Minnesota state Congress members shot at home

131,052 Views | 1003 Replies | Last: 9 mo ago by YokelRidesAgain
Tanya 93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TXAG 05 said:

Quo Vadis? said:

annie88 said:

Quo Vadis? said:

Some of you guys care too much about the political affiliation of this dude. I've met a ton of Trump voters that were absolute degenerates, I'm disgusted they vote the same way I do.

Just because the liberals are the cause of literally 100% of the problems in our country and western society at large and should be rounded into Arts and Crafts camps for their own safety doesn't mean the Republican Party doesn't have its share of weirdos.
You met a ton literally a ton of Trump voters who were absolute degenerates?

Where the hell are you hanging out to meet that many of them.

Everyone that I know that voted for Trump is a very normal well-adjusted person.

Sounds like you're hanging around with some damn weird people.


If you're ever in the NW side of Houston stop by a bar called "the angry elephant".


Since you are so much holier than thou, what are you doing hanging out in a bar with these so called degenerates?



Cheap beer and trivia nights?
Sloots?
Darts?
Cheap HH specials?
usmcbrooks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fullback44 said:

TAMUallen said:

The sign language translator is horrible

Yeah - that is horrible - like WTH is that person doing

I think the guy in the suit is trying to avoid looking at her so he doesn't laugh in this situation.. lol
Rattler12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YokelRidesAgain said:

Cougar11 said:

So let me get this straight he killed politicians that voted against giving illegals handouts? Sounds MAGA to me.
For at least, I think, the fourth time on this thread the two legislators who were shot voted on opposite sides on the bill to strip illegal immigrants of state health care. There is absolutely nothing to suggest that this issue had anything to do with the shootings.
Yeah he wouldn't shoot a democrat state senator for voting along with republican senators for a bill that eliminated support for illegals anymore than say, he would shoot a politician because his USAID funded NGO lost funding and he was broke ......neither scenario makes any sense at all.......right?
BlueSmoke
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Late to the party, cans someone help clarify a few things

So the targeting of Democrats for their voting records; one of which was visibly shaken after crossing party lines to kill a bill massively supported by the right, seems out of scope because of the voting record of the other victim? Regardless of her husband's voting history, she crossed party lines, and he was her husband. What else am i missing here?

So the shooters now being identified as a right-winger because of a manifesto that we now know isn't real, years prior voting history, and what else that has been clearly established?
Nobody cares. Work Harder
Gig em G
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Which NGO was he working with?
pollo hermanos
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BlueSmoke said:

Late to the party, cans someone help clarify a few things

So the targeting of Democrats for their voting records; one of which was visibly shaken after crossing party lines to kill a bill massively supported by the right, seems out of scope because of the voting record of the other victim? Regardless of her husband's voting history, she crossed party lines, and he was her husband. What else am i missing here?

So the shooters now being identified as a right-winger because of a manifesto that we now know isn't real, years prior voting history, and what else that has been clearly established?
lol you're ignoring every piece of evidence that indicates he's right wing. So odd that there is this need by the right to act like there are not crazies and likely just as many.

Info still coming out but now it is becoming pretty clear he was right wing. Dont think we know what his motivation was though, right?


He was a missionary, pastor, Trump supporter, etc.

Doesnt discredit all of MAGA or Trump (obviously) just like the crazies on the left dont discredit everything on the left.
Cougar11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
pollo hermanos said:

BlueSmoke said:

Late to the party, cans someone help clarify a few things

So the targeting of Democrats for their voting records; one of which was visibly shaken after crossing party lines to kill a bill massively supported by the right, seems out of scope because of the voting record of the other victim? Regardless of her husband's voting history, she crossed party lines, and he was her husband. What else am i missing here?

So the shooters now being identified as a right-winger because of a manifesto that we now know isn't real, years prior voting history, and what else that has been clearly established?
lol you're ignoring every piece of evidence that indicates he's right wing. So odd that there is this need by the right to act like there are not crazies and likely just as many.

Info still coming out but now it is becoming pretty clear he was right wing. Dont think we know what his motivation was though, right?


He was a missionary, pastor, Trump supporter, etc.

Doesnt discredit all of MAGA or Trump (obviously) just like the crazies on the left dont discredit everything on the left.
he worked for the Waltz admin, big time MAGA!
doubledog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
pollo hermanos said:


lol you're ignoring every piece of evidence that indicates he's right wing. So odd that there is this need by the right to act like there are not crazies and likely just as many.

Info still coming out but now it is becoming pretty clear he was right wing. Dont think we know what his motivation was though, right?


He was a missionary, pastor, Trump supporter, etc.

Doesnt discredit all of MAGA or Trump (obviously) just like the crazies on the left dont discredit everything on the left.
Sorry we are not going to put this mental patient in a convenient shoe box. Right/Left mean nothing to nut jobs.
pollo hermanos
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
doubledog said:

pollo hermanos said:


lol you're ignoring every piece of evidence that indicates he's right wing. So odd that there is this need by the right to act like there are not crazies and likely just as many.

Info still coming out but now it is becoming pretty clear he was right wing. Dont think we know what his motivation was though, right?


He was a missionary, pastor, Trump supporter, etc.

Doesnt discredit all of MAGA or Trump (obviously) just like the crazies on the left dont discredit everything on the left.
Sorry we are not going to put this mental patient in a convenient shoe box. Right/Left mean nothing to nut jobs.
Totally - he is a nut job I'm sure. His roommate has said he was a Trump supporter but not crazy and that this was a shock. Sounds like he just snapped.
pollo hermanos
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Cougar11 said:

pollo hermanos said:

BlueSmoke said:

Late to the party, cans someone help clarify a few things

So the targeting of Democrats for their voting records; one of which was visibly shaken after crossing party lines to kill a bill massively supported by the right, seems out of scope because of the voting record of the other victim? Regardless of her husband's voting history, she crossed party lines, and he was her husband. What else am i missing here?

So the shooters now being identified as a right-winger because of a manifesto that we now know isn't real, years prior voting history, and what else that has been clearly established?
lol you're ignoring every piece of evidence that indicates he's right wing. So odd that there is this need by the right to act like there are not crazies and likely just as many.

Info still coming out but now it is becoming pretty clear he was right wing. Dont think we know what his motivation was though, right?


He was a missionary, pastor, Trump supporter, etc.

Doesnt discredit all of MAGA or Trump (obviously) just like the crazies on the left dont discredit everything on the left.
he worked for the Waltz admin, big time MAGA!
you keep repeating that (even though it has been addressed like dozens of times) while ignoring everything else. Weird.
DonHenley
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He was a Walz appointee, was involved with No Kings, and murdered a Dem law maker for crossing party lines. Yep, def Maga
BlueSmoke
How long do you want to ignore this user?
pollo hermanos said:

BlueSmoke said:

Late to the party, cans someone help clarify a few things

So the targeting of Democrats for their voting records; one of which was visibly shaken after crossing party lines to kill a bill massively supported by the right, seems out of scope because of the voting record of the other victim? Regardless of her husband's voting history, she crossed party lines, and he was her husband. What else am i missing here?

So the shooters now being identified as a right-winger because of a manifesto that we now know isn't real, years prior voting history, and what else that has been clearly established?
lol you're ignoring every piece of evidence that indicates he's right wing. So odd that there is this need by the right to act like there are not crazies and likely just as many.

Info still coming out but now it is becoming pretty clear he was right wing. Dont think we know what his motivation was though, right?


He was a missionary, pastor, Trump supporter, etc.

Doesnt discredit all of MAGA or Trump (obviously) just like the crazies on the left dont discredit everything on the left.
So because we have all this anecdotal evidence that he's "right wing" we ignore the obvious that he killed the wife who dared to cross party lines and her husband for helping to kill a bill that is massively supported by the "right wingers"

Is that the narrative? So he's this crazy MAGA dude, that just happens to target a Democrat that killed a massively popular MAGA agenda item?
Nobody cares. Work Harder
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dems still desperately ignoring the only physical evidence we have seen and have proof of that doesn't rely on speculation or withheld "evidence"
Gig em G
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ok, not sure I'll be getting any more details from this thread…can't confirm 80% of what's been posted here.

How was he involved in the No Kings protest? Because he had flyers in his car? What does that indicate exactly?
pollo hermanos
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gig em G said:

Ok, not sure I'll be getting any more details from this thread…can't confirm 80% of what's been posted here.

How was he involved in the No Kings protest? Because he had flyers in his car? What does that indicate exactly?
I think we're still waiting on info and not sure we know why he had those. The WSJ put out a pretty good article on it yesterday that is worth reading.
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The guys been caught and needs to be thrown in a dungeon with no food or water, left til he dies off starvation.

I don't care about the why or speculations or theories or whatever. He killed an elected official, so regardless of what comes out, his fate needs to be as cruel as it gets.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
Rattler12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
pollo hermanos said:

doubledog said:

pollo hermanos said:


lol you're ignoring every piece of evidence that indicates he's right wing. So odd that there is this need by the right to act like there are not crazies and likely just as many.

Info still coming out but now it is becoming pretty clear he was right wing. Dont think we know what his motivation was though, right?


He was a missionary, pastor, Trump supporter, etc.

Doesnt discredit all of MAGA or Trump (obviously) just like the crazies on the left dont discredit everything on the left.
Sorry we are not going to put this mental patient in a convenient shoe box. Right/Left mean nothing to nut jobs.
Totally - he is a nut job I'm sure. His roommate has said he was a Trump supporter but not crazy and that this was a shock. Sounds like he just snapped
The roommate doesn't look he's all there either.
Rattler12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gig em G said:

Which NGO was he working with?
Just like all the other "proven indisputable evidence" that's been provided in this thread, when you consider his trips to Africa, his security firm, etc, there has to be an NGO that he ran funded by USAID and Trump is defunding USAID NGO money PDQ so now he's broke and desperate after having 42 other careers from working at the 7-11, funeral homes, to transporting eyeballs , to being a preacher, a speaker, a world traveler, a used car salesman, a fuller brush man and selling subscriptions to GRIT.......it just fits.
Tony Franklins Other Shoe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
pollo hermanos said:

doubledog said:

pollo hermanos said:


lol you're ignoring every piece of evidence that indicates he's right wing. So odd that there is this need by the right to act like there are not crazies and likely just as many.

Info still coming out but now it is becoming pretty clear he was right wing. Dont think we know what his motivation was though, right?


He was a missionary, pastor, Trump supporter, etc.

Doesnt discredit all of MAGA or Trump (obviously) just like the crazies on the left dont discredit everything on the left.
Sorry we are not going to put this mental patient in a convenient shoe box. Right/Left mean nothing to nut jobs.
Totally - he is a nut job I'm sure. His roommate has said he was a Trump supporter but not crazy and that this was a shock. Sounds like he just snapped.
I would say like dismissing the appointment by Walz, I would hold off on categorizing the roommates ramblings as credible yet. That dude screams introverted weirdo who could be saying just about anything right now.

Person Not Capable of Pregnancy
Francis Macomber
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm convinced some of the posters on here are Russian or Chinese bots.
TyHolden
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No video of the this guy entering either house?
You're a senator and you don't have security cameras?
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gig em G said:

Ok, not sure I'll be getting any more details from this thread…can't confirm 80% of what's been posted here.

How was he involved in the No Kings protest? Because he had flyers in his car? What does that indicate exactly?
That he was handing out flyers? It was a huge stack. What else would he be doing with them?
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tony Franklins Other Shoe said:

pollo hermanos said:

doubledog said:

pollo hermanos said:


lol you're ignoring every piece of evidence that indicates he's right wing. So odd that there is this need by the right to act like there are not crazies and likely just as many.

Info still coming out but now it is becoming pretty clear he was right wing. Dont think we know what his motivation was though, right?


He was a missionary, pastor, Trump supporter, etc.

Doesnt discredit all of MAGA or Trump (obviously) just like the crazies on the left dont discredit everything on the left.
Sorry we are not going to put this mental patient in a convenient shoe box. Right/Left mean nothing to nut jobs.
Totally - he is a nut job I'm sure. His roommate has said he was a Trump supporter but not crazy and that this was a shock. Sounds like he just snapped.
I would say like dismissing the appointment by Walz, I would hold off on categorizing the roommates ramblings as credible yet. That dude screams introverted weirdo who could be saying just about anything right now.
The hell you say

J. Walter Weatherman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There were screenshots of the video earlier on the thread. He had some sort of mask on.
BlueSmoke
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's all too convenient. This screams "patsy" to me - dude takes out a official that dared to cross party lines and her husband. This is a MASSIVE loss for the Dems. And a MASSIVE win for the right.

You will NEVER see another Dem dare to do this now. The message was sent. All this rhetoric from the #Resist crowd that this is an existential threat, the gloves are off, etc.. Why would anyone affiliated with the right be motivated by this? Fetterman is on the fence, the former WH speaker left the party. The dam is cracking.

Hell, we still don't know anything about the Trump shooter that had his apartment and social media accounts scrubbed.
Nobody cares. Work Harder
pollo hermanos
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tony Franklins Other Shoe said:

pollo hermanos said:

doubledog said:

pollo hermanos said:


lol you're ignoring every piece of evidence that indicates he's right wing. So odd that there is this need by the right to act like there are not crazies and likely just as many.

Info still coming out but now it is becoming pretty clear he was right wing. Dont think we know what his motivation was though, right?


He was a missionary, pastor, Trump supporter, etc.

Doesnt discredit all of MAGA or Trump (obviously) just like the crazies on the left dont discredit everything on the left.
Sorry we are not going to put this mental patient in a convenient shoe box. Right/Left mean nothing to nut jobs.
Totally - he is a nut job I'm sure. His roommate has said he was a Trump supporter but not crazy and that this was a shock. Sounds like he just snapped.
I would say like dismissing the appointment by Walz, I would hold off on categorizing the roommates ramblings as credible yet. That dude screams introverted weirdo who could be saying just about anything right now.
Totally - we have to take all of the info and synthesize. The information is going to continue to come out. Its been 2 days? We all need to have some patience.
ETFan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
People are still arguing the shooters political affiliation? lmao

Every single big event; plane crashes, shootings, etc. We've got a group of people that start with a conclusion and feverishly defend it, no matter what.

Anyway, shooter was a conservative.
25Lighters
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Francis Macomber said:

I'm convinced some of the posters on here are Russian or Chinese bots.


Some get paid. You'll see them become very aggressive around election season and around certain narratives the media and dnc are gaslighting.
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Has there proof he's conservative? Not saying he's not, just haven't seen the proof.
tk for tu juan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
captkirk said:

Gig em G said:

Ok, not sure I'll be getting any more details from this thread…can't confirm 80% of what's been posted here.

How was he involved in the No Kings protest? Because he had flyers in his car? What does that indicate exactly?
That he was handing out flyers? It was a huge stack. What else would he be doing with them?

Depending on the quantity, maybe he was going to drop one on each victim. Random guess like everything else until actual facts are revealed (if we ever get those facts from the investigation)
Tramp96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ETFan said:



Every single big event; plane crashes, shootings, etc. We've got a group of people that start with a conclusion and feverishly defend it, no matter what.

Anyway, shooter was a conservative.

Please tell me you see the irony in your post.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Francis Macomber said:

I'm convinced some of the posters on here are Russian or Chinese bots.

They definitely lean commie.
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ETFan said:

People are still arguing the shooters political affiliation? lmao

Every single big event; plane crashes, shootings, etc. We've got a group of people that start with a conclusion and feverishly defend it, no matter what.

Anyway, shooter was a conservative.

Do you even hear yourself?

"He was so MAGA he killed a Dem who crossed the aisle to vote for his side. That's how MAGA he was."
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
redcrayon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ETFan said:

People are still arguing the shooters political affiliation? lmao

Every single big event; plane crashes, shootings, etc. We've got a group of people that start with a conclusion and feverishly defend it, no matter what.

Anyway, shooter was a conservative.


Russia, Russia, Russia? That group?
Slwdsm
How long do you want to ignore this user?
captkirk said:

Tony Franklins Other Shoe said:

pollo hermanos said:

doubledog said:

pollo hermanos said:


lol you're ignoring every piece of evidence that indicates he's right wing. So odd that there is this need by the right to act like there are not crazies and likely just as many.

Info still coming out but now it is becoming pretty clear he was right wing. Dont think we know what his motivation was though, right?


He was a missionary, pastor, Trump supporter, etc.

Doesnt discredit all of MAGA or Trump (obviously) just like the crazies on the left dont discredit everything on the left.
Sorry we are not going to put this mental patient in a convenient shoe box. Right/Left mean nothing to nut jobs.
Totally - he is a nut job I'm sure. His roommate has said he was a Trump supporter but not crazy and that this was a shock. Sounds like he just snapped.
I would say like dismissing the appointment by Walz, I would hold off on categorizing the roommates ramblings as credible yet. That dude screams introverted weirdo who could be saying just about anything right now.
The hell you say




I may have missed this explanation earlier... or just flat out misunderstood this.

But, why does he have a roommate? Isnt he married? Governor appointed positions for him and spouse, ties to security companies and an NGO.... but lives with the weird papa johns 50yo guy (that obviously smells like cat ****/piss)?

This whole thing is really bizarre.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.