Venezuelan Reactions

40,483 Views | 462 Replies | Last: 3 days ago by aggiedata
Squadron7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Who?mikejones! said:




Not the worst audition for "The View" I've seen.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Stay sad, my friend. America first.
Dr. Mephisto
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We fixed the keg said:

Who?mikejones! said:



Live look at Trump on the phone with the new leadership team for Venezuela as the EU tries to enter the discussion.....




Benny Hill was a genius.

Many a night as a kid, I watched for the laughs, but also hoping to see cleavage or side-boob!
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
“Some people bring joy wherever they go, and some people bring joy whenever they go.” ~ Mark Twain
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Who?mikejones! said:




That guy is a known idiot.
Racist idiot, actually.
“Some people bring joy wherever they go, and some people bring joy whenever they go.” ~ Mark Twain
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gentlemen, I have for you, a legitimate contender for the absolutely, feebly, worst of the imbecilic bad takes. Just in case any of you are ever tempted to lend this slow witted nincompoop a shred of credibility.



"1. Trump Doctrine. This operation was thematically similar to last summer's attack on Iranian nuclear facilities - billed as a masterstroke, collapses under scrutiny, and gives Trump cover to disengage from a foreign adventure.

2. As an initial matter, this was all flagrantly illegal aggression against a sovereign state on pretenses so flimsy they're not even legally cognizable. We're literally charging Maduro with violating the National Firearms Act. Dude is going to be a martyr for the Second Amendment, I can't wait to see gun twitter jump all over this lol.

3. This was not actually regime change. Maduro was not a totalitarian law unto himself, he's an eminently replaceable Latin American kleptocrat. The Venezuelan government (to include its senior leadership) and military appear to be almost entirely intact. At the moment they're discussing simply implementing the legal line of succession through the Vice President and moving on with business as usual! In any event Trump discussing somehow picking a new government in Venezuela or exercising authority over the country's governance is a fantasy at this point, we're occupying nothing and we have no leverage.

4. Tying back into the above, all of those senior leaders and that military seem to have gotten the memo to change their bed down locations and not show up for duty last night. The assault force, flying in slow and highly vulnerable helicopters, took desultory small arms fire coming in but not the antiaircraft buzzsaw they should have run into over Caracas given the Venezuelans have had four months to prepare for war. It's unclear whether they faced any resistance at all on the ground - for all we know by that point Maduro had already been arrested by his own military and was simply handed over to the commandos. Certainly the troops were in and out very quickly, suggesting actions on the objective were largely pro forma.

5. Trump has immediately pivoted to an offramp in the Caribbean despite the fact that absolutely none of the ostensible underlying causes of our intervention are remotely resolved at this point - drugs, oil, expropriation, etc. In fact he's been quite clear the Chinese will get their oil, so he seems to consider the operation entirely concluded. As I mentioned above, this is identical to his offramp from the 12 Days' War - conduct a strike on Iranian nuclear sites that was far less impactful than it was billed as to the American public and which was actually below the retaliatory threshold of the Iranians, and then immediately declare victory and leave. This operation feels exactly as choreographed as the denouement of the 12 Days' War - conduct a flashy raid while the Venezuelan Army takes a siesta, get a scalp, declare victory and leave, after which the Venezuelan government shrugs and moves on. Perhaps the Venezuelan government will be persuaded to give US companies some oil concessions going forward."
Squadron7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Who?mikejones! said:




That is the Twitter gotcha question.

The real-world geopolitical question is: Do you think the Chinese are more or less likely to do this as of today?
rab79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dr. Mephisto said:

We fixed the keg said:

Who?mikejones! said:



Live look at Trump on the phone with the new leadership team for Venezuela as the EU tries to enter the discussion.....




Benny Hill was a genius.

Many a night as a kid, I watched for the laughs, but also hoping to see cleavage or side-boob!


My father-in-law and I would watch Benny Hill after the women had gone to bed, his favorite comment was "Them girls are plum D formed".
FCBlitz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rossticus said:

Gentlemen, I have for you, a legitimate contender for the absolutely, feebly, worst of the imbecilic bad takes. Just in case any of you are ever tempted to lend this slow witted nincompoop a shred of credibility.



"1. Trump Doctrine. This operation was thematically similar to last summer's attack on Iranian nuclear facilities - billed as a masterstroke, collapses under scrutiny, and gives Trump cover to disengage from a foreign adventure.

2. As an initial matter, this was all flagrantly illegal aggression against a sovereign state on pretenses so flimsy they're not even legally cognizable. We're literally charging Maduro with violating the National Firearms Act. Dude is going to be a martyr for the Second Amendment, I can't wait to see gun twitter jump all over this lol.

3. This was not actually regime change. Maduro was not a totalitarian law unto himself, he's an eminently replaceable Latin American kleptocrat. The Venezuelan government (to include its senior leadership) and military appear to be almost entirely intact. At the moment they're discussing simply implementing the legal line of succession through the Vice President and moving on with business as usual! In any event Trump discussing somehow picking a new government in Venezuela or exercising authority over the country's governance is a fantasy at this point, we're occupying nothing and we have no leverage.

4. Tying back into the above, all of those senior leaders and that military seem to have gotten the memo to change their bed down locations and not show up for duty last night. The assault force, flying in slow and highly vulnerable helicopters, took desultory small arms fire coming in but not the antiaircraft buzzsaw they should have run into over Caracas given the Venezuelans have had four months to prepare for war. It's unclear whether they faced any resistance at all on the ground - for all we know by that point Maduro had already been arrested by his own military and was simply handed over to the commandos. Certainly the troops were in and out very quickly, suggesting actions on the objective were largely pro forma.

5. Trump has immediately pivoted to an offramp in the Caribbean despite the fact that absolutely none of the ostensible underlying causes of our intervention are remotely resolved at this point - drugs, oil, expropriation, etc. In fact he's been quite clear the Chinese will get their oil, so he seems to consider the operation entirely concluded. As I mentioned above, this is identical to his offramp from the 12 Days' War - conduct a strike on Iranian nuclear sites that was far less impactful than it was billed as to the American public and which was actually below the retaliatory threshold of the Iranians, and then immediately declare victory and leave. This operation feels exactly as choreographed as the denouement of the 12 Days' War - conduct a flashy raid while the Venezuelan Army takes a siesta, get a scalp, declare victory and leave, after which the Venezuelan government shrugs and moves on. Perhaps the Venezuelan government will be persuaded to give US companies some oil concessions going forward."



….for just a sec I thought you lost your ever loving mind.
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
techno-ag said:

Fox reporting Venezuelans wearing MAGA hats in the streets.


Uhhh, where would they get those?
HalifaxAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BadMoonRisin said:

Who?mikejones! said:



Bro, youre a glorified fire chief of a city. Sorry your commie butt buddy got arrested, but your opinion on this matter means abiut the same as mine

Bro wasn't briefed on ***** Get real. lol. You would have tried to help these ******ed f****ts


If he was serious, then he would arrest Trump like he plans to arrest Netanyahu....I'll bring the popcorn!!
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
rab79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Eh, he was just quoting an imbecile that wouldn't recognize reality if it crawled up his ass.
HalifaxAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Squadron7 said:

Who?mikejones! said:




That is the Twitter gotcha question.

The real-world geopolitical question is: Do you think the Chinese are more or less likely to do this as of today?


With Trump in office, they will not. As it should be, we have a leader who doesn't play bull**** games and protects US interests first. We are the alpha dog and need to remind the world.
TrumpsBarber
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nm
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
rab79 said:

Eh, he was just quoting an imbecile that wouldn't recognize reality if it crawled up his ass.


I mean, I thought I prefaced it pretty clearly as such. lol.
PhatMack19
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PhatMack19 said:




That wasn't in Spanish when I copied it



Yukon Cornelius
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Why even share it. User is probably in India or something.
Yukon Cornelius
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They got the 2020 ones
Squadron7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Senate hopeful James Talarico weighs in about how you'd expect.

Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yukon Cornelius said:

Why even share it. User is probably in India or something.


Comedic value. Believe it or not, that is a longstanding US based account.
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Burpelson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Its not hard going in, its the getting out that is tricky!
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Only took 88 minutes start to finish. Got out in record time with no loss of equipment or men.

Not to shabby
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Le Pen turned out to be sort of a wet weenie. Continues to surprise me how many on the right cite the sovereignty of an illegitimate government opposed by its people.



"There were a thousand reasons to condemn the regime of Nicols Maduro: communist, oligarchic, and authoritarian, it had imposed on its people, for far too many years, a suffocating yoke that plunged millions of Venezuelans into miserywhen it did not force them into exile.

But there is one fundamental reason to oppose the regime change that the United States has just brought about in Venezuela. The sovereignty of states is never negotiable, regardless of their size, their power, or their continent. It is inviolable and sacred.

To renounce this principle today for Venezuela, for any state, would be to accept our own enslavement tomorrow. It would thus be a mortal peril, at a time when the 21st century is already the stage for major geopolitical upheavals that cast over humanity the constant threat of war and chaos.

All that remains for us is to hope, in the face of this situation, that a voice be given as soon as possible to the Venezuelan people. It is for them to reclaim the power to define, sovereignly and freely, the future they wish to forge as a Nation."
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Deputy Travis Junior said:

The questions about "was this a war?" are legitimate

What war? I don't see a war.

Did someone declare war on the country of Venezuela?

I must have missed that...
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HoustonAg2106
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
4 said:

Deputy Travis Junior said:

The questions about "was this a war?" are legitimate

What war? I don't see a war.

Did someone declare war on the country of Venezuela?

I must have missed that...


Oh stop it. The US hasn't declared war since WWII, it's not a requirement to launch a war anymore
4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That light bulb head is one of the biggest morons I've ever come across.
4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We aren't at war
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
HoustonAg2106 said:

4 said:

Deputy Travis Junior said:

The questions about "was this a war?" are legitimate

What war? I don't see a war.

Did someone declare war on the country of Venezuela?

I must have missed that...


Oh stop it. The US hasn't declared war since WWII, it's not a requirement to launch a war anymore
Well then I guess that answers your question. Duh.
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
Squadron7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They did this in 88 minutes because everyone knows that the Dems begin shouting "quagmire!!!" at the 90 minute mark.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.