Yeah, that advantage is great if you don't have an alliance, but that probably burned some bridges.
If Michelle voted Tyson then it should have beenQuinn said:
Gotcha. Looks like you're right - according to Wikipedia, Michelle voted for Tyson as well, so it was 5-2-2. I wish they would show the votes in the credits. When did they stop doing that?
I don't necessarily disagree with the steal a vote thing, but I'm OK with it.Quinn said:
Does anyone else think they shouldn't be able to gather like that at tribal? I kinda think it's bs that they can get all the evidence like that and then regroup and come up with a new plan.
Also, stealing a vote should not be part of the game. Your vote at tribal is the most integral part of the game, you shouldn't be able to get that taken away. Give someone an extra vote, okay, I get that; but stealing a vote is too much.
I read it the same way, Tyson got 5 votes and Denise got 2 votes. In my opinion, it looks like Sarah messed up her vote. If the goal was to get a 3-3-3 tie to avoid any chance of HII saving the minority Alliance then it appears the boys (Nick, Tony, Ben) were supposed to vote Tyson and the girls ( Sophie, Sarah x 2) were supposed to vote Denise.Quinn said:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survivor:_Winners_at_War
See if I'm misreading the table?
Quinn said:
Whispers I'm fine with, but I dunno, for some reason the huddle bugged me. Jeremy made a game play move with an advantage he bought, so now they get to press pause on tribal and change their plans? Dunno, just seemed like a cheap move to me. I get that others are okay with it, that's fine.
MooreTrucker said:
And I thought it was a smart move to regroup based on the changing situation.
Good point, maybe that was the purpose of the edit back at camp where she was getting pissed about Tony not listening. She either got confused or said Eff it.agsquirrel97 said:I read it the same way, Tyson got 5 votes and Denise got 2 votes. In my opinion, it looks like Sarah messed up her vote. If the goal was to get a 3-3-3 tie to avoid any chance of HII saving the minority Alliance then it appears the boys (Nick, Tony, Ben) were supposed to vote Tyson and the girls ( Sophie, Sarah x 2) were supposed to vote Denise.Quinn said:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survivor:_Winners_at_War
See if I'm misreading the table?
Yul is one of those people who excels at everything he attempts in life, and he's such a great guy that you don't hate him for it. So the wife comes as no surprise.MuckRaker96 said:
i think jeremy knew it was just him, tyson, and kim voting sophie and that the other 2 were iffy at best. At that point, you have to go to your last resort "how do I get 3 more days in the game". He was correct that they were targetting him so he used his escape clause. now he just has to hope someone else does something dumb and gets targetted, or paint it on kimS back - she has lots of friends over on EoE and she had a HII without anyo f you knowing it.
also, hello mrs. yul
Username checks outaggietony2010 said:
Tony came to play.
Thought about this more this week. Jeremy leaving like he did threw all of the plans out of the window and they HAD to reconvene to come up with a new plan.Quinn said:
Does anyone else think they shouldn't be able to gather like that at tribal? I kinda think it's bs that they can get all the evidence like that and then regroup and come up with a new plan.
Also, stealing a vote should not be part of the game. Your vote at tribal is the most integral part of the game, you shouldn't be able to get that taken away. Give someone an extra vote, okay, I get that; but stealing a vote is too much.
Bulldog73 said:
I was rooting for him his season, but he's done nothing this year. I think Tony would qualify as a villain, but I love his hustle.
I don't remember much about that season, but I do remember being OK that he won.Foxymophandlemama said:
Bens quite possible the least likeable player in the game left.
We're convinced in our house they manipulated his win.