***Russian - Ukraine War Tactical and Strategic Updates*** [Warning on OP]

9,560,272 Views | 52840 Replies | Last: 8 hrs ago by Rossticus
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sclaff
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rossticus said:

MaxPower said:

That buggy looks like something from GI Joe


And that makes it AWESOME!!!


Chuck Norris would drive that
sclaff
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
sclaff said:

Rossticus said:

MaxPower said:

That buggy looks like something from GI Joe


And that makes it AWESOME!!!


Chuck Norris would drive that

When playing golf
EFR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The tweet you linked is about the Brits about to seize tankers but then has a video of a Russian submarine, this may not be the most reliable source.
chickencoupe16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
EFR said:

The tweet you linked is about the Brits about to seize tankers but then has a video of a Russian submarine, this may not be the most reliable source.


At the same time, US military social media has before used pictures of Russian equipment .
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EFR said:

The tweet you linked is about the Brits about to seize tankers but then has a video of a Russian submarine, this may not be the most reliable source.


The people they have sourcing images for media these days don't know their a holes from their elbows but it doesn't USUALLY correspond to inaccuracy of the reporting, from what I've found.

To your point, though, news outlets don't proof electronic media with the rigor that they used to apply to print media. So many typos and inaccurate images. Drives me nuts.
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
chickencoupe16 said:

EFR said:

The tweet you linked is about the Brits about to seize tankers but then has a video of a Russian submarine, this may not be the most reliable source.


At the same time, US military social media has before used pictures of Russian equipment .


And Chinese equipment as well, if I'm not mistaken.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
sclaff said:

sclaff said:

Rossticus said:

MaxPower said:

That buggy looks like something from GI Joe


And that makes it AWESOME!!!


Chuck Norris would drive that

When playing golf

During coitus...

With ALL the golf beer girls...
You can turn off signatures, btw
sclaff
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Quote:

One of the most iconic videos of the war. Assaults like these aren't possible these days. Chosen company has since disbanded. A few of the guys are still active though. The commander Ryan is still active on twitter. The lines don't look like this now. All of the guys on both sides would have been fpv'd in like 20 minutes today. Crazy how much it's changed.

TRM
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This was brought 3 years ago, but Russia can't really afford to move troops back to the east to protect its border. If they do, Ukraine needs to take full advantage.
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Funding for Ukraine aid again before Congress.

"At $300 million to $400 million, Congress is not trying to underwrite the war effort alone. That would cost billions. It is trying to keep Ukraine's forces viable, reinforce European burden sharing, and maintain Western leverage in negotiations as Russia continues to attack Ukraine's cities and infrastructure."

VOTE
Naveronski
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
74OA said:

Funding for Ukraine aid again before Congress.

"At $300 million to $400 million, Congress is not trying to underwrite the war effort alone. That would cost billions. It is trying to keep Ukraine's forces viable, reinforce European burden sharing, and maintain Western leverage in negotiations as Russia continues to attack Ukraine's cities and infrastructure."

VOTE

I'd expect to see a sale of helicopters to Ukraine, too, soon.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TRM said:

This was brought 3 years ago, but Russia can't really afford to move troops back to the east to protect its border. If they do, Ukraine needs to take full advantage.


I am not surprised in the slightest China saw that opportunity and would take it. Guess the only thing is what took them so long?

Russia left their flank exposed.
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'd like more corroboration of the Chinese incursion into the Far East. I think there would be a bigger stink over it if it was legit.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Waffledynamics said:

I'd like more corroboration of the Chinese incursion into the Far East. I think there would be a bigger stink over it if it was legit.

I don't think Russia wants to appear even weaker so they would not squeal too loudly. After all, what can Russia actually do about it with their military stretched so thin?
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ya going to call BS on that. Shaded area would include the resort town/port of Andreevka plus be right on the doorstep of Komsomolsk-on-Amur which is home to the Sukhoi plant, bassically their version of Lockheed in Fort Worth.
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Waffledynamics said:

I'd like more corroboration of the Chinese incursion into the Far East. I think there would be a bigger stink over it if it was legit.

I don't think Russia wants to appear even weaker so they would not squeal too loudly. After all, what can Russia actually do about it with their military stretched so thin?


Russia can do a lot in response to a major incursion on areas that include the Russian mainland in that military industrial area. That's the kind of thing that would provoke a nuclear response.
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Teslag said:

aggiehawg said:

Waffledynamics said:

I'd like more corroboration of the Chinese incursion into the Far East. I think there would be a bigger stink over it if it was legit.

I don't think Russia wants to appear even weaker so they would not squeal too loudly. After all, what can Russia actually do about it with their military stretched so thin?


Russia can do a lot in response to a major incursion on areas that include the Russian mainland in that military industrial area. That's the kind of thing that would provoke a nuclear response.


Lol and then what? China has nukes as well.
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Then MAD. But that's why MAD exists. If you invade a nuclear's powers mainland and threaten key production areas of military assets and bases those responses are on the table. And justifiably so.
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You're explaining why there would be no nuclear response. And Russia has most of their military assets tied up in Ukraine.
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PJYoung said:

You're explaining why there would be no nuclear response. And Russia has most of their military assets tied up in Ukraine.


The Russian pacific fleet is anchored in Vladivostok along with key naval assets and nuclear arsenals. It is also a large port and shipbuilding center for the Russian. To the NW and the aforementioned Komsomolents-an-Amur, Sukhoi's largest military and civilian aerospace plant exists along with several strategic airbases. That entire region is industry heavy and a lot of it tied up in defense production. They would defend the hell out of it and burn it and everyone else down trying.
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Teslag said:

PJYoung said:

You're explaining why there would be no nuclear response. And Russia has most of their military assets tied up in Ukraine.


The Russian pacific fleet is anchored in Vladivostok along with key naval assets and nuclear arsenals. It is also a large port and shipbuilding center for the Russian. To the NW and the aforementioned Komsomolents-an-Amur, Sukhoi's largest military and civilian aerospace plant exists along with several strategic airbases. That entire region is industry heavy and a lot of it tied up in defense production. They would defend the hell out of it and burn it and everyone else down trying.

Gaeilge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kadyrov is suffering from kidney failure...I give you a kidney transplant!



Quote:

BREAKING:

Ramzan Kadyrov's son, Adam, was involved in a serious car accident, according to Chechen opposition channels.

It is reported that Adam's motorcade was moving at high speed, and after one vehicle lost control, the others began crashing into each other.

Sources say that several streets in Grozny have been blocked and the city hospital has been closed.

According to Niyso, Adam is in critical condition. Doctors are resuscitating him and preparing him for an urgent transfer to Moscow.

Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wow. That is indeed convenient.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I was confused by that at first but now I get it. Don't need to kill his son to get it though.
EastSideAg2002
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

I was confused by that at first but now I get it. Don't need to kill his son to get it though.

On His DL:
Organ Donor: No Yes
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Europe continues to step up: Poland confirms plans to transfer the remainder of its MIG 29s to Ukraine.

FIGHTERS
KentK93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
74OA said:

Europe continues to step up: Poland confirms plans to transfer the remainder of its MIG 29s to Ukraine.

FIGHTERS

This should have been done with in the first year of the war.
AlaskanAg99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
74OA said:

Europe continues to step up: Poland confirms plans to transfer the remainder of its MIG 29s to Ukraine.

FIGHTERS


Good
They need to do more. This is their problem to deal with.

The US should sell arms to those EU countries who support the US. Like Poland.
aTm '99
twelve12twelve
How long do you want to ignore this user?



Justin Taylor went to Ukraine to see first hand all that is going on currently with the war. About a quarter of the way through it, but this is good stuff that highlights how normal people are caught up in all this bull***** Civilians being trained to be first responders to keep people from bleeding out before the ambulance can even arrive.
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
KentK93 said:

74OA said:

Europe continues to step up: Poland confirms plans to transfer the remainder of its MIG 29s to Ukraine.

FIGHTERS

This should have been done with in the first year of the war.

Poland transferred the majority years ago. This is the final 14 which it couldn't let go until it had enough new FA-50s on board to backfill for its own defense needs.
KentK93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
74OA said:

KentK93 said:

74OA said:

Europe continues to step up: Poland confirms plans to transfer the remainder of its MIG 29s to Ukraine.

FIGHTERS

This should have been done with in the first year of the war.

Poland transferred the majority years ago. This is the final 14 which it couldn't let go until it had enough new FA-50s on board to backfill for its own defense needs.

The USA could have pushed fighters to Poland to cover those 14 until the FA-50's got there.
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
And we could have sent F-16's ourselves but we didn't.

The MiG-29's made more sense early on because that's what they already had pilots experienced in. Now with better options like F-16's and Mirage 2000's it's less helpful.
First Page Last Page
Page 1493 of 1510
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.