Ol_Ag_02 said:

---

LegalDrugPusher said:

---

Ol_Ag_02 said:

---

LegalDrugPusher said:

---

Jack Boyette said:

---

FobTies said:

---

LegalDrugPusher said:

---

What do you think the liberal media is going to say about Trump when he dies whatever that may be even if it's in 30 years from now?

---

Thats irrelevant. Trump is basically giving his opps a gift. Only a small delusional demographic thinks this is appropriate. Its on the level of calling Eptein a "hoax".

---

Nobody thinks it's "appropriate," but some of us also know that it isn't some bed-wetting moment either.

---

Exactly! That's my point. No one will
Remember this in a few days by the time A&M beats Miami we Will be the story not this

---

The reality you live in is extremely odd.

---

So it's odd that I believe A&M beats Miami in the 1st round of the CFP?

---

That's not the odd part. It's that you believe that people will forget about Trump making an ******* out of himself again becuase of the A&M / Miami game. Which the vast majority of Americans won't even watch. It's like you don't recognize there's a reality out there outside of your own personal political and collegiate rooting interests.

---

Naw! It's the Christmas season people have the holidays on their minds. By Santa's trip down the chimneys on Christmas Eve this will be all forgotten including you.

You and all will get that sentimental feeling

Maybe he should have worried more about being a good father than about Trump. My X feed was inundated daily on Reiner's bull**** about fascism and the typical crap. Even after silencing him.

Old McDonald said:

---

Aston04 said:

---

It's weird, because Trump absolutely nailed his impromptu response when Ginsberg died

---

something his few remaining die hards don't like to acknowledge or admit is that he's had pretty severe cognitive decline over the last 2-3 years. it's the same blind spot democrats had with biden. he's getting even more unhinged, demented, and raving week over week as the sunset of his political relevancy and life looms.

---

You voted for Biden and want to talk about cognitive decline? He aced all the MoCA tests. Stop lying.

Old McDonald said:

---

Aston04 said:

---

It's weird, because Trump absolutely nailed his impromptu response when Ginsberg died

---

something his few remaining die hards don't like to acknowledge or admit is that he's had pretty severe cognitive decline over the last 2-3 years. it's the same blind spot democrats had with biden. he's getting even more unhinged, demented, and raving week over week as the sunset of his political relevancy and life looms.

---

Maybe someday you will be right someday Trump very well could start having dementia like any human being but he's not having it now. Trump's been a thorn into your heart for 10+ years so this is nothing new but you try to make it out to be as if oh here's the sign of his cognitive decline.

Old McDonald said:

---

Aston04 said:

---

It's weird, because Trump absolutely nailed his impromptu response when Ginsberg died

---

something his few remaining die hards don't like to acknowledge or admit is that he's had pretty severe cognitive decline over the last 2-3 years. it's the same blind spot democrats had with biden. he's getting even more unhinged, demented, and raving week over week as the sunset of his political relevancy and life looms.

---

Most dementia addled folks do not work 20 hours a day and constantly talk to hostile reporters whilst trolling libs and getting them to gush over Reiner.

I can only assume you are trolling since your accusations have been repeatedly debunked.

ABATTBQ11 said:

---

AozorAg said:

---

M.C. Swag said:

---

AozorAg said:

---

I voted for Trump based on the policies he has implemented and would happily do so again. He is a deeply flawed person who has said and done evil things, but politics isn't a contest about who the better individual is. It's about what greater political agenda each individual is going to push.

When I voted for Trump, I knew this would be a by-product of him being elected, but it is far outweighed by the good he has done at a policy level (cracking down on crime, closing borders, deporting criminals, curtailing and defunding abortion, lessening regulations on energy, promoting the existence of only two sexes/genders, and much more). These policies stand in stark contrast to the savage evil that is embodied by the democrat party platform.

If you are focusing on, and placing your faith in, the individuals running for office, you will always be disappointed.

---

Just wanted to say that this philosophy is dangerous because it could be used to justify putting literally anyone in power. A murderer? A rapist? A thief? As long as they have 'the right agenda' (or simply say the right words) you could theoretically rationalize a vote anyone on earth.

---

It is the only rational way for a voter to make voting decisions, dangerous or not.

---

Perceived character voting is highly rational because it involves an estimation of how a candidate will handle unknown or novel policy issues, as well as their ability and intention to follow through with stated policy. The problem with party purists on both sides is mistaking votes for actual support when a lot of voters are simply choosing the lesser of two evils.

That's why Trump beat Hillary in 2016, he was in turn beaten by a pedophile potato, and he in turn trounced a cackling wh*re who didn't win a primary. None of these are good options, they're just the only available ones because of s ****ty primary system.

---

Sure, among people in the same party or espousing similar sets of ideas, character voting is rational. But when faced with two well-established and diametrically opposed political agendas in a general election, one of which is pretty good (Republican) and one of which is heinously evil (democrat), character voting makes no sense. If you support most of the policies Trump advocates for and none of the policies Harris advocates for, it is not rational to vote for Harris simply because you perceive her to be a better overall person. In our political system, that is the reality.

If you're talking about some other hypothetical political system when the agendas of the two parties and the people running for office are not so obviously diametrically opposed, I can't speak to that.

Because the politics and the behavior of their person is irrelevant, its turned into a giant football game. Gotta support the team, consequences irrelevant....

This tweet is the greatest Dem victory all year.

"Waaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhh!!! He said mean things about an awful evil person that died consumed by hatred and virtriol for anyone who disagreed with him!"

Just such an amazing victory for you Dems because suddenly you all show up after not wanting to come out for all the Aloha Snackbar mass murder threads

Ag_of_08 said:

---

Because the politics and the behavior of their person is irrelevant, its turned into a giant football game. Gotta support the team, consequences irrelevant....

---

What are the consequences of Trump not eulogizing Rob ****ing Reiner in a manner that satisfies the left and moderately concerned, TDS afflicted folks?

Old McDonald said:

---

thank god the trump era of politics is nearly over. the sooner we move on from him the better.

---

Thank God the country rejected your pathetic, stupid ideology last November.

Gordo14 said:

---

This is who he always has been. He's a narcissist.

---

He is a business man and his name, personality is his business. Not being a narcissist would make him a bad business man. Instead, being a narcissist is YUGE to his success.

Terrible

Gordo14 said:

---

Jack Boyette said:

---

Dan Carlin said:

---

Queso1 said:

---

These types of threads are evidence that most Trump voters are so far better than leftists. Leftists would never question a similar post by Obama or any other Democrat.

---

There is no precedent prior to Donald Trump of such horrible vulgarities blasted by the President of the United States. It would have been unconscionable even in his first term. Now it's become normalized. I hope both parties can non-normalize it once he ****s off in 2029.

---

I'm sorry…have you not seen what Democrats have posted and said about Charlie Kirk since his death?

---

Find me a serious Democrat politician - not some fringe TikTok looney - who didn't say very publicly that Charlie Kirk's murder was unacceptable. **** Ezra Klein (who is quickly becoming the loudest non politician voice of the Democratic Party) even said plenty of words of support for what Charlie was doing in practicing politics even if he didn't support his politics. Our president is basically saying that Reiner got murdered and deserved to be murdered because he didn't support Trump. I would say there's a pretty obvious difference there if we are still capable of critical thought in our society.

---

The entire Democratic H of Reps would not vote for a Charlie Kirk Day and refused to even have a moment of silence on the House floor for his memory.

YouBet said:

---

Politically speaking, it's an own goal and it's not even debatable. He should have either taken the high road or said nothing at all.

Something like this is all the independents need to go Democrat. If we are lucky, that feckless voting demo will hear something equally as bad by the Democrats right before they walk into the voting booth that has them knee jerk vote against the Dems.

---

I understand what you wrote after what I bolded. What is amazing is the sheer stupidity of anyone who would claim to be politically independent and let a tweet influence their vote that much.

Not policy, not accomplishments or lack thereof.

Just walk in to vote and have a dumbass tweet make you pull the lever one way or another.

That's political ignorance, not independence.

IslanderAg04 said:

---

Old McDonald said:

---

Aston04 said:

---

It's weird, because Trump absolutely nailed his impromptu response when Ginsberg died

---

something his few remaining die hards don't like to acknowledge or admit is that he's had pretty severe cognitive decline over the last 2-3 years. it's the same blind spot democrats had with biden. he's getting even more unhinged, demented, and raving week over week as the sunset of his political relevancy and life looms.

---

You voted for Biden and want to talk about cognitive decline? He aced all the MoCA tests. Stop lying.

---

How do you know he aced them? Why is he taking so many MoCa tests? Why is he doing them in front of multiple medical professionals? Why is he getting MRIs? Why is he bragging about "acing MoCa tests as if they are an IQ test? Both Biden and Trump have been experiencing severe cognitive decline. But Trump's is more harmful even if it's less obvious to those of us who look the other way.

Old McDonald said:

---

thank god the trump era of politics is nearly over. the sooner we move on from him the better.

---

Not if it means the Democrats claw back power. That's objectively a worse outcome.

Mr Mojo Risin said:

---

YouBet said:

---

Politically speaking, it's an own goal and it's not even debatable. He should have either taken the high road or said nothing at all.

Something like this is all the independents need to go Democrat. If we are lucky, that feckless voting demo will hear something equally as bad by the Democrats right before they walk into the voting booth that has them knee jerk vote against the Dems.

---

I understand what you wrote after what I bolded. What is amazing is the sheer stupidity of anyone who would claim to be politically independent and let a tweet influence their vote that much.

Not policy, not accomplishments or lack thereof.

Just walk in to vote and have a dumbass tweet make you pull the lever one way or another.

That's political ignorance, not independence.

---

I agree but a whole mess of voters operate this way.

It's not his best look but you have to take the good with the bad with Trump. I'm more concerned about my country being invaded by muslims, unvetted foreigners, crime, corruption, government waste, etc than I am about a social media post in which he wasn't as compassionate as he should've been.

Ag_of_08 said:

---

The consequences of electing someone based solely on your perception of football team style politics? The CF we're in now where no fiscal conservative has been allowed power in decades, we spend like drunken sailors in a ***** house, and we're driving the nation into financial ruin. Not to mention continuing to tap dance around immigration and the destruction of the American economy.

But your dude talked trash and your social agenda got advanced so, "winning".

---

The other option was letting Kamala win so not sure what you're trying to argue here.

I voted for Trump 3x. What Trump said about Reiner was gross and way out of bounds. That said, what am I supposed to do about it?

I can't go back in time and rescind my votes. I can't vote for him again in 2028. I'm not voting for a Democrat. Should I go riot? March in the streets? Or maybe just shrug my shoulders and move on with things in my life that actually affect me?

Gordo14 said:

---

IslanderAg04 said:

---

Old McDonald said:

---

Aston04 said:

---

It's weird, because Trump absolutely nailed his impromptu response when Ginsberg died

---

something his few remaining die hards don't like to acknowledge or admit is that he's had pretty severe cognitive decline over the last 2-3 years. it's the same blind spot democrats had with biden. he's getting even more unhinged, demented, and raving week over week as the sunset of his political relevancy and life looms.

---

You voted for Biden and want to talk about cognitive decline? He aced all the MoCA tests. Stop lying.

---

How do you know he aced them? Why is he taking so many MoCa tests? Why is he doing them in front of multiple medical professionals? Why is he getting MRIs? Why is he bragging about "acing MoCa tests as if they are an IQ test? Both Biden and Trump have been experiencing severe cognitive decline. But Trump's is more harmful even if it's less obvious to those of us who look the other way.

---

Maybe his magnets got wet, have you even thought that that might be at issue, here?!

Ol_Ag_02 said:

---

LegalDrugPusher said:

---

That's your opinion

---

Wrong. It's just as disgusting as when those on the left blamed Charlie Kirk's words for his own murder.

If you can't see that you're part of the political problem.

---

It's not even close. Horrible take.

Kashchei said:

---

I voted for Trump 3x. What Trump said about Reiner was gross and way out of bounds. That said, what am I supposed to do about it?

I can't go back in time and rescind my votes. I can't vote for him again in 2028. I'm not voting for a Democrat. Should I go riot? March in the streets? Or maybe just shrug my shoulders and move on with things in my life that actually affect me?

---

Dan Carlin said:

---

Queso1 said:

---

These types of threads are evidence that most Trump voters are so far better than leftists. Leftists would never question a similar post by Obama or any other Democrat.

---

There is no precedent prior to Donald Trump of such horrible vulgarities blasted by the President of the United States. It would have been unconscionable even in his first term. Now it's become normalized. I hope both parties can non-normalize it once he ****s off in 2029.

---

Dems are pure evil and are literally murdering conservatives. There's no "both parties." What the left does and what the right does aren't even in the same stratosphere.

Kashchei said:

---

I voted for Trump 3x. What Trump said about Reiner was gross and way out of bounds. That said, what am I supposed to do about it?

I can't go back and time and rescind my votes. I can't vote for him again in 2028. I'm not voting for a Democrat. Should I go riot? March in the streets? Or maybe just shrug my shoulders and move on with things in my life that actually affect me?

---

You mean "...again.", right?

I voted for Trump, but he's a dem, just not a progressive, so he's better than Harris/Biden, but that's no feat.

BigRobSA said:

---

Kashchei said:

---

I voted for Trump 3x. What Trump said about Reiner was gross and way out of bounds. That said, what am I supposed to do about it?

I can't go back and time and rescind my votes. I can't vote for him again in 2028. I'm not voting for a Democrat. Should I go riot? March in the streets? Or maybe just shrug my shoulders and move on with things in my life that actually affect me?

---

You mean "...again.", right?

I voted for Trump, but he's a dem, just not a progressive, so he's better than Harris/Biden, but that's no feat.

---

We know you think he's a lib. You've said that ad nauseum on every thread for the past 10 years. He was the Republican choice for president, so that's who I voted for. And he's not on the ticket in 2028 so you will be relieved.