***** 2026 Spurs Off-Season Thread *****

25,197 Views | 544 Replies | Last: 2 hrs ago by Guitarsoup
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Salary Cap: $165M
Luxury Tax: 201M
1st Apron: 209M
2nd Apron: 222M
Current Payroll: ~153.5M for 9 players.

Fox: 49.5
Devin 27.5
Keldon 18 (ending year)
Victor 16.7
Dylan 13
Kornet 10.5
Castle 10
Bryant 5.1
Julian 3 (team option/ending year)


The salary slot for the 20th pick is about $4M which I didn't include above in current payroll.

With the 20th pick, we are at 157.5 and I expect us to stay below the 201 Luxury tax. That's about 43M in space between resigning, trades, etc.

-----------------------

Despite being under the cap, we will operate as an over the cap team, because we are less than the MLE under the tax and the cap holds push us up higher.

Assets:
Mid-Level Exception. About $15M. We can use this to sign free agents or trade players into it. It can be split into multiple players. If a free agent, we can sign them for up to 4 years.
Bi-Annual Exception. About $5M. We can trade players into it or sign free agents. Contracts can be 2 years max.
Vet Min. As many as we want.
20th pick
35th pick
42nd pick
44th pick
Spurs have no trade exceptions.

Free Agents
Barnes
Olynyk
Waters
McLaughlin
Plumlee
Biyombo
DJG (twoway)
Harrison Ingram (two way)

I think Barnes and McLaughlin might be back. I think Biyombo will get a front office job like Georgi Dieng got. Neither Barnes or McLaughlin will get much more than the min. We could give Barnes more on a 1y deal just for trade purposes later. Vet min deals count as zero in some trade scenarios for matching salary. Vet Min+$1 counts as the actual salary.


Needs:
I can just copy and paste from previous years. PF/C that can provide physicality and shooting. We need a physical PF to pair with Wemby that can stretch the floor. Having an additional guy that can play center is a need.

Players that could be traded:
Keldon on an 18M expiring is our best trade asset as far as taking back money, but he has a lot of value off the court. I don't expect him to be traded.
Julian on a 3M expiring has a lot of trade value if he doesn't agree on contract terms for a long term deal that are team favorable. I don't expect us to trade him, either.
Fox is obviously not the fan favorite but I don't expect him to be traded this summer.
I don't expect any major deals this summer but some minor deals to add PFs to the roster will make sense.

FA/Trade Targets:
I think we will see more come on line as things start to play out.
BeefStew has been dangled by Detroit and he fits into the MLE
Portis is out once Giannis is traded and he fits into the MLE.
Anyone on a rookie deal fits into the MLE.

Because we are under the aprons:
A player making under $7.5M (Julian) can take back 200%+250k in salary. So 6.25M.
A player making between 7.5m and 29M can take back $7.5M more in salary. Keldon makes 18M so he can take back 25.5M. Devin fits in that range as well.
A player making more than 29M (FOX) can take back 125%+250k.

FAs:
Replace Lindy as shooter: Gary Trent?

PF/C:
Dean Wade: I think he would fit into the BAE. Very good defender and adequate (36%) 3pt shooter.
Marvin Bagley: I think he will want a bigger role to prove himself worthy of a big contract next summer
Ariel Hukporti: Knicks 3rd string center is a RFA but they have cap issues. He has shown a lot of promise as a rim protector. Would love him as our 3rd.
Rui: awful rebounder and passer, gives intermittent effort on defense, shooting doesnt make up for it IMO
John Collins: Do you love missed rotations and defensive assignments? He's your guy. Spurs have passed on him multiple times when he was only valued as a 2nd round pick in a trade.
Kenrich Williams: I think OKC declines his team option. He would be a solid rotation piece that can hit threes.
Jock Landale: Not much of a rim protector, but we love our ex Spurs
Vooch: Too expensive, awful defender.
Nurkic: Has been a locker room problem multiple times, probably doesn't want to split time with Kornet.
TimeLord: I think would be too expensive and too injury prone for the role we need. Think he goes back to Portland or Boston
Looney: Don't hate it as a 3rd string center that can set bone rattling screens
Thomas Bryant: didnt seem like any mutual interest last year, but would be a great 3rd center

Pickins are pretty slim. Would love grabbing BeefStew or Portis with a trade then signing Dean Wade.

Draft:
My personal Spurs Big Board:
1. Morez Johnson (would have to trade up)
2. Yaxel or Steinbach (tied - also would have to trade up)
3. Lopez - first mexican born 1st round pick? City would go wild. Plus big body and great athlete
4. Cam Carr - Devin Vassell Starter Kit, even though wrong position
5. Dailyn Swain - Bigger Keldon Johnson with great on ball defense
6. Chris Cenac - Positional size and athleticism, but seems kind of soft. Development needed.
7. Jayden Quintance - Could be a DPOY candidate, but also could be Greg Oden. 40% FT shooter.
8. Tarris Reed. UCONN center, undersized but elite athlete <or> Zuby Ejifor Pitino's monster athlete PF/C that can defend like 3-5. Both have incredible motors. Might put them above Quintance because they have a higher floor
9. Henri Veesaar. D&3 center, but skinny and not physical like we need. Hit over 40% from three, but I dont think he could play PF. More of a weakside help defender.

Not on my list for first round: Allen Graves or Jefferson. Would take either in the 2nd round, but both are subpar athletes. Graves worked as a center hub because his passing and processing was great, but he cannot stay in front of anyone even at a mid-major and at under 6'8 and 225lbs, he is too small and unathletic to make it as a rotation player on a great team. I see him as 2026 Harrison Barnes with Derik Queen's passing. I prefer Jefferson, who has 20lbs of muscle on Graves.
ThenamesAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Great summary.

A few comments/things I want to see:
1. Wemby needs to perfect his mid-range/elbow jumper. I think this is where he can be the deadliest offensively (think the last shot of game 2).
2. Castle and Harper to develop offensively and improve ball-handling. If either one develops either a reliable jumper or middie, then the drives become unstoppable.
3. Fox to work on catch and shoot 3s. If the other guards develop, then teams will continue to help off him. He needs to make them pay.
4. Keep Johnson for his regular season value alone. Getting 15-20 minutes of bullyball did wonders for this team this year, even if it didn't translate to the postseason.
5. Re-sign Julian for 4/50 and tell him to work on continuing to expand his offensive game.

Draft wants:
1. Morez
2. Yaxel
3. Carr
4. Swain
5. Big body in second round
6. Karaban with the later second.
TheNotoriousP.I.P.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think the next 2 years will be the deepest and most matchup-resilient of any years in the Wemby era. We've got a lot of tools in the belt to get better, and a lot of leverage over our own extension-eligible players (Keldon and Julian) to get them to come to terms on something team-beneficial.

I kind of expect every one of our FAs to not be back. HB obviously is a guy that could have a role as a sporadic fill-in, but I think some team is gonna hand him a BAE-type multi-year deal that I ultimately prefer we don't match.

I'd be surprised if we took in more than 1 second rounder from our 3, either using the extras to trade into the back-end of R1/tippy top of R2, or trade out for cash/future picks.

That would put as at 11 players, including all 9 of our playoff rotation guys plus 2 rookies. Phenomenal set-up by Brian Wright honestly.

I'd think we use both the MLE and BAE to bring in some help, puts us at 13 assuming no trades and no Barnes. I hope we are done signing vets that don't have a prayer of helping us in the playoffs, instead using the last 2 spots on Bassey/Champagnie/Barlow type swings on young guys that may have been overlooked. This has always been a major strength of our FO and hope that trend continues.

Was a really fun year and I think we will be even better next year. I have a lot of faith in the FO so this should be a fun few months.
West Texan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I hope our offseason threads always start this late in the summer, preferably with a better final outcome.

I'm just here to remind everyone that thinks a bad finals from Fox means we have to make a huge trade and shake things up, during the glory days of PATFO and the Big 3, we rarely made big offseason moves. We typically made moves on the edges and counted on our own internal development from the players and coaches.

Go Spurs Go!
All I do is Nguyen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
In.

GSG
No matter what!
Epstein didn't do, you know, the thing...
I'm the rare Astros/Cowboys/Spurs fan. We do exist
superunknown
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Isnt Brent Barry like the only actual FA signing that made any sort of splash up until TheMarcus? DDR, Fox were all trades, right? I can't see PATFO going crazy with future assets. They're put too much thought and planning into the next few years to blow it up for a big splashy thing.

Besides, someone's going to have to be pretty persuasive to convince me we need much more than 30-40 minutes of average play at the 4 to be knocking on the door for #6 next year and for the foreseeable future. I truly think we're that close.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
superunknown said:

Isnt Brent Barry like the only actual FA signing that made any sort of splash up until TheMarcus? DDR, Fox were all trades, right? I can't see PATFO going crazy with future assets. They're put too much thought and planning into the next few years to blow it up for a big splashy thing.

Besides, someone's going to have to be pretty persuasive to convince me we need much more than 30-40 minutes of average play at the 4 to be knocking on the door for #6 next year and for the foreseeable future. I truly think we're that close.

Yeah, that is right. Trading for a guy like Portis/BeefStew and signing Dean Wade would be a huge win, without even addressing the draft.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Didn't address the Julian situation above, but here is my thoughts.

Julian has a team option for $3M and will be a UFA next year.

If he wants to get paid early, I think he needs to take a team-friendly deal. I think around or slightly more than Sam Hauser's 4y45M contract is appropriate and we make it front loaded so he gets the most money early. This is a step up from Luke Kornet's deal of 4/41.

If Julian thinks he is worth more than that, then he can play out the $3M and test the market next year, but I don't think any team is offering him the full MLE (about 4/60.)

The problem with a bigger contract to lock him down is I think he is average or so as a defender (exposed and hunted by NYK) and as a 37-38% shooter, he is above average, but not consistent. He does a lot of things well for us, but he can't attack close outs and he is appropriately a ~7-8th man on a championship team. If you pay him too much, you are really hurting yourself in the apron era, especially on a team with Vassell and Bryant probably both being better than him by the end of next season.

As a $3M 1y player that did have a very good playoffs, I think he would also have a lot of trade value right now, especially for a team that is trying to cut some salary or needs a solid role player. So like Charlotte is trying to move Bridges/Williams for Sabonis, moving Julian for #14 might make sense for their rotation needing a D&3 shooter that could play some PF/SF. Then we could use 14 on Morez Johnson and 20 on Cameron Carr. I dont know if 14 or 15 (bulls have 3&15 and Julian would be a good fit next to Matas) would make sense. If we could make a Julian for Morez trade, I think it would end up feeling a lot like the George Hill-Kawhi trade. Loved Hill, but we got better.

Also, if Julian is getting 15M/year and Morez gets $5M year, we shave $10M/year off the cap for a guy that is a better positional fit.

That small contract gives us a lot of flexibility. But I'll be pretty disappointed if it is anymore than DFS' contract last year. I'd love to keep Julian, but I would love Morez Johnson and a good big rotation more.
Conroe_Ag_8
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Saw a clip from Gil's Arena where they pose Fox for Zion trade. I'd sign up for that immediately.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG



They basically said you have to prepare for a Fox trade in the next 1-2 years but wouldn't expect it soon. Good listen
Backcountry Birds
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anyone that has followed the Spurs for long knows that the most likely option is to pay Julian more than most think he's worth, sign a 2nd string PF using part of the MLE. Trade back or out of the draft for future assets if the player we love isn't there and not use any of the 2nd round picks.

I can absolutely see a scenario where we give Julian $15M a year, sign someone like Wade into half the MLE, draft best available or trade back even if a non need position and add a few end of bench Veterans and run it back.

I personally think we should trade Fox. If you know he's not in your long term plans (it's basically impossible for him to be) and he just showed in the finals that he's not the missing piece to win it all, then why not trade him for either a PF that can shoot, rebound and defend or at least an assortment of a few different role players that can at least add to our bench depth and be able to trade easier/individually if needed?

I know a lot of y'all keep insisting Fox is somehow still going to be our primary ball handler and 2nd leading shooter/scorer and an all NBA player again next year, but if that's the case aren't we stunting the growth of Harper/Bryant/Castle that all need to increase their roles offensively and learn to play together? Especially after Harper just showed he's vastly superior already?

If there was any chance that Fox was part of the long term plans then I would be all for running it back and hoping he improves/blame it on the ankle. However, the only rational reason to bring him back is if we truly believe he's the missing piece for a championship and didn't he just show us he isn't that by his awful performance?

I fear he's only going to decline and be even harder to trade in a year or two. It's extremely hard to come back from that kind of meltdown. Especially with the young pups breathing down your neck for your playing time. Moving him now seems like the smart play.
FTAG 2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They'd be fools to commit long term and big money to Julian. Can't do that after already having that Fox contract hanging around our necks.
jsc8116
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I keep hanging on to the belief the Spurs will leave him unprotected in an expansion draft in 2 years. Is there any disadvantages to do that vs getting back other massive/bad contracts in a return trade from the financial side of things?

Guess would be egg in face to management if he somehow doesn't get picked up by Vegas/Seattle and then would definitely have to trade him.
Backcountry Birds
How long do you want to ignore this user?
jsc8116 said:

I keep hanging on to the belief the Spurs will leave him unprotected in an expansion draft in 2 years. Is there any disadvantages to do that vs getting back other massive/bad contracts in a return trade from the financial side of things?

Guess would be egg in face to management if he somehow doesn't get picked up by Vegas/Seattle and then would definitely have to trade him.


I think there is a legit chance he doesn't get picked. His game is based on speed (which will decline as he ages). His rim pressure was already way down this season. His mid range jumper will continue to be inefficient analytically. I don't see an expansion organization wanting to take on that salary and try to build a team around a 30+ year old, no longer all star PG who has a max salary and isn't really a long term solution for them. Then you look around the league to try to trade a player that didn't even get picked in the expansion draft and I think you will need to add some significant assets to move him. And remember we can't take back salary at that point. If we move him now, we can take back salary and hopefully get either a mixture of cheaper players that we can move more easily individually or a younger player that has more trade value in a couple years, especially if he helps the Spurs win a championship.

The advantage of moving him now is you can probably get 3+ role players back that can build out our depth or you get a PF piece that fits better besides Wemby and fills a weakness better.

We need shooting and rebounding more than we need another ball handler. All 3 of Castle, Harper and Fox aren't great outside shooters so there is a level of redundancy there. Inserting a lesser PG that shoots the 3 better might actually be a net positive for the team.


We have a rare opportunity to build the depth we need or be aggressive at PF and try to win a championship or two before the big salaries kick in. If we stick with Fox's big contract, you basically are saying you think he's the missing piece to get you a ship over the next 2 years before trading him and we just saw first hand that he isn't that guy.
Backcountry Birds
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And by the way Fox kind of tanked his trade value intentionally for the Kings and forced his way to the Spurs, which is why we got him for a good deal.

What makes us think he won't pull a Kawhi and do something very similar again to the Spurs when we are attempt to trade him from a championship caliber squad?

I would rather deal with the fallout now than in 2 years when you desperately need that salary off the books and likely have even fewer teams interested in an older, non-All star PG.

I get that this is weird for Spurs fans. We are loyal to our players. Especially a player like Fox who forced his way in. I would be all for running it back and letting him develop if he fit in our long-term plans. We all love a good redemption story. But it is really just a matter of when, not if Fox gets traded.
LawHall88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sam Vecenie of the Athletic updated his mock draft today, and has the Spurs taking Karim Lopez. Other picks of interest - Morez to OKC at #12, Steinbach to Charlotte at #14, Yaxel to the Bulls at #15, Swain to OKC at #17, Carr to the Raptors at #19.

Quote:

20. San Antonio Spurs (via ATL)

Karim Lopez | 6-8 wing | 19 years old | New Zealand Breakers


Lopez has largely been working out for teams ahead of this range so far, feeling confident in his status as a top-15 selection. I'm not convinced of that. When I speak to teams about him, the feedback is commensurate with a mid-to-late first-rounder, as opposed to a lottery pick. He has some questions to answer as a defender and shooter, even if scouts are enticed by his rebounding and ability to drive into the lane. His range feels like it's anywhere from No. 11 down to No. 25 or so, among the widest in the class for the guys invited to the draft green room.

The Spurs need some tough, physical rebounding ability at the four spot, and Lopez could provide that, along with the downhill driving ability they've valued in their picks in recent years. The organization has also prioritized positional strength, and Lopez's frame looks like one that will fill out well in the coming years.

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/7365062/2026/06/18/nba-2026-mock-draft-peterson-boozer-acuff/
TheNotoriousP.I.P.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I do really like Lopez; you want strength and rebounding at the 4 spot? He can already provide that at a very young age, and he's shown some signs of being at least a shooter/connective passer that may not be lethal but can't just be dared to shoot.
HummingbirdSaltalamacchia
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LawHall88 said:

Sam Vecenie of the Athletic updated his mock draft today, and has the Spurs taking Karim Lopez. Other picks of interest - Morez to OKC at #12, Steinbach to Charlotte at #14, Yaxel to the Bulls at #15, Swain to OKC at #17, Carr to the Raptors at #19.

Quote:

20. San Antonio Spurs (via ATL)

Karim Lopez | 6-8 wing | 19 years old | New Zealand Breakers


Lopez has largely been working out for teams ahead of this range so far, feeling confident in his status as a top-15 selection. I'm not convinced of that. When I speak to teams about him, the feedback is commensurate with a mid-to-late first-rounder, as opposed to a lottery pick. He has some questions to answer as a defender and shooter, even if scouts are enticed by his rebounding and ability to drive into the lane. His range feels like it's anywhere from No. 11 down to No. 25 or so, among the widest in the class for the guys invited to the draft green room.

The Spurs need some tough, physical rebounding ability at the four spot, and Lopez could provide that, along with the downhill driving ability they've valued in their picks in recent years. The organization has also prioritized positional strength, and Lopez's frame looks like one that will fill out well in the coming years.

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/7365062/2026/06/18/nba-2026-mock-draft-peterson-boozer-acuff/


I really don't see OKC taking two guys in the first. I'd be shocked if they don't package both to move up at least some. How much will be interesting if they try and package both with a player. But little chance they keep both picks


And count me as another liking the Lopez pick. I guess I'm turning into Masai Ujiri, liking big switchable wings. I think Lopez will be a good to great shooter and has the frame to put on a little size to be a serviceable 4 next to Vic. Won't be an amazing defender but he should be big enough to throw against some of the other big wings/small ball centers that like to gravitate outside the arc and rebound at a good clip. To read Sam V describe him, it reminds me of Lopez being a Deni knockoff. Which, I'd be fine with
Backcountry Birds
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm sure his Mexican lineage is appealing but Lopez being a 19 year old role player in New Zealand worries me. I think he's a nice prospect but his shooting and defense aren't elite currently. His rebounding is appealing but don't think he's a plus athlete so in the NBA that might not transfer quite as well. Since he will need some developmental time as is, I would rather err towards a better athlete that needs to develop or more ideally a more polished product that has at least one A+ skill that is instantly transferable and can help the team win now(preferably shooting).
Chipotlemonger
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Will be interesting to watch the development between this season and the next with how things ended up. Mental, physical, and team development all. Promising players on this team. Here's to capitalizing on it and going out and winning it all.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yeah, the problem with Lopez is he doesn't have a great skill to hang his hat on. He's very much a project, but he plays well with his physicality against grown men and has a great frame. He already rebounds well. I think a mean outcome is he becomes a 2" taller, 15-20lb heavier version of Julian in 2-3 years. He has a good feel for the game and good BBIQ. Unlike Julian, he is good at attacking closeouts and can take the ball to the rack with power. He made 68% of his rim attempts in the half-court sets, which is a great number. His shooting is shaky/inconsistent but he is a solid cutter and with him embracing his size should be a good screener/roller. Still take him way above guys like Allen Graves or Joshua Jefferson.

In that draft, if Chicago is getting Yaxel at 15, we gotta move up and grab that.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Snagging him in the 2nd round would be amazing.

If the guys we want aren't there, maybe trade with Knicks.

#20+35 to Knicks for #24+31+2032 Swap.

Take Zuby+Quintance.
Earth Rider
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just walked past Mitch at Baha Mar in Bahamas. I gave him a pass, glad he's getting away.
FTAG 2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Thought you were gonna say he bricked the wide open **** after the pass.
Earth Rider
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Guitarsoup said:

Yeah, the problem with Lopez is he doesn't have a great skill to hang his hat on. He's very much a project, but he plays well with his physicality against grown men and has a great frame. He already rebounds well. I think a mean outcome is he becomes a 2" taller, 15-20lb heavier version of Julian in 2-3 years. He has a good feel for the game and good BBIQ. Unlike Julian, he is good at attacking closeouts and can take the ball to the rack with power. He made 68% of his rim attempts in the half-court sets, which is a great number. His shooting is shaky/inconsistent but he is a solid cutter and with him embracing his size should be a good screener/roller. Still take him way above guys like Allen Graves or Joshua Jefferson.

In that draft, if Chicago is getting Yaxel at 15, we gotta move up and grab that.

Watching the tape on Lopez he looks like a huge project like you said and a gamble. I don't think he would get any playing time for at least two years.

Morez has moved up looks to go top 14.personally like Zuby also. Also like Veesar 20 is high for him. But for a 7 footer has really improved his shooting needs to bulk up but I like how he plays.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'll add one other wildcard: Sergio de Larrea

He's kind of a combo guard/forward playmaker but also shot really well at Valencia (Spanish basketball league; high level euro.) He shot .407 on 91 3pt attempts (6.8 per 36) in 28 games of Liga ACB. Little turnover and foul prone, but big guard with feel that can shoot? Seems like a Spurs guy.

https://www.tankathon.com/players/sergio-de-larrea

Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Lowe talking to Jared Weiss was a great listen. Jared is the Spurs beat reporter for The Athletic

https://open.spotify.com/episode/3h7nd34NS9lrbzbIJTy0WO
superunknown
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sam Amick in the athletic reporting...
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
superunknown said:

Sam Amick in the athletic reporting...



Yeah, I would love him. Not the shooter that Portis is, but he can play 5 or 4 and and hit 42% from the corner. I think he's able to play PF next to Wemby. He sure isn't going to let anyone bully our boys

If Detroit cuts salary, they can make an offer to Reeves and Max out Duren
superunknown
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I thought of you when I saw that, you've been banging that drum for a while and I was like omg it's happening!
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He's the easiest salary to dump for them and obviously he's a lose cannon. Paul Reed is a solid backup center.

They want to dump LaVert but he's a negative asset.
superunknown
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Is he a serious headcase or just a little nasty? He swung on Drew Eubanks, right?

Nvm, been reading through his record on wikipedia.

You know what? I'm good with it. We need someone like that.
AggieEP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I wonder if Detroit would accept a trade as a pure salary dump or if they would want value back. I'm less of a fan if we have to send any real assets back, but sure I'd send out one of our 2nd round picks (not 35) this year for Stewart.

I like Stewart in theory, but his role was pretty minimal in the playoffs and he looked a bit in over his head in his minutes. Detroit went with Reed because Stewart was not very impactful. There is also always the worry that he'll get into a fight and get himself suspended.

Still, all things considered he'd be a tough piece that could play next to Wemby for stretches and improves our frontcourt depth.
SanAntonio
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Wiki write up on his professional career is entertaining, dude knows how to fight.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.