***** 2026 Spurs Off-Season Thread *****

27,046 Views | 547 Replies | Last: 4 hrs ago by Guitarsoup
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
West Texan said:



Dang I would have liked to have beef stew.


My valuation was pretty close of 2 seconds and no salary back.

Guessing the Spurs didn't think he was a cultural fit. Don't want to mess up the chemistry.
jteagle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FTAG 2000 said:

Another uninspired second round round. Just lighting picks on fire.


It's the 2nd round! What do you expect?
For every Manu, there is at least 100 Chimezi Metus
AggieEP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I like the pick of the kid from Duke, I think he was picked to be our big man defensive specialist and rebounder if we need to get a stop on one possession at the end of a game. It's likely that Jayden doesn't play for a while based on reports of another procedure on his knee, so this kid from Duke gives us someone who could come in and play that role.

OG was able to tip that ball in because we went with 4 guards on the last possession, I think we're now situated to be able to be much bigger in those situations going forward and make sure we can secure a rebound.
jteagle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Didn't see this posted yet.
Enzo The Baker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jteagle said:



Didn't see this posted yet.

Wow. Charlotte's FO really is becoming competent.
CC09LawAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If the offseason is spent replacing our end of the bench big men (Plumlee, Biyombo, Olynyk) that have no upside left with young, athletic guys with upside, I won't complain about that.

Really the only thing I think we're absolutely missing is the plug and play 4 that we've been talking about and the thing on my "want" list is a sharpshooter that can do everything else well enough to get some minutes.
Iowaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Iowaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They could have had Ja for scraps.
He would have been an unstoppable pairing with Ant for 3 games before he got injured again. And then return for 2 games, and then injured and ruled out for the season
Backcountry Birds
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I figured Naz was going to be on the move. Wish we could have gotten involved with Fox. He was probably too expensive to make to work I suppose. Surely the Wolves would have preferred Fox over Melo right?
Dr. Not Yet Dr. Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Would have been tough to make the salaries work for a Fox trade, if even possible, which I don't think it was after they traded Randle. I do wish we could have figured that out, I think Naz Reid is exactly the piece this team was missing.

Also, interesting that I was told in here that Minn was not moving Naz for a point guard a few weeks ago which is exactly what happened. I'm not sure how much more value Melo has compared to Fox outside of a slightly better contract and his age. He's still a streaky, inefficient volume scorer, poor defensive effort, will play you out of games, and is a legitimate liability off the court with the way he drives. He also is an injury liability having only played >65 games twice in his 6 seasons. I'm certainly surprised Minnesota made this move, but just goes to show that this trade was potentially available to us all along with a salary dump of Randle to the nets for scraps afterwards.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Enzo The Baker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Minnesota getting weaker this offseason. That's a win for the Spurs next season and our 2030 pick swap looking good.
jsc8116
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So who are they rolling out there with Gobert in the frontcourt?
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jsc8116 said:

So who are they rolling out there with Gobert in the frontcourt?


It's a wild trade, especially after dumping Randle for nothing.

Gobert, McD, Ant, Ayo, Ball? They went from physical and intimidating to this?

They went from Randle and Naz to Kyle Anderson being their best PF
Enzo The Baker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jsc8116 said:

So who are they rolling out there with Gobert in the frontcourt?

Apparently they are high on their other frenchy. But I'd imagine Jaden plays 4. Still their depth is depleted.

Hornets Reddit is furious. I don't get it. Melo isn't a winning player and capped that team. I get the return wasn't great but what am I missing? To me it shows me the hornets FO is serious about winning.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


This move is so hilarious to me. I like Beringer, but he's a center.
Enzo The Baker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Funny enough the wolves traded another 2030 pick swap to the hornets. Ours has priority. So they can only use it if we use the Dallas pick swap in the same year instead.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Enzo The Baker said:

Funny enough the wolves traded another 2030 pick swap to the hornets. Ours has priority. So they can only use it if we use the Dallas pick swap in the same year instead.


It can be reswapped.

Milwaukee did that with the 28 first and Atlanta did it this year.

We had the Hawks swap and the Hawks swapped that with the Cavs in the Deandre Hunter trade so they only moved down to 23.

Milwaukee did it the other way. They swapped with Port for Lillard. Whatever they get back is swapped with Washington for the Khris salary dump. So even if Gianna was traded to Portland for their picks back, they still had to swap to Washington anyways
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hornets are way under the salary cap now. Expect them to trade for a PG.

They have 41M in space under the cap and $75 million under tax

They could just take Ja for nothing
Enzo The Baker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We have a clutch PG that would be perfect.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Assuming Miller and Kon are off the table, how do we improve
LawHall88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Guitarsoup said:

Hornets are way under the salary cap now. Expect them to trade for a PG.

They have 41M in space under the cap and $75 million under tax

They could just take Ja for nothing

Enzo The Baker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Guitarsoup said:

Assuming Miller and Kon are off the table, how do we improve

3 way trade with Boston for Brown. But then the question is what can Boston get out of it.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yeah Boston isn't going to go from trading Brown for Giannis to hornets scraps or Vassell. All three teams want to win now.



And way more than I would have paid him
Backcountry Birds
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Guitarsoup said:

Assuming Miller and Kon are off the table, how do we improve


I think Naz is the obvious answer. Doubt they would do it, but they basically could trade Melo for Fox plus draft picks.

Do they have any bad contracts left that can we take back to make the money work for Naz plus fillers?

Keldon and a pick for Naz would be another option I would do.

I think this wins two of the next 3 championships.

Wemby - Kornet - Reed
Naz - Keldon - Q
Vassell - Champ-Barnes
Harper - Half the MLE, DJG
Castle - Half the MLE, McLovin

Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You still need a guard to replace him. Naz for Fox is a massive downgrade in talent.

He's a good positional fit for our needs, but he's a 13/6 stretch 4 that shot 36% from three last year, and isn't a great defender or rebounder. He's a career 37% shooter from three.

Fox for Naz makes us bigger and worse
superunknown
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Lets just trade Fox to LAC for Kawhi and get it over with.

/s
(Or maybe not /s i dont know anymore. Weird that all these sources saying Kawhi would sign extensions in SA or Toronto)
West Texan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
How does everyone feel about nephew coming back? Apparently us and Toronto are the only places he'd sign any kind of extension. From a purely basketball standpoint, he'd be an amazing fit. But also, **** Kawhi.
Enzo The Baker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
West Texan said:

How does everyone feel about nephew coming back? Apparently us and Toronto are the only places he'd sign any kind of extension. From a purely basketball standpoint, he'd be an amazing fit. But also, **** Kawhi.

I'd do it in a vacuum. But unfortunately uncle Dennis is part of it, so I'd likely pass. Unless Kawhi had a come to Jesus moment.
superunknown
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
West Texan said:

How does everyone feel about nephew coming back? Apparently us and Toronto are the only places he'd sign any kind of extension. From a purely basketball standpoint, he'd be an amazing fit. But also, **** Kawhi.


Tbh I'd do it with the idea of shipping him out like we would Fox in a season or two. Its just a salary slot, really, and he's a good fit on a growing team like Fox is. Expose him in the expansion draft or trade him to the Raptors in a couple years, idc.
West Texan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Enzo The Baker said:

West Texan said:

How does everyone feel about nephew coming back? Apparently us and Toronto are the only places he'd sign any kind of extension. From a purely basketball standpoint, he'd be an amazing fit. But also, **** Kawhi.

I'd do it in a vacuum. But unfortunately uncle Dennis is part of it, so I'd likely pass. Unless Kawhi had a come to Jesus moment.


Perhaps part of the reunion (besides obviously ring chasing) is trying to fix his legacy here in San Antonio. He went from the most beloved player and obvious next in line to inherit the franchise from Timmy to hated. Maybe he wants to change that impression.
superunknown
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
West Texan said:

Enzo The Baker said:

West Texan said:

How does everyone feel about nephew coming back? Apparently us and Toronto are the only places he'd sign any kind of extension. From a purely basketball standpoint, he'd be an amazing fit. But also, **** Kawhi.

I'd do it in a vacuum. But unfortunately uncle Dennis is part of it, so I'd likely pass. Unless Kawhi had a come to Jesus moment.


Perhaps part of the reunion (besides obviously ring chasing) is trying to fix his legacy here in San Antonio. He went from the most beloved player and obvious next in line to inherit the franchise from Timmy to hated. Maybe he wants to change that impression.


Maybe he has a shhtton of trees to plant
Obi Wan Ginobili
How long do you want to ignore this user?
West Texan said:

Enzo The Baker said:

West Texan said:

How does everyone feel about nephew coming back? Apparently us and Toronto are the only places he'd sign any kind of extension. From a purely basketball standpoint, he'd be an amazing fit. But also, **** Kawhi.

I'd do it in a vacuum. But unfortunately uncle Dennis is part of it, so I'd likely pass. Unless Kawhi had a come to Jesus moment.


Perhaps part of the reunion (besides obviously ring chasing) is trying to fix his legacy here in San Antonio. He went from the most beloved player and obvious next in line to inherit the franchise from Timmy to hated. Maybe he wants to change that impression.


Kawhi doesn't give a **** about his SA legacy.

Also, **** Kawhi
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Enzo The Baker said:

West Texan said:

How does everyone feel about nephew coming back? Apparently us and Toronto are the only places he'd sign any kind of extension. From a purely basketball standpoint, he'd be an amazing fit. But also, **** Kawhi.

I'd do it in a vacuum. But unfortunately uncle Dennis is part of it, so I'd likely pass. Unless Kawhi had a come to Jesus moment.

If his contract is voided and he would sign with us for the MLE and publicly admit he was wrong with how he handled everything in SA, absolutely would hold my nose and deal with him at PF. I wouldn't give up assets for him and I still won't like him, just like Chris Paul.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Maliq Brown from San Vecenie's predraft write up. Great pickup.

Analysis
Brown is one of the more interesting prospects in this class because his outcome depends almost purely on finding the right coach, roster fit and scheme to take advantage of his skills. He needs a coach who will let him be ultraaggressive with his hands while living with some of the overaggressiveness. He needs a roster that has a bigger-bodied center next to him who can shoot 3s and rebound on the defensive end.

But if Brown finds that right scheme, he has a chance to be a valuable energy player at the hybrid big position. He passes incredibly well, he's a diligent screener, and he does just about all the little things you want. Scoring is important, and Brown needs to find answers there. But between the havoc creation on defense and the potential as a passer and playmaker on offense, he has a chance to be a rotation player if he can find the right landing spot.
In an ideal world for him, Brown would fall to No. 37, and the Oklahoma City Thunder would unleash him on their opponents. That organization would understand how to get the most out of this kind of player.

Strengths
  • Good enough size for the role he'll play in the NBA. Measured 6 feet 8 without shoes at the combine with a 7-0.75 wingspan and an 8-11 standing reach. As a combo four/five, that should work, given his motor and athleticism.
  • Plays incredibly hard all the time and has athletic twitch and reactivity. Extremely quick for his size. Has elite hands and hand-eye coordination. Knows who he is as a player. Doesn't try to do too much. Makes good decisions and is happy to play the role he's asked to play. Gets out in transition as a good athlete with a good motor and creates opportunities by beating bigs down the court.
  • Causes havoc on the defensive end. As aggressive a defensive player as you will find in the 2026 draft class. Averaged 1.8 steals this season at Duke. His incredible hand-eye coordination and reactivity play up in a significant way on this end of the court. Disrupts everything you want to do. Has unbelievable anticipation for what the offensive player is trying to do before he does it. Makes himself big with his arms and legs outstretched to try to cut off angles. Unbelievably quick with pokes when an offensive player gets loose with the ball. He seems to jump on every potential turnover opportunity.
  • A disruptor with his hands. Tries to crawl underneath ballhandlers, then will poke and try to bother the opposition if it's a big. Even against guards, he's more comfortable than most at trying to invade their space to frustrate them. Gets a lot of pokes from behind on the block or if he gets beaten. The hand-eye coordination is wild for someone this big.
  • Was incredibly aggressive in ball screens. Duke loved to show and recover or trap with him, and he made life miserable because of how quickly he closes space. Can also switch in ball screens and defend in space against guards. Gets his arms up and cuts off angles. Has quick, active feet. Created a panic and indecision in ballhandlers with how quickly he'd be in their space. When he hedged, was always a threat with his hands in recovery for a deflection.
  • Excellent as a help defender in scramble situations and as a rim protector. Because he moves so fluidly and anticipates actions so well, he can fly around the play and disrupt what's happening there, too. Blocked only 0.6 shots per game but at least made himself available.
  • Tremendous passer and playmaker for his teammates. Excellent in short-roll settings after ball screens. Good in high-lows. Does an awesome job finding corner kickouts or lobs on the interior. Gets his eyes up to the perimeter to find open shooters. Also sharp at finding 3-point shooters after offensive rebounds. Averaged just 1.6 assists, but that number undersells his passing ability. Makes quick decisions. Doesn't hold the ball. Keeps his team in rhythm. Puts good velocity on the ball and finds his teammates in position to score.
  • I also liked him in dribble-handoff settings. Excellent at flipping the ball out to his guards and making quick decisions on slips to roll or going out to make contact on a screen. Has a great sense of timing. Understands how to play. Brown's also a sharp screener who gets a body on his man and makes contact. Gets his guards loose from their man. Knows how to flip screens, too. Has quick hips to turn and get a body on the opposition. Makes the effort plays, like sealing his man underneath the rim so that rim protectors can't get across.
  • Crushes the offensive glass. Does a great job attacking and high-pointing the ball for tip-outs and second chances. Averaged 1.9 offensive rebounds in just 20 minutes per game. Crashes well from the perimeter.
  • Keeps things simple as a scorer. That's not going to be a big part of his game in the NBA. However, he at least consistently made himself available as a lob threat on the baseline in the dunker spot and in rolls out of ball screens. Made a ridiculous percentage of his attempts at the rim 76.8 percent of his half-court attempts, per Synergy. Picks his spots well and finishes above the rim regularly. Had 32 dunks in half-court settings, a strong number given his lower offensive usage. Cuts well to the rim on the baseline and sets up lobs.
Areas for improvement
  • Doesn't have a ton of strength for the role he'll be asked to play. Came into the combine at 217 pounds as essentially a big man, and you can feel that on the court with how he plays. Can't anchor to any spot. Can sometimes get pushed around despite his aggressive mindset and demeanor. Occasionally, stronger players can go through his chest, which will happen more often in the NBA.
  • Brown does not bring much to the table on offense. You don't want him dribbling the ball unless it's an interior power dribble to draw a defender. Can take one dribble with time and space on the perimeter into a dribble handoff, but that's it. Didn't seem to be comfortable dribbling in tight quarters. Would love to see a little improvement and comfort with how tightly he can keep the ball to himself. He won't be a shot creator.
  • Even with his efficient finishing, Brown didn't put enough pressure on the rim. Took under two shots at the rim per game in half-court settings, per Synergy. Part of this is that he knows his limitations and doesn't take bad shots. He's vertical, but because he's smaller, he can't always challenge the super giants on the interior, even on lobs. Sometimes can get bumped off his line on rim runs out of ball screens. Finishing through contact when he doesn't get that straight line can be an adventure. Getting stronger would help here, but I'm skeptical he'll ever be an immense rim-pressure player.
  • Can Brown provide a consistent scoring threat to take advantage of his passing and playmaking by opening angles and forcing help even when he gets short-roll situations? One way Brown could do that is by becoming a legitimate shooter from behind the 3-point line, something he worked on a lot in his pre-draft process. He hit five of his 30 attempted 3s this season at Duke, and the shot doesn't look broken. But he has never shot well from the free-throw line, either. He made just 59.6 percent of his free throws at Duke. It's hard to project him as a shooter.
  • He can overpass. Will sometimes give up on good shot attempts at the rim in favor of passes out. Turned the ball over 1.2 times per game, and often it was a result of overthinking a layup attempt at the rim to hit a dump-off or a kickout. Can also get overaggressive on hit-aheads in transition or trying to fit the ball into a tight window from the top of the key. Also can get hit with illegal screen calls in which he gets his legs spread too wide and clips the offensive player.
  • Duke was worse with Brown on the floor offensively. The Blue Devils scored 121.2 points per 100 possessions with him on the court, per Synergy, and 128 with him off the court. However, a big portion of those numbers came from when Cameron Boozer was also off the court, which significantly hindered the offense. Still, Brown has serious limitations he must improve to become more of a threat.
  • Brown gets overly aggressive on defense at times. He can push himself out of position with a blitz that gets too high up the court or an attempted steal that pushes him out of the play. He creates havoc, but that sometimes turns into a lack of discipline. Will close out too aggressively to go for a steal. He might be a scheme-specific player you'd want in a more aggressive defensive situation as opposed to a conservative game plan.
  • Brown averaged 2.7 fouls in just 20 minutes per game. Gets extremely aggressive poking at the ball or trying to swat shots. Can also get slightly out of position and try to make up for it in recovery with athletic plays that put him in fouling positions. Falls for pump fakes. Needs to get more positionally solid and find a middle ground on his aggressiveness.
  • Brown's best offensive position will be center, but he probably can't handle true defensive responsibilities at the five. He's not a great post defender. Duke allowed opponents to shoot 63.7 percent at the rim with Brown and Boozer on the court together versus just 57 percent when Brown was off the court or when Boozer was on the court without Brown. He's not big enough to play traditional drop coverage in a ball-screen situation. Also, he's an average defensive rebounder and cannot consistently hold his own ground against true size and strength. Teams will need to play him next to a spacing big to get the most out of him.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
JaKobe Gillespie:

Analysis
Gillespie is a winner, through and through. From his high school days to his final two years of college, the teams Gillespie has run have almost always exceeded expectations.

That's because he helps his team win the possession battle as a low-turnover, high-steals player who is also a fearless shot-maker. In the second round, you can certainly do worse than someone who knocks down shots, makes good decisions and works hard on defense. He's a lead guard who you can employ to run your G League team for a year and maybe move up to the NBA later in the year if you need depth.

There are size-based limitations, but Gillespie has a chance to stick as a third guard.


Strengths
  • A smaller guard with a well-rounded game. Drove a lot of Tennessee's offense this year and still had the energy to play aggressively on defense. The Vols' offense died without Gillespie on the court; it averaged 122.5 points per 100 possessions with him and 93.6 points per 100 without him, per CBB Analytics.
  • On offense, everything starts with the threat of his jumper. Gillespie took 8.2 3s per game this year. He made just 33.8 percent, but that understates his shooting ability. Over the last three years, Gillespie took 6.4 3s per game and made 37 percent of them. Has a beautiful, compact jumper with repeatable mechanics and range well beyond the NBA 3-point line. Took 236 of his 305 3-point attempts from NBA range this year, per Synergy, making 34.7 of those looks.
  • He's more efficient off the catch than as a pull-up 3-point shooter. He hit 38.7 percent of his catch-and-shoot 3s from NBA range this season and looks comfortable letting it fly. Very quick release. Makes tough shots over tight contests. Can one-two step into them or take them off the hop. Does a nice job relocating around drives to create open shots. Gets a great, high trajectory on the shot.
  • Tight handle. Can get in and out of different moves quickly. Can hesitate and hang dribble into different crossovers and moves. Has good footwork. Doesn't always get where he needs as a driver, but he's a reliable ballhandler, initiates actions and doesn't turn it over. Deals well with ball pressure. Averaged just 2.3 turnovers per game this year.
  • Very comfortable getting into pull-up shots and has mechanics that should allow him to succeed, although he struggled to separate this season, leading to lower percentages. Was much better at Maryland last year, drilling 37.7 percent of his three pull-up 3s per game. Also hit 42.9 percent of his pull-up 3s at Belmont as a sophomore. Makes them going to his right or left. Loves to get into hang-dribble pull-ups. Has a few nice stepback moves to his left. Very dangerous on one-dribble relocations if you close out on him too heavily.
  • Uses the threat of that shot to attack. It felt like a lot of his drives came off hesitations or pump fakes where he'd attack closeouts. Takes more than half his shots from beyond the 3-point line but also uses the threat of that gravity to get into the lane. Has a nice floater game. Has a nice driving jumper where he'll stop on a dime and get into a turnaround pivot Dirk jumper. For a smaller guard, it's notable that he took about three shots per game at the rim, too. Can wiggle his way through tight spaces when he needs to because of that tight handle.
  • Good in ball screens. Not quite the elite ball-screen playmaker you'd want as an NBA lead guard, but he knows his reads and uses them to get into the paint. Plays well at pace. Most of his assists came out of screen situations this year. Averaged 5.4 assists per game. Sharp early passes in transition. Was good at finding Felix Okpara and other Tennessee bigs for lobs. Good with dumpoffs and pocket passes. Can make same-side kickouts when he feels help from wings. Can sometimes make skip passes. He usually makes the right reads and puts the ball on target without trying to hit home runs.
  • Defensively, there are size-based concerns, but he's not a zero. Has excellent hands and plays with a motor. Tries to get underneath opposing players to disrupt their space and always seems to be poking at the ball. Averaged 2.1 steals per game over the last three years of his career. Sharp with little digs from the same side. Has good hand-eye coordination to rip the ball from drivers.
Areas for improvement
  • Undersized for the lead guard position in the NBA. Measured 5 feet 11.75 at the combine. Has a solid 6-4 wingspan, but his 7-11.5 standing reach is an issue.
  • Gillespie is a solid athlete but not an elite one. Gives effort on defense and has lateral flexibility and flexible hips, but his first step doesn't always allow him to separate from defenders. His driving angles out of ball screens can also be wide. He can get into the paint, but he's more of a perimeter player.
  • Gillespie had to take a ton of incredibly difficult shots for Tennessee as its bailout option at the end of shot clocks, as the team ran a methodical offense without many shooters or floor-spacers. Still, he made just 29 percent of his pull-up jumpers this season. When he was called upon to take the tough ones, he didn't separate well. He'll likely be asked to do this often in the NBA, and I buy his pull-up shooting game as a whole. But players with length who can wall him up impacted him on pull-ups in college, and players only get bigger and longer in the NBA.
  • Gillespie's more of a scorer than a true point guard. Dished out 5.4 assists per game this year, but his vision wasn't impressive compared to other NBA lead guards. Makes the right choices and puts the ball on target. Tennessee's offensive structure was hideous and didn't give him a chance to make many advanced reads. But throughout his career, he has always been more of a timely, sharp distributor versus a true visionary passer.
  • He's always going to be deficient size-wise in the NBA. Gillespie is stout with a 181-pound frame, but he's not big or strong enough to deal with bigger wings. They're going to shoot over the top of him too easily in cross-match situations. Even with how hard he plays on that end, he'll be a magnet for switch situations from opposing creators.
  • This could have been a function of his role at Tennessee, but opposing teams could get away from Gillespie behind the 3-point line. It would be unfair to call him a ball-watcher, but he is aggressive at going for digs, and that can lead to his opponents relocating away from him for kickout 3s. Doesn't have the length to get back in those circumstances, which led to guys getting open shots if he didn't get home on the dig or foul-line help. Ground coverage with Gillespie as a non-elite athlete under 6 feet tall could be a significant issue in the NBA.
  • While both Maryland and Tennessee were nine and 14 points better per 100 possessions with Gillespie on the court, those impacts came entirely on offense. Both teams were about 10 points per 100 possessions better without Gillespie on the court defensively, per CBB Analytics. There are some loud 3-point differentials in both those seasons that mean the impact is probably not as aggressive as the stats make it out to be; it's also a reminder that in the NBA, it is very hard to have smaller players out there.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.