Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:
Maroon Dawn said:
Jeeper79 said:
Maroon Dawn said:
Jeeper79 said:
With Charlie Kirk and Matt Walsh, they have to realize it cuts both ways. Do white Afrikaners qualify to be here as refugees? Sure. But so do plenty of dark skinned Venezuelans.
If you're against neither, I get it. If you're against both, I get it. But what I don't get is anyone picking one group and not the other.
There it is folks!
The patented Leftist equivocating!
"I'm poor and want to be less poor" is the same as "I am actively being persecuted by my government for my race" and both make you a refugee
Venezuelans are just poor. They're escaping violence (including threat of death), the same as South Africans.
It's not violence from their government directed at them because of their race and religion
The UN has held time and again that "I'm poor and there's violent crime here the government doesn't do anything to stop!" does not make you a refugee. If it did Chicagoan's could flee to Canada
I thought we wanted people from **** hole countries to stay there and fix their problems. Why is this different?
It is sad that you cannot see the difference between
- economic hardship not being an excuse for asylum and
- the ongoing genocide and immoral seizure of property
going on the these respective countries.
You also seem to not understand illegally invading a country based on economic reasons and legally applying for entry into the U.S. being granted.
You may want to reconsider your core belief system and the legal constricts being used.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787