Aggie4Christ09 said:

---

B-1 83 said:

---

Satellite of Love said:

---

Ag4life80 said:

---

Every bit of this is avoided if the elected officials of Minnesota, who swore under oath to uphold the law, actually did their sworn duty. Then, it's just ICE picking up the bad guys with the aid of local law enforcement.

---

Except ICE is picking up US citizens too.

---

Not this crap again......... How many do they still have in custody that did nothing? How many total arrests have been made? While it certainly isn't good, %$#@ happens and regular cops do it on occasion, too, so it's not the horrible ICE issue you'd like to make it.

---

There's an American man from Venezuela who was deported to El Salvador for having a tattoo that would like to have a word with you.

---

Hey everybody! Look!!! Look!!! Over here among the hundreds of thousands detained! We found one! Let's stop detaining and deporting illegal immigrants right this instant!

It's amazing how you can keep digging your ridiculous hole and grasping at straws at the same time.

If a good shoot, if a bad shoot, the fact remains that person was there due to false claims of ICE kidnapping people and being "evil."

Let them do the job. It is a job that needs doing. There isn't a country in the world that lets anyone come in and do whatever they want and stay there.

This chaos is manufactured by people to empower their lies and themselves. They want more deaths so they can grandstand on socials and hold more inflammatory press conferences.

This thread and overall situation makes it very obvious how so many "good" people ignored what happened in Germany in the 30s and 40s.


Ps. The people "protesting" aren't the good guys.

when a legally armed protester is executed while pinned to the ground by federal agents, it's all "comply" "fafo" "the agent feared for his life because he had a gun". If you can't legally carry around law enforcement without being killed, do you really have second amendment rights?

the principle disappears the moment the government they like does the shooting.

Old McDonald said:

---

when a legally armed protester is executed while pinned to the ground by federal agents, it's all "comply" "fafo" "the agent feared for his life because he had a gun". If you can't legally carry around law enforcement without being killed, do you really have second amendment rights?

the principle disappears the moment the government they like does the shooting.

---

Gaslighting 101

schmendeler said:

---

Who?mikejones! said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

This board would be praising the red coats and posting FAFO after the Boston massacre if it existed in 1770

---

Hyperbole noted

---

You can't expect to get off scot-free after throwing snowballs at law enforcement! I heard they were even throwing rocks!

---

My brother in Christ, you are supporting the actions of Democrats who are manipulating useful idiots into causing chaos and getting themselves injured or killed because those Democrats want to keep their illegal slave labor population and you think you have the moral high ground?

schmendeler said:

---

This board would be praising the red coats and posting FAFO after the Boston massacre if it existed in 1770

---

Wow, this takes the cake. Comparing what happened today to the Boston Massacre.

Some of you guys need to step back and take a break.

Aggie4Christ09 said:

---

Btw, here he is on the sidewalk with a PHONE on his hand when an ICE officer approaches him:

This is the man ICE murdered today in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

The local police chief has confirmed him to be 37 years old & in legal possession of a gun, with a permit to carry. pic.twitter.com/iBzk8oOnhu

— Dean Withers (@itsdeaann) January 24, 2026

In a few Minutes you'll say he should be even be outside.

---

He assaulted an ICE officer, he violated 18 USC 111. Now he's dead because of it. Had he been somewhere else, allowing ICE to do their jobs, he would still be in the planet.

Stressboy said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

This board would be praising the red coats and posting FAFO after the Boston massacre if it existed in 1770

---

Really? You never read an actual history book then. Those were taxes levied against people without representation.

The immigration laws of this country were ratified by the representatives of all 50 states and accordance with the constitution. Resisting those laws is not an act of self governance but rebellion.

You sir, would've supported the confederacy.

---

Yes, citizens and govt both have an obligation to follow the law. In this case, the federal govt is attempting to follow federal immigration law and the state is attempting to thwart that and encouraging its citizens to protect that.

Aggie4Christ09 said:

---

Aglaw97 said:

---

Aggie4Christ09 said:

---

ttu_85 said:

---

Aggie4Christ09 said:

---

Latest reports are stating that the man was actually disarmed immediately.

What justification now?

---

Dont know I wasn't there and neither were you. I do know this if that dude hadn't strapped on a 9-mil and went looking for trouble in terrible weather in a volatile situation nobody would need to justify anything would they ?

---

Yeah, good thing we have cell phones right?

---

If you can't understand the point some of us are trying to make, innocent people will continue to die. It used to be a universal truth amongst EVERYONE that if a cop tells you to do something, do it eve if you are completely in the right. There's an old saying "you can beat the rap but you can't beat the ride". Just shut up and do what cops ask and then fight your battle later. But if you go looking for trouble, which this guy was clearly, it very likely may find you even if it wasn't justified. Right now nobody has all the facts. But this guy clearly put himself in a position for a bad outcome.

---

These aren't cops. This is ICE. they have a totally separate set of rules, that you seem to be okay with.

---

But you and the protesters are still subject to their jurisdiction, especially true if you are obstructing their work

Aggie4Christ09 said:

---

Aglaw97 said:

---

Aggie4Christ09 said:

---

ttu_85 said:

---

Aggie4Christ09 said:

---

Latest reports are stating that the man was actually disarmed immediately.

What justification now?

---

Dont know I wasn't there and neither were you. I do know this if that dude hadn't strapped on a 9-mil and went looking for trouble in terrible weather in a volatile situation nobody would need to justify anything would they ?

---

Yeah, good thing we have cell phones right?

---

If you can't understand the point some of us are trying to make, innocent people will continue to die. It used to be a universal truth amongst EVERYONE that if a cop tells you to do something, do it eve if you are completely in the right. There's an old saying "you can beat the rap but you can't beat the ride". Just shut up and do what cops ask and then fight your battle later. But if you go looking for trouble, which this guy was clearly, it very likely may find you even if it wasn't justified. Right now nobody has all the facts. But this guy clearly put himself in a position for a bad outcome.

---

These aren't cops. This is ICE. they have a totally separate set of rules, that you seem to be okay with.

---

Appreciate you evading the point and proving me right. They are law enforcement officers. If they give you an order, comply.

Physically intervening in an arrest or entering the immediate arrest space is illegal, even if the arrest itself is unlawful. It can either be charged as a felony obstruction just or a misdemeanor interfering with a Peace Officer, depending on the degree of severity.

Common statutory language:

• "Obstructing governmental administration"
• "Obstruction of Justice"
• "Interfering with a police officer"
• "Resisting arrest" (applied to third parties)
• "Hindering prosecution"

This includes:

• Stepping into the arrest space
• Grabbing the officer or suspect
• Blocking handcuffing
• Refusing to back up after lawful commands

Even verbal conduct can cross the line if it:

• Incites resistance
• Prevents officers from performing duties

Aggie4Christ09 said:

---

Ag87H2O said:

---

AGinHI said:

---

The Unforgiven said:

---

So more info has come out now. He has carrying two additional mags and had no ID on him. That dude planning on shooting a lot. And if he got caught make it harder for law enforcement to ID him.

---

Well...How would you respond to violent, masked, untrained Gestapo?

It's a recipe for disaster.

---

Well ... Maybe don't be there to antagonize the law enforcement in the first place. Maybe don't carry a loaded gun and then start a physical altercation with them.

And they aren't violent, they're responding in kind to and armed individual who did not follow their orders and started a physical altercation.

And they aren't Gestapo. That's the kind of inflammatory rhetoric that enrages/emboldens the weak minded and provokes these incidents.

The only recipe for disaster is the left wing nutjobs out there protesting federal agents that are doing their jobs, and the Democrat leaders encouraging and enabling bad things to happen.

---

This is just Unamerican.

They are exactly like the gestapo. They interrogate people without any sort of cause but their race.

• That is a lie, they have the identity of the illegal alien prior to dentention. Mostly from records of arrests for acts like pedophilia, violent assault, etc.

They assault people who protest.

• That is a lie, they have been attacked quite often with rocks, chunks of concrete or are trying to disperse the unlawful impeding of their progress the detain the illegal aliens

They use excessive force instead of deescalating.

• That is a lie. Most of the officer speak calmly requesting the protesters obey the law. Only when the protesters do they try and press their way through and respond to illegal acts.

To still have this logic you either lack empathy, are brainwashed, or just don't believe in the Constitution.

• No, you need to study the Constitution and the Federalist papers to understand the original intent of the Constitution. Also, much of what is discussed pertains to laws on the books that were passed by the Federal Government within the powers granted them by the Constitution

---

WCrew04 said:

---

Immigration may be a federal responsibility, but enforcement still has to be competent, restrained, and accountable, and flooding communities with force while civilians get hurt does the opposite of maintaining order. Enforcing the law does not require intimidation or chaos, and when it produces fear and violence, that reflects failure in leadership and execution, not moral authority.

---

Funny, I'm not at risk as a civilian citizen because I'm not a ruhtarded dumbass out there "protesting" for criminals.

Weird how that works.

Quote:

---

If you can't legally carry around law enforcement without being killed, do you really have second amendment rights?

---

I legally carry all the time and I have zero fear of getting shot by a cop.

Who?mikejones! said:

---

If Walz and Frey actually cared about Minneapolis or its citizens and wanted ice to "back off," they would stop cold shouldering ice and instead work with them to remove those ice is trying to deport

---

Exactly, in states not actively impeding ICE none of this crap is happening. That is proof that the leaders in Minnesota are inciting the violence and chaos. The why is the fraud being uncovered.

sam callahan said:

---

Quote:

---

If you can't legally carry around law enforcement without being killed, do you really have second amendment rights?

---

I legally carry all the time and I have zero fear of getting shot by a cop.

---

Let me guess why. You don't instigate confrontation with them? You don't go looking for trouble with cops while carrying? You comply with their orders even if you 100% disagree?


See it's not that hard to avoid a potentially life altering situation

schmendeler said:

---

This board would be praising the red coats and posting FAFO after the Boston massacre if it existed in 1770

---

You're completely full of crap and keep posting these false historical analogies. I would expect better from you.