There is now water in front of my parents lake house on lake CC that hadn't been there in a few years.
Captain Pablo said:
Just checked the radar and that low is parked on top of Kingsville, and is drawing decent rains upstream of LCorpus. Maybe this will help
Broseph said:
I think they are still relying on Lake Texana which is not in such a dry region as Lake CC and Choke. But if they want growth in CC, they'll need more water sources. Of course, CC has never set it sights on growth so I don't they care.
Broseph said:
There is now water in front of my parents lake house on lake CC that hadn't been there in a few years.
Kenneth_2003 said:
K2-HMFIC said:Captain Pablo said:
Just checked the radar and that low is parked on top of Kingsville, and is drawing decent rains upstream of LCorpus. Maybe this will help
It'll help...but we need Carrizo Springs, Rocksprings, Crystal City, and Freer to be getting dumped on.
This low is 50 miles too far east.
Maybe that will reach ChokeFdsa said:
Had really good rain between Hondo and Uvalde..around 4" in parts. Should help CC a little.
5-6" almost right on top of Medina Lake. Still waiting to see impact to that. I've learned it takes sometimes 2-3 days to see the full impact.
Fdsa said:
Had really good rain between Hondo and Uvalde..around 4" in parts. Should help CC a little.
5-6" almost right on top of Medina Lake. Still waiting to see impact to that. I've learned it takes sometimes 2-3 days to see the full impact.
Fdsa said:
Had really good rain between Hondo and Uvalde..around 4" in parts. Should help CC a little.
5-6" almost right on top of Medina Lake. Still waiting to see impact to that. I've learned it takes sometimes 2-3 days to see the full impact.
Kenneth_2003 said:
https://dashboard.waterdata.usgs.gov/app/nwd/en/
Haven't pulled the charts for the gages around Medina... Those gages on the Nueces are days flow between each other. Interestingly tough, look at the flows on Seco creek. Up quite nicely, but the key will be to see if the gages south of 90 show any of that flow tomorrow. The ground at the base of the Hill Country is capable of drinking up vast amounts of surface flow and sending it to the aquifers. That's not a bad thing, but that must be satisfied before the surface will flow.
SMM48 said:
75% of water is coming from lake texana. Let's hope that first storm fills that up a well. Lake CC/choke at 29.5%.
Ag with kids said:Kenneth_2003 said:
https://dashboard.waterdata.usgs.gov/app/nwd/en/
Haven't pulled the charts for the gages around Medina... Those gages on the Nueces are days flow between each other. Interestingly tough, look at the flows on Seco creek. Up quite nicely, but the key will be to see if the gages south of 90 show any of that flow tomorrow. The ground at the base of the Hill Country is capable of drinking up vast amounts of surface flow and sending it to the aquifers. That's not a bad thing, but that must be satisfied before the surface will flow.
Interesting website! Thanks!!!
Looks like the gauge at Bandera for Medina Lake is at 66 ft^3/s which is normal, but at Pipe Creek (I assume English crossing) it's 569 ft^/s...so that's A LOT going through there. I wonder if it's over the new bridge...
Kenneth_2003 said:Ag with kids said:Kenneth_2003 said:
https://dashboard.waterdata.usgs.gov/app/nwd/en/
Haven't pulled the charts for the gages around Medina... Those gages on the Nueces are days flow between each other. Interestingly tough, look at the flows on Seco creek. Up quite nicely, but the key will be to see if the gages south of 90 show any of that flow tomorrow. The ground at the base of the Hill Country is capable of drinking up vast amounts of surface flow and sending it to the aquifers. That's not a bad thing, but that must be satisfied before the surface will flow.
Interesting website! Thanks!!!
Looks like the gauge at Bandera for Medina Lake is at 66 ft^3/s which is normal, but at Pipe Creek (I assume English crossing) it's 569 ft^/s...so that's A LOT going through there. I wonder if it's over the new bridge...
Should have bult Applewhite
Kenneth_2003 said:
Well we honestly should and do hate all of them...
But San Antonio folks should recall the Applewhite dam project that was killed by voters in 1991. Site engineering and archeology was progressing, this would have created another reservoir downstream of Medina before the water dumps into the San Antonio River.
I know this is a Corpus thread, but folks keep bringing up Lake Medina. The Medina river meets up with the San Antonio and heads toward Floresville, Karnes City, & Goliad
Kenneth_2003 said:SMM48 said:
75% of water is coming from lake texana. Let's hope that first storm fills that up a well. Lake CC/choke at 29.5%.
Lake Texana is full. Has been for a few days.
Not certain, but in town usage might be pipeline constrained from Texana.
Kenneth_2003 said:
1300 cfs for 24 hours is 2600 acre feet. It's not nothing but that flow work need to be sustained for about 2.5 months to fill Lake CC
Captain Pablo said:Kenneth_2003 said:
1300 cfs for 24 hours is 2600 acre feet. It's not nothing but that flow work need to be sustained for about 2.5 months to fill Lake CC
I don't think anybody thought it would fill the lake.
But raise it a few percentage points? Yes, that's probably gonna happen, and will be very helpful, especially if we hit drought conditions this summer.
All this being said, with lake Mathis approaching one third capacity, and Texana having water to spare, how much are we gonna hear about desalinization plants in the next six months?
My guess is, not much.. lol
Kenneth_2003 said:
Absolutely, every drop helps and especially so in regards to the Lake for places like Beeville who's raw water intake is in Mathis. These recent rains have put much needed water depth over their intake. They too are finally drilling brackish wells for reverse osmosis; a position that was voted down (don't get me started) in the early/mid 20-teens.
I agree with you, I won't underestimate Corpus' ability to kick the can down the road and do the wrong thing.
American Hardwood said:
The Evangeline groundwater project is under construction right now. "No progress" is already incorrect to the tune of 25-28 MGD once that is online. The only potential roadblock is the permit protest, but I suspect that will get worked out. The city attorneys seem to think so.
We'll see on desal, but I think the momentum is still there. I don't think there is anyone in the entire region that thinks that the problem is solved because it is raining right now except critics who want to take cheap shots. Everyone knows this problem will return.
Captain Pablo said:Kenneth_2003 said:
Absolutely, every drop helps and especially so in regards to the Lake for places like Beeville who's raw water intake is in Mathis. These recent rains have put much needed water depth over their intake. They too are finally drilling brackish wells for reverse osmosis; a position that was voted down (don't get me started) in the early/mid 20-teens.
I agree with you, I won't underestimate Corpus' ability to kick the can down the road and do the wrong thing.
Is the Nueces super narrow at Tilden?
It's at Moderate flood stage, and is up 14 feet
But only flowing at 1400 cfs
Seems odd
American Hardwood said:
I don't see it as THE answer long term, but it can be a stop gap measure now, and a component of a future comprehensive water management system in combination with existing surface water sources and future desal.
The hydrology reports as I understand them, say the Evangeline aquifer would supply the water demand of the water project for a VERY long time. However there is no guarantee that others won't tap it too.
The city of Sinton, in a bold move of hypocrisy considering they are protesting Evangeline permits, have submitted for well permits too for example.