered on nearly every page.

EDIT: Oh, and man I don't know, but I bet the Trump ran DOJ shutting things down will help get us to the bottom of things!

I have not seen the answer to this. Someone has explained exactly what the Dems destroyed?

And what they covered up during those 4 years?

I looked at the past 4 pages and didn't find either answer...

Somehow I think you're FOS...





Page 193

https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3548558/replies/71884936
DeschutesAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Silent For Too Long said:

Quote:

The conservatives of the future are going to have entire history departments devoted to how a failing Russia was able to knock over the mighty USA.


Oh that's rich. The guy who still believes in Russia gate after multiple investigations and 50 million dollars in tax payer money exposed was a hoax created by Hillary Clinton to distract from her own crimes. Now wants that same irrational attention placed on Trump's connection to Epstein.

This pretty much proves that no amount of information will be enough for you. Your preconceived TDS infused notions will never be changed.
Paul Manafort says hello.
ETFan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
David_Puddy said:

techno-ag said:

Watermelon Man said:

flown-the-coop said:

ETFan said:

flown-the-coop said:

Massie was going off about some names that were released and it was pointed out to him those names were randoms included in a photo lineup.

Massie got butthurt about this revelation and claimed the DOJ should have added that context.

Shipwrecked and Harmeet are pointing out their stupid act did not allow for such.

For those who actually read the bill, it was poorly done to the point it had to be intentional. Or Massie is on of the MIT students who fail at making change from a dollar.

Quote:

The names of the individuals in the line-up cards created for some ID purpose are part of an common "investigatory material."





"Yeah well the stupid idiot should have done better, can we move on?"

Meanwhile the DOJ is explicitly covering this up. That's no longer debatable.



Can you tell us what is being covered up?

Does that really matter?

Isn't the fact that they are covering up something while, at the same time, telling you they are the most transparent group ever give you cause?



I'm more concerned about what the Dems were hiding. They literally had full access to these files for years.


Exactly. If Kamala would have won, these files would have never seen the light of day, just like when she was 2nd in command.

If this isn't some revisionist history, I don't know what is.

1. Trump admin had access to all of this before Biden.
2. Epstien died in Trumps custody
3. Kamala didn't win, let it go
4. Republican Massie and Democrat Ro Khanna forced this issue
5. The GOP Congress had to essentially be forced to sign on
6. Trump was forced to sign the law, veto proof.
7. Bondi, Trump, etc have done everything they can to stall or stop the release of anything
8. They still are, they're still breaking the law, they're still involved in a coverup


Revise and hyperbolize all you want, those are the facts.



flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ETFan said:

If this isn't some revisionist history, I don't know what is.

1. Trump admin had access to all of this before Biden.
2. Epstien died in Trumps custody
3. Kamala didn't win, let it go
4. Republican Massie and Democrat Ro Khanna forced this issue
5. The GOP Congress had to essentially be forced to sign on
6. Trump was forced to sign the law, veto proof.
7. Bondi, Trump, etc have done everything they can to stall or stop the release of anything
8. They still are, they're still breaking the law, they're still involved in a coverup


Revise and hyperbolize all you want, those are the facts.





I think you did enough of that with the 8 Points of Fiction you posted.
ETFan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
1. Trump admin didn't have access?
2. Epstein didn't die in trumps hands?
3. Kamala won?
4. Massie and Ro aren't the ones who brought the petition?
5. The GOP congress was onboard when this was presented? When it looked like they didn't have the votes?
6. It wasn't Veto proof? He was forced, hence the petition and law
7. How many times have they flip flopped? The files exist. They don't. Binders. No binders. Hoax. Hoax. Hoax. I'm totally exonerated! (from a hoax) and on and on. And now prematurely ending the release and doing no prosecuting.
8. See 7 and reality.
David_Puddy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ETFan said:

David_Puddy said:

techno-ag said:

Watermelon Man said:

flown-the-coop said:

ETFan said:

flown-the-coop said:

Massie was going off about some names that were released and it was pointed out to him those names were randoms included in a photo lineup.

Massie got butthurt about this revelation and claimed the DOJ should have added that context.

Shipwrecked and Harmeet are pointing out their stupid act did not allow for such.

For those who actually read the bill, it was poorly done to the point it had to be intentional. Or Massie is on of the MIT students who fail at making change from a dollar.

Quote:

The names of the individuals in the line-up cards created for some ID purpose are part of an common "investigatory material."





"Yeah well the stupid idiot should have done better, can we move on?"

Meanwhile the DOJ is explicitly covering this up. That's no longer debatable.



Can you tell us what is being covered up?

Does that really matter?

Isn't the fact that they are covering up something while, at the same time, telling you they are the most transparent group ever give you cause?



I'm more concerned about what the Dems were hiding. They literally had full access to these files for years.


Exactly. If Kamala would have won, these files would have never seen the light of day, just like when she was 2nd in command.

If this isn't some revisionist history, I don't know what is.

1. Trump admin had access to all of this before Biden.
2. Epstien died in Trumps custody
3. Kamala didn't win, let it go
4. Republican Massie and Democrat Ro Khanna forced this issue
5. The GOP Congress had to essentially be forced to sign on
6. Trump was forced to sign the law, veto proof.
7. Bondi, Trump, etc have done everything they can to stall or stop the release of anything
8. They still are, they're still breaking the law, they're still involved in a coverup


Revise and hyperbolize all you want, those are the facts.






Your bullet points are cool and all, but you can't sit there with a straight face and type that with Democrat control of the House in 2019 (when JE killed himself and an active investigate still going on), they would have passed legislation for those files to be released to the public. Too many powerful Democrat donors in them to ever allow them past the Democrat controlled HoR. They were too busy trying to impeach Trump to care anything about protecting innocent children. Think logically for a second on this one. Massie and Khanna didn't force them to release anything, it took both the House and Senate to vote to do so. They're just pushing for unredacted names in them.

What are they covering up exactly? You still haven't answered that. These files have only seen the light of day because Trump agreed to it. Not a peep about these files being released or even talked about up until 2024 during the campaign. That is a fact.

Not hard to figure out why Covid was unleashed upon the world just a few months after his death coincidentally and why it has taken this long for them to be shown to the public. You know, that whole Covid thing where Bill Gates was openly discussing in 2018 and involving the WHO. Let me guess, you still believe that Covid just happened to come about from a crazy dude biting a bat in Wuhan in late 2019?
fullback44
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
so what's you guys final verdict, is Epstein in some plush tropical island drinking pina colada's (being fanned by 70 virgins) or is he in the dirt?

B-1 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Page 197 and the resident leftists still can't find that smoking gun they've been soooooooooooo hoping for.
Being in TexAgs jail changes a man……..no, not really
ETFan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
David_Puddy said:

ETFan said:

David_Puddy said:

techno-ag said:

Watermelon Man said:

flown-the-coop said:

ETFan said:

flown-the-coop said:

Massie was going off about some names that were released and it was pointed out to him those names were randoms included in a photo lineup.

Massie got butthurt about this revelation and claimed the DOJ should have added that context.

Shipwrecked and Harmeet are pointing out their stupid act did not allow for such.

For those who actually read the bill, it was poorly done to the point it had to be intentional. Or Massie is on of the MIT students who fail at making change from a dollar.

Quote:

The names of the individuals in the line-up cards created for some ID purpose are part of an common "investigatory material."





"Yeah well the stupid idiot should have done better, can we move on?"

Meanwhile the DOJ is explicitly covering this up. That's no longer debatable.



Can you tell us what is being covered up?

Does that really matter?

Isn't the fact that they are covering up something while, at the same time, telling you they are the most transparent group ever give you cause?



I'm more concerned about what the Dems were hiding. They literally had full access to these files for years.


Exactly. If Kamala would have won, these files would have never seen the light of day, just like when she was 2nd in command.

If this isn't some revisionist history, I don't know what is.

1. Trump admin had access to all of this before Biden.
2. Epstien died in Trumps custody
3. Kamala didn't win, let it go
4. Republican Massie and Democrat Ro Khanna forced this issue
5. The GOP Congress had to essentially be forced to sign on
6. Trump was forced to sign the law, veto proof.
7. Bondi, Trump, etc have done everything they can to stall or stop the release of anything
8. They still are, they're still breaking the law, they're still involved in a coverup


Revise and hyperbolize all you want, those are the facts.






Your bullet points are cool and all, but you can't sit there with a straight face and type that with Democrat control of the House in 2019 (when JE killed himself and an active investigate still going on), they would have passed legislation for those files to be released to the public. Too many powerful Democrat donors in them to ever allow them past the Democrat controlled HoR. They were too busy trying to impeach Trump to care anything about protecting innocent children. Think logically for a second on this one. Massie and Khanna didn't force them to release anything, it took both the House and Senate to vote to do so. They're just pushing for unredacted names in them.

What are they covering up exactly? You still haven't answered that. These files have only seen the light of day because Trump agreed to it. Not a peep about these files being released or even talked about up until 2024 during the campaign. That is a fact.

Not hard to figure out why Covid was unleashed upon the world just a few months after his death coincidentally and why it has taken this long for them to be shown to the public. You know, that whole Covid thing where Bill Gates was openly discussing in 2018 and involving the WHO. Let me guess, you still believe that Covid just happened to come about from a crazy dude biting a bat in Wuhan in late 2019?

1. No idea what would have happened in an alternate universe, that's a cool story though? Wish they would have gone after people, they didn't. I many cases they couldn't. I'm not sure your point?
2. Uh, Massie filed a discharge petition in September of 25 specifically to bypass GOP House leadership, if that's not forcing the issue I'm not sure what is? Trump was against it until it became veto proof, then called it all a hoax AFTER SIGNING IT
3. Coverup: Let's start with a simple one, the list of names and coconspirators she said was on her desk and in the binders. People who have seen the files can confirm they are withholding information. Hell, they said they had 6million releasable documents, we got ~3mil. They're also lying about the amount of info, but that's in the weeds... and their redactions have been breaking the law Trump signed.
4. I'm not here to discuss covid or bill gates (has he been subpoenaed yet???)

Where are the rest of the files, where are the arrests, you're good with what we've got?
First Page Last Page
Page 197 of 203
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.