***** 2025-2026 San Antonio Spurs Thread *****

1,047,499 Views | 13019 Replies | Last: 16 days ago by Guitarsoup
All I do is Nguyen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No matter what!
Epstein didn't do, you know, the thing...
I'm the rare Astros/Cowboys/Spurs fan. We do exist
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
All I do is Nguyen said:



Which is why we need to move that 27 Hawks pick to move up and get Morez Johnson or Hannes Steinbach sooner than later.

Hawks are going to have a core of Daniels, NAW, Jaylen Brown and Jalen Johnson.
LawHall88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Maybe we should sign this guy for good luck.
LawHall88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Stay classy, New York.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
With the rumored Giannis to Celtics deal getting closer, it means Miami misses out.

How about this. They dump the Jovic extension and trade back to get a legit scorer next to Mr. 83.

Herro gets the 6th man role he is destined for.


Bam, Fox, Wiggins, Ware, Jacquez, Kasparas, Pelle, Davion Mitchell and the 20th pick. They upgrade talent wise

Spurs get guaranteed one of Yaxel, Morez, or Steinbach, off Fox's deal but have to take on Jovic 's (back problems, never played 50 games). Fox to Herro is a downgrade on defense but upgrade on size and shooting
MookieBlaylock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LawHall88 said:

Maybe we should sign this guy for good luck.


who
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MookieBlaylock said:

LawHall88 said:

Maybe we should sign this guy for good luck.


who

Mike Jones's brother.
Dobro Turtlebane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Guitarsoup said:

Dobro Turtlebane said:

The most fascinating outcome of this will be the effect on Wemby's mental development. I don't remember anyone being so openly obsessed with their legend and GOAT placement, and I think sometimes he wants so much to be "mommy, there go that man" that it leads to bad basketball decisions. Not saying he's a bad teammate, but he talks openly about how and where legends are made.

Example: Game 2, Spurs have clawed back from a hole and have momentum. They've started moving the ball on offense. They get a turnover? long rebound? (don't remember that part). Instead of getting into the offense, Wemby takes a 28' heat check 3 in transition… on a 2-on-4 disadvantage. Last night, Wemby takes a contested 3 with like 18 seconds on the shot clock. Spurs get a rare offensive rebound, and Wemby launches another (slightly longer) contested 3.

Maybe he watches a ton of film and decides it's going to take a village to win rings. But he might watch the same film and see missed layups, awful turnovers, and clanked middies and think "yes, only a legend can carry a Finals team" and make more bad decisions in clutch time.

Wemby lost that U19 game despite being the best player. He lost the gold medal game despite being the highest scorer from either team.

He has shown that he feeds off the defeat and takes it personally to fuel himself getting better. He's done that since he was a kid. I am not at all worried about his mental psyche.

The biggest problem for him is the demands of being the #1 player on offense and #1 player on defense. I don't think that physiologically his body can handle that and after the Minn/OKC series he was physically worn down.

Wemby had to launch those threes at the end because we needed as much time as possible. Same shot he launched that killed OKC.


I'm not worried about his psyche at all either. I'm not even "worried" about the outcome, I'm just interested in it. He'll never play on the U19 team again. He'll play on the French national team for 6 weeks every 4 years (and the team makeup will change a lot each time). He'll be on 80-90% of the same Spurs team next year. Will the sting of the collapses make him more ball dominant? Will he become a John Stockton level distributor in the clutch? Will he start punting the ball into the net from the far baseline? It's nothing to be worried about, but the psychology is interesting
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dobro Turtlebane said:

Guitarsoup said:

Dobro Turtlebane said:

The most fascinating outcome of this will be the effect on Wemby's mental development. I don't remember anyone being so openly obsessed with their legend and GOAT placement, and I think sometimes he wants so much to be "mommy, there go that man" that it leads to bad basketball decisions. Not saying he's a bad teammate, but he talks openly about how and where legends are made.

Example: Game 2, Spurs have clawed back from a hole and have momentum. They've started moving the ball on offense. They get a turnover? long rebound? (don't remember that part). Instead of getting into the offense, Wemby takes a 28' heat check 3 in transition… on a 2-on-4 disadvantage. Last night, Wemby takes a contested 3 with like 18 seconds on the shot clock. Spurs get a rare offensive rebound, and Wemby launches another (slightly longer) contested 3.

Maybe he watches a ton of film and decides it's going to take a village to win rings. But he might watch the same film and see missed layups, awful turnovers, and clanked middies and think "yes, only a legend can carry a Finals team" and make more bad decisions in clutch time.

Wemby lost that U19 game despite being the best player. He lost the gold medal game despite being the highest scorer from either team.

He has shown that he feeds off the defeat and takes it personally to fuel himself getting better. He's done that since he was a kid. I am not at all worried about his mental psyche.

The biggest problem for him is the demands of being the #1 player on offense and #1 player on defense. I don't think that physiologically his body can handle that and after the Minn/OKC series he was physically worn down.

Wemby had to launch those threes at the end because we needed as much time as possible. Same shot he launched that killed OKC.


I'm not worried about his psyche at all either. I'm not even "worried" about the outcome, I'm just interested in it. He'll never play on the U19 team again. He'll play on the French national team for 6 weeks every 4 years (and the team makeup will change a lot each time). He'll be on 80-90% of the same Spurs team next year. Will the sting of the collapses make him more ball dominant? Will he become a John Stockton level distributor in the clutch? Will he start punting the ball into the net from the far baseline? It's nothing to be worried about, but the psychology is interesting

No one in the fast paced modern basketball era has been asked to do as much as wemby has on both sies of the court. Not even close. He anchors and directs the entire defense and is also the primary scorer. And in both, he is matched up nearly every night with a guy that weighs 30-50lbs more than him with a center of gravity a foot lower. That is going to wear on anyone physically. I think by the end of the series, his body was just too drained and he had to pick his battles on offense. Even in the slow grind era, Kobe spent most of the game guarding Bowen so he didn't have to put in any effort and could save it. Wemby doesn't have that ability.

The biggest thing will be the development of Castle and Harper to take the scoring load off Wemby and adding a physical PF that can take the punishment Wemby receives off. Instead of Wemby fighting for position, he should be coming around a pin down screen from a 250lb PF to get position down low. But Julian and Devin can't do that to guys like KAT or Robinson.

Taking scoring necessity off his plate and taking physicality off his plate will make him a better overall player by making everything just easier on him. And he will have a lot more energy because he wont be burning it fighting a guy like Hartenstein or KAT.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sorry you don't understand that by getting him help and asking less of him throughout the season and the playoffs will allow him to have more energy saved up to take over when he is needed to. Being less tired tends to help players play more efficiently and rise the overall level of their game. When he is asked to do less, he will be able to better dominate when he is needed to do more. Being asked to do too much ends with players not being able to do everything at the level they are capable. And all that plays into his ultra-competitive psyche because he wants to win more than anything. He's not sitting and pouting when they use him as a decoy to get Castle the game winning dunk like Pippen did with Kukoc.

hth
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


He says ~15M year for Julian. Then basically use the MLE and run it back. Spurs are in a great place.
Cave Johnson, CEO
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Guitarsoup said:



He says ~15M year for Julian. Then basically use the MLE and run it back. Spurs are in a great place.


Where is Morez projected to go? I'm hoping we trade up to get him.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Cave Johnson, CEO said:

Guitarsoup said:



He says ~15M year for Julian. Then basically use the MLE and run it back. Spurs are in a great place.


Where is Morez projected to go? I'm hoping we trade up to get him.

Anywhere from 12-24 depending on who you ask.

No way he gets past us and I think that OKC, Charlotte, or Chicago might take him ahead of us.

KOC's latest Mock has Yaxel dropping to us at 20 and Morez going at 14 to Charlotte. I do think that could be realistic.

https://sports.yahoo.com/nba/draft/
LawHall88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'd be stunned if Yaxel fell to #20, but I would be thrilled if that happens.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He has been falling in the mock drafts and there are rumors he didn't have the best private work outs with teams.

There are several teams with multiple picks ahead of us, and with the multiple picks, teams often take the high upside guy (Lopez, Quintance, etc) rather than the lower ceiling guy. I think Yaxel is ideal for us, but he doesn't have all-star upside. He might be Obi Toppin or Keegan Murray. That's not bad, but other players have the chance to be way better. Lopez is like 4-5 years younger so that is a lot of time to develop.

Yaxel's 3/4 sprint and vertical were bad at the combine. His lane agility and shuttle run were great, though.
Cave Johnson, CEO
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I know you've probably mentioned it before so sorry for asking you to repeat yourself, but who do you think the best options are for the spurs assuming they stay put at 20?
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Cave Johnson, CEO said:

I know you've probably mentioned it before so sorry for asking you to repeat yourself, but who do you think the best options are for the spurs assuming they stay put at 20?

Morez Johnson
Yaxel or Steinbach
Karim Lopez or Jayden Quintance(high upside low floor)
Dailyn Swain (Keldon with better defense)
Cam Carr (Devin Vassell clone)
Chris Cenac (I think he is too soft, but has right size and great athleticism)


Also if Fox is traded (which I don't think he would be)
Ebuka Okorie
Christian Anderson

Completely off my board for first round:
Allen Graves (small and poor athleticism, poor defense)
Joshua Jefferson (short and not athletic, but has mass)
Koa Peat (More athletic Jeremy Sochan)
AggieEP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maybe it's time for us to put this thread down and start our off-season thread?

I don't think I've ever been more ready to just turn the page on a season. Not because I'm that upset at how it ended, but I'm incredibly excited and curious about what the Spurs do to enhance the roster. In the past they've always been super conservative, but this feels like a moment to be bold and plug the roster holes we have.

It's wild how a certain matchup can all of a sudden expose some hidden weaknesses, but everyone is going to take notes from what the Knicks did to us and try and replicate it, so we need to be proactive in patching those holes.

Also, going to be some interesting internal dynamics at play as new roles are established going forward. Harper showed me enough that I think he's the guy you invest in next year by making sure the ball is in his hands in the clutch. Give him a chance to grow into that role because I don't see that from Fox, Castle or Wemby. And this is no slight at Wemby, but he isn't a primary creator and it's dumb of us to ask that of him.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Maybe it's time for us to put this thread down and start our off-season thread?

I'll have time tomorrow to do my big cap and roster breakdown if you want me to do it then. Long flight and gotta stay occupied somehow
Cave Johnson, CEO
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It'll be interesting to see how the draft goes. It looks like we'd have to move up to 12-14 for a chance at Morez or Steinbach. I saw someone say the 27 draft is supposed to be a weaker one? Is it worth including it in a trade to move up?
West Texan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I only posted once after last night's game, and I intentionally made it positive. I was disappointed and knew everyone else was as well, so it wouldn't do any good to add to all the complaints and criticisms. I've made my peace with it.

Hats off to the Knicks. They made all the big plays exactly when they needed to and very much had that "team of destiny" feel to them. Every time it seemed like we were gonna pull away, they'd have someone step up and hit a huge shot (how many 3s did OG hit over Wemby?!?). They did enough defensively that we were never able to stay in a rhythm.

As for the Spurs, I want to echo the sentiment I had last night. It was a hell of a season. One that I don't think anyone at any level anticipated. Most people, including myself, thought we'd be in the play in to slightly above. We had the second best record in the league and went all the way to the NBA finals with an extremely young core. The future is incredibly bright and the rest of the league is still very worried about what is to come for San Antonio. With all that said, I'm going to say the same thing I said last summer when everyone wanted us to make a big deal for Giannis, KD, etc. bet on ourselves. Our 2 best players are 22 and 21, and depending on how highly you rank Harper, our third best is 20. Those guys are only going to get better. Everyone on social media is willing to ship off Fox to the first buyer, but we don't get to the finals without him. Yes, he played ****ty. But we also can't lose sight of the process that got us there, and his steady presence is what helped us get past OKC. Mitch also had some moments where I think his youth and inexperience as a coach got the better of him. But he also did some masterful things throughout the regular season and playoffs that he'll continue to learn from as well.

Knee jerk, emotional decisions are never beneficial long term. Have some patience and faith Spurs fans. We caught a team playing its best ball of the season and went just couldn't find the juice to close. We're there. Teams have to catch us. We don't have to make the big move to get to the promised land because we already proved we can get there. Now let our youth that got us there improve and let's see what happens next season.
Average Joe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I feel like our player pool is pretty small at that 20 spot. Only 2-3 real options there. Curious what the play is if they don't make it to us.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Average Joe said:

I feel like our player pool is pretty small at that 20 spot. Only 2-3 real options there. Curious what the play is if they don't make it to us.


I would trade the Hawks pick to move up for Johnson and maybe Steinbach.

If the only thing left is Cenac, I might trade out and use it to get a rotation player. #20 and Spurs get the right to swap in 2029 to Detroit for BeefStew? I think I would do that. I would trade Julian for BeefStew right now.
Average Joe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Guitarsoup said:

Average Joe said:

I feel like our player pool is pretty small at that 20 spot. Only 2-3 real options there. Curious what the play is if they don't make it to us.


I would trade the Hawks pick to move up for Johnson and maybe Steinbach.

If the only thing left is Cenac, I might trade out and use it to get a rotation player. #20 and Spurs get the right to swap in 2029 to Detroit for BeefStew? I think I would do that. I would trade Julian for BeefStew right now.

I worry about his injury history, but for Champ? I'll take that.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Average Joe said:

Guitarsoup said:

Average Joe said:

I feel like our player pool is pretty small at that 20 spot. Only 2-3 real options there. Curious what the play is if they don't make it to us.


I would trade the Hawks pick to move up for Johnson and maybe Steinbach.

If the only thing left is Cenac, I might trade out and use it to get a rotation player. #20 and Spurs get the right to swap in 2029 to Detroit for BeefStew? I think I would do that. I would trade Julian for BeefStew right now.

I worry about his injury history, but for Champ? I'll take that.


Champ at 3m fits into their trade exception. Stewart fits into our MLE.

They have cap space right now and need shooting. Champ makes sense to rotate with Duncan Robinson (who doesn't fit into the MLE)

Stewart gives us size, toughnes and "I dare you to try MFer"-ness.
AggieEP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I've seen tons of the talk on here about Julian, I'm curious why we don't just make him play out his contract at 3 million. He's obviously worth more than that, but I don't know what we're worried about if he gets to UFA, there won't be many teams with real cap room to make some big offer. And some of those teams will be crappy teams not interested in signing a role player. Maybe Julian wants to go home to Brooklyn for top dollar but I think it's in our favor to play hardball and make him prove it one more year before we are in on him long term.

We've seen repeatedly in the last few seasons that there hasn't been any money out there for guys like Julian on the open market. I think there is a good chance that of we play it out and put an offer of 4 years 40 million he doesn't have many options better than that, and if he does we have to think hard about whether we're still in for more than 10 million a year for someone who will never be more than a role player.

Alternatively, I have to wonder if we could use his 3 million salary to buy a future 1st from someone who is already bumping hard against the aprons. Imagine calling up Boston and swapping them Champ for Hauser and a future 1st. Or maybe the Rockets are interested and would give us one of the Brooklyn picks. It's really a great opportunity to save a capped out team and profit from their desperation.

Or Portland and their cheap ass owner and giving them Champ and Kelly for Camara.


I love Champ, but I don't think I see him as one of the guys with long term value to us that couldn't be replaced at a much cheaper price tag.

Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AggieEP said:

I've seen tons of the talk on here about Julian, I'm curious why we don't just make him play out his contract at 3 million. He's obviously worth more than that, but I don't know what we're worried about if he gets to UFA, there won't be many teams with real cap room to make some big offer. And some of those teams will be crappy teams not interested in signing a role player. Maybe Julian wants to go home to Brooklyn for top dollar but I think it's in our favor to play hardball and make him prove it one more year before we are in on him long term.

We've seen repeatedly in the last few seasons that there hasn't been any money out there for guys like Julian on the open market. I think there is a good chance that of we play it out and put an offer of 4 years 40 million he doesn't have many options better than that, and if he does we have to think hard about whether we're still in for more than 10 million a year for someone who will never be more than a role player.

Alternatively, I have to wonder if we could use his 3 million salary to buy a future 1st from someone who is already bumping hard against the aprons. Imagine calling up Boston and swapping them Champ for Hauser and a future 1st. Or maybe the Rockets are interested and would give us one of the Brooklyn picks. It's really a great opportunity to save a capped out team and profit from their desperation.

Or Portland and their cheap ass owner and giving them Champ and Kelly for Camara.


I love Champ, but I don't think I see him as one of the guys with long term value to us that couldn't be replaced at a much cheaper price tag.



Yeah, I completely agree. Look at the last few championship teams. NYK, OKC, BOS, DEN, MIL, GSW, LAL, TOR, etc.... Julian isn't a starter on any of those teams. I like him, but he's a 7th or 8th man and shouldn't really be getting the MLE or close to it.

Your thought on the trade was why I thought about Champ for BeefStew.

A difficulty is we don't have a trade exception other than MLE/BAE.

How much does Houston love Jabari at his big contract? 5y125M.

For teams needing to cut cash, would Denver do Keldon+20 or the Hawks 27 for Cam Johnson? That saves them ~5M. Opens up more money for Peyton Watson.

Would Memphis do 20+Keldon for Santi?

Can we take advantage of old man Dumars? Fox+Champ+20 for Herb+Saddiq+DJM

Philly is weak at SF. Hilarious to sell Champ back to them for a 1st.

I think once teams start making trades, a team that needs a rotation piece like Champ will open up. Unless he wants a 4/50 or less that is front loaded, I am probably telling him to prove he can be a 40% shooter consistently.
Enzo The Baker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Guitarsoup said:

AggieEP said:

I've seen tons of the talk on here about Julian, I'm curious why we don't just make him play out his contract at 3 million. He's obviously worth more than that, but I don't know what we're worried about if he gets to UFA, there won't be many teams with real cap room to make some big offer. And some of those teams will be crappy teams not interested in signing a role player. Maybe Julian wants to go home to Brooklyn for top dollar but I think it's in our favor to play hardball and make him prove it one more year before we are in on him long term.

We've seen repeatedly in the last few seasons that there hasn't been any money out there for guys like Julian on the open market. I think there is a good chance that of we play it out and put an offer of 4 years 40 million he doesn't have many options better than that, and if he does we have to think hard about whether we're still in for more than 10 million a year for someone who will never be more than a role player.

Alternatively, I have to wonder if we could use his 3 million salary to buy a future 1st from someone who is already bumping hard against the aprons. Imagine calling up Boston and swapping them Champ for Hauser and a future 1st. Or maybe the Rockets are interested and would give us one of the Brooklyn picks. It's really a great opportunity to save a capped out team and profit from their desperation.

Or Portland and their cheap ass owner and giving them Champ and Kelly for Camara.


I love Champ, but I don't think I see him as one of the guys with long term value to us that couldn't be replaced at a much cheaper price tag.



Yeah, I completely agree. Look at the last few championship teams. NYK, OKC, BOS, DEN, MIL, GSW, LAL, TOR, etc.... Julian isn't a starter on any of those teams. I like him, but he's a 7th or 8th man and shouldn't really be getting the MLE or close to it.

Your thought on the trade was why I thought about Champ for BeefStew.

A difficulty is we don't have a trade exception other than MLE/BAE.

How much does Houston love Jabari at his big contract? 5y125M.

For teams needing to cut cash, would Denver do Keldon+20 or the Hawks 27 for Cam Johnson? That saves them ~5M. Opens up more money for Peyton Watson.

Would Memphis do 20+Keldon for Santi?

Can we take advantage of old man Dumars? Fox+Champ+20 for Herb+Saddiq+DJM

Philly is weak at SF. Hilarious to sell Champ back to them for a 1st.

I think once teams start making trades, a team that needs a rotation piece like Champ will open up. Unless he wants a 4/50 or less that is front loaded, I am probably telling him to prove he can be a 40% shooter consistently.



I don't know about giving up Champ man. His shooting completely unlocked our team this year. I'd like to keep him and think he's more valuable than a 4. That's how important his shooting is. His defense was exposed a bit in the Knicks series but I'd take him over beef stew and it's not even that close to be honest.
Enzo The Baker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This team needs to fill out a competent bench. I think part of that comes organically with Bryant's development. I think he can be a playoff rotational piece next year. Move Fox to the bench and that's 7. A deep playoff run with a basically 6 man rotation is what killed us in the end. We were gassed.
flashplayer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Guitarsoup said:

Cave Johnson, CEO said:

I know you've probably mentioned it before so sorry for asking you to repeat yourself, but who do you think the best options are for the spurs assuming they stay put at 20?

Morez Johnson
Yaxel or Steinbach
Karim Lopez or Jayden Quintance(high upside low floor)
Dailyn Swain (Keldon with better defense)
Cam Carr (Devin Vassell clone)
Chris Cenac (I think he is too soft, but has right size and great athleticism)


Also if Fox is traded (which I don't think he would be)
Ebuka Okorie
Christian Anderson

Completely off my board for first round:
Allen Graves (small and poor athleticism, poor defense)
Joshua Jefferson (short and not athletic, but has mass)
Koa Peat (More athletic Jeremy Sochan)



I would be happy with either Carr or Swain if the bigs are gone or if we plan to address PF with the MLE. Both those guys look to me like they can be solid contributors on good teams.

In my dream scenario we somehow trade up for Mara and then can use the MLE for some wing depth.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Enzo The Baker said:

Guitarsoup said:

AggieEP said:

I've seen tons of the talk on here about Julian, I'm curious why we don't just make him play out his contract at 3 million. He's obviously worth more than that, but I don't know what we're worried about if he gets to UFA, there won't be many teams with real cap room to make some big offer. And some of those teams will be crappy teams not interested in signing a role player. Maybe Julian wants to go home to Brooklyn for top dollar but I think it's in our favor to play hardball and make him prove it one more year before we are in on him long term.

We've seen repeatedly in the last few seasons that there hasn't been any money out there for guys like Julian on the open market. I think there is a good chance that of we play it out and put an offer of 4 years 40 million he doesn't have many options better than that, and if he does we have to think hard about whether we're still in for more than 10 million a year for someone who will never be more than a role player.

Alternatively, I have to wonder if we could use his 3 million salary to buy a future 1st from someone who is already bumping hard against the aprons. Imagine calling up Boston and swapping them Champ for Hauser and a future 1st. Or maybe the Rockets are interested and would give us one of the Brooklyn picks. It's really a great opportunity to save a capped out team and profit from their desperation.

Or Portland and their cheap ass owner and giving them Champ and Kelly for Camara.


I love Champ, but I don't think I see him as one of the guys with long term value to us that couldn't be replaced at a much cheaper price tag.



Yeah, I completely agree. Look at the last few championship teams. NYK, OKC, BOS, DEN, MIL, GSW, LAL, TOR, etc.... Julian isn't a starter on any of those teams. I like him, but he's a 7th or 8th man and shouldn't really be getting the MLE or close to it.

Your thought on the trade was why I thought about Champ for BeefStew.

A difficulty is we don't have a trade exception other than MLE/BAE.

How much does Houston love Jabari at his big contract? 5y125M.

For teams needing to cut cash, would Denver do Keldon+20 or the Hawks 27 for Cam Johnson? That saves them ~5M. Opens up more money for Peyton Watson.

Would Memphis do 20+Keldon for Santi?

Can we take advantage of old man Dumars? Fox+Champ+20 for Herb+Saddiq+DJM

Philly is weak at SF. Hilarious to sell Champ back to them for a 1st.

I think once teams start making trades, a team that needs a rotation piece like Champ will open up. Unless he wants a 4/50 or less that is front loaded, I am probably telling him to prove he can be a 40% shooter consistently.



I don't know about giving up Champ man. His shooting completely unlocked our team this year. I'd like to keep him and think he's more valuable than a 4. That's how important his shooting is. His defense was exposed a bit in the Knicks series but I'd take him over beef stew and it's not even that close to be honest.

His shooting is also so inconsistent. His defense is suspect against better teams. We absolutely have to address shooting, but I think that a physical PF will unlock Wemby. And SFs that are kind of above average defensively and can shoot 37-38% from three aren't super difficult to come by.

Plus, I think Bryant passes Julian in the rotation sooner than later. Bryant is already the better individual (but not team) defender. He shot 45/35 post ASB and shot 50/41 for the playoffs. Bryant makes Julian expendable and Julian's value will be highest for a lot of teams when he can fit into a $3m exception.

If we are stupid and give Julian a big contract because of his fantastic 11/6 season and sporadically good shooting in the playoffs, we are going to regret it just like Denver does with Christian Braun.

We have the 3 PGs for a while which means Devin is mostly playing SF for 25-30mpg. That means we have Bryant and Julian fighting for the rest of those SF minutes and whatever backup PF minutes we have after we get a PF. I'm betting on Carter and getting value for Julian if I can rather than over pay him. If Julian wants to take a front loaded 4/40-48 or something, I'm in. Beyond that and I either trade him for a PF or make him prove it and let him play the market next summer. I don't think any team is going to give him the full MLE unless he suddenly becomes a 40% shooter and more consistent. The market for guys like that just isn't good.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
flashplayer said:

Guitarsoup said:

Cave Johnson, CEO said:

I know you've probably mentioned it before so sorry for asking you to repeat yourself, but who do you think the best options are for the spurs assuming they stay put at 20?

Morez Johnson
Yaxel or Steinbach
Karim Lopez or Jayden Quintance(high upside low floor)
Dailyn Swain (Keldon with better defense)
Cam Carr (Devin Vassell clone)
Chris Cenac (I think he is too soft, but has right size and great athleticism)


Also if Fox is traded (which I don't think he would be)
Ebuka Okorie
Christian Anderson

Completely off my board for first round:
Allen Graves (small and poor athleticism, poor defense)
Joshua Jefferson (short and not athletic, but has mass)
Koa Peat (More athletic Jeremy Sochan)



I would be happy with either Carr or Swain if the bigs are gone or if we plan to address PF with the MLE. Both those guys look to me like they can be solid contributors on good teams.

In my dream scenario we somehow trade up for Mara and then can use the MLE for some wing depth.

Mara doesn't do a ton for me. I think he is solid, but he isn't going to play with Wemby. I just can't see trading up for a guy that can't share the court with your best player. I think Johnson, Yaxel, and Steinbach will. I think you go after the super athletic centers like Tarris Reed or Zuby with the 35th pick. Veesaar if he drops to 35.
AggieEP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is what drives my thinking also. It'd be a long term disaster to pay Julian 20 million a year to be Carter Bryant's backup, so if you believe in Carter, then Julian shouldn't get anything other than a very team friendly deal offered to him. It's a win win for the Spurs if we can keep him for 4/40 because that increases our depth but also makes Julian a tradeable piece down the line if need be.

For Julian, I'm just not sure where an offer better than that comes from if he values playing on a winning team.

On a related note, I don't think the Spurs will do it, but they should take the same approach with Castle next summer unless he makes a big leap next year. I think he's a 25/30 million player not a full max guy. But I don't think the Spurs will risk rocking the boat with the chemistry and probably just offer the rookie scale max extension to him. Love me some Steph Castle but he's not ever going to be more than our 3rd guy behind Wemby and Harper unless he learns to value the ball better and gets better at finishing around the rim. Saving 10 million a season on Castle would be HUGE long-term though for our ability to retain quality depth.

vaqueroag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I haven't been reading through this thread closely enough so I'm sure this has been touched on a bunch, but from a level headed perspective how do we feel about Mitch? Is he on a hot seat going into next year?
satexas
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
vaqueroag said:

I haven't been reading through this thread closely enough so I'm sure this has been touched on a bunch, but from a level headed perspective how do we feel about Mitch? Is he on a hot seat going into next year?


Mitch will be here for the unforeseeable future because he's "Pop's guy" and Pop still has that influence and control.

I think too many people overlook his deficiencies because of our other issues (Fox, youth, conditioning, etc) and want to praise him because we "go so far" - but you can't collapse that many times using the same template and it not be coaching. Just ask Orlando.

No chance he's fired - but he HAS to be on some kind of hot seat/analysis. We can't waste this talent.

And speaking of Orlando - they just hired our defensive specialist as their next head coach…. So what now?
First Page Last Page
Page 368 of 372
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.