Quote:

---

Not just a Senate seat. With that loss, lost any check on Biden. Because with that, they got the Senate control. Oddly enough, because it so exposed how off-the-chart deviant, deranged and actually crazy the Progressive Left is, perhaps the four years were necessary to discredit them.

---

From your lips to God's ear because I have lost my formerly PollyAnna optimism at this point.

Had forgotten about this one.

And here it is:

Twenty years in the making.

The State of Georgia:

Dominion Rigging Systems declared the wrong winner for the May 22, 2024, DeKalb County, Georgia, District 2 Commission primary.

The election board decided to conduct a hand recount to ensure accurate results.… pic.twitter.com/CFyvJPwErI

— 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸 (@Real_RobN) December 19, 2025

More:

Quote:

---

The issue only came to light because a candidate received no votes, not a single one in the precinct where she and her husband lived and voted. When she reported the problem to the DeKalb Election Board, they ordered a machine recount, which produced the same results once again.

A subsequent hand count revealed that the voting system had shorted the candidate 3,049 of her actual 4,078 votesover 74% of her total. The system had given 1,456 of her votes to one opponent and failed to count another 1,805 votes.

"Play it again, Sam."

---

ETA: I went back. The year was 2022, not 2024. My apologies for not catching that inaccuracy before.

Five hours? And no one is even attempting to pooh-pooh that last post? ActBlue bots are piking today.

🚨BREAKING & MERRY CHRISTMAS! 🚨
Fulton County Superior Court Judge McBurney has just DENIED Fulton County's Petition to Quash the State Election Board's subpoena for the 2020 Election Records. 🇺🇸 Great week for the good guys 🇺🇸@hw_floyd @Georgia_AG @christina_bobb… pic.twitter.com/PjmCc6sOmt

— Kevin Moncla (@KevinMoncla) December 20, 2025

WOW! After years of inaction on several election cases before him, guess that judge finally remembered where his office is located!

The incredible work by Phillip Davis, aka @mad_liberals, who wrote a program to successfully identify 3,930 double scanned ballots in the Fulton County 2020 recount. I've worked with Phillip in my ongoing Ware County case. To my knowledge, he's the first man in the world to write… https://t.co/dcjtLhP6oP

— Jeff Fulgham (@jeffmfulgham) December 22, 2025

"Safest, most secure election in history."

aggiehawg said:

---

Had forgotten about this one.

And here it is:

Twenty years in the making.

The State of Georgia:

Dominion Rigging Systems declared the wrong winner for the May 22, 2024, DeKalb County, Georgia, District 2 Commission primary.

The election board decided to conduct a hand recount to ensure accurate results.… pic.twitter.com/CFyvJPwErI

— 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸 (@Real_RobN) December 19, 2025

More:

Quote:

---

The issue only came to light because a candidate received no votes, not a single one in the precinct where she and her husband lived and voted. When she reported the problem to the DeKalb Election Board, they ordered a machine recount, which produced the same results once again.

A subsequent hand count revealed that the voting system had shorted the candidate 3,049 of her actual 4,078 votesover 74% of her total. The system had given 1,456 of her votes to one opponent and failed to count another 1,805 votes.

"Play it again, Sam."

---

ETA: I went back. The year was 2022, not 2024. My apologies for not catching that inaccuracy before.

---

Its not voting machines you can't trust, it's democrats. Of course they use voting machines to rig elections, but they'll stuff ballot boxes, too. They have no ethical bounds.

You can't 'vacate' a certification that wasn't valid in the first place. Pro V&V & SLI Gaming weren't lawfully acceditated in 2019. Therefore, vacation isn't necessary. What's req'd is for the EAC to PROVE (which they can't) those vendors were ABLE to certify election systems. pic.twitter.com/4FUsdtQTiN

— TheGoodFight (@TheGoodFight) December 20, 2025

Quote:

---

You can't 'vacate' a certification that wasn't valid in the first place. Pro V&V & SLI Gaming weren't lawfully acceditated in 2019. Therefore, vacation isn't necessary. What's req'd is for the EAC to PROVE (which they can't) those vendors were ABLE to certify election systems.

---

Help America Vote Act, HAVA, was passed in 2002 after the debacle that was Florida in 2000 became Bush v. Gore.

It was HAVA that created the Election Assistance Commission, EAC, that was to have certification AND oversight of electronic voting systems. But the dirty little secret was that back then as the commission was being set up in 2003, few people were thoroughly trained in such systems except people who worked for such companies. So they were essentially checking their own work, not doing an objective analysis.

Further, even when EAC had honest, knowledgeable experts in the field consulting with them, raising alarms about what they were finding, those experts were just ignored. (i.e. Clay Parikh, Halderman, Phil Stark, Harri Hursti, et. al.)

So 2004 election rolls around and many states had switched to electronic voting only nearly all of those were DREs back then. Digital only. I have said before that I am no longer sure W. actually won in 2004 as there was no method to effectively audit the full digital trail.

And the so-called "certified" certifiers, outside companies Pro V&V and SLI were more rinky dink outfits in on the grift funded by federal money in HAVA. It was one hand washes the other which in turn, washes another, wink, wink, nod nod.

A glimmer of light?

Quote:

---

With the National Defense Authorization Act signed by President Donald Trump on December 18th, 2025, a little-known section was snuck into the 3000+ page bill: Section 6805. Requiring Penetration Testing As Part Of The Testing And Certification of Voting Systems.

This section amends the Help America Vote Act of 2002 by adding a "Required Penetration Testing" section that "provides for the conduct of penetration testing as part of the testing, certification, decertification, and recertification of voting system hardware and software" by an accredited laboratory.
The amendment now requires the penetration testing as a condition of certification from the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) and allows consultation with the National Institute of Standards and Technology or any other federal agency on "lab selection criteria" and "other aspects of the program."

---

Some back story here. I mentioned Clay Parikh before. He was contracted to do testing on Dominion and ESS&S machines...that is until he was instructed to stop and not complete his work by his superiors. Of note, what Parikh was doing was showing how vulnerable to hacking the machines were, even before the data made it to the Election Management Server, EMS.

Quote:

---

Parikh worked as a security tester and subject matter expert for Wyle Laboratories and Pro V&V from 2008 through 2017, and had tested hundreds of voting systems, including Dominion Voting Systems (now Liberty Vote) and ES&S voting systems.

He testified that it would take him anywhere between "five to ten minutes" to hack into these systems, with a "best time" of two and a half minutes. All of these hacks were recorded and his reports were given to the voting system test labs.

Perhaps the most concerning moment during his testimony, however, came when he was asked about hacking into the ES&S DS200:

Quote:

---

Q. And were you able to hack into the DS200 when you were in that position?
A (Parikh). Yes, I was.

---

Q. Did that take [a long time] to do?
A. No. I was stopped from going further.
Q. So you were going to but you didn't complete it[?]
A. Because my approach I wanted to actually get in and control the software because you can actually manipulate the statistical data on the system.
Q. And you wanted to show that that could be done[?]
A. Yes. Before it even gets to the EMS. Yes, I did.

---

LINK

GaryClare said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Five hours? And no one is even attempting to pooh-pooh that last post? ActBlue bots are piking today.

---

Aggiehawg - I don't know if you can practice in Texas, but I have a "special project" I'd like to run by you. It's not overly complicated but it's an issue that needs someone who can think outside the box. It does not look like I can DM you on here - would you mind emailing me if you are up for me running this issue by you?

Thank you!

garyclare at aol

---

Sorry but although I am licensed in two states, I am inactive in both and thus cannot assist in specific inquiries. That would be illegal.

aggiehawg said:

---

GaryClare said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Five hours? And no one is even attempting to pooh-pooh that last post? ActBlue bots are piking today.

---

Aggiehawg - I don't know if you can practice in Texas, but I have a "special project" I'd like to run by you. It's not overly complicated but it's an issue that needs someone who can think outside the box. It does not look like I can DM you on here - would you mind emailing me if you are up for me running this issue by you?

Thank you!

garyclare at aol

---

Sorry but although I am licensed in two states, I am inactive in both and thus cannot assist in specific inquiries. That would be illegal.

---

Just declare yourself as a Democrat and you can do whatever you like.

nortex97 said:

---

The incredible work by Phillip Davis, aka @mad_liberals, who wrote a program to successfully identify 3,930 double scanned ballots in the Fulton County 2020 recount. I've worked with Phillip in my ongoing Ware County case. To my knowledge, he's the first man in the world to write… https://t.co/dcjtLhP6oP

— Jeff Fulgham (@jeffmfulgham) December 22, 2025

"Safest, most secure election in history."

---

That bold italics is why most doubt it ironically. Its a classic case of protesting too much.

There is no chance whatsoever such a cluster- was secure. So far the MSD/DC clique to go so far out of their way to claim it was only quintuples the retroactive suspicion.

At the end of the day nothing will come of it and that it what sucks the most. People need to face the consequences regardless of political affiliation.

If you're an R or a D and you facilitated cheating go to jail. Make the headlines. Never be allowed to vote or volunteer again. Banned for life. Sadly nothing will happen and nothing will change.

Quote:

---

Except as noted, reference to the following matters is presented in the Favorito press conference video starting at meter reading 44:22.
[ol]

20,713 original and recount ballots are missing tabulation records

17,852 recount ballot images are completely missing

17,234 unsourced ballots were uploaded to the results, apparently to reconcile original count errors

Over 530,000 Secure Hash Algorithm (SHA) authentication files are missing (needed to authenticate ballot images, and required by Georgia law). The number includes 17,852 recount SHA files.

16,198 unsourced uploaded ballots were added to the results, apparently to reconcile recount errors

380,458 original in-person ballot images were never produced

4,000 ballot images have identical timestamps -- to the same split second. That is a physical impossibility, since it takes nearly a second to produce each image (The Georgia Record

16,034 mail-in ballot authentication files were added days after scanning. Since these files are created simultaneously with the image files, that is another impossibility, and likely evidence of fraud (The Georgia Record)

According to a complaint filed by data analysts Kevin Moncla and Joseph Rossi, the election results included 20,713 votes "...from unreported and unidentifiable tabulators..."

[/ol]

---

Quote:

---

In 2020, Georgia's ballot rejection rate was the lowest of all 50 states. In addition, Fulton County's rate was only 1/7 of the state rate. I did a statistical analysis to determine the likelihood that Fulton's rate would be only 1/7th of the state rate (assuming similar rejection standards were applied). The statistical odds were less than one in one billion. In addition, I compared Fulton to other counties of similar size, demographics, and per capita income. Again, the odds were less than one in one billion.
Voter signatures were not matched
An explanation for the ultra-low rejection rate was produced by a man named Mark Wingate, who served on the 2020 Election Board. Years after the election, Wingate testified (under oath) that he was told by Fulton County election personnel that Fulton did not do any signature matching. The lack of signature matching, in violation of election law, might explain why Garland Favorito found that "only 6 ballots were rejected [county wide] and it should have been in the thousands." He also noted that the signature-matching machine used by Fulton County was not even operational.

---

LINK

But yeah, most secure election, evah, riiiight?

Not at all shocked they were "not certified" after reading those two reports 5 years ago.

AtomicActuator said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

If non-citizens are voting, they're disenfranchising the rest of us. They do not have the right to vote in American elections. Period.

---

Only if they were allowed to vote in the same election as you. So if you voted in Georgia, and Georgia did that, then yes, your vote was diluted.

If you voted in Texas, then your vote was unaffected by an illegal voting in Georgia, but you are well justified in letting your state leaders in Texas know you don't want to see illegals voting in Texas.

---

That is some serious irrational thinking. In a federal election the malfeasance in one state most certainly affects those in other states. The corrupt idiot President Biden and his minions allowing a flood of illegal aliens most certainly affected those citizens killed and their family members. That is just one example there are thousands more.taxes, NGO fraud, ActBlue, etc.

94DCAg said:

---

KerrAg76 said:

---

He actually says there are many, many different incompatible systems and nothing can be verified

---

He also comes to the conclusion that Trump didn't win. The votes weren't there.

---

How can this official be sure,"there are many, many different incompatible systems and nothing can be verified."
He is either lying or an irrational person, potentially both.

Raffensperger says Fulton County’s ‘clerical error’ does not nullify votes https://t.co/3MpOIV7Toh

— Atlanta Journal-Constitution (@ajc) December 23, 2025

TRM said:

---

Raffensperger says Fulton County’s ‘clerical error’ does not nullify votes https://t.co/3MpOIV7Toh

— Atlanta Journal-Constitution (@ajc) December 23, 2025

---

The votes are fraudulent. They have nullified themselves.

TRM said:

---

Raffensperger says Fulton County’s ‘clerical error’ does not nullify votes https://t.co/3MpOIV7Toh

— Atlanta Journal-Constitution (@ajc) December 23, 2025

---

First, this was not a random clerical error, that would effect that large a margin of votes. A couple of 100 ballot batches? Okay, I could believe that. 315,000 votes over multiple days through early voting? No.

Second, language counts. It is not nullifying a vote that was never properly certified in the first place. Nor are the questionable vote counts illegal or unlawful, they are simple invalid and do not meet the required criteria for inclusion in an official count. (Think provisional ballots, they are cast, segregated and then researched to either remove the provisional classification and added to the official count or they are not and are not counted.)

Third, the 2020 primary voting in GA was also a s***show with multiple precinct captains trying to get ahold of Gabe Sterling to help them fix the multiple problems they were encountering with the Dominion system. He largely ignored their requests and complaints. So, Raffensperger and Sterling had advance notice there were serious issues before the general. (That was part of the findings of fact in Judge Totenberg's 147 page October 2020 opinion in the Curling case.She also found the testimony of both Dominion's and Pro V&V's main witnesses were not credible and had been caught lying in affidavits that they were forced to later recant.)

Yeah, nothing ole Raffy has to say holds any credibility at this point. His involvement should be limited to responding to subpoenas and attending depositions.

We fixed the keg said:

---

Yeah, nothing ole Raffy has to say holds any credibility at this point. His involvement should be limited to responding to subpoenas and attending depositions.

---

But, but, but he's just too busy! And the 11th Circuit bought that lie.

You know? Normally I would taking victory laps because I was correct...for freakin; years! (Thanks in no small part to you explaining things to me) but now I am just sad. This was all so unnecessary.

You should take a victory lap. So many smart asses on those threads merrily whistling past the graveyard. Who needs secure elections.

aggiehawg said:

---

Second, language counts. It is not nullifying a vote that was never properly certified in the first place. Nor are the questionable vote counts illegal or unlawful, they are simple invalid and do not meet the required criteria for inclusion in an official count.

---

Thats why I used the term "fraudulent." There is no excuse for uncertified votes to be included in the count. They are not valid, for whatever reason. The guardrails exist to prevent fraud.

They choose to count votes that were not legal to be counted. People SHOULD go to jail because this was a choice someone made. That Raffensperger keeps diminishing what happened tells us he was in on it (but we've known that for years).

That election was as illegitimate as a Democrat presidential primary. Someone chose who Georgia voted for, and it wasn't the people of Georgia.

If this happened in my County (or jurisdiction I was responsible for) and I was not in on it, I'd be calling all the attention in the world to it so it would be fixed and so people would know I was not guilty.

Quote:

---

It has been 1,071 days since the Georgia Supreme Court remanded the VoterGA.org lawsuit back to the lower courts after determining Garland Favorito's voter integrity group did, in fact, have standing. That lawsuit was asking the court to unseal the physical paper ballots and allow inspection.

---

Quote:

---

Last year, the Georgia State Election Board also sought to unseal the physical paper ballots when it issued a subpoena to Fulton County demanding the ballots, ballot stubs, envelopes, and digital images. Fulton County's Board of Registration and Elections, without a vote from the board, filed a lawsuit challenging that subpoena.
Today, Judge Robert McBurney granted the State Election Board access to the physical ballots and related documents; however, the Board would be on the hook for the estimated $400,000 in "document costs," as estimated by the county.

Fulton County has until January 7th to provide the State Election Board with the estimated costs.

---

Not happy about that large of a cost in just producing something they supposedly have in a warehouse. How hard is that?

Quote:

---

Fulton County Chairman Rob Pitts seemed irritated with the decision, telling FOX 5, "This nonsense has to stop at some point. I assured the public then, reassure the public today, those elections are open and fair and transparent, and every vote was counted."

---

Uhm? Doesn't take over a 1000 days after the state supreme court issues their decision to be "transparent" Bucko.

Quote:

---

That is in addition to ten mystery tabulators that have zero documentation or record and accounted for more than 20,000 ballots in the 2020 Election and 17,852 with "unknown provenance," meaning there was no physical ballot, according to SEB Complaint 2023-025.

---

LINK

Tired of baby steps. But some progress.

So I guess conservatives aren't deniers anymore?