Minneapolis getting Hot? [Staff Warning. Take Note]

649,495 Views | 8200 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by ShaggySLC
schmendeler
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Maroon Dawn said:

schmendeler said:

Who?mikejones! said:

schmendeler said:

The apologists here acknowledge that we have a constitutional right to protest, right?

Protests by their nature are disruptive. Disruption isn't cause to initiate violence at citizens. If you must remain quite and meek to be kept from state violence, you have no right to protest.


You just have to not impede by standing in the middle of the street. The sidewalk is right there. Stand on that.


Stand on the sidewalk! If you're in the street, you're fair game!



MLK wasn't fighting to protect criminals killing young women and make sure the Dems could politically and economically profit off a slave labor class so maybe don't make this dumb comparison


He was fighting against the laws at the time. You're just not able to make the connection because you live in a culture that (at least claims to) rejects overt racism.
Aggie4Christ09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Btw, here he is on the sidewalk with a PHONE on his hand when an ICE officer approaches him:



In a few Minutes you'll say he should be even be outside.
Truth9911
How long do you want to ignore this user?
schmendeler said:

Truth9911 said:

schmendeler said:

2000AgPhD said:

Satellite of Love said:

Ag4life80 said:

Every bit of this is avoided if the elected officials of Minnesota, who swore under oath to uphold the law, actually did their sworn duty. Then, it's just ICE picking up the bad guys with the aid of local law enforcement.

Except ICE is picking up US citizens too.

You have provided NO evidence that shows that law abiding citizens have been "picked up" by ICE. Either put up, or shut up.


Over 100 US citizens have been detained by ICE.

https://www.propublica.org/article/immigration-dhs-american-citizens-arrested-detained-against-will

being detained is not having your rights violated.


I need to have this framed.

police detain people all the time are those violations?
2000AgPhD
How long do you want to ignore this user?
schmendeler said:

2000AgPhD said:

Satellite of Love said:

Ag4life80 said:

Every bit of this is avoided if the elected officials of Minnesota, who swore under oath to uphold the law, actually did their sworn duty. Then, it's just ICE picking up the bad guys with the aid of local law enforcement.

Except ICE is picking up US citizens too.

You have provided NO evidence that shows that law abiding citizens have been "picked up" by ICE. Either put up, or shut up.


Over 100 US citizens have been detained by ICE.

https://www.propublica.org/article/immigration-dhs-american-citizens-arrested-detained-against-will

ProPublica? They did not demonstrate in any way that ICE just arbitrarily detained them - they just listed people who had been detained without actually bothering to ask why.
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ice is batting 99.97%. And thats from liberal sources.

ttu_85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aggie4Christ09 said:

Latest reports are stating that the man was actually disarmed immediately.

What justification now?


Dont know I wasn't there and neither were you. I do know this if that dude hadn't strapped on a 9-mil and went looking for trouble in terrible weather in a volatile situation nobody would need to justify anything would they ?
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aggie4Christ09 said:

Btw, here he is on the sidewalk with a PHONE on his hand when an ICE officer approaches him:



In a few Minutes you'll say he should be even be outside.


A still shot is irrelevant. He is clearly in the middle of the street in the video.
Satellite of Love
How long do you want to ignore this user?
2000AgPhD said:

Satellite of Love said:

Ag4life80 said:

Every bit of this is avoided if the elected officials of Minnesota, who swore under oath to uphold the law, actually did their sworn duty. Then, it's just ICE picking up the bad guys with the aid of local law enforcement.

Except ICE is picking up US citizens too.

You have provided NO evidence that shows that law abiding citizens have been "picked up" by ICE. Either put up, or shut up.

You can't be this tone deaf? Already been posted:
https://www.propublica.org/article/immigration-dhs-american-citizens-arrested-detained-against-will

Then there is the kid working at Target, picked up then dropped off at a Walmart parking lot after being roughed up. Be better and don't live with your head under a rock.
B-1 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Satellite of Love said:

Ag4life80 said:

Every bit of this is avoided if the elected officials of Minnesota, who swore under oath to uphold the law, actually did their sworn duty. Then, it's just ICE picking up the bad guys with the aid of local law enforcement.

Except ICE is picking up US citizens too.

Not this crap again......... How many do they still have in custody that did nothing? How many total arrests have been made? While it certainly isn't good, %$#@ happens and regular cops do it on occasion, too, so it's not the horrible ICE issue you'd like to make it.

And then you double down with this! Bwahahahahahahahahaha! There is a whole thread about this incident, and you've just embarrassed yourself bringing it up.
Quote:

Then there is the kid working at Target, picked up then dropped off at a Walmart parking lot after being roughed up. Be better and don't live with your head under a rock.

Being in TexAgs jail changes a man……..no, not really
Aggie4Christ09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ttu_85 said:

Aggie4Christ09 said:

Latest reports are stating that the man was actually disarmed immediately.

What justification now?


Dont know I wasn't there and neither were you. I do know this if that dude hadn't strapped on a 9-mil and went looking for trouble in terrible weather in a volatile situation nobody would need to justify anything would they ?


Yeah, good thing we have cell phones right?
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
schmendeler said:

Maroon Dawn said:

schmendeler said:

Who?mikejones! said:

schmendeler said:

The apologists here acknowledge that we have a constitutional right to protest, right?

Protests by their nature are disruptive. Disruption isn't cause to initiate violence at citizens. If you must remain quite and meek to be kept from state violence, you have no right to protest.


You just have to not impede by standing in the middle of the street. The sidewalk is right there. Stand on that.


Stand on the sidewalk! If you're in the street, you're fair game!



MLK wasn't fighting to protect criminals killing young women and make sure the Dems could politically and economically profit off a slave labor class so maybe don't make this dumb comparison


He was fighting against the laws at the time. You're just not able to make the connection because you live in a culture that (at least claims to) rejects overt racism.


He wasn't fighting for criminals or Dems profiting off of slave labor. Democrats are
schmendeler
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ttu_85 said:

Aggie4Christ09 said:

Latest reports are stating that the man was actually disarmed immediately.

What justification now?


Dont know I wasn't there and neither were you. I do know this if that dude hadn't strapped on a 9-mil and went looking for trouble in terrible weather in a volatile situation nobody would need to justify anything would they ?


Breathtaking degrees of water carrying
Stressboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I see a man aggressively stepping toward a police officer. Not the other way around but you do you.
Aggie4Christ09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
B-1 83 said:

Satellite of Love said:

Ag4life80 said:

Every bit of this is avoided if the elected officials of Minnesota, who swore under oath to uphold the law, actually did their sworn duty. Then, it's just ICE picking up the bad guys with the aid of local law enforcement.

Except ICE is picking up US citizens too.

Not this crap again......... How many do they still have in custody that did nothing? How many total arrests have been made? While it certainly isn't good, %$#@ happens and regular cops do it on occasion, too, so it's not the horrible ICE issue you'd like to make it.


There's an American man from Venezuela who was deported to El Salvador for having a tattoo that would like to have a word with you.
Dirty_Mike&the_boys
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Don't fight with law-enforcement (especially when you're armed) and you won't get shot. It's pretty simple.
"We're going to turn this red Prius into a soup kitchen!"
Sims
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We're comparing that group to the bullhorn blaring, whistle wailing, traffic thwarting, ied tossing, police car ransacking, fire setting, fence destroying, public building destroying, federal agent stalking, predatory doxxing .... legal observers?
deddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
schmendeler said:

Maroon Dawn said:

schmendeler said:

Who?mikejones! said:

schmendeler said:

The apologists here acknowledge that we have a constitutional right to protest, right?

Protests by their nature are disruptive. Disruption isn't cause to initiate violence at citizens. If you must remain quite and meek to be kept from state violence, you have no right to protest.


You just have to not impede by standing in the middle of the street. The sidewalk is right there. Stand on that.


Stand on the sidewalk! If you're in the street, you're fair game!



MLK wasn't fighting to protect criminals killing young women and make sure the Dems could politically and economically profit off a slave labor class so maybe don't make this dumb comparison


He was fighting against the laws at the time. You're just not able to make the connection because you live in a culture that (at least claims to) rejects overt racism.


So you think we should eliminate immigration laws?
sam callahan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Using MLK as a justification is fairly disgusting. He would not advocate physical resistance against officers. He would advoacte the exact opposite and that is why he was successful.
2000AgPhD
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aggie4Christ09 said:

Maroon Dawn said:

Aggie4Christ09 said:

Who?mikejones! said:

2008and1 said:

Aglaw97 said:

2008and1 said:

So to be clear. Filming officers justifies them assaulting you. Got it.


Some of you willfully ignore the facts and that's why we can't have honest discussions. There are vastly less than 1% of law enforcement agents leads to any action let alone assault. We see time and again agitators filming cops, throwing stuff at them and calling the pigs and the cops do little but to try and de-escalate the situation. And in the extreme minority they overstep the line, then hold them accountable. That's not what happened here.



I mean it is on video. I watch him shove a woman. Then the guy who gets killed steps in to help her. I don't care if she is spewing hateful words at the officer. The violence starts with him.


The guy was in the street. The middle of it. I presume they'd been told to leave and then didn't, so we're removed from the street.

Did you expect the cops to hold the lady's hand?


This isn't tianemen square. There is zero justification for this.


Another one with ALL the facts! Go on: walk us through all her actions before the camera starts rolling


I could tell you the sky is blue and if anyone with Trump said it was brown, you'd fight that it's brown until the day you die.

There's no point.

Sorry, gotta call BS on this statement. It is just your average left-wing deflection.
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Satellite of Love said:

2000AgPhD said:

Satellite of Love said:

Ag4life80 said:

Every bit of this is avoided if the elected officials of Minnesota, who swore under oath to uphold the law, actually did their sworn duty. Then, it's just ICE picking up the bad guys with the aid of local law enforcement.

Except ICE is picking up US citizens too.

You have provided NO evidence that shows that law abiding citizens have been "picked up" by ICE. Either put up, or shut up.

You can't be this tone deaf? Already been posted:
https://www.propublica.org/article/immigration-dhs-american-citizens-arrested-detained-against-will

Then there is the kid working at Target, picked up then dropped off at a Walmart parking lot after being roughed up. Be better and don't live with your head under a rock.


The kid jumping in front and obstructing officers?

ShaggySLC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sam callahan said:

Once again, we have a situation where armchair analysts can review multiple different angles, multiple times, at slow speeds, and expect an officer to have all that information in real-time.

Suppose it is determined to be a bad shoot?

Can reasonable people not say protesting in this manner is a bad idea? Instead, we have manipulators encouraging it and unstable people following it.

My last confrontation with a cop was when he was arresting my buddy for something he didn't do. The cop made it clear that if I didn't step aside I was going to jail, too. I did step aside because I am not an idiot and I knew it wasnt going to get resolved on the sidewalk.

Exactly, this use to be common sense and the country would see this guy as Red Foreman would, dumbass. They were arresting them, comply and win a unnecessary use of force suit or wrongful arrest suit if one is there.
ttu_85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aggie4Christ09 said:

Btw, here he is on the sidewalk with a PHONE on his hand when an ICE officer approaches him:

In a few Minutes you'll say he should be even be outside.

Sorry I'll take your "sources" with a big grain of salt. So do your "sources" indicate what he was doing just prior to this snap shot ?

BigRobSA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aggie4Christ09 said:

B-1 83 said:

Satellite of Love said:

Ag4life80 said:

Every bit of this is avoided if the elected officials of Minnesota, who swore under oath to uphold the law, actually did their sworn duty. Then, it's just ICE picking up the bad guys with the aid of local law enforcement.

Except ICE is picking up US citizens too.

Not this crap again......... How many do they still have in custody that did nothing? How many total arrests have been made? While it certainly isn't good, %$#@ happens and regular cops do it on occasion, too, so it's not the horrible ICE issue you'd like to make it.


There's an American man from Venezuela who was deported to El Salvador for having a tattoo that would like to have a word with you.

That's horrible, if true.

But that's 1. With as many deportations as we've had....that's actually impressive, for govt work.

How many happened under Obama's deportation whirlwinds?
sam callahan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
and again, it has to be noted...the side defending this protestor's actions are the same ones complicit and cheering the arrest of peaceful prayers outside an abortion clinic.
Cinco Ranch Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Love it. Libs coming on here telling people to "be better" and "don't live with your head under a rock". In case you forgot, Biden was "president" for four years bringing all these illegals into this country, forcing vaccines on people or lose (a) family, (b) job, or (c) both, telling people that they are this -ist or that -ist if they don't go along with the Democrats' communist ideas.

The only ones ever living with their heads under rocks are liberals.
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aggie4Christ09 said:

B-1 83 said:

Satellite of Love said:

Ag4life80 said:

Every bit of this is avoided if the elected officials of Minnesota, who swore under oath to uphold the law, actually did their sworn duty. Then, it's just ICE picking up the bad guys with the aid of local law enforcement.

Except ICE is picking up US citizens too.

Not this crap again......... How many do they still have in custody that did nothing? How many total arrests have been made? While it certainly isn't good, %$#@ happens and regular cops do it on occasion, too, so it's not the horrible ICE issue you'd like to make it.


There's an American man from Venezuela who was deported to El Salvador for having a tattoo that would like to have a word with you.


Oh, and having a final deportation order, being a human trafficker and a proponent of spousal abuse
2000AgPhD
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aggie4Christ09 said:

B-1 83 said:

Satellite of Love said:

Ag4life80 said:

Every bit of this is avoided if the elected officials of Minnesota, who swore under oath to uphold the law, actually did their sworn duty. Then, it's just ICE picking up the bad guys with the aid of local law enforcement.

Except ICE is picking up US citizens too.

Not this crap again......... How many do they still have in custody that did nothing? How many total arrests have been made? While it certainly isn't good, %$#@ happens and regular cops do it on occasion, too, so it's not the horrible ICE issue you'd like to make it.


There's an American man from Venezuela who was deported to El Salvador for having a tattoo that would like to have a word with you.

You mean the one engaged in human trafficking? The one that his wife took out a restraining order on?
schmendeler
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This board would be praising the red coats and posting FAFO after the Boston massacre if it existed in 1770
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Among that pathos-soaked article lies a couple of key paragraphs:

Quote:

Immigration agents do have authority to detain Americans in limited circumstances. Agents can hold people whom they reasonably suspect are in the country illegally. We found more than 50 Americans who were held after agents questioned their citizenship. They were almost all Latino.

Immigration agents also can arrest citizens who allegedly interfered with or assaulted officers. We compiled cases of about 130 Americans, including a dozen elected officials, accused of assaulting or impeding officers.


Listen, they are not just randomly detaining protestors with no reason. You know this. I know this. We all know this. Quite frankly, if you truly believed they were, you'd expect the numbers to be in the thousands. You know this isn't true.

The article truly is nauseating with its appeals to emotion. "Some were cancer patients. Some were pregnant". Okay, then why are they at protests? This underscores the backdrop of severe mental illness especially in the women protesting and agitating.

If these people truly thought there is mass repression going on, it would be similar to what is happening in Iran.
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
schmendeler said:

This board would be praising the red coats and posting FAFO after the Boston massacre if it existed in 1770


Hyperbole noted
Stressboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
schmendeler said:

This board would be praising the red coats and posting FAFO after the Boston massacre if it existed in 1770


Really? You never read an actual history book then. Those were taxes levied against people without representation.

The immigration laws of this country were ratified by the representatives of all 50 states and accordance with the constitution. Resisting those laws is not an act of self governance but rebellion.

You sir, would've supported the confederacy.
Burdizzo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
policywonk98 said:

I'm fully supportive of the work ICE is doing. But public perception wise. The administration is losing and will lose the public support on this based on these types of incidences.

1) Because the Progressive Leaders of MN et al are lying about what and why ICE is carrying out their duties
2) Because ICE agents are not trained for protest/crowd control and dangerous incidents like this will happen.
3) Trump and Trumps social media team and some officials are making unnecessarily provocative statements immediately surrounding these extreme situations.

Most Americans want immigration enforcement, they don't want drama and Americans dying in the process. It doesn't matter who is at fault or who did what. General population of the country doesn't what crisis surrounding this stuff. For better or worse that's just general desire of the masses.

Walz et al are absolutely stoking this fire to get these kinds of situations. Right or wrong, the feds have to change tactics to fit the context of their operating environment.

If you are pro immigration enforcement you have to hope Trumps team gets smarter on this. He's losing the American public very quickly on this issue. An issue that was one of his strongest issues.

On a broader note, also related to the church service protesting. I understand the right the peacefully protest. That right does not extend to private property. And I don't know case law on this, but it can't possible extend to the middle of a law enforcement action. Trumps team has to get better at the messaging around that and some how turn this around in a way that clearly impresses on the minds of the American public that the progressive groups are operating way outside of their 1st Amendment rights. Unless they can get a handle on the messaging immigration enforcement will take a huge step backward in the next few years.


It is unfortunate that the leftists will go the extra step in letting a few of their useful idiots take a bullet for this and call them martyrs. Too many otherwise smart Americans won't see this for what it is. Rachel Good's death and this man's death are not on Trumps hands. These deaths are on the hands of the leftists for encouraging these people to catch bullets for their anarchist goals.
Aglaw97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aggie4Christ09 said:

ttu_85 said:

Aggie4Christ09 said:

Latest reports are stating that the man was actually disarmed immediately.

What justification now?


Dont know I wasn't there and neither were you. I do know this if that dude hadn't strapped on a 9-mil and went looking for trouble in terrible weather in a volatile situation nobody would need to justify anything would they ?


Yeah, good thing we have cell phones right?


If you can't understand the point some of us are trying to make, innocent people will continue to die. It used to be a universal truth amongst EVERYONE that if a cop tells you to do something, do it eve if you are completely in the right. There's an old saying "you can beat the rap but you can't beat the ride". Just shut up and do what cops ask and then fight your battle later. But if you go looking for trouble, which this guy was clearly, it very likely may find you even if it wasn't justified. Right now nobody has all the facts. But this guy clearly put himself in a position for a bad outcome.
ttu_85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
schmendeler said:

This board would be praising the red coats and posting FAFO after the Boston massacre if it existed in 1770

Bawahahah. Wow. Just wow. And your team would be praising the Bolsheviks after they murdered 12 million Ukrainian peasants in 1921-1924. Had Reddit or DU existed in 1921

schmendeler
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Who?mikejones! said:

schmendeler said:

This board would be praising the red coats and posting FAFO after the Boston massacre if it existed in 1770


Hyperbole noted


You can't expect to get off scot-free after throwing snowballs at law enforcement! I heard they were even throwing rocks!
First Page Last Page
Page 110 of 235
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.