Political fallout and arguments regarding the US-Israeli action against Iran 022824

596,725 Views | 6124 Replies | Last: 19 min ago by AlaskanAg99
DeepETX_Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Keyno said:

PaulsBunions said:

Looking forward to the Ben Shapiro and Mark Levin crashouts over what Vance said lol

Me too. It's really going to illustrate the contrast of interests as far as the United States and Israel is concerned (and which ones they support more)
I think it's kind of obvious which they support more! Or at least on the same level.

Seems like they don't make a decision/opinion without how it affects Israel. Which isn't America first.
Silent For Too Long
How long do you want to ignore this user?
[If you make that joke again when your ban is over you will get a permanent ban. -Staff]
Silent For Too Long
How long do you want to ignore this user?
shiftyandquick said:

bigtruckguy3500 said:

japantiger said:

Queso1 said:

bobbranco said:

K2-HMFIC said:

Appropriate we signed our surrender here…


This is pure delusion.


You may not like it, but it's not delusion. The US is a laughing stock right now…or at least Trump is. Unfortunately, China was watching. We should have never entered this nonsense.


How is it possible to see the recent US policy vChina and come to this conclusion?

We just demonstrated that nothing China has built to defend itself is functional vs US in both Iran and Venezuela.
China has been kicked out of the W hemisphere
We control the China oil supply chain from both Venezuela and the Strait
China stepped back and forced Iran to negotiate....just like RU, they did not defend "their ally"

China now knows for certain they have no ability to project power against Taiwan

So I disagree with this. At least based on what we have been able to see, China has weathered the diminished oil supply surprisingly well. They have actually done a good job building up a petroleum reserve. Additionally, they appear to have gone in quite heavily on solar, as well as electric vehicles. It was able to cut its petroleum imports by 40% without any substantial effect on its fuel supply or its economy. Again, at least based off what we can see publicly.

Now who knows how big their petroleum reserves are. If the US was looking at running dry in 4 weeks, and China was able to go 8 weeks, what does that mean?

Did China really force Iran to negotiate? Or was Iran already negotiating? I think from the beginning they said they'd stop shooting missiles at Israel and their neighbors if they stopped being bombed. And I don't really feel as though Iran really budged on any of its demands from early on. Everyone laughed at their demand for reparations, but now they're getting a 300 billion dollar reconstruction fund.

We can certainly project power and disrupt their supply lines, but it will affect us, and our allies as well. So it's not without a cost.

China has diversified their energy economy away from fossil fuels. Trump has done the opposite, he is using government power to shut down and stop PRIVATE solar and wind projects.

Trump is actively trying to make the US MORE dependent on fossil fuels by disrupting and blocking the non-fossil fuel economy in the US.


The same China that built over a thousand Coal plants in the last 15 years?

That one?
Gradin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GeorgiAg said:

We need:

Term limits
No individual stock trading by politicians
Reverse Citizens United
Voter ID
Campaign finance reform
Ranked choice voting



Agreed
--------------------
Silent For Too Long
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The people who Obama made the deal with are all dead right now. Their military infrastructure is demolished. Acting like the massive amounts of ordinance dropped by the US and Isreal did nothing to Iran is incredibly stupid.
Waco Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gradin said:

GeorgiAg said:

We need:

Term limits
No individual stock trading by politicians
Reverse Citizens United
Voter ID
Campaign finance reform
Ranked choice voting



Agreed

And age limits for all elected officials and judges.
AGHouston11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So Vance says this deal is fundamentally different than Obama's deal.

Well yes it's about hundred billion times different………..
Well likely much more than that!

Obama was terrible. But when Trump has ripped him for years over Iran and this is the unconditional surrender deal you promised AFTER you go to war and declare victory. Criticisms of Trump are well deserved.

AggieCVQ
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.yahoo.com/news/world/articles/irans-khamenei-approves-deal-says-185725223.html

Damn lol, Trump called these folks moderate and nice people and they just call him desperate!
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Man, a guy who had half his body, his dad, his wife and his son blown to bits by Trump is name calling.

The fact you cared to post what the gay ghost ayatollah says is what qualifies as max desperate.
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
To be fair we killed his dad, wife, and daughter, doubt he has many nice things to say about Trump
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DeepETX_Aggie said:




Poor Bibi being told the cold hard truth that the entire world knows, that without us they'd be nothing, or less if they're neighbors wanted.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
AggieCVQ
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Max desperate is turning "COMPLETE AND TOTAL SURRENDER" into "Ah shucks, I don't want to be Herbert Hoover, we're almost of oil! I'm out! Have some relief!"


Btw were those 14 points signed by the admin still IRGC propaganda? Can't believe they signed a propaganda doc. Oh well at least we got their nuclear dust. But actually we didn't.
bigtruckguy3500
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DeepETX_Aggie said:



Wow. Crazy to see an administration speak so harshly towards Israel. Don't know if I've seen anything like it in my lifetime.
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eliminatus said:

DeepETX_Aggie said:



Vance's arrogance is a liability at this point, not an asset. Nobody should mistake it as an adherence to American exceptionalism either, it's not. Israel has every right to ***** at this MOU. And should.


They do. They also have every right to tell Trump and our military, MIC, resources, and everything else that's kept Bibi and his country from extinction to pound sand and the Bibi will take care of Israel without any help whatsoever from the U.S.

I doubledog dare him, que Bini es tan chingon after all.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
Serious Lee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Vance's arrogance is a liability at this point, not an asset.

was beginning to think I was the only one whos noticed.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's the eye shadow, throws people off.

Vance is confident and takes no ***** Where I come from we call that leadership and respect it.

Arrogance is Barrack Obama telling people the Founding Fathers "fell short".
Dungeon Crawler Carl
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Quote:

BREAKING: Iran has suspended its entire 60-day negotiation period with the US over the direct violation of the MOU's first clause, with Israeli attacks on southern Lebanon constituting a breach less than 24 hours after the MOU was electronically signed, per Fars and Al-Mayadeen.

Iran's negotiating delegation had already been preparing to depart for Switzerland to launch the first round of talks before Iran made the decision to suspend the entire trip.

Iran will also not unilaterally fulfill its commitments, and until Iran is fully assured Israeli attacks on Lebanon have stopped and the US has practically adhered to the first-clause obligations, talks remain cancelled.
3:31 PM Jun 18, 2026

That was fast......
Queso1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Lolz. This quagmire will never end. Defund taxpayer money to Israel and they'll stop.
The Fall Guy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dungeon Crawler Carl said:


Quote:

BREAKING: Iran has suspended its entire 60-day negotiation period with the US over the direct violation of the MOU's first clause, with Israeli attacks on southern Lebanon constituting a breach less than 24 hours after the MOU was electronically signed, per Fars and Al-Mayadeen.

Iran's negotiating delegation had already been preparing to depart for Switzerland to launch the first round of talks before Iran made the decision to suspend the entire trip.

Iran will also not unilaterally fulfill its commitments, and until Iran is fully assured Israeli attacks on Lebanon have stopped and the US has practically adhered to the first-clause obligations, talks remain cancelled.
3:31 PM Jun 18, 2026

That was fast......


Hezbohla should not have attacked first today but Iran told them too. We are being schooled
The Fall Guy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/ambassador-to-us-israel-committed-to-truce-with-lebanon-as-long-as-hezbollah-doesnt-violate-it/

Don't violate and they won't hit back
Eliminatus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
flown-the-coop said:

It's the eye shadow, throws people off.

Vance is confident and takes no ***** Where I come from we call that leadership and respect it.

Arrogance is Barrack Obama telling people the Founding Fathers "fell short".

What an absolutely horrible and skewed definition of leadership. America fought to get away from such strong arm philosophy.

Leadership is looking at this debacle and realizing that there is a third seat in this business that needs to be wrangled in diplomatically first before any moves should have been made. This constant moving around all hare brained that we do with little to zero thought of others, or even contempt, has backfired. Again. Like it or not, Israel was with us there from the beginning and have just as much as stake here. More actually.

Our diplomacy under this admin is beyond abysmal and thinking that it is no longer needed to get at the dems or whatever it is, is just foolish.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FWTXAg said:

YouBet said:

Quote:

The rightwing party base hates Dems more than anything. That mindset won't change when the November election rolls around.

I hope it doesn't change. Democrats are now openly communist and hate this country. For all of the Republican's faults (and there are many), they are still better than the alternative. Only reason to vote for Republicans at this point is to selfishly try and delay the inevitable while I'm alive.

It sucks we've ended up in a situation where we are $40T in debt and growing it by $1T every six months. Both parties are at fault and neither want to do anything about it.


Good God I hope it does lol

That mindset is literally uniparty propaganda and it is the exact reason we have the monstrosity of a Federal government that we do now.

The average Democrat isn't a communist or deranged antifa freak just like the average Republican wouldn't shoot somebody to defend Trump like this forum might make it seem at times. Most people want a better life for their kids and their families than the one they had. There are a whole hell of a lot of us that feel that way on Team Blue, Team Red, and those like me who'd never vote for either party if you paid me.

The enemy is an overreaching, overpowered, and constantly growing central government, and it always has been.

Thankfully The People Vs. The Government (no matter which part of the uniparty is in power) party is growing every day.

I think it'll happen in our lifetimes. People are learning that we have been fooled by our masters for far too long.

Maybe they're not.

But, they'll have no problem voting for one.

Hell, you've got Maine Dems voting for a Nazi, VA Dems voting for a candidate that stated he'd love to see his opponent's kids murdered, Talarico (you'll vote for him), Mamdani, the DSA mayor candidate in DC...
You can turn off signatures, btw
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You realize Trump has been widely lambasted from both sides but particularly by MAGA for trying too much diplomacy.

You cannot be serious with your post. Was it meant as satire cause I seriously and struggling.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
shiftyandquick said:

bigtruckguy3500 said:

japantiger said:

Queso1 said:

bobbranco said:

K2-HMFIC said:

Appropriate we signed our surrender here…


This is pure delusion.


You may not like it, but it's not delusion. The US is a laughing stock right now…or at least Trump is. Unfortunately, China was watching. We should have never entered this nonsense.


How is it possible to see the recent US policy vChina and come to this conclusion?

We just demonstrated that nothing China has built to defend itself is functional vs US in both Iran and Venezuela.
China has been kicked out of the W hemisphere
We control the China oil supply chain from both Venezuela and the Strait
China stepped back and forced Iran to negotiate....just like RU, they did not defend "their ally"

China now knows for certain they have no ability to project power against Taiwan

So I disagree with this. At least based on what we have been able to see, China has weathered the diminished oil supply surprisingly well. They have actually done a good job building up a petroleum reserve. Additionally, they appear to have gone in quite heavily on solar, as well as electric vehicles. It was able to cut its petroleum imports by 40% without any substantial effect on its fuel supply or its economy. Again, at least based off what we can see publicly.

Now who knows how big their petroleum reserves are. If the US was looking at running dry in 4 weeks, and China was able to go 8 weeks, what does that mean?

Did China really force Iran to negotiate? Or was Iran already negotiating? I think from the beginning they said they'd stop shooting missiles at Israel and their neighbors if they stopped being bombed. And I don't really feel as though Iran really budged on any of its demands from early on. Everyone laughed at their demand for reparations, but now they're getting a 300 billion dollar reconstruction fund.

We can certainly project power and disrupt their supply lines, but it will affect us, and our allies as well. So it's not without a cost.

China has diversified their energy economy away from fossil fuels. Trump has done the opposite, he is using government power to shut down and stop PRIVATE solar and wind projects.

Trump is actively trying to make the US MORE dependent on fossil fuels by disrupting and blocking the non-fossil fuel economy in the US.

China commissioned 50 COAL plants in 2025.

Yeah...completely diversified away from fossil fuels...

Do you wipe your comments off after you pull them out of your ass or do just slap them on the keyboard and hit Post?
You can turn off signatures, btw
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Eliminatus said:

DeepETX_Aggie said:



Vance's arrogance is a liability at this point, not an asset. Nobody should mistake it as an adherence to American exceptionalism either, it's not. Israel has every right to ***** at this MOU. And should.

I'm liking Vance less as time goes by.

Not that I think he's bad, but his positions are not as good as I once thought.
You can turn off signatures, btw
Bull Meachem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag with kids said:

Eliminatus said:

DeepETX_Aggie said:



Vance's arrogance is a liability at this point, not an asset. Nobody should mistake it as an adherence to American exceptionalism either, it's not. Israel has every right to ***** at this MOU. And should.

I'm liking Vance less as time goes by.

Not that I think he's bad, but his positions are not as good as I once thought.


The promise of the candidate rarely lives up to the office holder.
Eliminatus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
flown-the-coop said:

You realize Trump has been widely lambasted from both sides but particularly by MAGA for trying too much diplomacy.

You cannot be serious with your post. Was it meant as satire cause I seriously and struggling.

Oh, you mean where he threatens everyone nonstop and when someone doesn't care about those threats and stands up to him, he stops and waffles around, grasping for a "deal"? The same grasping that ends up manipulating the markets for weeks and months and makes him (and us) look weak.

All the while calling our allies weak, ignoring them when we do something, then excoriating them for not being there.

Yeah bud, that is not diplomacy. Sorry. Look at this entire Iran debacle. Case. In. Point.

Look, I am not happy with what is going on. Believe it or not. This whole situation sucks. I am also a grown ass man though, educated and paying attention, and it is clear to me that we screwed the pooch in Iran. If you truly want to talk about leadership tenets, here you go. The ultimate responsibility lies with the leader. Which is Trump. He is going to wear this for the rest of his days and beyond.
Bull Meachem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FCP doesn't actually believe anything he writes. It's a bit he's doing.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bull Meachem said:

Ag with kids said:

Eliminatus said:

DeepETX_Aggie said:



Vance's arrogance is a liability at this point, not an asset. Nobody should mistake it as an adherence to American exceptionalism either, it's not. Israel has every right to ***** at this MOU. And should.

I'm liking Vance less as time goes by.

Not that I think he's bad, but his positions are not as good as I once thought.


The promise of the candidate rarely lives up to the office holder.


Fair Enough...

I think Rubio has been much better than I thought, and I was a supporter of his in his previous POTUS run.
You can turn off signatures, btw
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bull Meachem said:

FCP doesn't actually believe anything he writes. It's a bit he's doing.

What's the bit you're doing?
You can turn off signatures, btw
Eliminatus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag with kids said:

Eliminatus said:

DeepETX_Aggie said:



Vance's arrogance is a liability at this point, not an asset. Nobody should mistake it as an adherence to American exceptionalism either, it's not. Israel has every right to ***** at this MOU. And should.

I'm liking Vance less as time goes by.

Not that I think he's bad, but his positions are not as good as I once thought.

I've been off the Vance wagon for quite some time. I didn't realize his isolationism positions were as strong as they are, which I am not a fan of. Just something about him too. Not quite Fauci level perhaps but the arrogance rubs me wrong about him. Probably just the raw ambition that bleeds off of him in waves. Which is worse in my book. Most politicians have it, but it is especially egregious with him and it has all my red flags pinging.

His role of attack dog he has assumed is interesting though. Particularly in light of this latest sound bite of him trying to shame Israel. That will age well I am sure.
Old McDonald
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PaulsBunions said:

Looking forward to the Ben Shapiro and Mark Levin crashouts over what Vance said lol
vance's comments are the most forcefully critical toward israel we've seen from any administration in the past. smart of him to frontrun this, he's likely felt this way from the beginning but was scared to break with trump publicly until trump soured on israel.

meanwhile trump is likely fuming that bibi dragged him into this and it's turned into such a massive liability for him. the passive aggressive comments about patron pete and the other iran hawks corroborate this. israel might have generationally fumbled their most important alliance.
shiftyandquick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Old McDonald said:

PaulsBunions said:

Looking forward to the Ben Shapiro and Mark Levin crashouts over what Vance said lol

vance's comments are the most forcefully critical toward israel we've seen from any administration in the past. smart of him to frontrun this, he's likely felt this way from the beginning but was scared to break with trump publicly until trump soured on israel.

meanwhile trump is likely fuming that bibi dragged him into this and it's turned into such a massive liability for him. the passive aggressive comments about patron pete and the other iran hawks corroborate this. israel might have generationally fumbled their most important alliance.

JD loves to punch down. Remember when he publicly berated Zelensky to his face in front of the press? He absolutely loved that. It's who he is at the core.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Will be telling if the Dems try and suddenly start supporting Israel again after Vance's comments. Based on their recent positions toward Israel, they should be celebrating Vance's comments. Another red button meme for Dems.
Ciboag96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
shiftyandquick said:


JD loves to punch down. Remember when he publicly berated Zelensky to his face in front of the press? He absolutely loved that. It's who he is at the core.


You talking about the Billionaire who used to dance dressed in high heels? That guy?
First Page Last Page
Page 160 of 176
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.