Agador Spartacus said:
Rapier108 said:
"Bombing civilian infrastructure" is not a war crime.
And no matter what you want, other than ordering the release of nuclear weapons, Trump is not going to be removed from office by the 25th Amendment.

Activist "experts" are spinning bigtime.
This quote completely backs up my assertion. If the target has as legitimate function in aiding the ability to conduct war logistically or with command and control, to enable military production, transportation, communication, etc, it is a legal and legitimate target. The fact that it may also have civilian uses is considered but doesn't counter the military and command use eligibility.
Proportionality simply means the weapon or means used to destroy the military should not be deliberately excessive to its destruction or putting out of use, such that there is needless collateral damage.
You can't target housing and food or water infrastructure with the primary purpose of civilian harm or suffering, or shared use infrastructure if the aim is civilian suffering as versus military degradation.
There are zero war crimes being committed in hitting infrastructure that interferes with military operation so long as there is no violation of proportionality.