double aught said:Jeff99 said:
I was amused when Junior complained "The Studio" won Emmys because Hollywood is obsessed with stories about Hollywood. I yelled at the radio, "Have you heard your own podcasts?"
I was happy with what he said because I was thinking the same thing before he said it. There's nothing Hollywood types love more than inside Hollywood stories. They are indeed, as Craig said, up their own asses about that sort of thing.
The Shank Ag said:
What is the. "I'm ready" drop from
NormanEH said:
t&p for tc
1 said:
Political George showing his ignorance again.
"It's a joke."
No Jub, go back a few seconds to where he blatantly lies about the shooter's affiliation.
1 said:
I thought it was a funny joke.
But the early part was a blatant lie.
And the Musers have never sounded so unintelligent while talking about it.
tejas_ayanem said:
We've come full circle, the right used to say the left was overly sensitive and this joke is what made them mad..
The right throws a hissy fit over chinas censorship and are ok with this…
1 said:
He's insinuating that the shooter is MAGA
it is looking that way, but that still doesn't make what Kimmel said wrong. Go back and read what he actually said. He did not say the shooter was Maga.Doc4rock said:
The shooter was left leaning, person he lives with is a transgender.
Texas A&M University said:1 said:
He's insinuating that the shooter is MAGA
I'm guessing you are ok with insinuating the shooter was left leaning? That's part of the problem with both radical extremes, they think the rules they apply to the other side don't apply to them.
there's a lot of info out there and while I agree, that's what it looks like. I think everybody needs to be careful with the information they're seeing online. For example, I think that text message chain looks like absolute BS to me.1 said:Texas A&M University said:1 said:
He's insinuating that the shooter is MAGA
I'm guessing you are ok with insinuating the shooter was left leaning? That's part of the problem with both radical extremes, they think the rules they apply to the other side don't apply to them.
Are you serious? Have you seen the info on the shooter?
Macarthur said:Doc4rock said:
The shooter was left leaning, person he lives with is a transgender.
it is looking that way, but that still doesn't make what Kimmel said wrong. Go back and read what he actually said. He did not say the shooter was Maga.
Quote:
During his Monday, Sept. 15 episode, Kimmel said the following: "We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it."
sure his writings are not good but none of the late-night shows have good ratings. It's a dying concept. Writings are just kind of a convenient excuse.Hincemm said:
Just my opinion. I think this is still about ratings. If Kimmel was making abc affiliates a crazy amount of money from advertisers, then they'd overlook the comments.
Macarthur said:
Read what he said. He did not say the kid was maga. You can say he implied but then you're getting into what Kimmel was thinking there. If you go at face value for exactly what he said, he did not say what you are claiming he said.
