Arctic Frost: FBI Spied on 8 Republican Senators

21,194 Views | 141 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by Im Gipper
TRM
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Zapata23 • 9:08p, 10/31/25
AG
Shipwrecked said earlier today that it doesn't apply to federal officers.

But this is interesting

Quote:
Hate to be the lead ant at a picnic but...

Since Operation Arctic Frost is the investigation that matured into the U.S. v. Trump case filed in DC...

And since a few million pages of discovery was produced to the Trump defense in that case between August 2023 when it was filed and when the Supreme Court took up the immunity question...

Some/all these Arctic Frost documents being sent by a whistleblower to Congress should have been in the discovery produced to the defense.

The defense was led by Dep AG Todd Blanche.

I see a whole other layer of difficulties if that didn't happen.

Reply Quote
4
1 edit
Fuzzy Dunlop
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Zapata23 • 9:44p, 10/31/25
AG
Dirty_Mike&the_boys said:
Well well well…… interesting turn of events


"The attempted interview began at approximately 7:20 am and was approximately 44 minutes in length. The voluntary non-custodial interview of TABAS was surreptitiously recorded by the interviewing agents utilizing two covert recording devices that were secured on the persons of the interviewing agents. The resulting audio recordings were downloaded and submitted to the FBI's ELSUR Unit for evidentiary storage. ...The following is an interview summary. It is not intended to be a verbatim account and does not memorialize all statements made during the interview. The recording captures the actual words spoken. "

Now, why is that interesting? IT IS A VIOLATION OF PA LAW! PA is a two-party consent state -and NO ONE can be recorded without their knowledge or consent. recordinglaw.com/party-two-part… The names of the lawless FBI Agents are redacted. Those names need to be PUBLISHED and they need to be fired, disciplined, and Lawrence (who is a friend of mine) needs to sue them for illegally recording his VOLUNTARY conversation with them. @AAGDhillon @EdMartinDOJ @mrddmia @BasedMikeLee @SidneyPowell1 @JackPosobiec @bennyjohnson @ItsYourGov @MegynKellyShow @JudicialWatch @TomFitton



Correct my memory of this, but during the Flynn investigation, wasn't it stated that FBI agents didn't record interviews? They were all hand-written notes. Am i misremembering?
Double Talkin' Jive...
Reply Quote
2
Zapata23
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Fuzzy Dunlop • 8:23a, 11/1/25
Fuzzy Dunlop said:
Dirty_Mike&the_boys said:
Well well well…… interesting turn of events


"The attempted interview began at approximately 7:20 am and was approximately 44 minutes in length. The voluntary non-custodial interview of TABAS was surreptitiously recorded by the interviewing agents utilizing two covert recording devices that were secured on the persons of the interviewing agents. The resulting audio recordings were downloaded and submitted to the FBI's ELSUR Unit for evidentiary storage. ...The following is an interview summary. It is not intended to be a verbatim account and does not memorialize all statements made during the interview. The recording captures the actual words spoken. "

Now, why is that interesting? IT IS A VIOLATION OF PA LAW! PA is a two-party consent state -and NO ONE can be recorded without their knowledge or consent. recordinglaw.com/party-two-part… The names of the lawless FBI Agents are redacted. Those names need to be PUBLISHED and they need to be fired, disciplined, and Lawrence (who is a friend of mine) needs to sue them for illegally recording his VOLUNTARY conversation with them. @AAGDhillon @EdMartinDOJ @mrddmia @BasedMikeLee @SidneyPowell1 @JackPosobiec @bennyjohnson @ItsYourGov @MegynKellyShow @JudicialWatch @TomFitton



Correct my memory of this, but during the Flynn investigation, wasn't it stated that FBI agents didn't record interviews? They were all hand-written notes. Am i misremembering?



You're correct it has been policy dating back to Hoover that interviews were recorded in writing on 302's
It’s never too late
Reply Quote
2
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Fuzzy Dunlop • 8:32a, 11/1/25
AG
Quote:
Correct my memory of this, but during the Flynn investigation, wasn't it stated that FBI agents didn't record interviews? They were all hand-written notes. Am i misremembering?

That is correct. From their notes the agents then write a 302 report.
Reply Quote
3
McInnis
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 8:46a, 11/1/25
AG
will25u said:


I've been a long time Verizon customer and have been considering switching to AT&T because their coverage is better where I live but based on the recent news I'm getting serious about it.

I'm confused about something though and am hoping one of you legal types can explain this. Is compliance with a subpoena considered voluntary? How was AT&T able to ignore it? And why did they then comply with Boesberg's order to keep the subpoena secret?

It would be nice to think there's still a few democrats that would take Boesberg's impeachment seriously but I know better.
Reply Quote
1
1 edit
titan
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to McInnis • 9:47p, 11/1/25
S
McInnis said:
will25u said:


I've been a long time Verizon customer and have been considering switching to AT&T because their coverage is better where I live but based on the recent news I'm getting serious about it.

I'm confused about something though and am hoping one of you legal types can explain this. Is compliance with a subpoena considered voluntary? How was AT&T able to ignore it? And why did they then comply with Boesberg's order to keep the subpoena secret?

It would be nice to think there's still a few democrats that would take Boesberg's impeachment seriously but I know better.

They were probably able to ignore it because they are so big and powerful. They could imply they would also turn over MORE than what subpoenaed if had to take to court. Think of who that might be among the Bidenites.
Reply Quote
1
Bondag
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to titan • 5:53a, 11/2/25
AG
titan said:
McInnis said:
will25u said:


I've been a long time Verizon customer and have been considering switching to AT&T because their coverage is better where I live but based on the recent news I'm getting serious about it.

I'm confused about something though and am hoping one of you legal types can explain this. Is compliance with a subpoena considered voluntary? How was AT&T able to ignore it? And why did they then comply with Boesberg's order to keep the subpoena secret?

It would be nice to think there's still a few democrats that would take Boesberg's impeachment seriously but I know better.

They were probably able to ignore it because they are so big and powerful. They could imply they would also turn over MORE than what subpoenaed if had to take to court. Think of who that might be among the Bidenites.


Their legal department stated anything Ted Cruz said on Jan 6 was protected by speech and debate clause and could not be used to justify a subpoena .
Reply Quote
6
YouBet
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:15a, 11/2/25
AG
So many Democrats and deep staters need to be hanged for sedition. So very many.
Reply Quote
21
Aggieland Proud
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:07a, 11/2/25
AG
I agree but so many of them view it as just political posturing or justified political action. That's what scares me even more is when they come back into power, their actions will be even worse. They almost got us too far down that road already.

Hopefully, something can be done to rein it in but I'm not really optimistic of that happening unless you cut the head off. That head is the money from Soros and the likes.
Reply Quote
5
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to FireAg • 10:31a, 11/2/25
And they knew the original "sedition" was a set up.
Reply Quote
5
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:35a, 11/4/25
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Reply Quote
8
Zapata23
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:28p, 11/4/25
Brandon Gill, R-Texas, is formally introducing impeachment articles against U.S. District Judge James Boasberg on Tuesday for his role in the "Arctic Frost" probe.
It’s never too late
Reply Quote
6
Zapata23
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:31p, 11/4/25
It’s never too late
Reply Quote
7
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Zapata23 • 1:40p, 11/4/25
People like Lisa Murkowski will never vote to convict. The GOP needs to purge the feckless and corrupt.
Reply Quote
10
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:33p, 11/4/25
The HOR is not in session currently so it won't be filed or acted upon until they come back.
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Reply Quote
2
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:39p, 11/4/25

"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Reply Quote
4
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:38p, 11/20/25

"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Reply Quote
5
1 edit
jja79
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:57a, 11/21/25
AG
Is this another thing that will come to nothing?
Reply Quote
5
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to jja79 • 7:20a, 11/21/25
Don't know. Hope not, but it's a sad commentary on our nation's moral character that you're not even hearing about it.
Reply Quote
7
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:02p, 11/25/25
Reply Quote
4
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:38p, 11/26/25
Reply Quote
4
1 edit
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:48a, 12/2/25

"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Reply Quote
5
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:57a, 3/24/26
Reply Quote
3
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:39a, 3/24/26

Reply Quote
5
1 edit
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:59p, 3/24/26
So this is becoming a slippery slope for the Democrats. For the 2016 and 2024 election, the government of the United States was weaponized against Trump/Opposition party without impunity. Both times, thinking they wouldn't be caught because they were a shoe in to win the election.

Look for this to continue to happen whenever and presidential election comes up and a Democrat is holding the Executive.

Reply Quote
7
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:44p, 3/24/26
Reply Quote
6
AlexNguyen
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:12p, 3/24/26
Hate to be the imevitable Debbie Downer, but it's been years since we first known about the DOJ overreach during Trump #1 and Biden's term. Has anyone been brought to justice? All I see is a bunch of apparatchiks retiring from government and probably still making good money outside. And I see people like Jim Comey going scot free from any charges brought.

What makes us think anything will change?
Reply Quote
11
TheCurl84
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:27p, 3/24/26
AG
Yeah I'm gonna hold my breath. Consequences are surely on their way.
Reply Quote
2
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:43p, 3/24/26
Reply Quote
9
nortex97
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 5:44p, 3/24/26
AG
That's not a phone record, that's a full 360-degree life log on the guy spanning 3+ years. Absolutely outrageous. And they found NOTHING.

I suggest folks who even think they might care about any of this give that a quick read.

Oh, and never, ever vote for a Democrat. They love the dirty cops (and judges).
Reply Quote
13
nortex97
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:32a, 3/25/26
AG
Jack Smith, Boasberg, corruption, yet again.

'Loves the idea.' Republicans are so damn weak.
Reply Quote
4
rwpag71
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:13p, 3/25/26
AG
If I was forced to bet a large sum of money on how many people involved would be indicted, impeached, or held accountable in any way, shape, form or fashion, I would have to go with zero.
Reply Quote
2
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to rwpag71 • 4:14p, 3/25/26
That number is that same as the number of leftists who are concerned that the democrats wiped their asses all over the Constitution for political reasons.
Reply Quote
4
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:51a, 5/8/26

Reply Quote
1
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:59a, 5/8/26
AG


Going up the food chain. Offer immunity if warranted to advance the case against the main architects. Itis possible but painstaking work requiring patience.

But at this point perhaps I should use the past tense in that it was possible, seven years ago.
Reply Quote
1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.