Keyno said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

The longer I live, the more I realize "radical islam" is an op.

---

And you're able to live longer because some people choose to fight this "op", worldwide, preventing it from coming to, and ruining, our great nation.

Islam, radical or not, proves daily to be a religion not of peace, but subjugation via violence. Look at the beheadings, the stonings, and other murderous activities. And that's just Muslim on Muslim violence, not even their actions versus Israelis or other non-Muslims.

---

I support outlawing islam. Is that "conservative"?

---

Religiously? Yes.

Politically? No.




But I'll allow it. :-)

Keyno said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Queso1 said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

BlackGold said:

---

Queso1 said:

---

I oppose Hamas. What's it like living in a strictly dualistic world?

---

You don't fully support Israel in all of its actions, therefore you must support Hamas, Hezbollah and radical Islam!!

---

It's a war (that Hamas started in case you forgot). There are only two sides - the terrorists and the people fighting the terrorists.

---

Proposing that the war started on 10/7 is either deliberate avoidance or ignorance of history. That's not to say the Palestinians are right, but I've got real concerns debating someone that thinks this is a recent event.

---

The war started when Hamas decided to murder 1,000+ innocent civilians. Anyone who thinks otherwise is purposely ignoring that because they are looking for a way to blame Israel for being attacked. But I also have concerns about debating someone who continues to lie about things that are easily disproven (I.e Israel "indiscriminately bombing civilians")

---

Yes, the Israel/Palestine conflict began in 2023.

---

This war, the one that Hamas started and refused to surrender, while constantly placing Palestinian civilians in harms way in order to dupe useful idiots like Tucker into blaming Israel, started when Hamas attacked Israel. Thankfully they finally surrendered.

The broader conflict - mainly Islamic groups continually trying to wipe Israel off the map, certainly didn't start in 2023, but also wouldn't exist if those groups weren't openly calling for wiping Israel off the map. There is only one aggressor here.

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

The longer I live, the more I realize "radical islam" is an op.

---

And you're able to live longer because some people choose to fight this "op", worldwide, preventing it from coming to, and ruining, our great nation.

Islam, radical or not, proves daily to be a religion not of peace, but subjugation via violence. Look at the beheadings, the stonings, and other murderous activities. And that's just Muslim on Muslim violence, not even their actions versus Israelis or other non-Muslims.

---

I support outlawing islam. Is that "conservative"?

---

Religiously? Yes.

Politically? No.




But I'll allow it. :-)

---

I am deferring to you as the board's most "conservative" poster. Can we outlaw it. Or are we doomed to just complain about it on message boards while doing endless foreign war.

Keyno said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

The longer I live, the more I realize "radical islam" is an op.

---

And you're able to live longer because some people choose to fight this "op", worldwide, preventing it from coming to, and ruining, our great nation.

Islam, radical or not, proves daily to be a religion not of peace, but subjugation via violence. Look at the beheadings, the stonings, and other murderous activities. And that's just Muslim on Muslim violence, not even their actions versus Israelis or other non-Muslims.

---

I support outlawing islam. Is that "conservative"?

---

Religiously? Yes.

Politically? No.




But I'll allow it. :-)

---

I am deferring to you as the board's most "conservative" poster. Can we outlaw it. Or are we doomed to just complain about it on message boards while doing endless foreign war.

---

No, that isn't a politically conservative stance. Freedom is key. Even religious freedom. Even if that religion is full of violent morons and weirdos.

If you give the govt the ability to "ban" a certain religion, just because, that opens the door to future idiocy against other religions, for whatever reason.

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Keyno said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Queso1 said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

BlackGold said:

---

Queso1 said:

---

I oppose Hamas. What's it like living in a strictly dualistic world?

---

You don't fully support Israel in all of its actions, therefore you must support Hamas, Hezbollah and radical Islam!!

---

It's a war (that Hamas started in case you forgot). There are only two sides - the terrorists and the people fighting the terrorists.

---

Proposing that the war started on 10/7 is either deliberate avoidance or ignorance of history. That's not to say the Palestinians are right, but I've got real concerns debating someone that thinks this is a recent event.

---

The war started when Hamas decided to murder 1,000+ innocent civilians. Anyone who thinks otherwise is purposely ignoring that because they are looking for a way to blame Israel for being attacked. But I also have concerns about debating someone who continues to lie about things that are easily disproven (I.e Israel "indiscriminately bombing civilians")

---

Yes, the Israel/Palestine conflict began in 2023.

---

This war, the one that Hamas started and refused to surrender, while constantly placing Palestinian civilians in harms way in order to dupe useful idiots like Tucker into blaming Israel, started when Hamas attacked Israel. Thankfully they finally surrendered.

The broader conflict - mainly Islamic groups continually trying to wipe Israel off the map, certainly didn't start in 2023, but also wouldn't exist if those groups weren't openly calling for wiping Israel off the map. There is only one aggressor here.

---

Yes sir I watch CNN I know the talking points

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

The longer I live, the more I realize "radical islam" is an op.

---

And you're able to live longer because some people choose to fight this "op", worldwide, preventing it from coming to, and ruining, our great nation.

Islam, radical or not, proves daily to be a religion not of peace, but subjugation via violence. Look at the beheadings, the stonings, and other murderous activities. And that's just Muslim on Muslim violence, not even their actions versus Israelis or other non-Muslims.

---

I support outlawing islam. Is that "conservative"?

---

Religiously? Yes.

Politically? No.




But I'll allow it. :-)

---

I am deferring to you as the board's most "conservative" poster. Can we outlaw it. Or are we doomed to just complain about it on message boards while doing endless foreign war.

---

No, that isn't a politically conservative stance. Freedom is key. Even religious freedom. Even if that religion is full of violent morons and weirdos.

If you give the govt the ability to "ban" a certain religion, just because, that opens the door to future idiocy against other religions, for whatever reason.

---

Yeah, thats why "conservatism" is defunct. We have a problem that everyone is mad about about .Banning it would fix it. But banning it is not "conservative" so we cant do it

Keyno said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

The longer I live, the more I realize "radical islam" is an op.

---

And you're able to live longer because some people choose to fight this "op", worldwide, preventing it from coming to, and ruining, our great nation.

Islam, radical or not, proves daily to be a religion not of peace, but subjugation via violence. Look at the beheadings, the stonings, and other murderous activities. And that's just Muslim on Muslim violence, not even their actions versus Israelis or other non-Muslims.

---

I support outlawing islam. Is that "conservative"?

---

Religiously? Yes.

Politically? No.




But I'll allow it. :-)

---

I am deferring to you as the board's most "conservative" poster. Can we outlaw it. Or are we doomed to just complain about it on message boards while doing endless foreign war.

---

No, that isn't a politically conservative stance. Freedom is key. Even religious freedom. Even if that religion is full of violent morons and weirdos.

If you give the govt the ability to "ban" a certain religion, just because, that opens the door to future idiocy against other religions, for whatever reason.

---

Yeah, thats why "conservatism" is defunct. We have a problem that everyone is mad about about .Banning it would fix it. But banning it is not "conservative" so we cant do it

---

Not Constitutional, either. That darned Constitution gets in the way of lots of people's fun

Well, it looks like Megan Kelly is coming to these conclusions as well. Is Megan Kelly an antisemite? Dave Smith, a Jew, is already an antisemite. Soon the only non-antisemites will be Ted Cruz and some TA posters.

The best case scenario is to cancel him. I don't care if that's taboo.

Keyno said:

---

The longer I live, the more I realize "radical islam" is an op.

---

Quote:

---

Yeah, thats why "conservatism" is defunct

---

What a clown.

B-1 83 said:

---

Keyno said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

The longer I live, the more I realize "radical islam" is an op.

---

And you're able to live longer because some people choose to fight this "op", worldwide, preventing it from coming to, and ruining, our great nation.

Islam, radical or not, proves daily to be a religion not of peace, but subjugation via violence. Look at the beheadings, the stonings, and other murderous activities. And that's just Muslim on Muslim violence, not even their actions versus Israelis or other non-Muslims.

---

I support outlawing islam. Is that "conservative"?

---

Religiously? Yes.

Politically? No.




But I'll allow it. :-)

---

I am deferring to you as the board's most "conservative" poster. Can we outlaw it. Or are we doomed to just complain about it on message boards while doing endless foreign war.

---

No, that isn't a politically conservative stance. Freedom is key. Even religious freedom. Even if that religion is full of violent morons and weirdos.

If you give the govt the ability to "ban" a certain religion, just because, that opens the door to future idiocy against other religions, for whatever reason.

---

Yeah, thats why "conservatism" is defunct. We have a problem that everyone is mad about about .Banning it would fix it. But banning it is not "conservative" so we cant do it

---

Not Constitutional, either. That darned Constitution gets in the way of lots of people's fun

---

When our Founders drafted the Constitution, they were definitely taking into account unlimited immigration and islam

Im Gipper said:

---

Keyno said:

---

The longer I live, the more I realize "radical islam" is an op.

---

Quote:

---

Yeah, thats why "conservatism" is defunct

---

What a clown.

---

"Smaller government" will fix this problem

Let's see what the UAE has to say about radical islam and the west !!!

Queso1 said:

---

Well, it looks like Megan Kelly is coming to these conclusions as well. Is Megan Kelly an antisemite? Dave Smith, a Jew, is already an antisemite. Soon the only non-antisemites will be Ted Cruz and some TA posters.

---

If you don't support Israel in every way, you are an anti-semite, nazi and support radical Islamist jihadis - there's no middle ground. Israel is completely above reproach. So yea Megyn Kelly is an obvious Jew hater who supports radical Islamic terrorists. Cancel, defund and deplatform her!!!

Has Tucker spoken out about the Iranian revolution yet? He was all over Gaza everyday. I've noticed all the "free Gaza" ppl are conveniently silent.

ATX_AG_08 said:

---

Has Tucker spoken out about the Iranian revolution yet?

---

He's waiting for his orders from Doha.

Jeeper79 said:

---

The best case scenario is to cancel him. I don't care if that's taboo.

---

Eh, anyone who agrees with Tucker, Fuentes and/or Candace is obviously not smart enough to actually understand pretty much anything so it becomes a good indicator of who to not take seriously.

B-1 83 said:

---

Keyno said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

The longer I live, the more I realize "radical islam" is an op.

---

And you're able to live longer because some people choose to fight this "op", worldwide, preventing it from coming to, and ruining, our great nation.

Islam, radical or not, proves daily to be a religion not of peace, but subjugation via violence. Look at the beheadings, the stonings, and other murderous activities. And that's just Muslim on Muslim violence, not even their actions versus Israelis or other non-Muslims.

---

I support outlawing islam. Is that "conservative"?

---

Religiously? Yes.

Politically? No.




But I'll allow it. :-)

---

I am deferring to you as the board's most "conservative" poster. Can we outlaw it. Or are we doomed to just complain about it on message boards while doing endless foreign war.

---

No, that isn't a politically conservative stance. Freedom is key. Even religious freedom. Even if that religion is full of violent morons and weirdos.

If you give the govt the ability to "ban" a certain religion, just because, that opens the door to future idiocy against other religions, for whatever reason.

---

Yeah, thats why "conservatism" is defunct. We have a problem that everyone is mad about about .Banning it would fix it. But banning it is not "conservative" so we cant do it

---

Not Constitutional, either. That darned Constitution gets in the way of lots of people's fun

---

The totalitarian "christian" theocrats love radical Islam because they share many of the same values, especially the desire to force everyone to believe like they do, or be killed for refusing.

Rapier108 said:

---

B-1 83 said:

---

Keyno said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

The longer I live, the more I realize "radical islam" is an op.

---

And you're able to live longer because some people choose to fight this "op", worldwide, preventing it from coming to, and ruining, our great nation.

Islam, radical or not, proves daily to be a religion not of peace, but subjugation via violence. Look at the beheadings, the stonings, and other murderous activities. And that's just Muslim on Muslim violence, not even their actions versus Israelis or other non-Muslims.

---

I support outlawing islam. Is that "conservative"?

---

Religiously? Yes.

Politically? No.




But I'll allow it. :-)

---

I am deferring to you as the board's most "conservative" poster. Can we outlaw it. Or are we doomed to just complain about it on message boards while doing endless foreign war.

---

No, that isn't a politically conservative stance. Freedom is key. Even religious freedom. Even if that religion is full of violent morons and weirdos.

If you give the govt the ability to "ban" a certain religion, just because, that opens the door to future idiocy against other religions, for whatever reason.

---

Yeah, thats why "conservatism" is defunct. We have a problem that everyone is mad about about .Banning it would fix it. But banning it is not "conservative" so we cant do it

---

Not Constitutional, either. That darned Constitution gets in the way of lots of people's fun

---

The totalitarian "christian" theocrats love radical Islam because they share many of the same values, especially the desire to force everyone to believe like they do, or be killed for refusing.

---

I'm literally saying I want to ban islam. But go on I guess

Rapier108 said:

---

The totalitarian "christian" theocrats love radical Islam because they share many of the same values, especially the desire to force everyone to believe like they do, or be killed for refusing.

---

There aren't enough facepalms on earth for this comment...Muslims are 100% on the hook to either convert or kill all Christians.

Just because it gives you a cathartic release doesn't mean you should post.

Keyno said:

---

B-1 83 said:

---

Keyno said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

The longer I live, the more I realize "radical islam" is an op.

---

And you're able to live longer because some people choose to fight this "op", worldwide, preventing it from coming to, and ruining, our great nation.

Islam, radical or not, proves daily to be a religion not of peace, but subjugation via violence. Look at the beheadings, the stonings, and other murderous activities. And that's just Muslim on Muslim violence, not even their actions versus Israelis or other non-Muslims.

---

I support outlawing islam. Is that "conservative"?

---

Religiously? Yes.

Politically? No.




But I'll allow it. :-)

---

I am deferring to you as the board's most "conservative" poster. Can we outlaw it. Or are we doomed to just complain about it on message boards while doing endless foreign war.

---

No, that isn't a politically conservative stance. Freedom is key. Even religious freedom. Even if that religion is full of violent morons and weirdos.

If you give the govt the ability to "ban" a certain religion, just because, that opens the door to future idiocy against other religions, for whatever reason.

---

Yeah, thats why "conservatism" is defunct. We have a problem that everyone is mad about about .Banning it would fix it. But banning it is not "conservative" so we cant do it

---

Not Constitutional, either. That darned Constitution gets in the way of lots of people's fun

---

When our Founders drafted the Constitution, they were definitely taking into account unlimited immigration and islam

---

Irrelevant. Are you an originalist, or not? You're using the same argument leftists use against ARs.

Sid Farkas said:

---

Rapier108 said:

---

B-1 83 said:

---

Keyno said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

The longer I live, the more I realize "radical islam" is an op.

---

And you're able to live longer because some people choose to fight this "op", worldwide, preventing it from coming to, and ruining, our great nation.

Islam, radical or not, proves daily to be a religion not of peace, but subjugation via violence. Look at the beheadings, the stonings, and other murderous activities. And that's just Muslim on Muslim violence, not even their actions versus Israelis or other non-Muslims.

---

I support outlawing islam. Is that "conservative"?

---

Religiously? Yes.

Politically? No.




But I'll allow it. :-)

---

I am deferring to you as the board's most "conservative" poster. Can we outlaw it. Or are we doomed to just complain about it on message boards while doing endless foreign war.

---

No, that isn't a politically conservative stance. Freedom is key. Even religious freedom. Even if that religion is full of violent morons and weirdos.

If you give the govt the ability to "ban" a certain religion, just because, that opens the door to future idiocy against other religions, for whatever reason.

---

Yeah, thats why "conservatism" is defunct. We have a problem that everyone is mad about about .Banning it would fix it. But banning it is not "conservative" so we cant do it

---

Not Constitutional, either. That darned Constitution gets in the way of lots of people's fun

---

The totalitarian "christian" theocrats love radical Islam because they share many of the same values, especially the desire to force everyone to believe like they do, or be killed for refusing.

---

There aren't enough facepalms on earth for this comment...Muslims are 100% on the hook to either convert or kill all Christians.

Just because you get a cathartic release doesn't mean you should post.

---

Memes are fun and they own the libs. But can we agree that islam should be outlawed?

B-1 83 said:

---

Keyno said:

---

B-1 83 said:

---

Keyno said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

The longer I live, the more I realize "radical islam" is an op.

---

And you're able to live longer because some people choose to fight this "op", worldwide, preventing it from coming to, and ruining, our great nation.

Islam, radical or not, proves daily to be a religion not of peace, but subjugation via violence. Look at the beheadings, the stonings, and other murderous activities. And that's just Muslim on Muslim violence, not even their actions versus Israelis or other non-Muslims.

---

I support outlawing islam. Is that "conservative"?

---

Religiously? Yes.

Politically? No.




But I'll allow it. :-)

---

I am deferring to you as the board's most "conservative" poster. Can we outlaw it. Or are we doomed to just complain about it on message boards while doing endless foreign war.

---

No, that isn't a politically conservative stance. Freedom is key. Even religious freedom. Even if that religion is full of violent morons and weirdos.

If you give the govt the ability to "ban" a certain religion, just because, that opens the door to future idiocy against other religions, for whatever reason.

---

Yeah, thats why "conservatism" is defunct. We have a problem that everyone is mad about about .Banning it would fix it. But banning it is not "conservative" so we cant do it

---

Not Constitutional, either. That darned Constitution gets in the way of lots of people's fun

---

When our Founders drafted the Constitution, they were definitely taking into account unlimited immigration and islam

---

Irrelevant. Are you an originalist, or not? You're using the same argument leftists use against ARs.

---

No I'm not. I am saying islam should be outlawed in the US. You apparently disagree

That's not what we do or should do.

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

---

That's not what we do or should do.

---

That's fair. I guess we are doomed to complain on message boards instead of fixing problems.

Rapier108 said:

---

B-1 83 said:

---

Keyno said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

The longer I live, the more I realize "radical islam" is an op.

---

And you're able to live longer because some people choose to fight this "op", worldwide, preventing it from coming to, and ruining, our great nation.

Islam, radical or not, proves daily to be a religion not of peace, but subjugation via violence. Look at the beheadings, the stonings, and other murderous activities. And that's just Muslim on Muslim violence, not even their actions versus Israelis or other non-Muslims.

---

I support outlawing islam. Is that "conservative"?

---

Religiously? Yes.

Politically? No.




But I'll allow it. :-)

---

I am deferring to you as the board's most "conservative" poster. Can we outlaw it. Or are we doomed to just complain about it on message boards while doing endless foreign war.

---

No, that isn't a politically conservative stance. Freedom is key. Even religious freedom. Even if that religion is full of violent morons and weirdos.

If you give the govt the ability to "ban" a certain religion, just because, that opens the door to future idiocy against other religions, for whatever reason.

---

Yeah, thats why "conservatism" is defunct. We have a problem that everyone is mad about about .Banning it would fix it. But banning it is not "conservative" so we cant do it

---

Not Constitutional, either. That darned Constitution gets in the way of lots of people's fun

---

The totalitarian "christian" theocrats love radical Islam because they share many of the same values, especially the desire to force everyone to believe like they do, or be killed for refusing.

---

Is this garbage a serious post ? So how many of these "totalitarian "christian" theocrats actually exist- 5.

ttu_85 said:

---

Rapier108 said:

---

B-1 83 said:

---

Keyno said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

The longer I live, the more I realize "radical islam" is an op.

---

And you're able to live longer because some people choose to fight this "op", worldwide, preventing it from coming to, and ruining, our great nation.

Islam, radical or not, proves daily to be a religion not of peace, but subjugation via violence. Look at the beheadings, the stonings, and other murderous activities. And that's just Muslim on Muslim violence, not even their actions versus Israelis or other non-Muslims.

---

I support outlawing islam. Is that "conservative"?

---

Religiously? Yes.

Politically? No.




But I'll allow it. :-)

---

I am deferring to you as the board's most "conservative" poster. Can we outlaw it. Or are we doomed to just complain about it on message boards while doing endless foreign war.

---

No, that isn't a politically conservative stance. Freedom is key. Even religious freedom. Even if that religion is full of violent morons and weirdos.

If you give the govt the ability to "ban" a certain religion, just because, that opens the door to future idiocy against other religions, for whatever reason.

---

Yeah, thats why "conservatism" is defunct. We have a problem that everyone is mad about about .Banning it would fix it. But banning it is not "conservative" so we cant do it

---

Not Constitutional, either. That darned Constitution gets in the way of lots of people's fun

---

The totalitarian "christian" theocrats love radical Islam because they share many of the same values, especially the desire to force everyone to believe like they do, or be killed for refusing.

---

Is this garbage a serious post ? So how many of these "totalitarian "christian" theocrats actually exist- 5.

---

They don't exist. It's completely made up. HTH.

Ah, more personal attacks.

We have at least 10 that post on F16, and probably a few more on TA.

And yes, Islamists and totalitarian "christian" theocracts are simply opposite sides of the same evil coin. The world would be better off without any of them.

Keyno said:

---

B-1 83 said:

---

Keyno said:

---

B-1 83 said:

---

Keyno said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

The longer I live, the more I realize "radical islam" is an op.

---

And you're able to live longer because some people choose to fight this "op", worldwide, preventing it from coming to, and ruining, our great nation.

Islam, radical or not, proves daily to be a religion not of peace, but subjugation via violence. Look at the beheadings, the stonings, and other murderous activities. And that's just Muslim on Muslim violence, not even their actions versus Israelis or other non-Muslims.

---

I support outlawing islam. Is that "conservative"?

---

Religiously? Yes.

Politically? No.




But I'll allow it. :-)

---

I am deferring to you as the board's most "conservative" poster. Can we outlaw it. Or are we doomed to just complain about it on message boards while doing endless foreign war.

---

No, that isn't a politically conservative stance. Freedom is key. Even religious freedom. Even if that religion is full of violent morons and weirdos.

If you give the govt the ability to "ban" a certain religion, just because, that opens the door to future idiocy against other religions, for whatever reason.

---

Yeah, thats why "conservatism" is defunct. We have a problem that everyone is mad about about .Banning it would fix it. But banning it is not "conservative" so we cant do it

---

Not Constitutional, either. That darned Constitution gets in the way of lots of people's fun

---

When our Founders drafted the Constitution, they were definitely taking into account unlimited immigration and islam

---

Irrelevant. Are you an originalist, or not? You're using the same argument leftists use against ARs.

---

No I'm not. I am saying islam should be outlawed in the US. You apparently disagree

---

I'm saying the First Amendment, like it or not, protects it. You don't agree with the First Amendment?


"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Islam is not mentioned as an exception. It was written that way for a reason.

Keyno said:

---

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

---

That's not what we do or should do.

---

That's fair. I guess we are doomed to complain on message boards instead of fixing problems.

---

Well, you could actually win with ideas instead of using government violence. Be smarter than the other side.

Rapier108 said:

---

Ah, more personal attacks.

We have at least 10 that post on F16, and probably a few more on TA.

And yes, Islamists and totalitarian "christian" theocracts are simply opposite sides of the same evil coin. The world would be better off without any of them.

---

Where is the personal attack? You can't get upset when you completely make something up and it gets labeled garbage, as it should be. Totalitarian Christian theocrats do not exist in any meaningful way, unless you're taking us back to the crusades.

B-1 83 said:

---

Keyno said:

---

B-1 83 said:

---

Keyno said:

---

B-1 83 said:

---

Keyno said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

The longer I live, the more I realize "radical islam" is an op.

---

And you're able to live longer because some people choose to fight this "op", worldwide, preventing it from coming to, and ruining, our great nation.

Islam, radical or not, proves daily to be a religion not of peace, but subjugation via violence. Look at the beheadings, the stonings, and other murderous activities. And that's just Muslim on Muslim violence, not even their actions versus Israelis or other non-Muslims.

---

I support outlawing islam. Is that "conservative"?

---

Religiously? Yes.

Politically? No.




But I'll allow it. :-)

---

I am deferring to you as the board's most "conservative" poster. Can we outlaw it. Or are we doomed to just complain about it on message boards while doing endless foreign war.

---

No, that isn't a politically conservative stance. Freedom is key. Even religious freedom. Even if that religion is full of violent morons and weirdos.

If you give the govt the ability to "ban" a certain religion, just because, that opens the door to future idiocy against other religions, for whatever reason.

---

Yeah, thats why "conservatism" is defunct. We have a problem that everyone is mad about about .Banning it would fix it. But banning it is not "conservative" so we cant do it

---

Not Constitutional, either. That darned Constitution gets in the way of lots of people's fun

---

When our Founders drafted the Constitution, they were definitely taking into account unlimited immigration and islam

---

Irrelevant. Are you an originalist, or not? You're using the same argument leftists use against ARs.

---

No I'm not. I am saying islam should be outlawed in the US. You apparently disagree

---

I'm saying the First Amendment, like it or not, protects it. You don't agree with the First Amendment?


"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Islam is not mentioned as an exception. It was written that way for a reason.

---

Hence my earlier comment which you either did not understand or just disregarded. The Founders did not write in "freedom of religion" for islam. They were English protestants who warred with muslims and hated their King. They literally owned slaves. So yea no, the Founders were not allowing islam in the US

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

---

Keyno said:

---

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

---

That's not what we do or should do.

---

That's fair. I guess we are doomed to complain on message boards instead of fixing problems.

---

Well, you could actually win with ideas instead of using government violence. Be smarter than the other side.

---

Violence? What is this? Islam should be banned. If you disagree, that's your prerogative.

Keyno said:

---

B-1 83 said:

---

Keyno said:

---

B-1 83 said:

---

Keyno said:

---

B-1 83 said:

---

Keyno said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

The longer I live, the more I realize "radical islam" is an op.

---

And you're able to live longer because some people choose to fight this "op", worldwide, preventing it from coming to, and ruining, our great nation.

Islam, radical or not, proves daily to be a religion not of peace, but subjugation via violence. Look at the beheadings, the stonings, and other murderous activities. And that's just Muslim on Muslim violence, not even their actions versus Israelis or other non-Muslims.

---

I support outlawing islam. Is that "conservative"?

---

Religiously? Yes.

Politically? No.




But I'll allow it. :-)

---

I am deferring to you as the board's most "conservative" poster. Can we outlaw it. Or are we doomed to just complain about it on message boards while doing endless foreign war.

---

No, that isn't a politically conservative stance. Freedom is key. Even religious freedom. Even if that religion is full of violent morons and weirdos.

If you give the govt the ability to "ban" a certain religion, just because, that opens the door to future idiocy against other religions, for whatever reason.

---

Yeah, thats why "conservatism" is defunct. We have a problem that everyone is mad about about .Banning it would fix it. But banning it is not "conservative" so we cant do it

---

Not Constitutional, either. That darned Constitution gets in the way of lots of people's fun

---

When our Founders drafted the Constitution, they were definitely taking into account unlimited immigration and islam

---

Irrelevant. Are you an originalist, or not? You're using the same argument leftists use against ARs.

---

No I'm not. I am saying islam should be outlawed in the US. You apparently disagree

---

I'm saying the First Amendment, like it or not, protects it. You don't agree with the First Amendment?


"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Islam is not mentioned as an exception. It was written that way for a reason.

---

Hence my earlier comment which you either did not understand or just disregarded. The Founders did not write in "freedom of religion" for islam. They were English protestants who warred with muslims and hated their King. They literally owned slaves. So yea no, the Founders were not allowing islam in the US

---

Probably didn't want those Jews in here either….or Buddhists….or Hindus……. Hell, while you're at it, let's hit the F16 home run and boot those pesky Catholics while we're at it.

i have ZERO love for Islam, but that's a slippery slope you're on that goes against everything our forefathers stood for.

B-1 83 said:

---

Keyno said:

---

B-1 83 said:

---

Keyno said:

---

B-1 83 said:

---

Keyno said:

---

B-1 83 said:

---

Keyno said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Keyno said:

---

The longer I live, the more I realize "radical islam" is an op.

---

And you're able to live longer because some people choose to fight this "op", worldwide, preventing it from coming to, and ruining, our great nation.

Islam, radical or not, proves daily to be a religion not of peace, but subjugation via violence. Look at the beheadings, the stonings, and other murderous activities. And that's just Muslim on Muslim violence, not even their actions versus Israelis or other non-Muslims.

---

I support outlawing islam. Is that "conservative"?

---

Religiously? Yes.

Politically? No.




But I'll allow it. :-)

---

I am deferring to you as the board's most "conservative" poster. Can we outlaw it. Or are we doomed to just complain about it on message boards while doing endless foreign war.

---

No, that isn't a politically conservative stance. Freedom is key. Even religious freedom. Even if that religion is full of violent morons and weirdos.

If you give the govt the ability to "ban" a certain religion, just because, that opens the door to future idiocy against other religions, for whatever reason.

---

Yeah, thats why "conservatism" is defunct. We have a problem that everyone is mad about about .Banning it would fix it. But banning it is not "conservative" so we cant do it

---

Not Constitutional, either. That darned Constitution gets in the way of lots of people's fun

---

When our Founders drafted the Constitution, they were definitely taking into account unlimited immigration and islam

---

Irrelevant. Are you an originalist, or not? You're using the same argument leftists use against ARs.

---

No I'm not. I am saying islam should be outlawed in the US. You apparently disagree

---

I'm saying the First Amendment, like it or not, protects it. You don't agree with the First Amendment?


"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Islam is not mentioned as an exception. It was written that way for a reason.

---

Hence my earlier comment which you either did not understand or just disregarded. The Founders did not write in "freedom of religion" for islam. They were English protestants who warred with muslims and hated their King. They literally owned slaves. So yea no, the Founders were not allowing islam in the US

---

Probably didn't want those Jews in her either….or Buddhists….or Hindus……. Hell, while you're at it, let's not the F16 home run and boot those pesky Catholics while we're at it.

i have ZERO love for Islam, but that's a slippery slope you're on that goes against everything our forefathers stood for.

---

I am sorry it makes you uncomfortable. The Founders literally said only free white landowners can vote. It's a messy situation if you are sensitive but also trying to quote the Constitution at me