Accuser Sascha Riley isn't backing down. He's made some wild accusations and isn't pulling any punches. He's either telling some truth or he's going to be sued into oblivion. For the record, I think his allegations are not just unbelievable but also pretty impossible.

Maroon Elephant said:

---

Accuser Sascha Riley isn't backing down. He's made some wild accusations and isn't pulling any punches. He's either telling some truth or he's going to be sued into oblivion. For the record, I think his allegations are not just unbelievable but also pretty impossible.

---

The guy who threw in Clarence Thomas and Jim Jordan into his accusations?

It seems extremely likely this dude is just making **** up.

I agree.

Silent For Too Long said:

---

So why doesn't Massie just start naming names? Doesn't that mean he is also part of The Coverup now?

---

1. Massie and Ro Khanna have named names.

2. Many of the 3.5M files that Congress now has SCIF access to are still heavily redacted from Congress being able to see them.

3. Bondi and Todd Blanche say they won't let Congress see the other 2.5M files.

ETFan said:

---

Speaking of being sued, Trump sure doesn't like to sue about this stuff. Anything else and he's game.


Really wish we could find out why.

---

Sue whom and for what?

This will all go away when the Dems take the house next year, as the non-executive party historically does at the mid-terms. They will pivot to impeaching Trump and the Republicans in Congress will have pissed away their opportunity to make real needed changes for America,

DeschutesAg said:

---

Silent For Too Long said:

---

So why doesn't Massie just start naming names? Doesn't that mean he is also part of The Coverup now?

---

1. Massie and Ro Khanna have named names.

2. Many of the 3.5M files that Congress now has SCIF access to are still heavily redacted from Congress being able to see them.

3. Bondi and Todd Blanche say they won't let Congress see the other 2.5M files.

---

Thank you. This is not debatable. This is a cover up.

Silent For Too Long said:

---

Quote:

---

That's not a personal agenda and that's not covering up crimes lol

---

If he knows things he is not sharing with the public, he is part of The Coverup

Quote:

---

Any files that would ever be released to Congress or the public will never show a crime committed by anyone other than Epstein and Maxwell. 4 deep-state administrations have made sure of that.

---

Then we are all wasting our time.

---

No, we're not wasting our time. You're overlooking the court of public opinion. Most of its members have voices. And wallets. And they also vote.

And there are other potential huge repercussions in addition to criminal punishment.

DeschutesAg said:

---

Silent For Too Long said:

---

So why doesn't Massie just start naming names? Doesn't that mean he is also part of The Coverup now?

---

1. Massie and Ro Khanna have named names.

2. Many of the 3.5M files that Congress now has SCIF access to are still heavily redacted from Congress being able to see them.

3. Bondi and Todd Blanche say they won't let Congress see the other 2.5M files.

---

What are the names?

93MarineHorn said:

---

ETFan said:

---

Speaking of being sued, Trump sure doesn't like to sue about this stuff. Anything else and he's game.


Really wish we could find out why.

---

Sue whom and for what?

---

People like this:

https://sollenbergerrc.substack.com/p/underage-accuser-included-trump-rape

DeschutesAg said:

---

93MarineHorn said:

---

ETFan said:

---

Speaking of being sued, Trump sure doesn't like to sue about this stuff. Anything else and he's game.


Really wish we could find out why.

---

Sue whom and for what?

---

People like this:

https://sollenbergerrc.substack.com/p/underage-accuser-included-trump-rape

---

Do you have a name?

93MarineHorn said:

---

DeschutesAg said:

---

Silent For Too Long said:

---

So why doesn't Massie just start naming names? Doesn't that mean he is also part of The Coverup now?

---

1. Massie and Ro Khanna have named names.

2. Many of the 3.5M files that Congress now has SCIF access to are still heavily redacted from Congress being able to see them.

3. Bondi and Todd Blanche say they won't let Congress see the other 2.5M files.

---

What are the names?

---

They named at least 6 in the past week. Other Congressional members have been releasing names, too. But as stated above, many files are still heavily redacted.

DeschutesAg said:

---

93MarineHorn said:

---

DeschutesAg said:

---

Silent For Too Long said:

---

So why doesn't Massie just start naming names? Doesn't that mean he is also part of The Coverup now?

---

1. Massie and Ro Khanna have named names.

2. Many of the 3.5M files that Congress now has SCIF access to are still heavily redacted from Congress being able to see them.

3. Bondi and Todd Blanche say they won't let Congress see the other 2.5M files.

---

What are the names?

---

They named at least 6 in the past week. Other Congressional members have been releasing names, too. But as stated above, many files are still heavily redacted.

---

So they're naming people but not publicly?

This is so suspect, Democrats wanted to get Trump so bad that they would not have sat on this during the Biden Administration, if it had legs, they never would have had to trump up misdemeanors into felonies to try to get him.

Google still works.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/feb/10/thomas-massie-epstein-files-redacted-names

Hopefully economy will improve and the midterms next Nov will go our way

We used a large language model to analyse 1.4m of Jeffrey Epstein’s emails to identify the most disturbing. Here’s what it revealed about America’s most notorious sex offender: https://t.co/NiKSQzXGvZ pic.twitter.com/PV2vCaqc1N

— The Economist (@TheEconomist) February 19, 2026

93MarineHorn said:

---

DeschutesAg said:

---

93MarineHorn said:

---

ETFan said:

---

Speaking of being sued, Trump sure doesn't like to sue about this stuff. Anything else and he's game.


Really wish we could find out why.

---

Sue whom and for what?

---

People like this:

https://sollenbergerrc.substack.com/p/underage-accuser-included-trump-rape

---

Do you have a name?

---

Trump should sue people that sued Epstein's estate but didn't name Trump in the suit?

Queso1 said:

---

Google still works.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/feb/10/thomas-massie-epstein-files-redacted-names

---

Apologies. Can't wait to see the evidence.

With the margin between Dems and Republicans in the Congress and based on history, if the Republicans hold on to both houses, it will be unprecedented and just as big as Trump's election in 2024 as far as a mandate from the people.

Sadly, if it happens, I expect the Republican congress to fritter away for another two years and pound their chest about saving us from Sharia Law and have hearings on men in women sports.

93MarineHorn said:

---

Not discussing illegal behavior over emails and other means is pretty standard OPSEC.

I believe that he trafficked teens (prostitutes?) to other rich guys. I wouldn't be surprised if there is no documented evidence of it. It's why victims need to make accusations and tell their story. The files can then be used to corroborate their stories.

---

He had cameras throughout his house. This has been shown in pictures of his house and in released documents. Every bedroom was bugged. That is probably what compromises a lot of the remaining 2.5 million files yet to be released which the DOJ themselves contains CSAM.

Was trafficked teens the majority of it probably not, but it certainly existed. Most of the victims were college aged, and a lot of it was probably good old prostitution but there were a number that were trafficked as well.

Given his connections with heads of states and the elite this was all part of an intelligence operation either with Mossad or the CIA or both that im sure traded in many other things outside of sex. Epstein was a nexus for all of these individuals. Some of them had sex with kids, some with prostitutes and some wiith sex traffic victims and some had nothing to do with any of that but peddled in other things.

That is why every admin has sat on it.

AgDev01 said:

---

93MarineHorn said:

---

Not discussing illegal behavior over emails and other means is pretty standard OPSEC.

I believe that he trafficked teens (prostitutes?) to other rich guys. I wouldn't be surprised if there is no documented evidence of it. It's why victims need to make accusations and tell their story. The files can then be used to corroborate their stories.

---

He had cameras throughout his house. This has been shown in pictures of his house and in released documents. Every bedroom was bugged. That is probably what compromises a lot of the remaining 2.5 million files yet to be released which the DOJ themselves contains CSAM.

Was trafficked teens the majority of it probably not, but it certainly existed. Most of the victims were college aged, and a lot of it was probably good old prostitution but there were a number that were trafficked as well.

Given his connections with heads of states and the elite this was all part of an intelligence operation either with Mossad or the CIA or both that im sure traded in many other things outside of sex. Epstein was a nexus for all of these individuals. Some of them had sex with kids, some with prostitutes and some wiith sex traffic victims and some had nothing to do with any of that but peddled in other things.

That is why every admin has sat on it.

---

This would explain this whole debacle. Thx

93MarineHorn said:

---

DeschutesAg said:

---

93MarineHorn said:

---

ETFan said:

---

Speaking of being sued, Trump sure doesn't like to sue about this stuff. Anything else and he's game.


Really wish we could find out why.

---

Sue whom and for what?

---

People like this:

https://sollenbergerrc.substack.com/p/underage-accuser-included-trump-rape

---

Do you have a name?

---

Click the link. Read. Trump loves to sue reporters.

If you are unable to click the link and read the content, or if you are unable to do your own google searches instead of demanding others do them for you, this discussion thread is one you should probably bypass. Otoh, if you are trolling, then those of us who post updates and substantive information pertinent to the thread topic may choose to ignore you. Whichever of those two fits you best, have a nice day.

ETFan said:

---

PaulsBunions said:

---

Love that you're downplaying the most newsworthy thing about her -- she was Obama's White House counsel. Cuz that's what news organizations do.

— Mollie (@MZHemingway) February 13, 2026

Former Obama WH counsel gets the axe

---

Excellent, another freak down! Add to the list:

Miroslav Lajk Slovakia's National Security Adviser (Jan 31)

Peter Mandelson UK Labour Party & House of Lords (Feb 1 & Feb 3)

Morgan McSweeney UK Downing Street Chief of Staff (Feb 9)

Tim Allan UK Downing Street Communications Chief (Feb 10)

Jack Lang Former French Culture Minister; resigned as head of the Arab World Institute

Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem CEO & Chairman of DP World, Dubai (Feb 13) linked to the "torture video" email

Brad Karp Chairman, Paul Weiss law firm (Feb 5)

Kathryn Ruemmler Chief Legal Officer, Goldman Sachs (Feb 13, effective June 30)

Peter Attia Celebrity doctor; resigned from a protein bar company

David A. Ross Chair, MFA Art Practice, School of Visual Arts NYC (Feb 4)

Joanna Rubinstein Chair, Sweden for UNHCR (Feb 2)

Caroline Lang Head of French film producers' group

Facing calls to resign:

Howard Lutnick US Commerce Secretary; bipartisan calls to resign

Borge Brende WEF chief, under independent review

Chris Wormald UK Cabinet Secretary, expected to resign (EDIT: Feb 26 HE GONE)

Larry Summers Went on leave from Harvard teaching (voluntary), dropped by other institutions.


These are all 2026 resignations.

Trump and crew: it's all a hoax!

---

I'll bring this back around since this hoax is affecting so many people, more to add:

Resignations:

Tom Pritzker - Executive Chairman, Hyatt Hotels

Kimbal Musk - Resigned from the board of the Burning Man Project

Mona Juul - Norway's ex-ambassador to Jordan

Larry Summers - Also resigned from the OpenAI board


Notable:

Thorbjrn Jagland - Former PM of Norway, former head of Norwegian Nobel Committee & Council of Europe - charged with "aggravated corruption,"

Crown Princess Mette-Marit of Norway - publicly apologized for the messages between her and Epstein

Arrested:

Prince Andrew - "suspected misconduct in public office after revelations in the Jeffrey Epstein files."

DeschutesAg said:

---

93MarineHorn said:

---

DeschutesAg said:

---

93MarineHorn said:

---

ETFan said:

---

Speaking of being sued, Trump sure doesn't like to sue about this stuff. Anything else and he's game.


Really wish we could find out why.

---

Sue whom and for what?

---

People like this:

https://sollenbergerrc.substack.com/p/underage-accuser-included-trump-rape

---

Do you have a name?

---

Click the link. Read. Trump loves to sue reporters.

If you are unable to click the link and read the content, or if you are unable to do your own google searches instead of demanding others do them for you, this discussion thread is one you should probably bypass. Otoh, if you are trolling, then those of us who post updates and substantive information pertinent to the thread topic may choose to ignore you. Whichever of those two fits you best, have a nice day.

---

I read the link. The suit didn't name Trump. It mentioned an FBI interview where the victim claimed Trump and others but he was not actually named in the suit. Did I read that wrong?

Quote:

---

The lawsuit, without citing Trump by name, restates the same claim against him that the Justice Department flagged in an internal presentation last summer, which I reported on Sunday. But it's notable that the two claims aren't identical.

---

Also, the reporter DID NOT ACCUSE TRUMP of rape. He reported that the anonymous victim did.

Wow. Ex-prince Andrew's arrest has ignited MTG again.

"Marjorie Taylor Greene has responded to the arrest of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, formerly Prince Andrew, in Britain by lamenting the lack of any arrests in the United States and "the current state of MAGA."

Greene, the former Republican congresswoman from Georgia, said on X about 5 a.m. ET on Thursday, hours after Mountbatten-Windsor's arrest was first reported: "The UK has arrested Andrew because of the Epstein files and over here the President signed an EO [executive order] protecting cancer causing Glyphosate in our foods and we have zero Epstein related arrest and investigations since release of the files.

"And we are on the verge of going to war against Iran. That's the current state of MAGA [Make America Great Again] and MAHA [Make America Healthy Again]."

GREENE

DeschutesAg said:

---

Silent For Too Long said:

---

Quote:

---

That's not a personal agenda and that's not covering up crimes lol

---

If he knows things he is not sharing with the public, he is part of The Coverup

Quote:

---

Any files that would ever be released to Congress or the public will never show a crime committed by anyone other than Epstein and Maxwell. 4 deep-state administrations have made sure of that.

---

Then we are all wasting our time.

---

No, we're not wasting our time. You're overlooking the court of public opinion. Most of its members have voices. And wallets. And they also vote.

And there are other potential huge repercussions in addition to criminal punishment.

---

You have wallets!

So what's your plan here? Your not going vote for Trump anymore?

The next presidential election is going to be a republican that had nothing to do with this versus a democrat whose party was deeply involved with Epstein.

I know you desperately want to believe this is going to sway independents to vote for your comrades, but the DNC is more underwater then Trump is right now.

But keep holding your breath. Blue is a good look for you.

Some of you are implying Trump's guilty because he's not suing some people for libel or slanderous claims that the vast majority of the general public isn't familiar with. Hilarious.

Silent For Too Long said:

---

DeschutesAg said:

---

Silent For Too Long said:

---

Quote:

---

That's not a personal agenda and that's not covering up crimes lol

---

If he knows things he is not sharing with the public, he is part of The Coverup

Quote:

---

Any files that would ever be released to Congress or the public will never show a crime committed by anyone other than Epstein and Maxwell. 4 deep-state administrations have made sure of that.

---

Then we are all wasting our time.

---

No, we're not wasting our time. You're overlooking the court of public opinion. Most of its members have voices. And wallets. And they also vote.

And there are other potential huge repercussions in addition to criminal punishment.

---

You have wallets!

So what's your plan here? Your not going vote for Trump anymore?

The next presidential election is going to be a republican that had nothing to do with this versus a democrat whose party was deeply involved with Epstein.

I know you desperately want to believe this is going to sway independents to vote for your comrades, but the DNC is more underwater then Trunp is right now.

But keep holding your breath. Blue is a good look for you.

---

Hate to break it to you, but I don't think anybody will be.

That's the joke.gif

93MarineHorn said:

---

Some of you are implying Trump's guilty because he's not suing some people for libel or slanderous claims that the vast majority of the general public isn't familiar with. Hilarious.

---

We're implying it's just another odd piece of the puzzle. It's out of character behavior for him given his proclivity to launch lawsuits on people.

Is he guilty because of this? Nope.

Ervin Burrell said:

---

Weird that people are resigning their roles, being charged, and/or arrested over a "hoax." Super strange.

---

The only charge brought so far has nothing to do with sex trafficking.

BQ78 said:

---

This is so suspect, Democrats wanted to get Trump so bad that they would not have sat on this during the Biden Administration, if it had legs, they never would have had to trump up misdemeanors into felonies to try to get him.

---

I agree, but let's not forget the underlying ground has shifted a lot in the past 19 years.

Let's presume there were multiple reasons why the Bush Admin covered this up initially in 2006-07 and why later Administrations from both parties subsequently sat on this scandal and went along with the coverup.

The most obvious reason: both parties have members and big donors who are compromised.

Another likely reason: the Israeli intel agency - CIA - Saudi - Qatar - UAE connections to Epstein. If intel agencies were using Epstein to get info, that would be a huge scandal with enormous public backlash and repercussions. Both R & D Administrations would not want that scandalous connection exposed, not during their time in the WH, and not even now.

Consider this observation: Have GWB, Obama, Trump, Biden, or any of their past CIA and natsec chiefs and FBI Directors and DOJ AG's publicly called for the Epstein files, with only victim names redacted, to be released? Afaik, the answer is "no".

GWB, Obama, and the Trump 1.0 regime had real Middle East wars and real shadow wars going on vs. Al Queda, ISIS, Iran, the Taliban etc. in Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Libya, etc.

But now, some of the underlying ground that existed before 2025 has shifted. Public sentiment and public opinion about the our nation's relationship with Netanyahu and Israel has been gradually going through a huge sea change the past 2 years, and that transition is still picking up more momentum every day inside the voter base of both parties.

A majority of voters in the bases of both parties want this scandal exposed.