Entertainment
Sponsored by

Non Communist Hollywood?

11,293 Views | 213 Replies | Last: 5 yr ago by RoamingGnome
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fig96 said:

So I gotta start with this...

Quote:

I'm sure you can find some a-holes on F16, but you can also find plenty over here. But this is not talking about a-holes getting their just treatment. We are talking about non-a-holes losing jobs merely because they are conservative.
Such as? Everyone on here has been incredibly civil despite your ******* comments, while I could find you people telling folks who are liberal or Democrats that they're vile, the scum of the earth, hate America, etc., on that other board in about two minutes if you'd like. We do have disagreements on here, but in general folks stay pretty civil and get along. I'd happily see a movie and grab a beer with any of the regulars on this board, even the ones with terrible taste in Star Wars films (you know who you are).
Civility is in the eye of the beholder. I've not treated anybody differently on here than I am treated. And BTW, the people F16 is calling vile, scum of the earth, etc. are those Antifa/BLM types who riot and beat up unsuspecting innocent people who are minding their own business. Calling posters vile would get one banned within a few minutes.

Quote:

And we haven't yet found an example of a non a-hole losing a job because they're conservative. James Woods, I hate to to break it to you, is an a-hole. Antonio Sabato Jr is just not that talented.
I suspect Woods is considered an "a-hole" because he is conservative. I don't remember him being called an a-hole prior to that. And there are plenty of famous a-holes in Hollywood who still get plenty of work.

Quote:


Quote:

No. It's not. People don't get to make up who has the burden of proof out of the blue.
You are correct, the burden of proof falls on the person making the claim. If you claim conservatives are being blacklisted then you need to show evidence to that fact that's more convincing than "these guys who aren't getting work claim there's thousands more of them". Even us intellectual lightweights know that.
You guys are making the claim that Hollywood has magically exempted itself from the same behavior shown by liberals in every other industry. So why isn't the burden of proof on you? Why isn't your "claim" a "claim"?
Quote:

Quote:

...and liberal causes. Just watch ANY awards show for confirmation.
Haven't seen anyone claim that Hollywood doesn't lean liberal.

Are there some people who won't want to work with people who have beliefs that diverge greatly from their own, or folks that support something they find awful? Sure, and the same goes for both sides of the political aisle in just about any field. That's not blacklisting.
What is your definition of "blacklisting"? If you are talking about some sort of actual written list, then I agree that doesn't exist. If you are talking about a concerted effort by many in Hollywood to deny conservatives opportunities then that does exist. And Hollywood doesn't just lean liberal, it's off the charts liberal. Just look at the voting patterns in the area. It's overwhelming. So even if half opt to discriminate against conservatives, that's still a huge effect. Yeah, conservatives can still get work from the other half, but their salaries will not be as high, nor the opportunities as numerous.

Furthermore, I can't think of a mainstream conservative director who refuses to hire liberals. Clint Eastwood hires libs as does Mel Gibson. Maybe it can be said that whoever directs those religious movies tend to hire conservatives, but I'd argue that is more about hiring religious people, not conservatives. They wouldn't hire an avowed conservative atheist for those jobs.
Quote:

Quote:

They seem to not care about discrimination against conservatives. They just cloak it in "doing the right thing". And saying that a pastor should be forced to perform a marriage on somebody is slavery. I guess that's the sort of thing democrats are known for, however.
See, here's where you go off the rails and lose any semblance of a rational argument. Nothing about the anti-LGBT legislation in Georgia has anything to do with pastors being forced to marry anyone, which I'd imagine most people would say was dumb. And now you're ranting about Democrats. This is the Entertainment board, stick to the plot man.
Sorry, you are simply wrong. They threatened to pull out for an anti-abortion bill too. Yet, there is NO WAY these same people would consider politics when hiring, right?
Quote:

Quote:

So explain why you think Tim Allen's show was cancelled from ABC?
Per a quick search, ABC would've had to pick up the costs of producing the new season (it had been paid by the production company for the first several seasons) and was moving away from sitcoms in the slot where his show fit. Their president said it was a hard decision. But I don't know the details, and shows get cancelled for all kinds of reasons like the more liberal shows I mentioned. A show getting cancelled is a horribly flimsy piece of evidence.
If you believe that, then I have a bridge I'd like to sell you. Sitcoms are cheap. And his show was the #2 rated sitcom that year. Yet ABC couldn't afford to the costs for that? That explanation is what is flimsy if anything.
Quote:


Quote:

Well gee I guess that since Jackie Robinson was in MLB in 1947, then there must have been no racism in baseball anymore, right?
You're really terrible at the arguments.

Were there one lone conservative who was ridiculed but kept making movies anyway and was eventually an inspiration for the country then this might hold up in some weird way. Not to mention that racism is a far more complex issue. But I'll admit that only listing a few could be outliers so let's add to the list.

Outside the already mentioned really prominent conservatives that are incredibly successful in Hollywood, a quick search adds more to the list: Vince Vaughn, Joe Pesci, Kurt Russell, Sylvester Stallone, Tom Selleck, Jon Voight, James Caan, and Laura Prepon. Those folks aren't having a hard time finding work.

And we've already mentioned Adam Sandler...any argument that Hollywood is blacklisting conservatives goes out the window with Adam Sandler. He hasn't made a genuinely good movie in a decade and Netflix won't stop throwing money at him.
You are talking about guys who established themselves and gained a following prior to this cancel movement. Many of them produce their own stuff and call their own shots. Of course they aren't going cancel themselves. And I never said 100% of Hollywood is anti-conservative. In fact I have stated otherwise many times. So yes.. the few non-political shot callers left will still hire these guys. But that still does not change the fact that a large portion of Hollywood will never hire them again. Can you name me a single young up and comer who is a loud and proud conservative that is making it big in mainstream (non religious) movies?
Quote:

Quote:

It's not just those few people I'm talking about. Those are just the people who were big enough to come out and proud about it. According to them, there are thousands of lower level people who choose to remain anonymous out of fear of losing their jobs.
Here's the thing: that's not proof. That's hearsay at best.
And you have no proof otherwise. All we have is evidence and there is plenty of evidence on my side. What about Eric McCormack tweeting "kindly report on everyone attending this [Trump fundraiser in Beverly Hills] event, so the rest of us can be clear about who we don't wanna work with. Thx." And Debra Messing following up with "Please print a list of all attendees please. The public has a right to know."

Quote:

You want to prove that there's discrimination? Find a liberal, attractive late-40s actor who's not very talented that's super successful in Hollywood. Or a decent talented older liberal actor who says horrible hateful things on Twitter but is still busy making movies.
Robert Di Nero saying that Trump doesn't care how many die of covid and that he wants to punch him in the face? He's got plenty of work still.


Quote:

Spoiler: there's few or none, because if you're not talented or an awful person most folks don't want to hire you. If you're talented enough at anything (see: the NFL, Hollywood, etc.) then people will forgive all kinds of behavior. But if the headache of working with your eclipses how good you are people will just move on.
Wrong. There are plenty. I just know you will say they are "not talented" so I picked Di Nero.


Quote:

Are there some people who are refusing to hire people because of their political views? Probably, there's awful people everywhere. But the fact that none of these articles are featuring folks who were at one time really successful (except for Woods...again, *******) and now can't get projects is kind of telling.
Tim Allen was pretty damn successful. So was Vince Vaughn (RIP for being friendly with Trump). Adam Carolla, etc. There are plenty. Tim Allen said Hollywood is like 1930s Germany for conservatives. I guess he's lying too? Or are you now going to call him an a-hole now?
fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bluefire579 said:

Quote:

And we've already mentioned Adam Sandler...any argument that Hollywood is blacklisting conservatives goes out the window with Adam Sandler. He hasn't made a genuinely good movie in a decade and Netflix won't stop throwing money at him.
Too be fair, I've heard Uncut Gems from last year was very good (still need to watch it myself).

But otherwise, stellar post
It was actually really damn good and Sandler was incredible (like should've been nominated). It's not everyone's cup of tea but definitely worth a watch.

As it does not fit my narrative, however, I shall choose to ignore it for the sake of this argument
Whos Juan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

It sounds like your side is losing, buddy.

Maybe picking up a new hobby will help you cope.

Perhaps taking Antonio Sabato Jr's acting class will work. You can support a conservative owned business (you do care about supporting conservative owned businesses, right?) and you can pick up a new craft.

Now I know it's for children, but you're acting like a child, so he may make an exception for you.

Plus, you get to work with this 48 year old dream boat and maybe, just maybe, you can work up the courage to tell him how you've been white knighting him against all the big liberal elitist meanie-heads on Texags.
fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If your "civility in the eye of the beholder" is using calling others "intellectual lightweights" and the like then I'm glad you're not much of a regular here.

Either way this is exhausting so I'll leave you to your opinions. You actually have one or two somewhat valid points but it's not worth the effort to attempt to continue.

The bottom line is if you're talented enough you'll be working, it's that simple. We could even pretend that Tim Allen's show only got canceled because he was conservative and some exec didn't like that, but because it was good someone else picked it up.

And for the record, Vince Vaughn has 3 films in production as a producer, 2 in preproduction and 2 in postproduction as an actor, and was in 4 eps this seasons of a very conservative show called Curb Your Enthusiasm. Cancel culture indeed.
BBQ4Me
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That big time conservative Jerry Bruckheimer is certainly getting held down by Hollywood. Oh wait...
Ulrich
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I was listening to a comedy podcast, can't remember which one, and the people on it said that there are a lot of conservatives in entertainment. Not 50%, probably not even 25%, but more than you think. They said that if you don't know their politics, they are probably conservative specifically because it's a good career move to be outspokenly liberal.

The name they threw out was Jerry Seinfeld. A counterexample would be Harrison Ford, who always tried to stay quiet on politics because he's just an actor, but when people started saying he must be conservative he set the record straight. If there's a young person who rose to stardom more or less during this era and might be conservative (is definitely an outspoken Christian), I would guess Chris Pratt.

The real test of the current climate in entertainment will be ten years from 2016. Chris Pratt had already made it by 2015, and once you're a moneymaker, you're in the club. Do unknowns who are openly conservative or even who aren't activists get a chance 2016-present? What about for ordinary staffers? Are there litmus tests? It's starting to happen in the corporate world, and I don't think Hollywood is less liberal than business.
fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think that's a much more fair way to frame the discussion.

Another spin on this is that if if you have political views that are conservative and aren't an awful person about it, i.e. Pratt (who's an outspoken Christian, likes guns, and is married to Arnold's daughter), no one's really bothered by it.
expresswrittenconsent
How long do you want to ignore this user?
60% of network TV this decade is police related (procedurals, COPS type shows) and that number has been steady since the 1960s. These shows all serve to glamorize law enforcement by vastly overstating crime (crime rates in the USA have been dropping for 2 decades), and by vastly overstating police performance (law and order type shows have an arrest 90% of the time and shows like COPS have evolved over 3 decades to show arrests in 80% of cases compared with 50% when the show began) when real police solve crimes at a 20% clip.
Hollywood has done more to create the military police state we currently live in than any other single entity not related to the actual government.
Aggie4242
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

You are talking about guys who established themselves and gained a following prior to this cancel movement. Many of them produce their own stuff and call their own shots. Of course they aren't going cancel themselves. And I never said 100% of Hollywood is anti-conservative. In fact I have stated otherwise many times. So yes.. the few non-political shot callers left will still hire these guys. But that still does not change the fact that a large portion of Hollywood will never hire them again. Can you name me a single young up and comer who is a loud and proud conservative that is making it big in mainstream (non religious) movies?

So now the argument isn't "conservatives are blacklisted by Hollywood"...now it is, "show me a conservative that has made it big in hollywood in the last 24 months who is outspoken about supporting trump who isn't making religious movies!"

Why all the qualifications?

As to your claim that nobody will hire these actors again...

Vince Vaugh: Already covered
Joe Pesci: Has done 3 movies since 2011, with the Irishman coming out last year
Kurt Russell: Was in "Once Upon a Time in Hollywood" lat year was also in a small indy project called Guardians of the Galaxy Vol II
Sly: Was in 3 movies in 2018, 2 movies in 2019, is currently filming a movie,has a movie in Pre-production, and has been announced to be in a 3rd movie with no date attached
Tom Selleck: Is starring on a network drama
Jon Voight: Stars on a Cable Drama, has a movie coming out this year, is starring in a movie about Roe v Wade and Reagan
James Caan: Currently has 4 movies announced, including one coming out this year and had 2 in 2018
Laura Prepon: Was in 12 episodes of OINTB in 2019

I didn't realize all of these folks were able to produce so many movies on their own and that only non-political shot-callers were producing these movies.
Brian Earl Spilner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PatAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We should always have a thread like this, it's like putting out a fly strip.
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fig96 said:

If your "civility in the eye of the beholder" is using calling others "intellectual lightweights" and the like then I'm glad you're not much of a regular here.
Oh, I've been called worse on this thread and way worse on this board.

Quote:

Either way this is exhausting so I'll leave you to your opinions. You actually have one or two somewhat valid points but it's not worth the effort to attempt to continue.

The bottom line is if you're talented enough you'll be working, it's that simple. We could even pretend that Tim Allen's show only got canceled because he was conservative and some exec didn't like that, but because it was good someone else picked it up.
Could you answer this one question: Do you know of any young up-and comers who have been openly conservative that are now hitting it big (in mainstream movies)?

Quote:

And for the record, Vince Vaughn has 3 films in production as a producer, 2 in preproduction and 2 in postproduction as an actor, and was in 4 eps this seasons of a very conservative show called Curb Your Enthusiasm. Cancel culture indeed.
A producer does the hiring. Of course he is not going to fire himself. And he is another one that was already established and a proven money maker prior to the cancel culture. Back then he was comedy royalty and all over the place. Now he's not.

As I've said already, there are people who don't care about politics who will hire them, but it won't be as many. One can demand a much higher wage if they are in demand from 10 different projects vs only 2. Kirk Cameron is still getting work too, but nobody would pretend that he's as successful as Leonardo Decaprio. Yet, back when they were both on Growing Pains, Cameron was the bigger name.
Brian Earl Spilner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Could you answer this one question: Do you know of any young up-and comers who have been openly conservative that are now hitting it big (in mainstream movies)?
Chris Pratt is doing pretty well.
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fig96 said:

I think that's a much more fair way to frame the discussion.

Another spin on this is that if if you have political views that are conservative and aren't an awful person about it, i.e. Pratt (who's an outspoken Christian, likes guns, and is married to Arnold's daughter), no one's really bothered by it.
Chris Pratt is religious and does hunt, but he has gone out of his way to say he was not on either side of the political spectrum.

He could be super conservative for all we know, but he is sure not loud and proud about it if he was.

Edit: Turns out he donated to Obama. So he is in the clear as far as libs are concerned.
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aggie4242 said:

Quote:

You are talking about guys who established themselves and gained a following prior to this cancel movement. Many of them produce their own stuff and call their own shots. Of course they aren't going cancel themselves. And I never said 100% of Hollywood is anti-conservative. In fact I have stated otherwise many times. So yes.. the few non-political shot callers left will still hire these guys. But that still does not change the fact that a large portion of Hollywood will never hire them again. Can you name me a single young up and comer who is a loud and proud conservative that is making it big in mainstream (non religious) movies?

So now the argument isn't "conservatives are blacklisted by Hollywood"...now it is, "show me a conservative that has made it big in hollywood in the last 24 months who is outspoken about supporting trump who isn't making religious movies!"

Why all the qualifications?

As to your claim that nobody will hire these actors again...

Vince Vaugh: Already covered
Joe Pesci: Has done 3 movies since 2011, with the Irishman coming out last year
Kurt Russell: Was in "Once Upon a Time in Hollywood" lat year was also in a small indy project called Guardians of the Galaxy Vol II
Sly: Was in 3 movies in 2018, 2 movies in 2019, is currently filming a movie,has a movie in Pre-production, and has been announced to be in a 3rd movie with no date attached
Tom Selleck: Is starring on a network drama
Jon Voight: Stars on a Cable Drama, has a movie coming out this year, is starring in a movie about Roe v Wade and Reagan
James Caan: Currently has 4 movies announced, including one coming out this year and had 2 in 2018
Laura Prepon: Was in 12 episodes of OINTB in 2019

I didn't realize all of these folks were able to produce so many movies on their own and that only non-political shot-callers were producing these movies.

You guys keep bringing this up as a gotcha point. These guys are already established. The few non-libs in Hollywood will still hire them. That's not the point.
BBQ4Me
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Have you ever considered that fewer cons go into Hollywood as opposed to Hollywood blacklisting them?
expresswrittenconsent
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BBQ4Me said:

Have you ever considered that fewer cons go into Hollywood as opposed to Hollywood blacklisting them?

He also hasn't considered that being for equality isn't really a political belief or statement for most people. It used to be called the "golden rule" and taught to every kindergarten student.
Duncan Idaho
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Laura Prepon terminated a pregnancy, thus not a conservative. That is unless abortion is a complex subject and should be a decision left up to a woman and her doctor.
fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aTmAg said:

fig96 said:

If your "civility in the eye of the beholder" is using calling others "intellectual lightweights" and the like then I'm glad you're not much of a regular here.
Oh, I've been called worse on this thread and way worse on this board.
I'd challenge you to point out where, particularly on this thread. You got called a Karen and that's it.

Quote:

Quote:

Either way this is exhausting so I'll leave you to your opinions. You actually have one or two somewhat valid points but it's not worth the effort to attempt to continue.

The bottom line is if you're talented enough you'll be working, it's that simple. We could even pretend that Tim Allen's show only got canceled because he was conservative and some exec didn't like that, but because it was good someone else picked it up.
Could you answer this one question: Do you know of any young up-and comers who have been openly conservative that are now hitting it big (in mainstream movies)?
I don't watch much tv with those types of actors so I honestly couldn't tell you about any up and comers of any political persuasion. Off the top of my head KJ Apa is the lead in Riverdale and starred in I Still Believe (Jeremy Camp's story) a few months ago.

Quote:

Quote:

And for the record, Vince Vaughn has 3 films in production as a producer, 2 in preproduction and 2 in postproduction as an actor, and was in 4 eps this seasons of a very conservative show called Curb Your Enthusiasm. Cancel culture indeed.
A producer does the hiring. Of course he is not going to fire himself. And he is another one that was already established and a proven money maker prior to the cancel culture. Back then he was comedy royalty and all over the place. Now he's not.

As I've said already, there are people who don't care about politics who will hire them, but it won't be as many. One can demand a much higher wage if they are in demand from 10 different projects vs only 2. Kirk Cameron is still getting work too, but nobody would pretend that he's as successful as Leonardo Decaprio. Yet, back when they were both on Growing Pains, Cameron was the bigger name.
The producer also has to get the money and keep everyone happy, which would be tough if no one wanted to work with you.

Cameron was the bigger name when Growing Pains was on, because Leo was like 16.

After Growing Pains Cameron did a handful of movies then a few tv movies because he was a decent sitcom actor and that's about it. Leo's next role was What's Eating Gilbert Grape? where he was nominated for a Best Supporting Actor Oscar.

If your argument hinges on the idea Kirk Cameron should be making the same kinds of movies that Leo is, I'd abandon ship.

Have a good day.
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BBQ4Me said:

Have you ever considered that fewer cons go into Hollywood as opposed to Hollywood blacklisting them?
Why would that be, other than them being afraid that they'd have a hard time making a living in hollywood due to their politics? There used to be plenty of conservatives in Hollywood, just like there used to be plenty in academia. But they have been pushed out over time.
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
expresswrittenconsent said:

BBQ4Me said:

Have you ever considered that fewer cons go into Hollywood as opposed to Hollywood blacklisting them?

He also hasn't considered that being for equality isn't really a political belief or statement for most people. It used to be called the "golden rule" and taught to every kindergarten student.
Where have I been against equality?
boy09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aTmAg said:

BBQ4Me said:

Have you ever considered that fewer cons go into Hollywood as opposed to Hollywood blacklisting them?
Why would that be, other than them being afraid that they'd have a hard time making a living in hollywood due to their politics? There used to be plenty of conservatives in Hollywood, just like there used to be plenty in academia. But they have been pushed out over time.
I've always heard that in this country if you really want something, all you have to do is work hard for it...
expresswrittenconsent
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aTmAg said:

expresswrittenconsent said:

BBQ4Me said:

Have you ever considered that fewer cons go into Hollywood as opposed to Hollywood blacklisting them?

He also hasn't considered that being for equality isn't really a political belief or statement for most people. It used to be called the "golden rule" and taught to every kindergarten student.
Where have I been against equality?

You've repeatedly argued that companies pulling out of states with discriminatory laws against LGBTQ is an act of liberals against conservatives. Ergo, youre making the claim (whether you realize it or not, Karen) that only libs support equality, and that conservatives support discrimination against LGBTQ.
The thing is, you don't realize you aren't a conservative, you're an extremist (actually, its far more likely you're just a troll who likes to argue but doesn't believe in anything). The overwhelming majority of Americans support equality for LGBTQ and BIPOC, that isnt a divider among conservatives and liberals, just a divider amongst hateful extremists.
Aggie4242
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aTmAg said:

Aggie4242 said:

Quote:

You are talking about guys who established themselves and gained a following prior to this cancel movement. Many of them produce their own stuff and call their own shots. Of course they aren't going cancel themselves. And I never said 100% of Hollywood is anti-conservative. In fact I have stated otherwise many times. So yes.. the few non-political shot callers left will still hire these guys. But that still does not change the fact that a large portion of Hollywood will never hire them again. Can you name me a single young up and comer who is a loud and proud conservative that is making it big in mainstream (non religious) movies?

So now the argument isn't "conservatives are blacklisted by Hollywood"...now it is, "show me a conservative that has made it big in hollywood in the last 24 months who is outspoken about supporting trump who isn't making religious movies!"

Why all the qualifications?

As to your claim that nobody will hire these actors again...

Vince Vaugh: Already covered
Joe Pesci: Has done 3 movies since 2011, with the Irishman coming out last year
Kurt Russell: Was in "Once Upon a Time in Hollywood" lat year was also in a small indy project called Guardians of the Galaxy Vol II
Sly: Was in 3 movies in 2018, 2 movies in 2019, is currently filming a movie,has a movie in Pre-production, and has been announced to be in a 3rd movie with no date attached
Tom Selleck: Is starring on a network drama
Jon Voight: Stars on a Cable Drama, has a movie coming out this year, is starring in a movie about Roe v Wade and Reagan
James Caan: Currently has 4 movies announced, including one coming out this year and had 2 in 2018
Laura Prepon: Was in 12 episodes of OINTB in 2019

I didn't realize all of these folks were able to produce so many movies on their own and that only non-political shot-callers were producing these movies.

You guys keep bringing this up as a gotcha point. These guys are already established. The few non-libs in Hollywood will still hire them. That's not the point.
Then why did you say this, in reference to the actors listed:

Quote:

But that still does not change the fact that a large portion of Hollywood will never hire them again
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

fig96 said:

If your "civility in the eye of the beholder" is using calling others "intellectual lightweights" and the like then I'm glad you're not much of a regular here.
Oh, I've been called worse on this thread and way worse on this board.
I'd challenge you to point out where, particularly on this thread. You got called a Karen and that's it.
I've been told that I'm "not suited for debate" that I cannot think critically, and it has been heavily implied that I'm a bigot who is A-okay with discrimination against LBGTXYZ.
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Either way this is exhausting so I'll leave you to your opinions. You actually have one or two somewhat valid points but it's not worth the effort to attempt to continue.

The bottom line is if you're talented enough you'll be working, it's that simple. We could even pretend that Tim Allen's show only got canceled because he was conservative and some exec didn't like that, but because it was good someone else picked it up.
Could you answer this one question: Do you know of any young up-and comers who have been openly conservative that are now hitting it big (in mainstream movies)?
I don't watch much tv with those types of actors so I honestly couldn't tell you about any up and comers of any political persuasion. Off the top of my head KJ Apa is the lead in Riverdale and starred in I Still Believe (Jeremy Camp's story) a few months ago.
I said hitting it big. I have never heard of that guy. I just googled "biggest new actor" and it came up with this list (none of them are (public) consevatives from what I can tell):

Timothe Chalamet (liberal)
Storm Reid (not obvious)
Lucas Hedges (liberal)
Katherine Langford (not obvious)
Tye Sheridan (not obvious)
Kathryn Newton (not obvious)
Tom Holland (liberal)
Florence Pugh (liberal)
Daniel Kaluuya (not obvious)
Olivia Cooke (not obvious)
Anya Taylor-Joy (not obvious)

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

And for the record, Vince Vaughn has 3 films in production as a producer, 2 in preproduction and 2 in postproduction as an actor, and was in 4 eps this seasons of a very conservative show called Curb Your Enthusiasm. Cancel culture indeed.
A producer does the hiring. Of course he is not going to fire himself. And he is another one that was already established and a proven money maker prior to the cancel culture. Back then he was comedy royalty and all over the place. Now he's not.

As I've said already, there are people who don't care about politics who will hire them, but it won't be as many. One can demand a much higher wage if they are in demand from 10 different projects vs only 2. Kirk Cameron is still getting work too, but nobody would pretend that he's as successful as Leonardo Decaprio. Yet, back when they were both on Growing Pains, Cameron was the bigger name.
Cameron was the bigger name when Growing Pains was on, because Leo was like 16.

After Growing Pains Cameron did a handful of movies then a few tv movies because he was a decent sitcom actor and that's about it. Leo's next role was What's Eating Gilbert Grape? where he was nominated for a Best Supporting Actor Oscar.

If your argument hinges on the idea Kirk Cameron should be making the same kinds of movies that Leo is, I'd abandon ship.
No, my point is that using your guys standard, Kirk Cameron is "getting plenty of work". But nobody would consider his career stellar any stetch. Just because you can go on IMBD and see recent entries does not mean they are mega stars.
Aggie4242
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aTmAg said:

BBQ4Me said:

Have you ever considered that fewer cons go into Hollywood as opposed to Hollywood blacklisting them?
Why would that be, other than them being afraid that they'd have a hard time making a living in hollywood due to their politics? There used to be plenty of conservatives in Hollywood, just like there used to be plenty in academia. But they have been pushed out over time.
Maybe because conservatives rail against things like "Drama class" in high school and think liberal arts colleges are a waste of time? They also want to cut funding for the arts across the board.

https://www.heritage.org/report/ten-good-reasons-eliminate-funding-the-national-endowment-orthe-arts

https://www.statesman.com/NEWS/20170612/Legislature-cuts-Texas-arts-funding-28-percent

https://www.nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/is-the-neh-worth-keeping
boy09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aTmAg said:



and it has been heavily implied that I'm a bigot who is A-okay with discrimination against LBGTXYZ.
Mocking the acronym will definitely help your case.
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
expresswrittenconsent said:

aTmAg said:

expresswrittenconsent said:

BBQ4Me said:

Have you ever considered that fewer cons go into Hollywood as opposed to Hollywood blacklisting them?

He also hasn't considered that being for equality isn't really a political belief or statement for most people. It used to be called the "golden rule" and taught to every kindergarten student.
Where have I been against equality?

You've repeatedly argued that companies pulling out of states with discriminatory laws against LGBTQ is an act of liberals against conservatives. Ergo, youre making the claim (whether you realize it or not, Karen) that only libs support equality, and that conservatives support discrimination against LGBTQ.
Wrong. It's a lie to claim a law that allows private individuals to opt out of things they don't agree with is discriminatory. Nobody should be able to force somebody else to bake a gay/nazi cake, perform a marriage they don't want to, etc. I would also be against forcing a pro-gay pastor from performing a marriage for a straight couple if he/she didn't want to. It's nothing to do with discrimination, but opposing force.

Not to mention, they threatened to leave over an abortion bill too. Who are they discriminating against there?

Quote:

The thing is, you don't realize you aren't a conservative, you're an extremist (actually, its far more likely you're just a troll who likes to argue but doesn't believe in anything). The overwhelming majority of Americans support equality for LGBTQ and BIPOC, that isnt a divider among conservatives and liberals, just a divider amongst hateful extremists.
I don't have any issues with LGBTQetc. They should be able to marry, have insurance policies, etc. like everybody else. In fact, I think government should get completely out of the marriage business altogether. Why are they involved at all? They don't give me and best friend a "friend certificate". I just don't want to force people to do stuff they don't want to do.
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aggie4242 said:

aTmAg said:

BBQ4Me said:

Have you ever considered that fewer cons go into Hollywood as opposed to Hollywood blacklisting them?
Why would that be, other than them being afraid that they'd have a hard time making a living in hollywood due to their politics? There used to be plenty of conservatives in Hollywood, just like there used to be plenty in academia. But they have been pushed out over time.
Maybe because conservatives rail against things like "Drama class" in high school and think liberal arts colleges are a waste of time? They also want to cut funding for the arts across the board.

https://www.heritage.org/report/ten-good-reasons-eliminate-funding-the-national-endowment-orthe-arts

https://www.statesman.com/NEWS/20170612/Legislature-cuts-Texas-arts-funding-28-percent

https://www.nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/is-the-neh-worth-keeping

Liberal arts college are a waste of time. You shouldn't need to spend $100K at college for acting. Most don't make money doing that and they still have to pay a crap load of debt. Lot of the best actors never went to college at all. And just because I don't think government should pay taxpayer money on the arts does not mean I oppose people pursing that stuff on their own. I'm also against government funding NFL stadiums, but that doesn't mean I hate football.
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
boy09 said:

aTmAg said:



and it has been heavily implied that I'm a bigot who is A-okay with discrimination against LBGTXYZ.
Mocking the acronym will definitely help your case.
They keep adding letters. I don't even think there is a single agreed acronym anymore.
Aggie4242
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jesus christ, could you be any more obtuse if you tried?

It isn't about the government funding the arts, or the fact that folks go to liberal arts colleges. It's about the fact that conservatives (as you just proved) constantly mock the people that choose to go that route in life.

So when you ask why there aren't more conservatives in Hollywood, the answer just might have something to do with how they were raised and what their priorities are.
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aggie4242 said:

Jesus christ, could you be any more obtuse if you tried?

It isn't about the government funding the arts, or the fact that folks go to liberal arts colleges. It's about the fact that conservatives (as you just proved) constantly mock the people that choose to go that route in life.

So when you ask why there aren't more conservatives in Hollywood, the answer just might have something to do with how they were raised and what their priorities are.
Where did I mock people who go down that path?

And none of this changes the fact that there are conservatives who already made the choice to work in Hollywood and now report that they are treated poorly.
PascalsWager
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aTmAg said:

Aggie4242 said:

aTmAg said:

BBQ4Me said:

Have you ever considered that fewer cons go into Hollywood as opposed to Hollywood blacklisting them?
Why would that be, other than them being afraid that they'd have a hard time making a living in hollywood due to their politics? There used to be plenty of conservatives in Hollywood, just like there used to be plenty in academia. But they have been pushed out over time.
Maybe because conservatives rail against things like "Drama class" in high school and think liberal arts colleges are a waste of time? They also want to cut funding for the arts across the board.

https://www.heritage.org/report/ten-good-reasons-eliminate-funding-the-national-endowment-orthe-arts

https://www.statesman.com/NEWS/20170612/Legislature-cuts-Texas-arts-funding-28-percent

https://www.nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/is-the-neh-worth-keeping

Liberal arts college are a waste of time. You shouldn't need to spend $100K at college for acting. Most don't make money doing that and they still have to pay a crap load of debt. Lot of the best actors never went to college at all. And just because I don't think government should pay taxpayer money on the arts does not mean I oppose people pursing that stuff on their own. I'm also against government funding NFL stadiums, but that doesn't mean I hate football.
I think you're confusing liberal arts colleges with fine arts or mere art colleges. These schools offer actual degrees in social sciences. Arguably the people who go there are more pretentious than fine arts people.
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PascalsWager said:

aTmAg said:

Aggie4242 said:

aTmAg said:

BBQ4Me said:

Have you ever considered that fewer cons go into Hollywood as opposed to Hollywood blacklisting them?
Why would that be, other than them being afraid that they'd have a hard time making a living in hollywood due to their politics? There used to be plenty of conservatives in Hollywood, just like there used to be plenty in academia. But they have been pushed out over time.
Maybe because conservatives rail against things like "Drama class" in high school and think liberal arts colleges are a waste of time? They also want to cut funding for the arts across the board.

https://www.heritage.org/report/ten-good-reasons-eliminate-funding-the-national-endowment-orthe-arts

https://www.statesman.com/NEWS/20170612/Legislature-cuts-Texas-arts-funding-28-percent

https://www.nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/is-the-neh-worth-keeping

Liberal arts college are a waste of time. You shouldn't need to spend $100K at college for acting. Most don't make money doing that and they still have to pay a crap load of debt. Lot of the best actors never went to college at all. And just because I don't think government should pay taxpayer money on the arts does not mean I oppose people pursing that stuff on their own. I'm also against government funding NFL stadiums, but that doesn't mean I hate football.
I think you're confusing liberal arts colleges with fine arts or mere art colleges. These schools offer actual degrees in social sciences. Arguably the people who go there are more pretentious than fine arts people.
What and what is not college worthy is probably a whole new thread topic. It has become so expensive that I don't think it's worth the price for many if not most degrees. People would probably be better off if they took that college money and invested it in a mutual fund and got 4 more years of work experience.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fig96 said:

So I gotta start with this...

Quote:

I'm sure you can find some a-holes on F16, but you can also find plenty over here. But this is not talking about a-holes getting their just treatment. We are talking about non-a-holes losing jobs merely because they are conservative.
Such as? Everyone on here has been incredibly civil despite your ******* comments, while I could find you people telling folks who are liberal or Democrats that they're vile, the scum of the earth, hate America, etc., on that other board in about two minutes if you'd like. We do have disagreements on here, but in general folks stay pretty civil and get along. I'd happily see a movie and grab a beer with any of the regulars on this board, even the ones with terrible taste in Star Wars films (you know who you are).

And we haven't yet found an example of a non a-hole losing a job because they're conservative. James Woods, I hate to to break it to you, is an a-hole. Antonio Sabato Jr is just not that talented.

Annnnnd...

Quote:

No. It's not. People don't get to make up who has the burden of proof out of the blue.
You are correct, the burden of proof falls on the person making the claim. If you claim conservatives are being blacklisted then you need to show evidence to that fact that's more convincing than "these guys who aren't getting work claim there's thousands more of them". Even us intellectual lightweights know that.

Anyway...

Quote:

...and liberal causes. Just watch ANY awards show for confirmation.
Haven't seen anyone claim that Hollywood doesn't lean liberal.

Are there some people who won't want to work with people who have beliefs that diverge greatly from their own, or folks that support something they find awful? Sure, and the same goes for both sides of the political aisle in just about any field. That's not blacklisting.

Quote:

They seem to not care about discrimination against conservatives. They just cloak it in "doing the right thing". And saying that a pastor should be forced to perform a marriage on somebody is slavery. I guess that's the sort of thing democrats are known for, however.
See, here's where you go off the rails and lose any semblance of a rational argument. Nothing about the anti-LGBT legislation in Georgia has anything to do with pastors being forced to marry anyone, which I'd imagine most people would say was dumb. And now you're ranting about Democrats. This is the Entertainment board, stick to the plot man.

Quote:

So explain why you think Tim Allen's show was cancelled from ABC?
Per a quick search, ABC would've had to pick up the costs of producing the new season (it had been paid by the production company for the first several seasons) and was moving away from sitcoms in the slot where his show fit. Their president said it was a hard decision. But I don't know the details, and shows get cancelled for all kinds of reasons like the more liberal shows I mentioned. A show getting cancelled is a horribly flimsy piece of evidence.

Quote:

Well gee I guess that since Jackie Robinson was in MLB in 1947, then there must have been no racism in baseball anymore, right?
You're really terrible at the arguments.

Were there one lone conservative who was ridiculed but kept making movies anyway and was eventually an inspiration for the country then this might hold up in some weird way. Not to mention that racism is a far more complex issue. But I'll admit that only listing a few could be outliers so let's add to the list.

Outside the already mentioned really prominent conservatives that are incredibly successful in Hollywood, a quick search adds more to the list: Vince Vaughn, Joe Pesci, Kurt Russell, Sylvester Stallone, Tom Selleck, Jon Voight, James Caan, and Laura Prepon. Those folks aren't having a hard time finding work.

And we've already mentioned Adam Sandler...any argument that Hollywood is blacklisting conservatives goes out the window with Adam Sandler. He hasn't made a genuinely good movie in a decade and Netflix won't stop throwing money at him.

Quote:

It's not just those few people I'm talking about. Those are just the people who were big enough to come out and proud about it. According to them, there are thousands of lower level people who choose to remain anonymous out of fear of losing their jobs.
Here's the thing: that's not proof. That's hearsay at best.

You want to prove that there's discrimination? Find a liberal, attractive late-40s actor who's not very talented that's super successful in Hollywood. Or a decent talented older liberal actor who says horrible hateful things on Twitter but is still busy making movies.

Spoiler: there's few or none, because if you're not talented or an awful person most folks don't want to hire you. If you're talented enough at anything (see: the NFL, Hollywood, etc.) then people will forgive all kinds of behavior. But if the headache of working with your eclipses how good you are people will just move on.

Are there some people who are refusing to hire people because of their political views? Probably, there's awful people everywhere. But the fact that none of these articles are featuring folks who were at one time really successful (except for Woods...again, *******) and now can't get projects is kind of telling.
Took five pages but we finally got our Last Jedi dig in. Good job, fig!
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.