According to artificial intelligence, the statistical probability of Spencer Pratt getting 0 out of 24,000 votes in last nights late night Los Angeles ballot drop is “1 in trillions”

California Democrats are rigging the election pic.twitter.com/t01wHDU1n6

— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) June 5, 2026

YouBet said:

---

johnnyblaze36 said:

---

Big Al 1992 said:

---

Has there ever been a Republican that has gained an advantage when late votes were counted. It goes one way (d) every time.

---

Why the **** do you think Trump is trying to pass the SAVE act along with the rest of the small majority of people in Congress with any integrity?

---

He can't. McConnell and Thune are TDS traitors who just voted against it AGAIN.

---

Not that I want to stand up for him at all, but I read that Thune voted yes. Murkowski, McConnell and Tillis voted no. Collins even voted yes the second time through (which I think was the earlier version of the act w/o the men in women's sports and transgender language).

dvldog said:

---

YouBet said:

---

johnnyblaze36 said:

---

Big Al 1992 said:

---

Has there ever been a Republican that has gained an advantage when late votes were counted. It goes one way (d) every time.

---

Why the **** do you think Trump is trying to pass the SAVE act along with the rest of the small majority of people in Congress with any integrity?

---

He can't. McConnell and Thune are TDS traitors who just voted against it AGAIN.

---

Not that I want to stand up for him at all, but I read that Thune voted yes. Murkowski, McConnell and Tillis voted no. Collins even voted yes the second time through (which I think was the earlier version of the act w/o the men in women's sports and transgender language).

---

Yep, I mistakenly switched Tillis with Thune. I wonder why Thune changed his mind. Probably using turtle as cover. The latter of whom shouldn't even be in the Senate anymore. Having mini strokes on live tv and all.

are we supposed to switch over to the new thread someone started on CA vote counting?

What is the source for the 0-24k twitter claim?

not sure the source, but I saw dozens of tweets last night with that screenshot of that impossible ballot drop


why do democrats think mass mailing ballots out to 100% of the people on old outdated voter rolls, not requiring an ID to vote as proof the person voting is the person who is registered, not requiring a signature verifcation on mailed back ballots to the registered voter, etc. is sure and free from possible fraud?

Not sure who to believe.

No, it did not happen.@spencerpratt (orange on the graph) received votes in every single ballot drop.

This is fake news. https://t.co/ZRVSAwJGaq pic.twitter.com/nr3GYKgxyD

— Elizabeth Barcohana (@E_Barcohana) June 5, 2026

Some of you actually thought Pratt was going to win? Were you born yesterday?

AozorAg said:

---

Some of you actually thought Pratt was going to win? Were you born yesterday?

---

he should have finished second and been in the runoff.

I won't be convinced both communists beat him with: no ID to vote, mass mailed ballots, no signature verification requirements, not post date requirement if there's another date written on the ballot, and endless counting for days or a week. defend those policies. tell me how secure they all are. tell me how those policies "protect our democracy".

oh no said:

---

AozorAg said:

---

Some of you actually thought Pratt was going to win? Were you born yesterday?

---

he should have finished second and been in the runoff.

I won't be convinced both communists beat him with: no ID to vote, mass mailed ballots, no signature verification requirements, not post date requirement if there's another date written on the ballot, and endless counting for days or a week. defend those policies. tell me how secure they all are. tell me how those policies "protect our democracy".

---

Read this morning they accept votes up to 22 days after the election. Crazy absurd. So we aren't going to know for a while.

AozorAg said:

---

Some of you actually thought Pratt was going to win? Were you born yesterday?

---

No, we didn't think he was going to win but we were somewhat hoping for a semi honest vote count against the cheating Dems. Silly us.

oh no said:

---

AozorAg said:

---

Some of you actually thought Pratt was going to win? Were you born yesterday?

---

he should have finished second and been in the runoff.

I won't be convinced both communists beat him with: no ID to vote, mass mailed ballots, no signature verification requirements, not post date requirement if there's another date written on the ballot, and endless counting for days or a week. defend those policies. tell me how secure they all are. tell me how those policies "protect our democracy".

---

Is he not in second place now?


I know they have not finished the counting yet, so the outcome is still TBD. That said, I am am asking for the third time, what is the source for the claim regarding the 24k vote drop on favor of Raman?

Please don't say it was all on twitter.

Somedays reading politics board is like reading a game thread on Liuccis board and the opposing team takes a 0-3 lead in the first quarter. WE ARE SO EFFING SCREWED BRO