Jake Lloyd - young Anakin
Hayden Christensen - young/adult Anakin
Definitely Colin Farrell as Alexander
Hayden Christensen - young/adult Anakin
Definitely Colin Farrell as Alexander
Most Miscast Roles
21,197 Views |
210 Replies |
Last: 4 yr ago by SpreadsheetAg
Have to disagree. He actually sung some of those songs and can sing well.GoAgs92 said:
Colin Farrell as a country singer in Crazy Heart.
Mickey Rooney as the Chinese guy in Breakfast at Tiffany's
Rob Schneider as a Hawaiian in 50 first dates
Sylvester Stallone in Rhinestone.
It's an amazing album anchored by Jeff Bridges of all people.
DeNiro as Max Cady in the Cape Fear remake. RD's southern accent isn't believable throughout the film. As bad or worse than Diaz's Irish accent in GONY.
DallasTeleAg said:
Both miscast and I think he's a terrible actor.
- He's short, Harry is tall (granted, not possible to know at 10 yrs old)
- His eyes are blue and Harry's are green.
- He is just bad... like uncomfortable to watch level bad.
Compare his casting to Alan Rickman or Maggie Smith. I mean, you basically name the adult actor in that film, and I would say it was perfectly cast. I give them a pass on Dumbledore because their original actor was great, and he passed away.
They frankly did a terrible job with a lot of the adult actors regardless of how incredible a lot of them were. They should have all been about 20 years younger. Snape would have been early 30s in sorcerers stone
Jk Rowling specifically asked for Alan Rickman for Snape. Hard to say the role was miscast when the person who created the character chooses the actor!
John Malkovich.
In anything.
In anything.
These criticisms of Harry Potter movies casting coming out of the woodworks.Fat Bib Fortuna said:
Jk Rowling specifically asked for Alan Rickman for Snape. Hard to say the role was miscast when the person who created the character chooses the actor!
"You do NOT understand! His eye color was WRONG!!!"
NoahAg said:
John Malkovich.
In anything.
Does that include "Being John Malkovich"?
The Dark Arts age you buddy. And so does pining over a girl and having so much emotions over her kid. get with the program.Saxsoon said:DallasTeleAg said:
Both miscast and I think he's a terrible actor.
- He's short, Harry is tall (granted, not possible to know at 10 yrs old)
- His eyes are blue and Harry's are green.
- He is just bad... like uncomfortable to watch level bad.
Compare his casting to Alan Rickman or Maggie Smith. I mean, you basically name the adult actor in that film, and I would say it was perfectly cast. I give them a pass on Dumbledore because their original actor was great, and he passed away.
They frankly did a terrible job with a lot of the adult actors regardless of how incredible a lot of them were. They should have all been about 20 years younger. Snape would have been early 30s in sorcerers stone
Especially. He's just an annoying and punchable actor.gggmann said:NoahAg said:
John Malkovich.
In anything.
Does that include "Being John Malkovich"?
NoahAg said:Especially. He's just an annoying and punchable actor.gggmann said:NoahAg said:
John Malkovich.
In anything.
Does that include "Being John Malkovich"?
NoahAg said:Especially. He's just an annoying and punchable actor.gggmann said:NoahAg said:
John Malkovich.
In anything.
Does that include "Being John Malkovich"?
He was perfect in Con Air.
I thought he did a great job as Lenny in Of Mice and Men.
I think Ratcliffe was a good pick for Harry Potter, but Ratcliffe is just an annoying actor because of his mannerisms and acting abilities. He fit the part though, and looked like "Harry Potter". Hell he probably did a good job being a dopey idiot in his early years...
It's his facial expressions and voice when he's yelling that really grates on me, but a good fit for the part.
It's his facial expressions and voice when he's yelling that really grates on me, but a good fit for the part.
Malkovich was the perfect person to cast in Burn After Reading and In The Line of Fire.
Jimmy Stewart in Vertigo. It's still one of the greatest films of all time, but he was too old.
Same thing for Rear Window, but not as bad.
Same thing for Rear Window, but not as bad.
Uhtred of Bebbanburg from the books (supposed to be like 6'4 240 lbs blonde hair; large man)
Uhtred of Bebbanburg - Alexander Dreymon (5'10, 188 lbs, brown hair)
(Great actor for the part, just undersized / wrong features)
On the other hand, they nailed Finan:
Uhtred of Bebbanburg - Alexander Dreymon (5'10, 188 lbs, brown hair)
(Great actor for the part, just undersized / wrong features)
On the other hand, they nailed Finan:
He was awesome in Dangerous LiaisonsBruce Almighty said:NoahAg said:Especially. He's just an annoying and punchable actor.gggmann said:NoahAg said:
John Malkovich.
In anything.
Does that include "Being John Malkovich"?
He was perfect in Con Air.
Don't worry about it Tanya. NoahAg doesn't like Malkovich. Pretty sure we know what he'd say.
Nic Cage was better.Bruce Almighty said:NoahAg said:Especially. He's just an annoying and punchable actor.gggmann said:NoahAg said:
John Malkovich.
In anything.
Does that include "Being John Malkovich"?
He was perfect in Con Air.
Pretty sad when you get out-acted by Nic Cage.
Speaking of Willy Wonka, Timothee Chalamet was just cast as Wonka.
Could be disastrous, or could be brilliant. I feel like he might be great.
Could be disastrous, or could be brilliant. I feel like he might be great.
I don't buy Al Pacino as a NFL head coach in "Any Given Sunday"
Same thing with "Braveheart" casting shorty Mel Gibson as William Wallace, who by all historical accounts was huge.
I was just saying to my friends the other day, I wish someone would cram another Willy Wonka movie down our throats.Brian Earl Spilner said:
Speaking of Willy Wonka, Timothee Chalamet was just cast as Wonka.
Could be disastrous, or could be brilliant. I feel like he might be great.
That must suck having no choice of what to watch.
I mean, if we're nitpicking the historical accuracy of Braveheart, that's probably the last thing anyone should really be worried about.An L of an Ag said:
Same thing with "Braveheart" casting shorty Mel Gibson as William Wallace, who by all historical accounts was huge.
How dare Mel Gibson cast himself in his own movie!!!!!
Said Kevin Costner after producing Robin Hood
KC was an awful cast for this movie; everything else in that movie clicked. Except Kevin Costner as Robin Hood (even though I enjoyed him in the movie, just plain BAD casting) as well as Christian Slater as Will Scarlet
KC was an awful cast for this movie; everything else in that movie clicked. Except Kevin Costner as Robin Hood (even though I enjoyed him in the movie, just plain BAD casting) as well as Christian Slater as Will Scarlet
I had no idea I needed or was getting a Willy Wonka origin story...
Alan Rickman, Morgan Freeman, and Bryan Adams saved that movie.SpreadsheetAg said:
Said Kevin Costner after producing Robin Hood
Awful cast too; everything else in that movie clicked. Except Kevin Costner as Robin Hood (even though I enjoyed him in the movie, just plain BAD casting) as well as Christian Slater as Will Scarlet
Prince of Thieves is one of my biggest guilty pleasure movies and I love Costner in it.
My unpopular opinion about Jack Reacher is that Tom Cruise is fine in those movies and I've read the books and know that Reacher is supposed to be huge. Part of my comfort with it is that those movies aren't getting made without a star attached to the role and I can't think of anyone with Reacher's real size who gets those made. Cruise did fine with every aspect other than being a foot short.
Squirrel Master said:
My unpopular opinion about Jack Reacher is that Tom Cruise is fine in those movies and I've read the books and know that Reacher is supposed to be huge. Part of my comfort with it is that those movies aren't getting made without a star attached to the role and I can't think of anyone with Reacher's real size who gets those made. Cruise did fine with every aspect other than being a foot short.
He's also too old.
I watched the Reacher movies before reading any of the books so I had no preconceived expectations. I get he's not what the novels describe physically but I thought Cruise played the roll well. I'm not sure what tall physical actor exists who could have matched the book. Blond and 6'-5" actors with that physical build aren't exactly lying around.
Featured Stories
See All
Spring Football Snippets: Practice No. 5
by Olin Buchanan
5 Thoughts: First look at Jamie Morrison's 2026 Aggies
by Kay Naegeli
2:46
6h ago
1.3k
Sights & Sounds: Spring Practice No. 5
by Diego Saenz
Texas A&M's Bucky McMillan set to receive raise, contract extension
by Luke Evangelist
Echoes of Kyle
He's going to be in College Station next year isn't he!?
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
58
txaggie2012
He's going to be in College Station next year isn't he!?
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
49
daltonhughes18
He's going to be in College Station next year isn't he!?
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
40
Gigem314
He's going to be in College Station next year isn't he!?
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
38