There is no evidence this political candidate was a victim.
— Rep. Ro Khanna (@RepRoKhanna) February 13, 2026
And you refuse to answer @RepThomasMassie and my basic question. Why were all the FBI files scrubbed in March and uploaded redacted in the DOJ database? https://t.co/lecij831nZ
AggieVictor10 said:
So much smoke, yet no fire.
DOJ redacted information necessary to identify who sent Epstein the “torture video email.”@RepRoKhanna and I first discovered his name and released it Monday.
— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) February 13, 2026
Today he resigns. https://t.co/4zynZTwCjc
First page of article beyond the paywall. pic.twitter.com/p3KVn3BeRF
— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) February 13, 2026
Love that you're downplaying the most newsworthy thing about her -- she was Obama's White House counsel. Cuz that's what news organizations do.
— Mollie (@MZHemingway) February 13, 2026
PaulsBunions said:flown-the-coop said:PaulsBunions said:flown-the-coop said:ETFan said:flown-the-coop said:
The admin is not ignoring the law. Thats a laughable lie.
Breaking my own rule here since youre brazenly lying. The administration is breaking the law. The end.
This can not be argued.
Actively complying with is not ignoring.
Have files been released? Okay, then they are not ignoring.
You can say they have not fully complied, timely complied, etc.
But it is an absolute lie to say they are ignoring. They are ignoring it about as effectively as your promise to ignore me.
"Hey Mr IRS man i'm paying my taxes $1 at a time I'm complying even though I'm technically 4 months late"
The length of the leash you are willing to give Incompetent DC bureaucrats is amazing lol
There are fines for not paying your taxes on time. Its written into the code. Next time you want to make a poor comparison, know your facts.
Why did Ro/Massie forget the important part?
BTW - Massie is getting destroyed on The Five. By all five.BREAKING: Pam Bondi is facing contempt or impeachment efforts led by Reps. Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna, over allegations that she covered up the rape, torture, and trafficking of children by Jeffrey Epstein’s clients.
— The General (@GeneralMCNews) January 23, 2026
Sure seems like a punishment to me. Also I'm not one of you tabloiders so I could not care less about what some washed up talking heads on Fox think about Massie lol
flown-the-coop said:PaulsBunions said:flown-the-coop said:PaulsBunions said:flown-the-coop said:ETFan said:flown-the-coop said:
The admin is not ignoring the law. Thats a laughable lie.
Breaking my own rule here since youre brazenly lying. The administration is breaking the law. The end.
This can not be argued.
Actively complying with is not ignoring.
Have files been released? Okay, then they are not ignoring.
You can say they have not fully complied, timely complied, etc.
But it is an absolute lie to say they are ignoring. They are ignoring it about as effectively as your promise to ignore me.
"Hey Mr IRS man i'm paying my taxes $1 at a time I'm complying even though I'm technically 4 months late"
The length of the leash you are willing to give Incompetent DC bureaucrats is amazing lol
There are fines for not paying your taxes on time. Its written into the code. Next time you want to make a poor comparison, know your facts.
Why did Ro/Massie forget the important part?
BTW - Massie is getting destroyed on The Five. By all five.BREAKING: Pam Bondi is facing contempt or impeachment efforts led by Reps. Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna, over allegations that she covered up the rape, torture, and trafficking of children by Jeffrey Epstein’s clients.
— The General (@GeneralMCNews) January 23, 2026
Sure seems like a punishment to me. Also I'm not one of you tabloiders so I could not care less about what some washed up talking heads on Fox think about Massie lol
We know, you only care about what Reddit tells you.
How is it punishment? It will never get a vote in the house. And no judge will issue the contempt. None. Because the DOJ is actively complying.
PaulsBunions said:flown-the-coop said:PaulsBunions said:flown-the-coop said:PaulsBunions said:flown-the-coop said:ETFan said:flown-the-coop said:
The admin is not ignoring the law. Thats a laughable lie.
Breaking my own rule here since youre brazenly lying. The administration is breaking the law. The end.
This can not be argued.
Actively complying with is not ignoring.
Have files been released? Okay, then they are not ignoring.
You can say they have not fully complied, timely complied, etc.
But it is an absolute lie to say they are ignoring. They are ignoring it about as effectively as your promise to ignore me.
"Hey Mr IRS man i'm paying my taxes $1 at a time I'm complying even though I'm technically 4 months late"
The length of the leash you are willing to give Incompetent DC bureaucrats is amazing lol
There are fines for not paying your taxes on time. Its written into the code. Next time you want to make a poor comparison, know your facts.
Why did Ro/Massie forget the important part?
BTW - Massie is getting destroyed on The Five. By all five.BREAKING: Pam Bondi is facing contempt or impeachment efforts led by Reps. Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna, over allegations that she covered up the rape, torture, and trafficking of children by Jeffrey Epstein’s clients.
— The General (@GeneralMCNews) January 23, 2026
Sure seems like a punishment to me. Also I'm not one of you tabloiders so I could not care less about what some washed up talking heads on Fox think about Massie lol
We know, you only care about what Reddit tells you.
How is it punishment? It will never get a vote in the house. And no judge will issue the contempt. None. Because the DOJ is actively complying.
"Actively complying" just means "is not in compliance", this is the silliest hill to die on and you're getting ratio'd every time you try to cope post with it. They are breaking the law regardless of whether or not you think there is an explicit "punishment".
we have more than enough evidence from the last 10 years to dispense with this fiction now. he may have been an outsider to the DC bureaucrat class, but he's very much an insider to the epstein class that actually pulls everyone's strings.BboroAg said:
There is no doubt that Trump's attitude towards Epstein has changed…the question of "why" remains.
The appeal of Trump is that he is an outsider that has enough money to not be corrupted and has come out clean on every "investigation " ran on him
So why has he changed his mind about Epstein?
To me it indicates that he has been compromised…I don't think it is anything to do with the sexual deviancy…I think it has to do with Epstein's involvement with the intelligence community(CIA, Mossad, MI6). Specifically, I think Epstein's involvement with the intelligence community includes financial shenanigans with crypto currency.
flown-the-coop said:
The much much simpler, straight-forward answer is that they opened the big steaming pile of dog doodoo known as the "Epstein files" and after the 30,000th poor written and syntaxxed email from jeevacations asking how Trump wants to serve the Pickled Pediatric Podiatry Passarounds at their next fling on Epstein Island, the decision was made to "move on".
If that is indeed the determination, they have handled it absolutely disastrously. If you were going to cover it up and sweep it away and you had 100% control of the files, you would not have done it this way.
This was a failed execution of "there is nothing useful here, it's a mess, let's move on" strategy. Hugely failed.
That doesn't mean there is NOTHING in the Epstein files and that all allegations were a hoax. It means there are simply not the gigantic grand conspiracy laden bombs that folks thought there would be.
If me being wrong brings justice to the actual victims of Epstein and related crimes, I am perfectly fine with being wrong.
Ervin Burrell said:flown-the-coop said:
The much much simpler, straight-forward answer is that they opened the big steaming pile of dog doodoo known as the "Epstein files" and after the 30,000th poor written and syntaxxed email from jeevacations asking how Trump wants to serve the Pickled Pediatric Podiatry Passarounds at their next fling on Epstein Island, the decision was made to "move on".
If that is indeed the determination, they have handled it absolutely disastrously. If you were going to cover it up and sweep it away and you had 100% control of the files, you would not have done it this way.
This was a failed execution of "there is nothing useful here, it's a mess, let's move on" strategy. Hugely failed.
That doesn't mean there is NOTHING in the Epstein files and that all allegations were a hoax. It means there are simply not the gigantic grand conspiracy laden bombs that folks thought there would be.
If me being wrong brings justice to the actual victims of Epstein and related crimes, I am perfectly fine with being wrong.
Keep simping for billionaire perverts who don't give the slightest, solitary phauck about you. It's high entertainment.
flown-the-coop said:Ervin Burrell said:flown-the-coop said:
The much much simpler, straight-forward answer is that they opened the big steaming pile of dog doodoo known as the "Epstein files" and after the 30,000th poor written and syntaxxed email from jeevacations asking how Trump wants to serve the Pickled Pediatric Podiatry Passarounds at their next fling on Epstein Island, the decision was made to "move on".
If that is indeed the determination, they have handled it absolutely disastrously. If you were going to cover it up and sweep it away and you had 100% control of the files, you would not have done it this way.
This was a failed execution of "there is nothing useful here, it's a mess, let's move on" strategy. Hugely failed.
That doesn't mean there is NOTHING in the Epstein files and that all allegations were a hoax. It means there are simply not the gigantic grand conspiracy laden bombs that folks thought there would be.
If me being wrong brings justice to the actual victims of Epstein and related crimes, I am perfectly fine with being wrong.
Keep simping for billionaire perverts who don't give the slightest, solitary phauck about you. It's high entertainment.
At least they are not peeing on me this time. And flagged for bypassing the obscenity filters. No need for that.
Please see bolded part and reconsider your commentary.
Old McDonald said:we have more than enough evidence from the last 10 years to dispense with this fiction now. he may have been an outsider to the DC bureaucrat class, but he's very much an insider to the epstein class that actually pulls everyone's strings.BboroAg said:
There is no doubt that Trump's attitude towards Epstein has changed…the question of "why" remains.
The appeal of Trump is that he is an outsider that has enough money to not be corrupted and has come out clean on every "investigation " ran on him
So why has he changed his mind about Epstein?
To me it indicates that he has been compromised…I don't think it is anything to do with the sexual deviancy…I think it has to do with Epstein's involvement with the intelligence community(CIA, Mossad, MI6). Specifically, I think Epstein's involvement with the intelligence community includes financial shenanigans with crypto currency.
that's why he's worked so hard to keep their ties to epstein hidden the past year - he's one of them and always has been.
Ervin Burrell said:flown-the-coop said:Ervin Burrell said:flown-the-coop said:
The much much simpler, straight-forward answer is that they opened the big steaming pile of dog doodoo known as the "Epstein files" and after the 30,000th poor written and syntaxxed email from jeevacations asking how Trump wants to serve the Pickled Pediatric Podiatry Passarounds at their next fling on Epstein Island, the decision was made to "move on".
If that is indeed the determination, they have handled it absolutely disastrously. If you were going to cover it up and sweep it away and you had 100% control of the files, you would not have done it this way.
This was a failed execution of "there is nothing useful here, it's a mess, let's move on" strategy. Hugely failed.
That doesn't mean there is NOTHING in the Epstein files and that all allegations were a hoax. It means there are simply not the gigantic grand conspiracy laden bombs that folks thought there would be.
If me being wrong brings justice to the actual victims of Epstein and related crimes, I am perfectly fine with being wrong.
Keep simping for billionaire perverts who don't give the slightest, solitary phauck about you. It's high entertainment.
At least they are not peeing on me this time. And flagged for bypassing the obscenity filters. No need for that.
Please see bolded part and reconsider your commentary.
Now you're starting to sound like one of those libtard snowflakes.
Philip J Fry said:Old McDonald said:BboroAg said:
There is no doubt that Trump's attitude towards Epstein has changed…the question of "why" remains.
The appeal of Trump is that he is an outsider that has enough money to not be corrupted and has come out clean on every "investigation " ran on him
So why has he changed his mind about Epstein?
To me it indicates that he has been compromised…I don't think it is anything to do with the sexual deviancy…I think it has to do with Epstein's involvement with the intelligence community(CIA, Mossad, MI6). Specifically, I think Epstein's involvement with the intelligence community includes financial shenanigans with crypto currency.
we have more than enough evidence from the last 10 years to dispense with this fiction now. he may have been an outsider to the DC bureaucrat class, but he's very much an insider to the epstein class that actually pulls everyone's strings.
that's why he's worked so hard to keep their ties to epstein hidden the past year - he's one of them and always has been.
Biden had 4 years to release this stuff. Why didn't the DOJ do its job?
Ervin Burrell said:flown-the-coop said:
The much much simpler, straight-forward answer is that they opened the big steaming pile of dog doodoo known as the "Epstein files" and after the 30,000th poor written and syntaxxed email from jeevacations asking how Trump wants to serve the Pickled Pediatric Podiatry Passarounds at their next fling on Epstein Island, the decision was made to "move on".
If that is indeed the determination, they have handled it absolutely disastrously. If you were going to cover it up and sweep it away and you had 100% control of the files, you would not have done it this way.
This was a failed execution of "there is nothing useful here, it's a mess, let's move on" strategy. Hugely failed.
That doesn't mean there is NOTHING in the Epstein files and that all allegations were a hoax. It means there are simply not the gigantic grand conspiracy laden bombs that folks thought there would be.
If me being wrong brings justice to the actual victims of Epstein and related crimes, I am perfectly fine with being wrong.
Keep simping for billionaire perverts who don't give the slightest, solitary phauck about you. It's high entertainment.
Philip J Fry said:Old McDonald said:BboroAg said:
There is no doubt that Trump's attitude towards Epstein has changed…the question of "why" remains.
The appeal of Trump is that he is an outsider that has enough money to not be corrupted and has come out clean on every "investigation " ran on him
So why has he changed his mind about Epstein?
To me it indicates that he has been compromised…I don't think it is anything to do with the sexual deviancy…I think it has to do with Epstein's involvement with the intelligence community(CIA, Mossad, MI6). Specifically, I think Epstein's involvement with the intelligence community includes financial shenanigans with crypto currency.
we have more than enough evidence from the last 10 years to dispense with this fiction now. he may have been an outsider to the DC bureaucrat class, but he's very much an insider to the epstein class that actually pulls everyone's strings.
that's why he's worked so hard to keep their ties to epstein hidden the past year - he's one of them and always has been.
Biden had 4 years to release this stuff. Why didn't the DOJ do its job?
Zachary Klement said:Philip J Fry said:Old McDonald said:BboroAg said:
There is no doubt that Trump's attitude towards Epstein has changed…the question of "why" remains.
The appeal of Trump is that he is an outsider that has enough money to not be corrupted and has come out clean on every "investigation " ran on him
So why has he changed his mind about Epstein?
To me it indicates that he has been compromised…I don't think it is anything to do with the sexual deviancy…I think it has to do with Epstein's involvement with the intelligence community(CIA, Mossad, MI6). Specifically, I think Epstein's involvement with the intelligence community includes financial shenanigans with crypto currency.
we have more than enough evidence from the last 10 years to dispense with this fiction now. he may have been an outsider to the DC bureaucrat class, but he's very much an insider to the epstein class that actually pulls everyone's strings.
that's why he's worked so hard to keep their ties to epstein hidden the past year - he's one of them and always has been.
Biden had 4 years to release this stuff. Why didn't the DOJ do its job?
Why do people keep parroting this every few pages?
They are all corrupt.
But obviously there is a heightened level of intrigue under the Trump admin because:
- Trump talked about releasing it on the campaign trail.
- His son clamored for the release of the files in 2024.
- JD Vance discussed it multiple times after being named the VP nominee and said that they should be released.
- Kash Patel fueled conspiracies on his podcast.
- Dan Bongino fueled conspiracies on his podcast.
- Pam Bondi said that she had a list of names on her desk.
- Then on top of all of that, the massive flip-flopping in rhetoric by the administration over the course of the last year.
If Biden's administration had conducted themselves similarly, there would have been far more public pressure back then. Then, on top of that, people who have supported Trump (like myself) likely had far more faith in the Trump admin to be transparent than the Biden admin and are obviously letdown and outspoken about it.
PaulsBunions said:Love that you're downplaying the most newsworthy thing about her -- she was Obama's White House counsel. Cuz that's what news organizations do.
— Mollie (@MZHemingway) February 13, 2026
Former Obama WH counsel gets the axe
ETFan said:
Facing calls to resign:
Howard Lutnick US Commerce Secretary; bipartisan calls to resign
Keyno said:ETFan said:
Facing calls to resign:
Howard Lutnick US Commerce Secretary; bipartisan calls to resign
Never gonna happen. He was basically Epstein's best friend and is all over the files. And apparently he is Trump's "handler" now for some reason.
ETFan said:Keyno said:ETFan said:
Facing calls to resign:
Howard Lutnick US Commerce Secretary; bipartisan calls to resign
Never gonna happen. He was basically Epstein's best friend and is all over the files. And apparently he is Trump's "handler" now for some reason.
He was literally Epstiens neighbor. Makes his weird chuckles every time it comes up even more... Weird.
Keyno said:ETFan said:
Facing calls to resign:
Howard Lutnick US Commerce Secretary; bipartisan calls to resign
Never gonna happen. He was basically Epstein's best friend and is all over the files. And apparently he is Trump's "handler" now for some reason.
Ervin Burrell said:Keyno said:ETFan said:
Facing calls to resign:
Howard Lutnick US Commerce Secretary; bipartisan calls to resign
Never gonna happen. He was basically Epstein's best friend and is all over the files. And apparently he is Trump's "handler" now for some reason.
So "outsider" Trump who is "gonna drain the swamp" has Epstein's bestie in his cabinet? After having the guy who gave Epstein his sweetheart deal in his previous cabinet? LOL.
"TrUmP iS a WhItE hAt!!!!"
Zachary Klement said:Philip J Fry said:Old McDonald said:BboroAg said:
There is no doubt that Trump's attitude towards Epstein has changed…the question of "why" remains.
The appeal of Trump is that he is an outsider that has enough money to not be corrupted and has come out clean on every "investigation " ran on him
So why has he changed his mind about Epstein?
To me it indicates that he has been compromised…I don't think it is anything to do with the sexual deviancy…I think it has to do with Epstein's involvement with the intelligence community(CIA, Mossad, MI6). Specifically, I think Epstein's involvement with the intelligence community includes financial shenanigans with crypto currency.
we have more than enough evidence from the last 10 years to dispense with this fiction now. he may have been an outsider to the DC bureaucrat class, but he's very much an insider to the epstein class that actually pulls everyone's strings.
that's why he's worked so hard to keep their ties to epstein hidden the past year - he's one of them and always has been.
Biden had 4 years to release this stuff. Why didn't the DOJ do its job?
Why do people keep parroting this every few pages?
They are all corrupt.
But obviously there is a heightened level of intrigue under the Trump admin because:
- Trump talked about releasing it on the campaign trail.
- His son clamored for the release of the files in 2024.
- JD Vance discussed it multiple times after being named the VP nominee and said that they should be released.
- Kash Patel fueled conspiracies on his podcast.
- Dan Bongino fueled conspiracies on his podcast.
- Pam Bondi said that she had a list of names on her desk.
- Then on top of all of that, the massive flip-flopping in rhetoric by the administration over the course of the last year.
If Biden's administration had conducted themselves similarly, there would have been far more public pressure back then. Then, on top of that, people who have supported Trump (like myself) likely had far more faith in the Trump admin to be transparent than the Biden admin and are obviously letdown and outspoken about it.
What possible interest would the US government have in keeping Epstein’s clients secret? Oh… https://t.co/H8fGktWwmR
— JD Vance (@JDVance) December 30, 2021
.@JDVance, any comment on your Deputy Attorney General using a clown emoji and scrubbing so many of the files? https://t.co/lecij831nZ
— Rep. Ro Khanna (@RepRoKhanna) February 13, 2026
Schools all over the U.S. are cancelling picture day due to Leon Black, the co-founder of the parent company that owns Lifetouch, being listed in the Epstein Files.
— Pubity (@pubity) February 12, 2026
Lifetouch is the biggest school picture company in America and photographs millions of kids every year. pic.twitter.com/QnWTKeA1Vg
PaulsBunions said:
Unfortunately the Republicans pissed the bed by making this only an issue during election season, now the Dems can easily dunk on us because the Republicans are now playing cover up
