Entertainment
Sponsored by

Leave the World Behind on Netflix

21,479 Views | 163 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by LMCane
Muy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Came out yesterday, wow, awesome! I'm not a movie expert but it left me feeling like we're all effed.
The Milkman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I appreciate the overall message of it, but really hated the movie. It was a lot of nothing, and some very dumb scenes. It felt like some of the bad M Night Shamalan movies with the shot of a character staring at something and then we see it a little later

Just very heavy handed
lawless89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wife and I both really enjoyed it. Music was a little weird, but it added to the suspense I guess. Also the deer parts were very dumb and unrealistic to me.

Crazy to think that it's very possible something like that could happen and likely will be attempted at some point.
25Lighters
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I liked it. It isn't a movie I would watch again but it had some interesting scenes and the overall scenario is one that could actually happen. I wouldn't mind a sequel coming out that covers the next 90 days since we just started learning about what potentially happened.

I thought the main characters did a good job for the most part portraying their personalities. Such as Julia Roberts is a successful business woman but hates her job which has made her a controlling ***** with a jaded view on life.
chick79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Not that great. Overall I was disappointed.
TX04Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yeah was hoping it would be better given the cast and overall plot. Felt a bit lazily done for what could have been a really good movie. Had a lot of potential.
Dr. Not Yet Dr. Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Holy hell that was a pretentious, on-the-nose, absurd, piece of cr*p. Unnecessary long shots, zoom ins, and camera angles. Absurd dialogue like the 13 year old quoting the West Wing directly. "I don't know what'd I'd do without GPS or the internet." Unintentionally racist daughter, and the movie was clearly trying to paint her as in the right. Absurd scenarios (they are a 2 minute drive from the city but everyone has disappeared??), confusing music choices, annoying and misplaced horror movie violin rifts, bizarre character reactions (a teenage kid being nonplussed by losing all his teeth?), and the writer's complete lack of understanding of technology. What was the point of painting the son as a creep or the masturbation scene? Characters talking mysteriously rather than just talking straight. Painting the Julia Robert's character as racist when any sane person in her situation would be acting the same (no, I'm not letting two random people into my airbnb in the middle of the night, especially when he can't provide identification).

Then there is the bizarre happenings or scenes that really do deserve explanation, that are never explained.

What the hell was the point of the shot of the American flag on the moon? What was the point of the deer scenes? Who was sleeping in the cabin? What was the noise and just why?

This movie desperately needed an editor to cut out an hour of this mindless slop, and needed a co-writer that was willing to tell the director "No".

I totally get that this movie was attempting to be metaphorical, but when you have characters literally telling you the points you are supposed to be taking away or just bashing you over the head with "wink, wink" statements, it comes off as amateurish. This felt like a film student movie who lucked into getting a $50 million budget and free reign to do whatever he wanted with it.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
hph6203
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
College film project. Ham fisted. To the point it feels intentional. If it was intentional then the movie is a C, unintentional D.
chick79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dr Not Yet summed it up beautifully. Just a poorly done movie that could have been really good given the subject and actors. I think this was probably Ethan Hawke's worst performance ever.
Rick Dalton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It insists upon itself.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I haven't seen it yet and probably won't at this point, but at the very least it's sounding more and more like the rare instance where a sarcastic "Thanks, Obama!" can appropriately be used on this board...

BenTheGoodAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Thanks Obama

/sarcasm
$3 Sack of Groceries
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
"A tick bite, must be Lyme disease."

I love dystopian movies but this was so bad.
Jugstore Cowboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Been watching old Letterman clips on Youtube, and just saw one from the early 80s w/ Albert Brooks talking about looking for movie financing. "Hey, you were successful in the oil business, I bet you know how to make a movie!"

Netflix seems to have taken a similar approach w/ Obama. "Hey, you were a successful politician, why don't you make movies and TV shows?" Except I think the financing flows in a different direction.
PDEMDHC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Apparently the book is about class and race and how we are still bound to prejudice. Race was obvious but class? They were all rich idiots.

Reactions of Julia Roberts and house owners daughter were ridiculous. How the husband wouldn't help the scared woman because he didn't speak Spanish.
Brother was a jerk/karma with the tick bite.

Is this Lost? What's up with the deer?

We got to see people for who they really were before they realized Allah was going to do some damage like… program Teslas to drive into each other but not a brand new Jeep Cherokee for some reason.

The movie was all over the place. I do find it really damn bizarre an ex President (regardless of politics) wanted to work on a movie where it basically shows the end of America.

ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Says a lot about the Obamas, I guess. People might not be that far off the mark when they say they hate America...
Jugstore Cowboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Do you think the Obamas are creatively involved? They/he have a massive & broad deal w/ Netflix; I always assumed it was a pure business transaction: they provide their endorsement/"credibility" to Netflix in the streaming wars and get paid nicely for it.
G.I.Bro
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I mean, the tweet above said they gave lots of notes. Maybe they just helped translate "death to America", maybe more
Aggie_Journalist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Lmao
Thanks and gig'em
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I was ready for a clever explanation for everything, but the show just stopped.

Waste of time.
BTHOthatguy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Well there's 2 hours of my life I'll never get back. That was awful. Just really dumb writing and that "cinematography". Don't waste time on this one.
MaroonStain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Informative thread. I'll leave this one off the list.
Mr President Elect
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I didn't think it was horrible, just thought it was about 90 minutes too long. Condense it down to 45 minutes and make it episode 1 of a series and I would be intrigued.

Hmm, not sure how I feel about Obama's hand in this. There has been a lot of chatter about a high number of ceo's abruptly leaving their jobs and moving to places away from urban areas. Maybe he is trying to tell us something.

aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mr President Elect said:

I didn't think it was horrible, just thought it was about 90 minutes too long. Condense it down to 45 minutes and make it episode 1 of a series and I would be intrigued.

Hmm, not sure how I feel about Obama's hand in this. There has been a lot of chatter about a high number of ceo's abruptly leaving their jobs and moving to places away from urban areas. Maybe he is trying to tell us something.


There was a series sorta like that a while back. Something about electricity suddenly failing to work. Unlike this show, they started to explain why, but the show got canceled.
javajaws
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I didn't think it was half bad. But the ending just didn't do it for me. Kind of felt like they left the last third of the movie on the cutting room floor. Not that they actually cut film anymore. And apparently they don't use a test audience anymore either.
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is the same guy that did Mr Robot.

Is this worth watching or not?
AggieArchitect04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I didn't mind it. Not winning any awards, but I don't feel cheated.

ETA: It was over the top in places (violin riffs and long stare pan outs) and a little too "on the nose" in others (dependency on tech consumption).

aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That's the 2nd time that "on the nose" has been used in this thread. I've never heard that phrase used as a criticism. What do you guys mean?
Apache
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Some really stupid stuff in this film that squandered an interesting premise & good cast.

As others mentioned, the unexplained cabin, the flamingos, lack of people, the suddenly p*ssed off deer... just stupid. The ending just left me pissed off.

If you want post-apocalyptic done better, stick with the first few seasons of The Walking Dead or The Last of Us. This is "Bird Box" level type stuff.


Muy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
javajaws said:

I didn't think it was half bad. But the ending just didn't do it for me. Kind of felt like they left the last third of the movie on the cutting room floor. Not that they actually cut film anymore. And apparently they don't use a test audience anymore either.


It did have a sudden ending but clearly left everyone with the reality that nothing was going to stop the destruction of the US by internal civil war, so the only option was to bunker in and survive.
Muy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Apache said:

Some really stupid stuff in this film that squandered an interesting premise & good cast.

As others mentioned, the unexplained cabin, the flamingos, lack of people, the suddenly p*ssed off deer... just stupid. The ending just left me pissed off.

If you want post-apocalyptic done better, stick with the first few seasons of The Walking Dead or The Last of Us. This is "Bird Box" level type stuff.





Yeah I would have definitely preferred a little bit of info as to what the hell started this and was able to cause all of these off events like the deer, who was in the cabin (I only assume it was Kevin Bacon), and the noise.
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It would be one thing if they had an explanation for all of this and it was up to the viewer to figure out what that was. I'd be a big fan of that. But that doesn't seem to be the case. It seems like they just said, "it would be really weird if THIS happened" and kept adding crap upon crap.
Definitely Not A Cop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Muy said:

Apache said:

Some really stupid stuff in this film that squandered an interesting premise & good cast.

As others mentioned, the unexplained cabin, the flamingos, lack of people, the suddenly p*ssed off deer... just stupid. The ending just left me pissed off.

If you want post-apocalyptic done better, stick with the first few seasons of The Walking Dead or The Last of Us. This is "Bird Box" level type stuff.





Yeah I would have definitely preferred a little bit of info as to what the hell started this and was able to cause all of these off events like the deer, who was in the cabin (I only assume it was Kevin Bacon), and the noise.


They gave an explanation about the animals. When the car radio turned on for like 20 seconds midway through the movie they mentioned that animal migration patterns had gone wild as a result of the attack.

I think it's a dumb explanation though.

TBH, I think the movie would have been better served and made more sense if they had scrapped everything being a cyber attack and changed it to a solar flare that knocked out everything. I honestly thought that's what they were going with to start off in the first place.

I thought the storyline falls apart if you start to think about it too much, but it did do a pretty good job about ratcheting up my anxiety. As a thriller, it delivered.
Muy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Either solar flares or AI taking over all government networks.
hph6203
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aTmAg said:

That's the 2nd time that "on the nose" has been used in this thread. I've never heard that phrase used as a criticism. What do you guys mean?
It means the film beats you over the head with the point they're trying to make, like the interactions between Roberts and the daughter.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.