LA Mayor Race

69,689 Views | 615 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by Noctilucent
AGinHI
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
A little over a week ago, Scott Baio, who left California for Florida, was on Fox. And I agreed then with what he said:
Quote:

I don't think they're going to let him win. I don't know how anybody goes against that California political machine and wins. . . . Whatever they have to do . . . They will do whatever to keep these guys out. They can't stop the money train.

It is corrupt as **** out here.

And, at this point, only an act of God can stop people's unscrupulous and nefarious behavior.
85aggie777
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The voting is absolutely fraudulent here in California. There is absolutely no way to ensure the security of the vote with tens of millions of mail-in ballots that anyone can intercept and harvest. Our son moved away 6 years ago, and the state was notified. Yet, we still get a mail-in ballot for him for every election.

Shame on the republican congress for not getting the Save Act done. We desperately need some federal intervention in the California election process.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


The commie that conceded crying to her campaign on election night beat both bass and Pratt in every drop after Election Day?
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So basically they had to manufacture so many votes for her they messed up other races and demographics and made statistical anomalies everywhere.

Thats hilarious. Or it would be if it were not so brazen.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
But just like the mass mailed in election of 2020, lack of chains of custody, insecure unsurveiled drop boxes, signatures on envelopes long separated and untraceable to or vouchable from cast ballots, etc.: "you can't prove fraud! Therefore, it's the most secure election ever!!!!!"
Jack Squat 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Here we have yet another thread where no Democrats participate. Probably just a coincidence.

When you finally get the America you're hoping for I think you're going to be disappointed, but oops then it's going to be too late. The blood will have been let (if the final push happens soon enough and the non-soy men are still around) but there will be no going back.
I don't think you know me.
FTAG 2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mathguy64 said:

So basically they had to manufacture so many votes for her they messed up other races and demographics and made statistical anomalies everywhere.

Thats hilarious. Or it would be if it were not so brazen.


If only some prosecutor wasn't a flaming leftist *****, this would be teed up like a virgin on prom night.
AggieVictor10
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ozzy Osbourne said:

WhErE is tHE EviDeNCe?


Aside from speculation, conjecture, and a heaping helping of conspiracy theories, where is it?
“…What?”

- Joe Biden
sanangelo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Talarico is going to break the Republican control of statewides in Texas and we'll soon have the mail-in cheating charades of elections forever. Talarico will bring about our demise with that nice smile and claims of corruption from Paxton.

Nothing is as corrupt as a Democrat controlled election. Nothing!

We better vote for Paxton and drag every sane person remaining in Texas to the polls to do the same!
San Angelo LIVE!
https://sanangelolive.com/
Enviroag02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AggieVictor10 said:

Ozzy Osbourne said:

WhErE is tHE EviDeNCe?


Aside from speculation, conjecture, and a heaping helping of conspiracy theories, where is it?


Some people have the ability, aka common sense, to see data sets and know and understand the statistical impossibility of that data.
VegasAg86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AggieVictor10 said:

Ozzy Osbourne said:

WhErE is tHE EviDeNCe?


Aside from speculation, conjecture, and a heaping helping of conspiracy theories, where is it?


Yep, only a conspiracy theorist could look at this and question how it happened:





I'm sure any lawsuits will be dismissed on procedural grounds before any discovery so the Democrats can say "no evidence, they lost the lawsuit".
Hank the Grifter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AggieVictor10 said:

Ozzy Osbourne said:

WhErE is tHE EviDeNCe?


Aside from speculation, conjecture, and a heaping helping of conspiracy theories, where is it?

It's called "math". What happened was a statistical impossibility.
The same people who will tell you that Trump is a pedophile with zero evidence will tell you this election was transparent and fair.
The Republic is dead. I hate you people. I'm ready for the shooting to start.
agent-maroon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
"Evidence"... sigh...

Would be curious to know what degree majors offered at A&M do not include enough exposure to basic statistical concepts that the LA mayor's race fraud doesn't appear to be glaringly obvious? This has to be flat-earth level willful denial, right?
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They intentionally design a secret ballot system to be full of control gaps specifically for ez fraud in which you can't produce evidence. Then the low iq useful idiots just happy socialists win an election that would make Nico Maduro blush can say things like, "where's the evidence you election denying conspiracy theorist?"
oldord
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I remember during the Obama administration the justice department civil rights division would always show up to any contested elections. I'm no expert, but shouldn't this be a case where Spencer Pratt and anyone who voted for him civil rights have been violated?
bigfooticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If they keep counting, Raman will be at 50%+
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AggieVictor10 said:

Ozzy Osbourne said:

WhErE is tHE EviDeNCe?


Aside from speculation, conjecture, and a heaping helping of conspiracy theories, where is it?



There is also no evidence that Putin cheated to win in his last 3 elections. LMAO if you believe that!
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I fully expect them to now say they have miraculously counted all the ballots earlier than planned and that everyone complaining at how long it was going to take should pound sand.
doubledog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oh no said:



Did anyone think it would end any other way? Pass the SAVE act now. At least fed elections will be safe.
drdavid10k58
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Newsum said they would "break the glass" to pull these off. He knew what CA Dems are capable of.
ts5641
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The dems are stealing it, we know they're stealing it, they know we know they're stealing it and nothing will be done.
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Didn't Raman concede? Did Spencer make the mistake of forgetting to call "no take-backsies"?
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AggieVictor10 said:

Ozzy Osbourne said:

WhErE is tHE EviDeNCe?


Aside from speculation, conjecture, and a heaping helping of conspiracy theories, where is it?


See posts before yours and after yours.
HTownAg98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
agent-maroon said:

"Evidence"... sigh...

Would be curious to know what degree majors offered at A&M do not include enough exposure to basic statistical concepts that the LA mayor's race fraud doesn't appear to be glaringly obvious? This has to be flat-earth level willful denial, right?

It's also a basic misunderstanding that voting precincts are monolithic and then trying to apply statistics to that to show the high improbability.
Pratt is a Republican running in a very large deep blue liberal city in an off-year election when the President has very low approval ratings. Why would anyone expect some kind of an upset here? It's just the opposite side of the horseshoe thinking that Talarico is going to beat Paxton.
Enviroag02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Because if things are bad enough locally, which they are in LA, given viral messaging, an outsider can gain momentum. There is no doubt Pratt gained momentum. It's nothing like believing Talarico has a chance to beat Paxton. There is no extreme local crisis in play in Texas like there is in LA
4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AggieVictor10 said:

Ozzy Osbourne said:

WhErE is tHE EviDeNCe?


Aside from speculation, conjecture, and a heaping helping of conspiracy theories, where is it?

You can not possibly be this dense
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sanangelo said:

Talarico is going to break the Republican control of statewides in Texas
Bahahahahahahahahaha!
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
HTownAg98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Enviroag02 said:

Because if things are bad enough locally, which they are in LA, given viral messaging, an outsider can gain momentum. There is no doubt Pratt gained momentum. It's nothing like believing Talarico has a chance to beat Paxton. There is no extreme local crisis in play in Texas like there is in LA

He gained so much momentum that he's going to end up doing about as well as Trump did in 2024. Maybe he didn't gain as much momentum as people thought. Granted, his messaging was very good, and he ran about as good a campaign as could be done. But it will end up not mattering because it's damn near impossible to overcome a +50 lead. All this to suggest is that it's going to have to get way worse for anyone from an opposing party to have a chance.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ellis Wyatt said:

sanangelo said:

Talarico is going to break the Republican control of statewides in Texas
Bahahahahahahahahaha!
tallarico is a sacrilegious freak and a communist, but there's enough funding and enough low IQ useful idiots out there to make the democrat dream of voting ourselves into socialism realistic. They've got the full weight of east and left coast elitist money, mainstream media, academia, public ed, social media mobs. US senate is close to 50-50 so the socialist party doesn't need much to seize control, even if it's not Tularco this time. And once they seize it, they'll make sure it's permanent-like California. There's a reason they talk about needing to pack courts, needing to add DC and PR, ending electoral college, having open borders, etc.
Windy City Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

He gained so much momentum that he's going to end up doing about as well as Trump did in 2024. Maybe he didn't gain as much momentum as people thought. Granted, his messaging was very good, and he ran about as good a campaign as could be done. But it will end up not mattering because it's damn near impossible to overcome a +50 lead. All this to suggest is that it's going to have to get way worse for anyone from an opposing party to have a chance.


I still can't believe Spencer Pratt was even on the ballot much less in the mix at one point. The guy was one of the most reviled reality tv d-bags of all time and then vanished for years as a sort of F grade Instagram influencer. He has been laying around his apartment since he turned 18.

Herschel Walker, Mehmet Oz, Madison Cawthorn, JR Majewski, Roy Moore and now this clown of a dude. Trump picks some very odd hills to die on.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Was there anyone else running in this primary that isn't communist?
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Windy City Ag said:

Quote:

He gained so much momentum that he's going to end up doing about as well as Trump did in 2024. Maybe he didn't gain as much momentum as people thought. Granted, his messaging was very good, and he ran about as good a campaign as could be done. But it will end up not mattering because it's damn near impossible to overcome a +50 lead. All this to suggest is that it's going to have to get way worse for anyone from an opposing party to have a chance.


I still can't believe Spencer Pratt was even on the ballot much less in the mix at one point. The guy was one of the most reviled reality tv d-bags of all time and then vanished for years as a sort of F grade Instagram influencer. He has been laying around his apartment since he turned 18.

Herschel Walker, Mehmet Oz, Madison Cawthorn, JR Majewski, Roy Moore and now this clown of a dude. Trump picks some very odd hills to die on.


And yet to beat him they appear to have resorted to manufacturing votes in a way and scale that would make Kim Jong Un blush.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.