Why shouldn't the Afrikaners go back to their original lands?samurai_science said:We will never know but keep trying to make an issue out of something hypothetical.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:richardag said:If they were being slaughtered like the white people are today and their land was being illegally seized by white people.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:
So I'm assuming you would have been all for the black residents of South Africa being able to immigrate to this country during the Apartheid Era?
What about if their basic human rights were being taken away? Surely you would welcome them with open arms because there is no way you would tolerate that for yourself or your children.
Episcopal Church says it won't help resettle white South Africans
21,599 Views |
263 Replies |
Last: 8 mo ago by jickyjack1
It is just as much their original land in SA as anyone else currently living there and they have been there as long as we have been in the US. Since the 1600s.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:Why shouldn't the Afrikaners go back to their original lands?samurai_science said:We will never know but keep trying to make an issue out of something hypothetical.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:richardag said:If they were being slaughtered like the white people are today and their land was being illegally seized by white people.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:
So I'm assuming you would have been all for the black residents of South Africa being able to immigrate to this country during the Apartheid Era?
What about if their basic human rights were being taken away? Surely you would welcome them with open arms because there is no way you would tolerate that for yourself or your children.
And they are headed for more starvation, corruption, crumbling infrastructure, crime, and poverty. Back to their natural state. Just like the rest of Africa. Enjoy.Stone Choir said:The South African gov just told the world that white Afrikaner refugees aren’t fleeing persecution they’re fleeing “racial justice.” Their president then called them cowards for escaping. Within hours, the U.S. National Security Council suspended all agency cooperation with South… https://t.co/fzGMHlVE2t
— Danie Barnard (@DaanBarnard) May 15, 2025
Emotional Support Cobra
Joined:
Feb 5, 2003
Posts:
38,572
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Great work by the Trump administration to bring these 50 South African refugees to America. The Democrats wants unchecked third world migration because they want to make America less white and dismantle the American culture. The Episcopal Chruch opposes white refugees because it defeats their main purpose of the program.
Tom Fox said:It is just as much their original land in SA as anyone else currently living there and they have been there as long as we have been in the US. Since the 1600s.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:Why shouldn't the Afrikaners go back to their original lands?samurai_science said:We will never know but keep trying to make an issue out of something hypothetical.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:richardag said:If they were being slaughtered like the white people are today and their land was being illegally seized by white people.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:
So I'm assuming you would have been all for the black residents of South Africa being able to immigrate to this country during the Apartheid Era?
What about if their basic human rights were being taken away? Surely you would welcome them with open arms because there is no way you would tolerate that for yourself or your children.
Is there a set amount of time that doesn't allows us to say "Go back to your original land."
I can't go back to Europe...it's overrun with Muslims.
Tom Fox said:And they are headed for more starvation, corruption, crumbling infrastructure, crime, and poverty. Back to their natural state. Just like the rest of Africa. Enjoy.Stone Choir said:The South African gov just told the world that white Afrikaner refugees aren’t fleeing persecution they’re fleeing “racial justice.” Their president then called them cowards for escaping. Within hours, the U.S. National Security Council suspended all agency cooperation with South… https://t.co/fzGMHlVE2t
— Danie Barnard (@DaanBarnard) May 15, 2025
Of course:
90% of farms seized from the Boers by the Bantu commies are lying derelict.
— Wanjiru Njoya (@WanjiruNjoya) May 15, 2025
Nobody told the Bantus that farms require hard work, so they didn't bother.
This was a catastrophe for the farm animals, most of which had to be euthanized. pic.twitter.com/jHNJA6IKM6
According to the idiot leftists calling Israel Jews "colonizers", yes.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:Tom Fox said:It is just as much their original land in SA as anyone else currently living there and they have been there as long as we have been in the US. Since the 1600s.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:Why shouldn't the Afrikaners go back to their original lands?samurai_science said:We will never know but keep trying to make an issue out of something hypothetical.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:richardag said:If they were being slaughtered like the white people are today and their land was being illegally seized by white people.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:
So I'm assuming you would have been all for the black residents of South Africa being able to immigrate to this country during the Apartheid Era?
What about if their basic human rights were being taken away? Surely you would welcome them with open arms because there is no way you would tolerate that for yourself or your children.
Is there a set amount of time that doesn't allows us to say "Go back to your original land."
The Jews call it "aliyah", meaning "ascent" or "rising" in Hebrew, referring to the act of immigrating to Israel as being a spiritual "ascent" or "rising".BonfireNerd04 said:According to the idiot leftists calling Israel Jews "colonizers", yes.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:Tom Fox said:It is just as much their original land in SA as anyone else currently living there and they have been there as long as we have been in the US. Since the 1600s.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:Why shouldn't the Afrikaners go back to their original lands?samurai_science said:We will never know but keep trying to make an issue out of something hypothetical.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:richardag said:If they were being slaughtered like the white people are today and their land was being illegally seized by white people.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:
So I'm assuming you would have been all for the black residents of South Africa being able to immigrate to this country during the Apartheid Era?
What about if their basic human rights were being taken away? Surely you would welcome them with open arms because there is no way you would tolerate that for yourself or your children.
Is there a set amount of time that doesn't allows us to say "Go back to your original land."
Please define those basic human rights.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:What about if their basic human rights were being taken away? Surely you would welcome them with open arms because there is no way you would tolerate that for yourself or your children.richardag said:If they were being slaughtered like the white people are today and their land was being illegally seized by white people.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:
So I'm assuming you would have been all for the black residents of South Africa being able to immigrate to this country during the Apartheid Era?
We really need to rewrite our laws concerning libel and slander.
Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:Why shouldn't the Afrikaners go back to their original lands?samurai_science said:We will never know but keep trying to make an issue out of something hypothetical.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:richardag said:If they were being slaughtered like the white people are today and their land was being illegally seized by white people.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:
So I'm assuming you would have been all for the black residents of South Africa being able to immigrate to this country during the Apartheid Era?
What about if their basic human rights were being taken away? Surely you would welcome them with open arms because there is no way you would tolerate that for yourself or your children.
The Netherlands? Okay fine let's send them back to the Netherlands for this thought experiment. If we apply your logic consistently, the blacks in South Africa need to leave too. Remember under your model, migration or settling is not allowed, regardless of time period, and instead we look to original ownership of the land?
So if something was uninhabited, it must remain uninhabited forever?
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
Why shouldn't all whites in north, central and South America return to their original lands?Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:Why shouldn't the Afrikaners go back to their original lands?samurai_science said:We will never know but keep trying to make an issue out of something hypothetical.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:richardag said:If they were being slaughtered like the white people are today and their land was being illegally seized by white people.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:
So I'm assuming you would have been all for the black residents of South Africa being able to immigrate to this country during the Apartheid Era?
What about if their basic human rights were being taken away? Surely you would welcome them with open arms because there is no way you would tolerate that for yourself or your children.
I would guess that the reason is obvious unless you believe in reparations.
We really need to rewrite our laws concerning libel and slander.
This bull**** about returning to original lands is ridiculous.BenFiasco14 said:The Netherlands? Okay fine let's send them back to the Netherlands for this thought experiment. If we apply your logic consistently, the blacks in South Africa need to leave too. Remember under your model, migration or settling is not allowed, regardless of time period, and instead we look to original ownership of the land?Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:Why shouldn't the Afrikaners go back to their original lands?samurai_science said:We will never know but keep trying to make an issue out of something hypothetical.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:What about if their basic human rights were being taken away? Surely you would welcome them with open arms because there is no way you would tolerate that for yourself or your children.richardag said:If they were being slaughtered like the white people are today and their land was being illegally seized by white people.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:
So I'm assuming you would have been all for the black residents of South Africa being able to immigrate to this country during the Apartheid Era?
So if something was uninhabited, it must remain uninhabited forever?
The ultimate example would be we all friggin return to Ethiopia, where the bones of Lucy, who lived ~3 million years ago, were found.
It is a stupid argument only meant as a troll.
We really need to rewrite our laws concerning libel and slander.
That should include the black ones then.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:Why shouldn't the Afrikaners go back to their original lands?samurai_science said:We will never know but keep trying to make an issue out of something hypothetical.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:richardag said:If they were being slaughtered like the white people are today and their land was being illegally seized by white people.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:
So I'm assuming you would have been all for the black residents of South Africa being able to immigrate to this country during the Apartheid Era?
What about if their basic human rights were being taken away? Surely you would welcome them with open arms because there is no way you would tolerate that for yourself or your children.
I would rather not use their definition of anything.BonfireNerd04 said:According to the idiot leftists calling Israel Jews "colonizers", yes.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:Tom Fox said:It is just as much their original land in SA as anyone else currently living there and they have been there as long as we have been in the US. Since the 1600s.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:Why shouldn't the Afrikaners go back to their original lands?samurai_science said:We will never know but keep trying to make an issue out of something hypothetical.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:richardag said:If they were being slaughtered like the white people are today and their land was being illegally seized by white people.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:
So I'm assuming you would have been all for the black residents of South Africa being able to immigrate to this country during the Apartheid Era?
What about if their basic human rights were being taken away? Surely you would welcome them with open arms because there is no way you would tolerate that for yourself or your children.
Is there a set amount of time that doesn't allows us to say "Go back to your original land."
Fair, I was just using your words.samurai_science said:That should include the black ones then.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:Why shouldn't the Afrikaners go back to their original lands?samurai_science said:We will never know but keep trying to make an issue out of something hypothetical.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:richardag said:If they were being slaughtered like the white people are today and their land was being illegally seized by white people.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:
So I'm assuming you would have been all for the black residents of South Africa being able to immigrate to this country during the Apartheid Era?
What about if their basic human rights were being taken away? Surely you would welcome them with open arms because there is no way you would tolerate that for yourself or your children.
No, let's all go back to Africa and depopulate the rest of the planet.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:Tom Fox said:It is just as much their original land in SA as anyone else currently living there and they have been there as long as we have been in the US. Since the 1600s.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:Why shouldn't the Afrikaners go back to their original lands?samurai_science said:We will never know but keep trying to make an issue out of something hypothetical.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:richardag said:If they were being slaughtered like the white people are today and their land was being illegally seized by white people.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:
So I'm assuming you would have been all for the black residents of South Africa being able to immigrate to this country during the Apartheid Era?
What about if their basic human rights were being taken away? Surely you would welcome them with open arms because there is no way you would tolerate that for yourself or your children.
Is there a set amount of time that doesn't allows us to say "Go back to your original land."
Flavius Agximus said:No, let's all go back to Africa and depopulate the rest of the planet.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:Tom Fox said:It is just as much their original land in SA as anyone else currently living there and they have been there as long as we have been in the US. Since the 1600s.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:Why shouldn't the Afrikaners go back to their original lands?samurai_science said:We will never know but keep trying to make an issue out of something hypothetical.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:richardag said:If they were being slaughtered like the white people are today and their land was being illegally seized by white people.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:
So I'm assuming you would have been all for the black residents of South Africa being able to immigrate to this country during the Apartheid Era?
What about if their basic human rights were being taken away? Surely you would welcome them with open arms because there is no way you would tolerate that for yourself or your children.
Is there a set amount of time that doesn't allows us to say "Go back to your original land."
Nah, I think we need to squeeze everyone into Iraq, within the borders of the Tigris and Euphrates rivers, to give it our best shot to find Eden.
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
BenFiasco14 said:Flavius Agximus said:No, let's all go back to Africa and depopulate the rest of the planet.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:Tom Fox said:It is just as much their original land in SA as anyone else currently living there and they have been there as long as we have been in the US. Since the 1600s.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:Why shouldn't the Afrikaners go back to their original lands?samurai_science said:We will never know but keep trying to make an issue out of something hypothetical.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:richardag said:If they were being slaughtered like the white people are today and their land was being illegally seized by white people.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:
So I'm assuming you would have been all for the black residents of South Africa being able to immigrate to this country during the Apartheid Era?
What about if their basic human rights were being taken away? Surely you would welcome them with open arms because there is no way you would tolerate that for yourself or your children.
Is there a set amount of time that doesn't allows us to say "Go back to your original land."
Nah, I think we need to squeeze everyone into Iraq, within the borders of the Tigris and Euphrates rivers, to give it our best shot to find Eden.
Then again God allowed humans to live there and really belongs to Him. Perhaps the solution to land theft is for humans to stop reproducing and walk hand in hand into the abyss.
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
I think the Indus River Valley is probably a better destination.
Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:Why shouldn't the Afrikaners go back to their original lands?samurai_science said:We will never know but keep trying to make an issue out of something hypothetical.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:richardag said:If they were being slaughtered like the white people are today and their land was being illegally seized by white people.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:
So I'm assuming you would have been all for the black residents of South Africa being able to immigrate to this country during the Apartheid Era?
What about if their basic human rights were being taken away? Surely you would welcome them with open arms because there is no way you would tolerate that for yourself or your children.
They're in their original lands. South Africa
BREAKING: South African government will consider it as "TREASONOUS" to discuss treatment of white people
— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) May 15, 2025
Applies to politicians and citizens pic.twitter.com/edVSC3WQX3
It's incredible how they are doubling and tripling down. The South African government is close to just straight killing every white person at this point.
Captain Pablo said:Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:Why shouldn't the Afrikaners go back to their original lands?samurai_science said:We will never know but keep trying to make an issue out of something hypothetical.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:richardag said:If they were being slaughtered like the white people are today and their land was being illegally seized by white people.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:
So I'm assuming you would have been all for the black residents of South Africa being able to immigrate to this country during the Apartheid Era?
What about if their basic human rights were being taken away? Surely you would welcome them with open arms because there is no way you would tolerate that for yourself or your children.
They're in their original lands. South Africa
I guess the black population is as well.
And we should have left their country alone in the 1990s to handle their internal politics as they saw fit and let the SAs handle their business. This goes for Rhodesia as well.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:Captain Pablo said:Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:Why shouldn't the Afrikaners go back to their original lands?samurai_science said:We will never know but keep trying to make an issue out of something hypothetical.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:richardag said:If they were being slaughtered like the white people are today and their land was being illegally seized by white people.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:
So I'm assuming you would have been all for the black residents of South Africa being able to immigrate to this country during the Apartheid Era?
What about if their basic human rights were being taken away? Surely you would welcome them with open arms because there is no way you would tolerate that for yourself or your children.
They're in their original lands. South Africa
I guess the black population is as well.
Is what?
Nah, apartheid was a **** idea.Tom Fox said:And we should have left their country alone in the 1990s to handle their internal politics as they saw fit and let the SAs handle their business. This goes for Rhodesia as well.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:Captain Pablo said:Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:Why shouldn't the Afrikaners go back to their original lands?samurai_science said:We will never know but keep trying to make an issue out of something hypothetical.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:richardag said:If they were being slaughtered like the white people are today and their land was being illegally seized by white people.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:
So I'm assuming you would have been all for the black residents of South Africa being able to immigrate to this country during the Apartheid Era?
What about if their basic human rights were being taken away? Surely you would welcome them with open arms because there is no way you would tolerate that for yourself or your children.
They're in their original lands. South Africa
I guess the black population is as well.
Not when the other 90% will literally destroy the country if allowed to vote. And 30 years later ... boom.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:Nah, apartheid was a **** idea.Tom Fox said:And we should have left their country alone in the 1990s to handle their internal politics as they saw fit and let the SAs handle their business. This goes for Rhodesia as well.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:Captain Pablo said:Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:Why shouldn't the Afrikaners go back to their original lands?samurai_science said:We will never know but keep trying to make an issue out of something hypothetical.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:richardag said:If they were being slaughtered like the white people are today and their land was being illegally seized by white people.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:
So I'm assuming you would have been all for the black residents of South Africa being able to immigrate to this country during the Apartheid Era?
What about if their basic human rights were being taken away? Surely you would welcome them with open arms because there is no way you would tolerate that for yourself or your children.
They're in their original lands. South Africa
I guess the black population is as well.
Sometimes you have to realize that some people cannot be allowed to ever run things if you want to have something nice.
It is a bitter lesson to learn but part of growing up. The reality is that all men were not created equal. We never were. We spend so much effort trying to balance the destructiveness of that simple truth.
It applies here too. You cannot let the leeches vote. Universal suffrage is pure folly.
Tom Fox said:Not when the other 90% will literally destroy the country if allowed to vote. And 30 years later ... boom.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:Nah, apartheid was a **** idea.Tom Fox said:And we should have left their country alone in the 1990s to handle their internal politics as they saw fit and let the SAs handle their business. This goes for Rhodesia as well.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:Captain Pablo said:Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:Why shouldn't the Afrikaners go back to their original lands?samurai_science said:We will never know but keep trying to make an issue out of something hypothetical.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:richardag said:If they were being slaughtered like the white people are today and their land was being illegally seized by white people.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:
So I'm assuming you would have been all for the black residents of South Africa being able to immigrate to this country during the Apartheid Era?
What about if their basic human rights were being taken away? Surely you would welcome them with open arms because there is no way you would tolerate that for yourself or your children.
They're in their original lands. South Africa
I guess the black population is as well.
Sometime you have to realize that some people cannot be allowed to ever run things if you want to have something nice.
It is a bitter lesson to learn but part of growing up. The reality is that all men were not created equal. We never were. We spend so much effort trying to balance the destructiveness of that simple truth.
It applies here too. You cannot let the leeches vote. Universal suffrage is pure folly.
Yeah, I've come to realize the one-sided narrative of the Civil Rights movement we were taught in school.
Perhaps back in the 1960's, it was reasonable to assume that Black people could succeed if given the chance. I wasn't there, so I can't fairly judge how people thought then.
Well, we gave them what they wanted. Desegregation. Voting rights. Even preferential treatment in college admissions and job hiring. They got one of their own elected President in 2008. And what have they accomplished with it? They're still poor. They're still over-represented in crime rates, single motherhood, and the wrong side of damn near every social statistic.
So, maybe Jim Crow wasn't the problem after all.
BonfireNerd04 said:
So, maybe Jim Crow wasn't the problem after all.
Jim Crow laws were wrong. LBJ's plan destroyed the black community.
The black community and their overlords* selected the wrong representatives who promoted racial strife. Riots, criminal acts, and mayhem were considered to be the best path forward instead of hard work and family. White Democrats(*) subjugated their black constituents and the country to lives of misery. And Obama ramped the hate up to eleven.
What has happened to black wealth since Jim Crow? In 1960, it was equivalent to $9,000 in 2019 values. Today, it's estimated at 45,000.BonfireNerd04 said:Tom Fox said:Not when the other 90% will literally destroy the country if allowed to vote. And 30 years later ... boom.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:Nah, apartheid was a **** idea.Tom Fox said:And we should have left their country alone in the 1990s to handle their internal politics as they saw fit and let the SAs handle their business. This goes for Rhodesia as well.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:Captain Pablo said:Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:Why shouldn't the Afrikaners go back to their original lands?samurai_science said:We will never know but keep trying to make an issue out of something hypothetical.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:richardag said:If they were being slaughtered like the white people are today and their land was being illegally seized by white people.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:
So I'm assuming you would have been all for the black residents of South Africa being able to immigrate to this country during the Apartheid Era?
What about if their basic human rights were being taken away? Surely you would welcome them with open arms because there is no way you would tolerate that for yourself or your children.
They're in their original lands. South Africa
I guess the black population is as well.
Sometime you have to realize that some people cannot be allowed to ever run things if you want to have something nice.
It is a bitter lesson to learn but part of growing up. The reality is that all men were not created equal. We never were. We spend so much effort trying to balance the destructiveness of that simple truth.
It applies here too. You cannot let the leeches vote. Universal suffrage is pure folly.
Yeah, I've come to realize the one-sided narrative of the Civil Rights movement we were taught in school.
Perhaps back in the 1960's, it was reasonable to assume that Black people could succeed if given the chance. I wasn't there, so I can't fairly judge how people thought then.
Well, we gave them what they wanted. Desegregation. Voting rights. Even preferential treatment in college admissions and job hiring. They got one of their own elected President in 2008. And what have they accomplished with it? They're still poor. They're still over-represented in crime rates, single motherhood, and the wrong side of damn near every social statistic.
So, maybe Jim Crow wasn't the problem after all.
I would imagine the lives of most blacks have improved with the dismantling of Jim Crow, unless you are arguing that Jim Crow as a benevolent form of authoritarianism.
Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:Captain Pablo said:Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:Why shouldn't the Afrikaners go back to their original lands?samurai_science said:We will never know but keep trying to make an issue out of something hypothetical.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:richardag said:If they were being slaughtered like the white people are today and their land was being illegally seized by white people.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:
So I'm assuming you would have been all for the black residents of South Africa being able to immigrate to this country during the Apartheid Era?
What about if their basic human rights were being taken away? Surely you would welcome them with open arms because there is no way you would tolerate that for yourself or your children.
They're in their original lands. South Africa
I guess the black population is as well.
Of course
BS....LBJ and his cronies knew EXACTLY what they were doing back then. Ever heard that quote from LBJ right before he signed the CRA of '64?bobbranco said:BonfireNerd04 said:
So, maybe Jim Crow wasn't the problem after all.
Jim Crow laws were wrong. LBJ's plan destroyed the black community.
Google it....its a rather stark and sincere admission on his part.
Depends when you draw the line. If it's when the ancestors of the current white farmers settled the area, the native population were not black, but Khoi-San (and there weren't many of them, then or now). If it's a couple hundred years later, then the ancestors of the current blacks arrived. If it's just about power and retribution, then anything goes, I guess.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:Captain Pablo said:Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:Why shouldn't the Afrikaners go back to their original lands?samurai_science said:We will never know but keep trying to make an issue out of something hypothetical.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:richardag said:If they were being slaughtered like the white people are today and their land was being illegally seized by white people.Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:
So I'm assuming you would have been all for the black residents of South Africa being able to immigrate to this country during the Apartheid Era?
What about if their basic human rights were being taken away? Surely you would welcome them with open arms because there is no way you would tolerate that for yourself or your children.
They're in their original lands. South Africa
I guess the black population is as well.
My post agrees with your assessment.Come Out Roll said:BS....LBJ and his cronies knew EXACTLY what they were doing back then. Ever heard that quote from LBJ right before he signed the CRA of '64?bobbranco said:BonfireNerd04 said:
So, maybe Jim Crow wasn't the problem after all.
Jim Crow laws were wrong. LBJ's plan destroyed the black community.
Google it....its a rather stark and sincere admission on his part.
Featured Stories
See All
10:14
2d ago
9.8k
Zach Clemence leads Texas A&M's 3-point barrage vs. South Carolina
by Olin Buchanan
5 Thoughts: Texas A&M 92, South Carolina 69
by Luke Evangelist
6:13
30m ago
400
7:55
22h ago
3.3k
Aggies extend scholarship offer to 2027 DeSoto RB SaRod Baker
by Jason Howell