CAIR warns dear moslems not to waive the flag/use burner phones.

BREAKING: CAIR is advising non-citizens to take "proactive steps"—like using a burner phone—to avoid deportation after traveling abroad to support terrorist organizations.

CAIR is literally advising terrorists on how to evade U.S. law. CAIR needs to be banned. pic.twitter.com/8fSChe9sw8

— Eyal Yakoby (@EYakoby) March 27, 2025

CAIR needs to be investigated and charged for…many crimes.

Quote:

---

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) is advising non-citizens to take "proactive steps"like using a burner phoneto avoid deportation after traveling abroad as the Trump administration cracks down on foreigners who support terrorism.

During the anti-Israel group's annual Ramadan fundraiser webinar on Sunday, which the Washington Free Beacon attended, CAIR attorneys and policy experts told the 1,300 attendees that visa and green card holders should delete apps and pictures from their phones before returning to the United States. For foreign citizens who remain in America, the speakers recommended taking a back seat at protests for the time being. The CAIR crew also said President Donald Trump's order to remove foreigners who pose terror threats targeted the Islamic community, with one calling it a "pre-Muslim ban."

"Delete some of the apps, some pictures you have on your phone. Things that you think are maybe innocent, but in this day and age, with the Mahmoud Khalil's case [sic], what are they charging with all thisit's not my job as an immigration attorney to make the community fearful, but be smart about what we're doing," said Spojmie Nasiri, an immigration attorney on CAIR's National Board of Directors.

"Maybe buy a burner phone, or maybe have a backup phone," she added. Nasiri also warned that non-citizens' phones are subject to searches after traveling abroad and recommended setting up two-factor authentication and turning off facial recognition.

---

More hilarity: Columbia U internal faculty meeting laments Trump demands, couldn't figure out how to turn off transcript to hide their tears/anger.

Americans are too naive to realize there is an active fifth column amongst us

no different than in August 0f 2001.

there are literally more Al Qaeda supporters in the USA now than before 9/11.

I'll see if I can find it, but DOJ dropped the charges here. Said they will just deport instead.

On Columbia...

Wow — the federal government wants to place Columbia University under a consent decree.

It sounds like this is because former Interim President Katrina Armstrong failed to convince the government that Columbia is serious about change.

“The Trump administration is planning to… pic.twitter.com/nwqZW1D1QY

— Steve McGuire (@sfmcguire79) April 10, 2025

will25u said:

---

I'll see if I can find it, but DOJ dropped the charges here. Said they will just deport instead.

On Columbia...

Wow — the federal government wants to place Columbia University under a consent decree.

It sounds like this is because former Interim President Katrina Armstrong failed to convince the government that Columbia is serious about change.

“The Trump administration is planning to… pic.twitter.com/nwqZW1D1QY

— Steve McGuire (@sfmcguire79) April 10, 2025

---

will25u said:

---

I'll see if I can find it, but DOJ dropped the charges here. Said they will just deport instead.

On Columbia...

Wow — the federal government wants to place Columbia University under a consent decree.

It sounds like this is because former Interim President Katrina Armstrong failed to convince the government that Columbia is serious about change.

“The Trump administration is planning to… pic.twitter.com/nwqZW1D1QY

— Steve McGuire (@sfmcguire79) April 10, 2025

---

Armstrong failed to convince the government? Didn't she tell them she'd do everything they wanted, then privately tell faculty and staff "not really "?

nortex97 said:

---

An appeal on this is…highly unlikely to work. Hopefully, his very sad wife goes to live with him in the islamic paradise of Syria.

---

Bet mean ol' US of A is going to not look so bad to her in a couple of months of living the dream with hubby on his student salary.

deddog said:

---

Wait the government is going to give Columbia millions of taxpayer dollars and is not willing to accept Columbia's "word" at face value?

Oh noes.
DiCtaTorsShiP!!!!

That fact that this has gone on for so long is insane.

---

This is the problem:

13,745 international students and 3,181 international faculty and researchers
16,926 total international students and scholars

https://isso.columbia.edu/statistics#:~:text=International%20Student%20and%20Scholar%20Population,Number%20of%20countries%20represented

Clean it up. Make sure libs can't whitewash this bs. Obama and Biden been abetting the enemy

FAFO

will25u said:

---

I'll see if I can find it, but DOJ dropped the charges here. Said they will just deport instead.

On Columbia...

Wow — the federal government wants to place Columbia University under a consent decree.

It sounds like this is because former Interim President Katrina Armstrong failed to convince the government that Columbia is serious about change.

“The Trump administration is planning to… pic.twitter.com/nwqZW1D1QY

— Steve McGuire (@sfmcguire79) April 10, 2025

---

Quote:

---

"Columbia could fight the move in court; the Justice Department would need to prove that the arrangement is warranted. But a court case could take years, and Columbia would likely lose federal funding in the interim-and might ultimately lose. Fighting the move would also open the school up to required depositions and legal fact-finding, which could keep the school's campus politics in the spotlight."

---

Frankly, that's the only thing these ivy leagues respect. Funding, or lack thereof.

Shalom Khalil!

Enjoy Syria!

and your ugly Hamas wife can go with you!

LMCane said:

---

Shalom Khalil!

Enjoy Syria!

and your ugly Hamas wife can go with you!

---

From what I gather this is just the immigration judge's ruling. The judge in NJ seems to have a burr up his *** about this whole issue. This isn't over by a longshot.

lobopride said:

---

From what I gather this is just the immigration judge's ruling. The judge in NJ seems to have a burr up his *** about this whole issue. This isn't over by a longshot.

---

He now has a deportation order.

What's the NJ judge going to do about that?

Ag with kids said:

---

lobopride said:

---

From what I gather this is just the immigration judge's ruling. The judge in NJ seems to have a burr up his *** about this whole issue. This isn't over by a longshot.

---

He now has a deportation order.

What's the NJ judge going to do about that?

---

Legally? Nothing.

Illegally? Some stupid order to try and hold the Trump admin in contempt for violating an invalid order. There was a very specific reason why the original habeas claim was dropped. No jurisdiction.

Look, I have been out of the biz for quite awhile now nor was I a superlawyer when I was active but a lot of things are just so well settled procedure and law, it is just mind boggling how much these federal district court judges are on very thin ice, if anything at all.

Mind boggling.

The argument is that as the original claim was filed in NY, it was transferred to NJ because that is where he actually was at that time (for purposes of jurisdiction based on flight records) when the poor Hamas legal team filed it, but they didn't know. The NY lawfare judge wrote something like 60 pages about how NJ was proper. It's not going to stick since the SCOTUS ruling but it is what it is and NJ judge is animated about it.

Yes, it will go no where but I expect another 'judicial opinion' bordering on war and peace length about how mad he is about it.

aggiehawg said:

---

Ag with kids said:

---

lobopride said:

---

From what I gather this is just the immigration judge's ruling. The judge in NJ seems to have a burr up his *** about this whole issue. This isn't over by a longshot.

---

He now has a deportation order.

What's the NJ judge going to do about that?

---

Legally? Nothing.

Illegally? Some stupid order to try and hold the Trump admin in contempt for violating an invalid order. There was a very specific reason why the original habeas claim was dropped. No jurisdiction.

Look, I have been out of the biz for quite awhile now nor was I a superlawyer when I was active but a lot of things are just so well settled procedure and law, it is just mind boggling how much these federal district court judges are on very thin ice, if anything at all.

Mind boggling.

---

Can the SCOTUS or appellate courts issue sanctions to these district court judges?

Because I think that is the ONLY way this stuff is going to stop.

Quote:

---

Can the SCOTUS or appellate courts issue sanctions to these district court judges?

Because I think that is the ONLY way this stuff is going to stop.

---

Technically, they can refer them for investigation for violations of judicial ethics and Cod of Judicial Conduct. But the judiciary is just too clubby to do that one of their members. A tongue lashing in an opinion is about the worst that they would do.

Congress OTOH, besides the Supreme Court, created the federal judiciary. And what Congress creates, they can amend, in particular adding an additional way to remove these judges other than a full blown constitutional impeachment and removal process.

Moar foreign students, this time at Johns Hopkins ('dozens') lose their visas.

The thing many people do not understand about foreign students on visas is just what a cash cow those students are to the universities. Most of those non-U.S. students come from fairly affluent families abroad, and they pay full freight on the hyper-inflated tuition in America's… https://t.co/BEkmmcxXg5

— Cynical Publius (@CynicalPublius) April 12, 2025

Update, some idiot (D) clerk wrote a 100 page opinion in the Khalil habeas case. It's laughable, as only around a paragraph or two were needed, and the vagueness of the statute shouldn't have even been considered at all.

2/ Here's the entire opinion: https://t.co/4N1X0TFup9

— Margot Cleveland (@ProfMJCleveland) May 29, 2025

4/ The Court also seemed to ignore the concept of constitutional avoidance! There was no reason to discuss whether the statute was unconstitutionally vague because it didn't matter--Khalil was detained and removable for an independent reason.

— Margot Cleveland (@ProfMJCleveland) May 29, 2025

Note: The judge did NOT hold the Trump Administration is likely violating Khalil's First Amendment rights--the court held the statute was "vague." pic.twitter.com/z42VJkM7Zx

— Margot Cleveland (@ProfMJCleveland) May 29, 2025

TLDR: the statute is not vague, the court is legally illiterate. Mahmoud Khalil's motion for a preliminary injunction has been denied. The court found that Khalil is unlikely to succeed in his challenge against the claim that he failed to disclose key information in his green card application, such as his membership in CUAD and former employment by UNRWA.

Judge Farbiarz also said that Khalil is likely to succeed in his challenge that 8 U.S.C. 1227(a)(4)(C), which allows deportation for "compromising a compelling foreign policy interest", is unconstitutionally vague, but did not grant an injunction yet, said more to follow basically.

doubledog said:

---

I am confused. If you are a Palestinian supporter, whose country of origin is the middle east, then why would you not want to return to Palestine to directly support your cause on the front lines, after your education in the US is complete. Oh right we know why.

---

the VAST majority of Hamas terrorist supporters on our campuses are NOT Palestinians

they are leftist white trust fund babies

leftist marxist socialists like Elias Gonzalez

Chinese communists sent here to stoke revolution

Muslims who side with Hamas

professors who are socialists