Oh, look, it's aTmAg...
Uhhh…. Any of y'all catch that Zoo or GB thread?
59,536 Views |
479 Replies |
Last: 4 yr ago by AMW2010
Sea Speed said:
So we have godwins law for mentioning nazis, what is the law discussing a guaranteed mention of Barnes on a TA thread? It really is inevitable.
This really does need to be a thing.
That Chadwick thing was for you. Even after he was exonerated you were trashing the dude because he just seemed like that kind of guy. Yet are defending this guy.TCTTS said:
Oh, look, it's aTmAg...
Is his name Colin Robinson, because that would make sense.
****ING GUY
Atmag as an energy Vampire makes so much sense it makes me wonder if it possible for a vampire to feed so much they get fat?
TCTTS
Joined:
Mar 10, 2004
Posts:
62,880
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not as much energy as you guys. You've spent 10 11 pages defending a pedo. Way to go guys.
go get 'em vamps
This was fun to catch up on today. <insert popcorn gif>
Just thinking the same thing.
tysker said:
go get 'em vamps
aTmAg said:That Chadwick thing was for you. Even after he was exonerated you were trashing the dude because he just seemed like that kind of guy. Yet are defending this guy.TCTTS said:
Oh, look, it's aTmAg...
Once again, as is your MO, you cherry pick to make your dumb ass points. In no way am I "defending" Muck. I've made my feelings explicitly clear in that regard. He was a good guy on this board. Off of it? Not so much, it seems, and I've acknowledged that. Though, as is with most things in life, it's not black and white, which I know, with you, doesn't compute. Muck did some reprehensible sh*t. But it also seemed, to many of us, like he had turned things around. And we tried to express empathy to that end, something I know is utterly foreign to you. Then, it sounds like maybe his bad habits got the best of him again. And I expressed my disappointment/outrage accordingly. Yesterday was a roller coaster of information and emotions, and we all were reacting in the moment, with every new bit of info we learned. But any fool can see that most of us here aren't "defending" his actions.
I saw a bunch of posts and thought maybe some other interesting detail from this story came out. Nope, just politics vs entertainment bickering.
He's trolling, as usual. Best to just leave it.TCTTS said:aTmAg said:That Chadwick thing was for you. Even after he was exonerated you were trashing the dude because he just seemed like that kind of guy. Yet are defending this guy.TCTTS said:
Oh, look, it's aTmAg...
Once again, as is your MO, you cherry pick to make your dumb ass points. In no way am I "defending" Muck. I've made my feelings explicitly clear in that regard. He was a good guy on this board. Off of it? Not so much, it seems, and I've acknowledged that. Though, as is with most things in life, it's not black and white, which I know doesn't compute with you. Muck did some reprehensible sh*t. But it also seemed, to many of us, like he had turned things around. And we tried to express empathy to that end, something I know is utterly foreign to you. Then, it sounds like maybe his bad habits got the best of him again. And I expressed my disappointment/outrage accordingly. Yesterday was a roller coaster of information, and we all were reacting in the moment. But any fool can see that most of us here aren't "defending" his actions.
To the ones defending the f16 poster group that comes over a few pages back, these are the types we have a problem with, not the ones who typically engage in good conversations over the shows here.
Jared was a good guy in Subway commercials.TCTTS said:aTmAg said:That Chadwick thing was for you. Even after he was exonerated you were trashing the dude because he just seemed like that kind of guy. Yet are defending this guy.TCTTS said:
Oh, look, it's aTmAg...
Once again, as is your MO, you cherry pick to make your dumb ass points. In no way am I "defending" Muck. I've made my feelings explicitly clear in that regard. He was a good guy on this board. Off of it? Not so much, it seems, and I've acknowledged that. Though, as is with most things in life, it's not black and white, which I know, with you, doesn't compute. Muck did some reprehensible sh*t. But it also seemed, to many of us, like he had turned things around. And we tried to express empathy to that end, something I know is utterly foreign to you. Then, it sounds like maybe his bad habits got the best of him again. And I expressed my disappointment/outrage accordingly. Yesterday was a roller coaster of information and emotions, and we all were reacting in the moment, with every new bit of info we learned. But any fool can see that most of us here aren't "defending" his actions.
aTmAg said:
Jared was a good guy in Subway commercials.
Hey what'dya know. It's the sole reason I had to add a "for the most part" of things remaining civil in the EB.
Oh, and BTW, Chris Hardwick was a good guy on his show too. Did that keep TCTTS from trashing him? Nope.
What about when the allegations were shown to be false and he was rehired for his show? Did TCTTS say, "you know.. he paid his price to society." Nope again. He doubled down on trashing Chadwick because something simply "rubbed him the wrong way" or something preposterous like that.
What about when the allegations were shown to be false and he was rehired for his show? Did TCTTS say, "you know.. he paid his price to society." Nope again. He doubled down on trashing Chadwick because something simply "rubbed him the wrong way" or something preposterous like that.
This made me bust out laughing. Well done.aTmAg said:Jared was a good guy in Subway commercials.TCTTS said:aTmAg said:That Chadwick thing was for you. Even after he was exonerated you were trashing the dude because he just seemed like that kind of guy. Yet are defending this guy.TCTTS said:
Oh, look, it's aTmAg...
Once again, as is your MO, you cherry pick to make your dumb ass points. In no way am I "defending" Muck. I've made my feelings explicitly clear in that regard. He was a good guy on this board. Off of it? Not so much, it seems, and I've acknowledged that. Though, as is with most things in life, it's not black and white, which I know, with you, doesn't compute. Muck did some reprehensible sh*t. But it also seemed, to many of us, like he had turned things around. And we tried to express empathy to that end, something I know is utterly foreign to you. Then, it sounds like maybe his bad habits got the best of him again. And I expressed my disappointment/outrage accordingly. Yesterday was a roller coaster of information and emotions, and we all were reacting in the moment, with every new bit of info we learned. But any fool can see that most of us here aren't "defending" his actions.
This thread bit **** crazy.
This thread's still going, huh? Impressive.
Life's an endless party, not a punch card.
In a thread with lots of twists and turns. I did not have Chris Hardwick on my bingo card
aTmAg said:
Oh, and BTW, Chadwick was a good guy on his show too. Did that keep TCTTS from trashing him? Nope.
What about when the allegations were shown to be false and he was rehired for his show? Did TCTTS say, "you know.. he paid his price to society." Nope again. He doubled down on trashing Chadwick because something simply "rubbed him the wrong way" or something preposterous like that.
Get his damn name right if you are gonna troll another poster
Or, maybe… just maybe… I had a bit more inside info on that whole ordeal than you. It's just staggering sometimes how sure you think you are about sh*t you have no business commenting on.
I got it right the first time. My bad.Saxsoon said:aTmAg said:
Oh, and BTW, Chadwick was a good guy on his show too. Did that keep TCTTS from trashing him? Nope.
What about when the allegations were shown to be false and he was rehired for his show? Did TCTTS say, "you know.. he paid his price to society." Nope again. He doubled down on trashing Chadwick because something simply "rubbed him the wrong way" or something preposterous like that.
Get his damn name right if you are gonna troll another poster
Out of everything in this thread, why did staff just remove aTmAg's initial Subway Jared post, and my reply to it?
So either:TCTTS said:
Or, maybe… just maybe… I had a bit more inside info on that whole ordeal than you. It's just staggering sometimes how sure you think you are about sh*t you have no business commenting on.
1) you lie and trash a guy based on nothing (my vote)
2) You continue to bash a guy publicly on a forum and refuse to back it up because of supposed "inside info"
Either way reflects poorly on you.
TCTTS
Joined:
Mar 10, 2004
Posts:
62,880
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So you:
1) Come to the EB and literally pull an accusation out of your ass that people are defending someone's criminal actions, when nobody has done so.
2) Bring up a completely unrelated event and don't even know the name of the person involved
Yeah that reflects greatly on you. You clearly know stuff.
1) Come to the EB and literally pull an accusation out of your ass that people are defending someone's criminal actions, when nobody has done so.
2) Bring up a completely unrelated event and don't even know the name of the person involved
Yeah that reflects greatly on you. You clearly know stuff.
How much battery life does the aTm replybot have left?
TNNCS and I have had our disagreements over the years, but I do request other posters and lurkers respect him, as do I.
Let us converse with dispassionate reason. Please.
Let us converse with dispassionate reason. Please.
For the record, I haven't "continued to bash" anyone. The events you're referring to occurred in 2018 - THREE YEARS AGO - and I haven't spoken a word on the subject since. It's honestly insane that you're even bringing it up now. Either way, I'm not going to talk publicly about the things I heard privately. I don't owe you or anyone else here that. I'm merely saying, I have reason to believe the things I believe. That's it and that's all.
UntoldSpirit
WARNING FOR COMFORT SUITES ON TEXAS FOR FOOTBALL SEASON
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
46