The post did not say that the clinic is in the business to lose money.Woods Ag said:I understand that but losing money and very small slice of their business are two different things.IIIHorn said:It is a Family Clinic. Not a vaccine clinic. Administering vaccines is not their primary service and would have a negligible impact on revenue.Woods Ag said:"they lose money on their vaccines"IIIHorn said:Where does the post say that the clinic is in the business of losing money?Woods Ag said:So they're in business to lose money... All for the public good I am sure.rjhtamu said:
I can't speak for every clinic in America, but at my wife's clinic (Family Medicine), they lose money on their vaccines. Keep in mind that clinics have to buy the vaccines before they give them to you. The reimbursement rate from insurances, Medicaid and Medicare is not what you think it is. The clinic frequently pays more for their vaccine stock than they recoup.
Clinics are not getting rich off these things or kickbacks like some on this thread propose. They're happy just to break even honestly.
I think the whole post pretty much says it except the last sentence that reads "They are happy just to break even.."
If it loses money, jsut give it up to Walgreens and CVS. Doctors offices are already struggling so much to turn a profit how do they have room for negative contributions? That's what I hear anyways.
You did.