JP Morgan assault allegations

29,812 Views | 281 Replies | Last: 3 days ago by infinity ag
DannyDuberstein
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You mean the point of interest in his weirdass fantasy novel, which was him crying instead of getting to O
TXAG 05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LMCane said:

never been a huge Anniston fan but this was PEAK Jennifer



Go watch her dance scene in We're The Millers and get back with me.
infinity ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think bro ain't lyin'. Who would reject 1M of easy money?

fc2112
How long do you want to ignore this user?
infinity ag said:

I think bro ain't lyin'. Who would reject 1M of easy money?



Entirely possible this was a consensual affair. But if she was a manager above him, JPMorgan is exposed. Not at all wrong for him to go large since he probably is done in finance.
AxelFoley85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Probably still a liar but can't wait to find out.

"In a statement, a JPMorgan spokesman said "We did try to reach an agreement to avoid the time and expense of litigation and to support an employee who was being threatened with the very reputational harm now unfolding. We continue to believe these allegations have no merit and new information raised as a result of the public filing only reinforces that conclusion.""

Excerpt From
"JPMorgan Offered $1 Million Settlement Before Sexual Assault Claims Went Viral"
Alexander Saeedy
The Wall Street Journal
https://apple.news/AU6UpsjowTnurZVQl7vS4_Q
This material may be protected by copyright.
infinity ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AxelFoley85 said:

Probably still a liar but can't wait to find out.

"In a statement, a JPMorgan spokesman said "We did try to reach an agreement to avoid the time and expense of litigation and to support an employee who was being threatened with the very reputational harm now unfolding. We continue to believe these allegations have no merit and new information raised as a result of the public filing only reinforces that conclusion.""

Excerpt From
"JPMorgan Offered $1 Million Settlement Before Sexual Assault Claims Went Viral"
Alexander Saeedy
The Wall Street Journal
https://apple.news/AU6UpsjowTnurZVQl7vS4_Q
This material may be protected by copyright.


Why probably still a liar? It's just a he-said, she-said at this point.

  • Are you supporting the chick because she's a chick (white-knighting)?
  • Are you saying that he is lying because of his looks (why would she go for him)?
  • Is it because he is a "brown boy" (her alleged words)?
Sara Gonzales was laughing at him in a video, but why? Maybe he is the victim, we don't know yet.

JPM is a sleazy company and so they absolutely want to hush this up.
AozorAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AxelFoley85 said:

Probably still a liar but can't wait to find out.

"In a statement, a JPMorgan spokesman said "We did try to reach an agreement to avoid the time and expense of litigation and to support an employee who was being threatened with the very reputational harm now unfolding. We continue to believe these allegations have no merit and new information raised as a result of the public filing only reinforces that conclusion.""

Excerpt From
"JPMorgan Offered $1 Million Settlement Before Sexual Assault Claims Went Viral"
Alexander Saeedy
The Wall Street Journal
https://apple.news/AU6UpsjowTnurZVQl7vS4_Q
This material may be protected by copyright.

As a lawyer, I can say with a great deal of confidence that JPMorgan would not offer $1 million as a nuisance settlement. In a case like this, if you really think it's made up, nuisance money would be maybe $100k.

I have seen early 7 figures offers one might consider nuisance money in large commercial cases. This is not one of those cases. In a "my boss made me have sex with her" case, $1 million is real money. I could be totally wrong, but seems like they are concerned about something.

If the concern they had was truly just about the reputational harm to an innocent employee, then good on JPMorgan for putting up $1 million trying to prevent it, but I kind of doubt that was the motivation.

Again though, who knows. This whole thing is bizarre.
AxelFoley85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't believe that dweeb was the victim of a horny woman who wasn't his boss. I want it to be true for my entertainment, but I don't buy it.
AxelFoley85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'll defer to you on this. My immediate thought is it is in fact suspicious.
VP at Pierce and Pierce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AozorAg said:

AxelFoley85 said:

Probably still a liar but can't wait to find out.

"In a statement, a JPMorgan spokesman said "We did try to reach an agreement to avoid the time and expense of litigation and to support an employee who was being threatened with the very reputational harm now unfolding. We continue to believe these allegations have no merit and new information raised as a result of the public filing only reinforces that conclusion.""

Excerpt From
"JPMorgan Offered $1 Million Settlement Before Sexual Assault Claims Went Viral"
Alexander Saeedy
The Wall Street Journal
https://apple.news/AU6UpsjowTnurZVQl7vS4_Q
This material may be protected by copyright.

As a lawyer, I can say with a great deal of confidence that JPMorgan would not offer $1 million as a nuisance settlement. In a case like this, if you really think it's made up, nuisance money would be maybe $100k.

I have seen early 7 figures offers one might consider nuisance money in large commercial cases. This is not one of those cases. In a "my boss made me have sex with her" case, $1 million is real money. I could be totally wrong, but seems like they are concerned about something.

If the concern they had was truly just about the reputational harm to an innocent employee, then good on JPMorgan for putting up $1 million trying to prevent it, but I kind of doubt that was the motivation.

Again though, who knows. This whole thing is bizarre.


On the nuisance side, if Lorna is great her job and brings in tens or even hundreds of millions a year in business and has an incredible book business then yes JP Morgan would pay $1 million to make this go away especially if she did nothing wrong. I don't know if her role is in business development or anything like that, just spit balling.
infinity ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AozorAg said:

AxelFoley85 said:

Probably still a liar but can't wait to find out.

"In a statement, a JPMorgan spokesman said "We did try to reach an agreement to avoid the time and expense of litigation and to support an employee who was being threatened with the very reputational harm now unfolding. We continue to believe these allegations have no merit and new information raised as a result of the public filing only reinforces that conclusion.""

Excerpt From
"JPMorgan Offered $1 Million Settlement Before Sexual Assault Claims Went Viral"
Alexander Saeedy
The Wall Street Journal
https://apple.news/AU6UpsjowTnurZVQl7vS4_Q
This material may be protected by copyright.

As a lawyer, I can say with a great deal of confidence that JPMorgan would not offer $1 million as a nuisance settlement. In a case like this, if you really think it's made up, nuisance money would be maybe $100k.

I have seen early 7 figures offers one might consider nuisance money in large commercial cases. This is not one of those cases. In a "my boss made me have sex with her" case, $1 million is real money. I could be totally wrong, but seems like they are concerned about something.

If the concern they had was truly just about the reputational harm to an innocent employee, then good on JPMorgan for putting up $1 million trying to prevent it, but I kind of doubt that was the motivation.

Again though, who knows. This whole thing is bizarre.


Thank you. Yours is the most educated view in this thread. The rest of us are just giving out opinions.

So now, I am on the side of ma man, the brown boy. I now tend to believe his horny BSC boss wanted him to bang her, he didn't want to (his choice, maybe his Chinese wife is hotter). His principles are more important than $1M.
deddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
infinity ag said:

This is new information.
Lots of sexy stuff here.

Women these days are BSC with all the feminism they are drunk on, and the notion that they can get away with anything. You never know, dude may be telling the truth.

Naked, smoking JPMorgan exec's threesome invite: Ex-staffer's new bombshell claims
Former JPMorgan banker Chirayu Rana has returned to court in a bombshell twist to the "sex slave" case, citing new claims backed by two anonymous witness statements alleging a disturbing "threesome invitation".

Quote:

In a sensational twist to the JPMorgan "sex slave" case, Chirayu Rana, a former banker, has returned to court with explosive new claims, complete with two anonymous witnesses' statements alleging a disturbing "threesome invitation," according to a report by The Sun.

Rana, 35, has refiled his lawsuit which the bank has vehemently refuted in Manhattan Supreme Court against senior executive Lorna Hajdini, 37, accusing her of sexually assaulting, racially abusing and drugging him. The lawsuit previously withdrawn for "corrections" reappeared on Monday with the two witness statements detailing the alleged incidents from 2024.

One anonymous witness claimed he was staying at an apartment with Rana when he was woken by the sound of a woman. He alleged that Hajdini, "completely naked," entered the room, sat on a sofa, lit a cigarette, and asked him to "join" them in the bedroom. The witness said he repeatedly refused, after which Hajdini allegedly told him, "You know I own (Rana), so you'd better come join."

The same witness further claimed that after Hajdini returned to the bedroom, he heard Rana pleading, "No, no, no, you have to leave. I'm not going to do this. Please stop."

A second witness stated that Rana had earlier confided that a woman at work was making his "life hell." He also alleged that he once saw Hajdini kissing Rana's neck and grabbing him, adding that Rana appeared visibly uncomfortable during the interaction.

The revised filing also includes an affidavit in which Rana says he was diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in October 2024 following the alleged assaults, along with a letter from his counsellor confirming that he is undergoing treatment.

However, both the bank and Hajdini have strongly denied the allegations.

JPMorgan Chase told The Sun, "Following our investigation, we don't believe there's any merit to these claims. While numerous employees cooperated with the investigation, the complainant refused to participate and has declined to provide facts that would be central to support his allegations."
"Lorna continues to categorically deny the allegations. She never dated this individual, never had a sexual or romantic encounter with him of any kind and never gave him any drugs. She maintains that his false claims are entirely fabricated and tarnishing her reputation," Hajdini's lawyers said.



Yeah.
the dude has been lying through is a$$ all along. He claimed his *dad* was dead. This is one, insufferable, narcissist who thinks he's an Indian smarter than "dumb" americans.

Being a self absorbed narcissist, he undoubtedly thinks he has been wronged, and he got a couple of his clown friends to agree.

The POS needs to be ridiculed and prosecuted, an absolute disgrace to his parents, and to the Indian community. He EXEMPLIFIES the sanctimonious, stupid, scam Indian. His bull**** made the Indian news which , unsurprisingly, refused to cover how it was all a sham.

deddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
infinity ag said:

AxelFoley85 said:

Probably still a liar but can't wait to find out.

"In a statement, a JPMorgan spokesman said "We did try to reach an agreement to avoid the time and expense of litigation and to support an employee who was being threatened with the very reputational harm now unfolding. We continue to believe these allegations have no merit and new information raised as a result of the public filing only reinforces that conclusion.""

Excerpt From
"JPMorgan Offered $1 Million Settlement Before Sexual Assault Claims Went Viral"
Alexander Saeedy
The Wall Street Journal
https://apple.news/AU6UpsjowTnurZVQl7vS4_Q
This material may be protected by copyright.


Why probably still a liar? It's just a he-said, she-said at this point.

  • Are you supporting the chick because she's a chick (white-knighting)?
  • Are you saying that he is lying because of his looks (why would she go for him)?
  • Is it because he is a "brown boy" (her alleged words)?
Sara Gonzales was laughing at him in a video, but why? Maybe he is the victim, we don't know yet.

JPM is a sleazy company and so they absolutely want to hush this up.

You are clearly are not up to date on this nonsense.

And it certainly is not a "he said, she said"/

This ******* made a bunch of allegations. If you read the language of his allegations, there are clear signs that this moron has been reading playboy, and has never talked to a prettty woman, let alone be sexually harrassed by one. An absolute ,effiminate, beta taking his rage out on someone who was a lot more successful than this loser, as well as on his wife, who is probably disappointed with the man she married.

Once he made his complaint, both the alleged perpetrator(the Albanian lady) and JPM co-operated with HR. Not only had he no proof to back up *any* of his allegations, he then refused to cooperate.

Additionally, he made made factual errors in his allegation ( he claimed that Hajdini controlled his pay, she did not, she wasn't even in his hierarchy).

This dude is an absolute loser, and needs to be prosecuted so that he doesn't spread his vile bull**** and ruin other lives.

infinity ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
deddog said:

infinity ag said:

AxelFoley85 said:

Probably still a liar but can't wait to find out.

"In a statement, a JPMorgan spokesman said "We did try to reach an agreement to avoid the time and expense of litigation and to support an employee who was being threatened with the very reputational harm now unfolding. We continue to believe these allegations have no merit and new information raised as a result of the public filing only reinforces that conclusion.""

Excerpt From
"JPMorgan Offered $1 Million Settlement Before Sexual Assault Claims Went Viral"
Alexander Saeedy
The Wall Street Journal
https://apple.news/AU6UpsjowTnurZVQl7vS4_Q
This material may be protected by copyright.


Why probably still a liar? It's just a he-said, she-said at this point.

  • Are you supporting the chick because she's a chick (white-knighting)?
  • Are you saying that he is lying because of his looks (why would she go for him)?
  • Is it because he is a "brown boy" (her alleged words)?
Sara Gonzales was laughing at him in a video, but why? Maybe he is the victim, we don't know yet.

JPM is a sleazy company and so they absolutely want to hush this up.

You are clearly are not up to date on this nonsense.

And it certainly is not a "he said, she said"/

This ******* made a bunch of allegations. If you read the language of his allegations, there are clear signs that this moron has been reading playboy, and has never talked to a prettty woman, let alone be sexually harrassed by one. An absolute ,effiminate, beta taking his rage out on someone who was a lot more successful than this loser, as well as on his wife, who is probably disappointed with the man she married.

Once he made his complaint, both the alleged perpetrator(the Albanian lady) and JPM co-operated with HR. Not only had he no proof to back up *any* of his allegations, he then refused to cooperate.

Additionally, he made made factual errors in his allegation ( he claimed that Hajdini controlled his pay, she did not, she wasn't even in his hierarchy).

This dude is an absolute loser, and needs to be prosecuted so that he doesn't spread his vile bull**** and ruin other lives.




No one really knows other than brown-boy and girlboss.

We will all find out in due course. Until then pick your side and pay $10 into the pool.
japantiger
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
deddog said:

infinity ag said:

AxelFoley85 said:

Probably still a liar but can't wait to find out.

"In a statement, a JPMorgan spokesman said "We did try to reach an agreement to avoid the time and expense of litigation and to support an employee who was being threatened with the very reputational harm now unfolding. We continue to believe these allegations have no merit and new information raised as a result of the public filing only reinforces that conclusion.""

Excerpt From
"JPMorgan Offered $1 Million Settlement Before Sexual Assault Claims Went Viral"
Alexander Saeedy
The Wall Street Journal
https://apple.news/AU6UpsjowTnurZVQl7vS4_Q
This material may be protected by copyright.


Why probably still a liar? It's just a he-said, she-said at this point.

  • Are you supporting the chick because she's a chick (white-knighting)?
  • Are you saying that he is lying because of his looks (why would she go for him)?
  • Is it because he is a "brown boy" (her alleged words)?
Sara Gonzales was laughing at him in a video, but why? Maybe he is the victim, we don't know yet.

JPM is a sleazy company and so they absolutely want to hush this up.

You are clearly are not up to date on this nonsense.

And it certainly is not a "he said, she said"/

This ******* made a bunch of allegations. If you read the language of his allegations, there are clear signs that this moron has been reading playboy, and has never talked to a prettty woman, let alone be sexually harrassed by one. An absolute ,effiminate, beta taking his rage out on someone who was a lot more successful than this loser, as well as on his wife, who is probably disappointed with the man she married.

Once he made his complaint, both the alleged perpetrator(the Albanian lady) and JPM co-operated with HR. Not only had he no proof to back up *any* of his allegations, he then refused to cooperate.

Additionally, he made made factual errors in his allegation ( he claimed that Hajdini controlled his pay, she did not, she wasn't even in his hierarchy).

This dude is an absolute loser, and needs to be prosecuted so that he doesn't spread his vile bull**** and ruin other lives.



We're in a post-truth world. Facts don't matter. It's salacious and involves every point on the DEI compass. Therefore I believe it and he should be paid for his PTSD
“It was miraculous. It was almost no trick at all, he saw, to turn vice into virtue and slander into truth, impotence into abstinence, arrogance into humility, plunder into philanthropy, thievery into honor, blasphemy into wisdom, brutality into patriotism, and sadism into justice. Anybody could do it; it required no brains at all. It merely required no character.”
Joseph Heller, Catch 22
Hardcore Greg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This just doesn't add up to me, especially after seeing the guy. But then again, I will never understand this trend of smoking hot teachers in their 20's and 30's hooking up with 12-14 yr old students. Lots of sick women out there who still seem to generally function pretty well in society.
ShackelfordAg99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Based on this case, it's safe to conclude that the victim of sexual assault must be lying if they are not attractive.
deddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
infinity ag said:

deddog said:

infinity ag said:

AxelFoley85 said:

Probably still a liar but can't wait to find out.

"In a statement, a JPMorgan spokesman said "We did try to reach an agreement to avoid the time and expense of litigation and to support an employee who was being threatened with the very reputational harm now unfolding. We continue to believe these allegations have no merit and new information raised as a result of the public filing only reinforces that conclusion.""

Excerpt From
"JPMorgan Offered $1 Million Settlement Before Sexual Assault Claims Went Viral"
Alexander Saeedy
The Wall Street Journal
https://apple.news/AU6UpsjowTnurZVQl7vS4_Q
This material may be protected by copyright.


Why probably still a liar? It's just a he-said, she-said at this point.

  • Are you supporting the chick because she's a chick (white-knighting)?
  • Are you saying that he is lying because of his looks (why would she go for him)?
  • Is it because he is a "brown boy" (her alleged words)?
Sara Gonzales was laughing at him in a video, but why? Maybe he is the victim, we don't know yet.

JPM is a sleazy company and so they absolutely want to hush this up.

You are clearly are not up to date on this nonsense.

And it certainly is not a "he said, she said"/

This ******* made a bunch of allegations. If you read the language of his allegations, there are clear signs that this moron has been reading playboy, and has never talked to a prettty woman, let alone be sexually harrassed by one. An absolute ,effiminate, beta taking his rage out on someone who was a lot more successful than this loser, as well as on his wife, who is probably disappointed with the man she married.

Once he made his complaint, both the alleged perpetrator(the Albanian lady) and JPM co-operated with HR. Not only had he no proof to back up *any* of his allegations, he then refused to cooperate.

Additionally, he made made factual errors in his allegation ( he claimed that Hajdini controlled his pay, she did not, she wasn't even in his hierarchy).

This dude is an absolute loser, and needs to be prosecuted so that he doesn't spread his vile bull**** and ruin other lives.




No one really knows other than brown-boy and girlboss.

We will all find out in due course. Until then pick your side and pay $10 into the pool.

If you make an accusation, you need to provide proof. The burden of proof is always on the accuser (#MeToo notwitstanding)

In this case, an employee who was fired, then made a complaint against a boss (who wasn't a boss, and wasn't even in the reporting chain of command) that is complete hearsay, provided no proof (not a single recording????) and then when asked to provide proof, withdrew the complaint for "edits". This dude is a scumbag scammer, trying to make a few million dollars, and when called out on it, decided not to pursue. It just saw happened that the NYPost got hold of it, and now it's blown up in his face.

Until he provides proof, there is no "He said , she Said" - it's only his baseless accusation with no proof, and he is therefore making shi$ up.
infinity ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ShackelfordAg99 said:

Based on this case, it's safe to conclude that the victim of sexual assault must be lying if they are not attractive.


That is how most folks here have been looking at this case.
infinity ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
deddog said:

infinity ag said:

deddog said:

infinity ag said:

AxelFoley85 said:

Probably still a liar but can't wait to find out.

"In a statement, a JPMorgan spokesman said "We did try to reach an agreement to avoid the time and expense of litigation and to support an employee who was being threatened with the very reputational harm now unfolding. We continue to believe these allegations have no merit and new information raised as a result of the public filing only reinforces that conclusion.""

Excerpt From
"JPMorgan Offered $1 Million Settlement Before Sexual Assault Claims Went Viral"
Alexander Saeedy
The Wall Street Journal
https://apple.news/AU6UpsjowTnurZVQl7vS4_Q
This material may be protected by copyright.


Why probably still a liar? It's just a he-said, she-said at this point.

  • Are you supporting the chick because she's a chick (white-knighting)?
  • Are you saying that he is lying because of his looks (why would she go for him)?
  • Is it because he is a "brown boy" (her alleged words)?
Sara Gonzales was laughing at him in a video, but why? Maybe he is the victim, we don't know yet.

JPM is a sleazy company and so they absolutely want to hush this up.

You are clearly are not up to date on this nonsense.

And it certainly is not a "he said, she said"/

This ******* made a bunch of allegations. If you read the language of his allegations, there are clear signs that this moron has been reading playboy, and has never talked to a prettty woman, let alone be sexually harrassed by one. An absolute ,effiminate, beta taking his rage out on someone who was a lot more successful than this loser, as well as on his wife, who is probably disappointed with the man she married.

Once he made his complaint, both the alleged perpetrator(the Albanian lady) and JPM co-operated with HR. Not only had he no proof to back up *any* of his allegations, he then refused to cooperate.

Additionally, he made made factual errors in his allegation ( he claimed that Hajdini controlled his pay, she did not, she wasn't even in his hierarchy).

This dude is an absolute loser, and needs to be prosecuted so that he doesn't spread his vile bull**** and ruin other lives.




No one really knows other than brown-boy and girlboss.

We will all find out in due course. Until then pick your side and pay $10 into the pool.

If you make an accusation, you need to provide proof. The burden of proof is always on the accuser (#MeToo notwitstanding)

In this case, an employee who was fired, then made a complaint against a boss (who wasn't a boss, and wasn't even in the reporting chain of command) that is complete hearsay, provided no proof (not a single recording????) and then when asked to provide proof, withdrew the complaint for "edits". This dude is a scumbag scammer, trying to make a few million dollars, and when called out on it, decided not to pursue. It just saw happened that the NYPost got hold of it, and now it's blown up in his face.

Until he provides proof, there is no "He said , she Said" - it's only his baseless accusation with no proof, and he is therefore making shi$ up.


Okay. You seem to be quite certain in your judgement considering what you know is from the press as well.
Let's see how this plays out. This thread's still going to be there, and we'll find out who is right and who is wrong.
infinity ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hardcore Greg said:

This just doesn't add up to me, especially after seeing the guy. But then again, I will never understand this trend of smoking hot teachers in their 20's and 30's hooking up with 12-14 yr old students. Lots of sick women out there who still seem to generally function pretty well in society.


His looks don't really matter. A female sex offender just wants to be banged as her sex drive is uncontrollable. In such cases, she is likely to lower her "standards". Lots of mentally unwell women everywhere, not just men. So we should stop biasing ourselves based on male/female. Women say they are equal to men and that means they are equally likely to be creeps and sex-offenders as well.
AozorAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
VP at Pierce and Pierce said:

AozorAg said:

AxelFoley85 said:

Probably still a liar but can't wait to find out.

"In a statement, a JPMorgan spokesman said "We did try to reach an agreement to avoid the time and expense of litigation and to support an employee who was being threatened with the very reputational harm now unfolding. We continue to believe these allegations have no merit and new information raised as a result of the public filing only reinforces that conclusion.""

Excerpt From
"JPMorgan Offered $1 Million Settlement Before Sexual Assault Claims Went Viral"
Alexander Saeedy
The Wall Street Journal
https://apple.news/AU6UpsjowTnurZVQl7vS4_Q
This material may be protected by copyright.

As a lawyer, I can say with a great deal of confidence that JPMorgan would not offer $1 million as a nuisance settlement. In a case like this, if you really think it's made up, nuisance money would be maybe $100k.

I have seen early 7 figures offers one might consider nuisance money in large commercial cases. This is not one of those cases. In a "my boss made me have sex with her" case, $1 million is real money. I could be totally wrong, but seems like they are concerned about something.

If the concern they had was truly just about the reputational harm to an innocent employee, then good on JPMorgan for putting up $1 million trying to prevent it, but I kind of doubt that was the motivation.

Again though, who knows. This whole thing is bizarre.


On the nuisance side, if Lorna is great her job and brings in tens or even hundreds of millions a year in business and has an incredible book business then yes JP Morgan would pay $1 million to make this go away especially if she did nothing wrong. I don't know if her role is in business development or anything like that, just spit balling.

An executive director of finance is an internal management position. She doesn't have any kind of book of business and isn't directly dependent on outside clients taking out loans from JPM to keep herself employed. There is no reason that JPM can't just continue to employ her or even promote her. People saying her career is over are idiots, assuming the accusations are fake.

AM09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
deddog said:


In this case, an employee who was fired, then made a complaint against a boss

Totally agree with your take, except the one sentence above.

The WSJ article, excerpt below, says he was still employed when he made the complaint. Maybe he knew he was toast. The order of events is interesting.

In May 2025, Rana filed an internal complaint to JPMorgan's human resources department alleging that he had been the victim of discrimination, race-based harassment and sexual assault at the hands of fellow employees at JPMorgan...
Rana was put on paid leave after the complaint was made, and the bank conducted an internal investigation...

oldord
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
infinity ag said:

ShackelfordAg99 said:

Based on this case, it's safe to conclude that the victim of sexual assault must be lying if they are not attractive.


That is how most folks here have been looking at this case.



Agree, everybody knows ugly people don't have rights

They're basically serfs.
TyHolden
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ShackelfordAg99 said:

Based on this case, it's safe to conclude that the victim of sexual assault must be lying if they are not attractive.

never use the word cannons is what I learned
I hope I did not offend anybody with this post. If I did, please come see me at my address in my profile so we can talk.
AxelFoley85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pretty much.
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AozorAg said:

VP at Pierce and Pierce said:

AozorAg said:

AxelFoley85 said:

Probably still a liar but can't wait to find out.

"In a statement, a JPMorgan spokesman said "We did try to reach an agreement to avoid the time and expense of litigation and to support an employee who was being threatened with the very reputational harm now unfolding. We continue to believe these allegations have no merit and new information raised as a result of the public filing only reinforces that conclusion.""

Excerpt From
"JPMorgan Offered $1 Million Settlement Before Sexual Assault Claims Went Viral"
Alexander Saeedy
The Wall Street Journal
https://apple.news/AU6UpsjowTnurZVQl7vS4_Q
This material may be protected by copyright.

As a lawyer, I can say with a great deal of confidence that JPMorgan would not offer $1 million as a nuisance settlement. In a case like this, if you really think it's made up, nuisance money would be maybe $100k.

I have seen early 7 figures offers one might consider nuisance money in large commercial cases. This is not one of those cases. In a "my boss made me have sex with her" case, $1 million is real money. I could be totally wrong, but seems like they are concerned about something.

If the concern they had was truly just about the reputational harm to an innocent employee, then good on JPMorgan for putting up $1 million trying to prevent it, but I kind of doubt that was the motivation.

Again though, who knows. This whole thing is bizarre.


On the nuisance side, if Lorna is great her job and brings in tens or even hundreds of millions a year in business and has an incredible book business then yes JP Morgan would pay $1 million to make this go away especially if she did nothing wrong. I don't know if her role is in business development or anything like that, just spit balling.

An executive director of finance is an internal management position. She doesn't have any kind of book of business and isn't directly dependent on outside clients taking out loans from JPM to keep herself employed. There is no reason that JPM can't just continue to employ her or even promote her. People saying her career is over are idiots, assuming the accusations are fake.



They already went public saying the allegations are false and they found nothing. She has the leverage for now.
EX TEXASEX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well, we have the pict of the stud that the JP Morgan boss was sexually harrasing. She is 100% guilty.
This dude is your basic Adonis/Super Stud. LOCK HER UP !!





















No, this really is our " victim " not too bright.

Alta
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I actually worked on several deals with Hajdini pre-covid. I thought she was great (haven't spoken to her in a long time though).

And I disagree with an earlier post as JPM would absolutely settle a nuisance claim for $1.0mm under certain circumstances.
AJ02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I know the railroad would frequently settle obviously bogus lawsuits against them simply because it was cheaper to do that than to fight it. Not to mention they didn't want any sort of bad publicity, even if they were found to ultimately be not at fault. The court of public opinion, especially these days, is oftentimes worse than a court of law.
91AggieLawyer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Alta said:

I actually worked on several deals with Hajdini pre-covid. I thought she was great (haven't spoken to her in a long time though).

And I disagree with an earlier post as JPM would absolutely settle a nuisance claim for $1.0mm under certain circumstances.


I think so, too. They're looking at far more than that in bad exposure. Either they have an employee that's a sex maniac or they hired a guy who's a liar.

Which one is it?
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Alta said:

I actually worked on several deals with Hajdini pre-covid. I thought she was great (haven't spoken to her in a long time though).

And I disagree with an earlier post as JPM would absolutely settle a nuisance claim for $1.0mm under certain circumstances.

TRM
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Alta said:

I actually worked on several deals with Hajdini pre-covid.

So does she have cannons?
fullback44
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We hired a former chase employee once before, the person said many of those working there were not the "brightest crayons in the box"
lb3
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TRM said:

Alta said:

I actually worked on several deals with Hajdini pre-covid.

So does she have cannons?
This is why I TexAgs.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.