*****Official RPI and Seed Watch Thread*****

79,144 Views | 563 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by Detective Jake Peralta
Detective Jake Peralta
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We're almost to the end of April, and discussions about RPI, national seeds, and even the SEC title are heating up for the Ags!

I've always loved the content bobinator and ColleyvilleAg06 bring to the Basketball Board as the stretch run towards March Madness takes place, and I wanted to try to bring something similar to the great folks over here on the Baseball Board.

I'm a huge nerd over this stuff, and try to build a mock bracket every week or so as a hobby. Would love your feedback because, after all, this is a discussion board! If the discussion ends up just being me talking to myself, so be it

***LAST UPDATED: 5/18***

SUMMARY: They did it. Against all odds and without their best pitcher, the Ags dug deep and took 2/3 from a desperate Mississippi State squad to notch their 6th winning weekend in SEC play, and grab third place in the SEC with an 18-11 overall mark. Last week, I said this result would earn us a top 8 seed, and I'm still about 95% confident this will be the case. I have the Ags slotted in as the 8th overall seed, and I think there's a little cushion between 8th and 9th.

The DSR remains strong for A&M (7th), and if softball is any indication of what baseball might do, that will matter a lot. Additionally, A&M's top-end wins dwarf Florida State's, and they have the head to head series win over Florida in Gainesville to give some more evidence over the Gators.

Southern Miss and Nebraska are wild cards, especially with SM's AD on the committee (h/t to Mr. Ackar for that nugget), but USM would need to have a much higher RPI to get the nod as a non-P4 team, and I think Nebraska would need to run through the Big Ten tournament to have a shot.

Also of note, since 2015 the third place SEC team has received a top 8 seed 8/10 times, with 2015 (thanks, Hyman) and 2022 being the exceptions. In both of those years, the SEC overall received just two top 8 seeds - that will not be an issue this year.

Wins in Hoover never hurt, and if the Ags could get a 19th SEC win, especially against someone like Auburn, that would make me 100% confident. Let's just do that and remove any doubt.

Texas A&M Snapshot:
39-13 (18-11, 3rd in SEC)
RPI: 11 (-1 from last week)
ELO: 7 (+1)
KPI: 10 (-1)
DSR: 7 (no change)
PEAR NET: 6 (+1)
SoS: 18 (+8)

Q1: 10-12
Q2: 9-0
Q3: 4-1
Q4: 16-0


Predicting the Field of 64:
Top 8 Seeds (Right to host until Omaha) - Conference auto-bids are noted
1. UCLA (Big Ten)
2. Georgia Tech (ACC)
3. Georgia (SEC)
4. Texas
5. North Carolina
6. Auburn
7. Alabama
8. Texas A&M

I think spots 1-7 on this list are locked up, those resumes are a tier above everyone below them. A&M is almost there, and I think they edge out the next rung down. More high quality series wins than FSU (three better than the 'Nole's best), H2H wins over Florida, tougher schedules and more high quality wins than USM or Nebraska.

Remaining Regional Hosts (9-16)
9. Florida
10. Florida State
11. Southern Miss (Sun Belt)
12. Nebraska
13. Mississippi State
14. West Virginia
15. Oregon State
16. Ole Miss

Seeds 9-13 were pretty straight forward for me. West Virginia is a DSR darling (9th), and that might lead them to be higher than where I have them. The last two spots were tricky, but I think the committee will show some grace to Oregon State given their circumstances, and Ole Miss, to me, trumps Oregon from a resume standpoint. That's probably my SEC bias though.

One Bid League Auto-bids
17. America East (Binghamton)
18. ASUN (North Florida)
19. A10 (Saint Joesph's)
20. Big East (Saint John's)
21. Coastal (Campbell)
22. Horizon (Wright State)
23. Yale (Ivy) - Congrats to the Bulldogs for being the first team to punch their ticket!
24. MAAC (Rider)
25. Missouri Valley (UIC)
26. Mountain West (San Diego State)
27. NEC (Long Island)
28. Ohio Valley (SIUE) *SEMO is RPI 38
29. Patriot (Bucknell)
30. Southland (Lamar)
31. SWAC (Bethune Cookman)
32. Summit (Oral Roberts)
33. WAC (Tarleton State)

Other Auto-bids (Champ is currently in top 55 of RPI, meaning at-large is possible)
34. American (UTSA, 53 RPI) *Bubble at large
35. Big 12 (Kansas, 21 RPI) *At-large lock
36. Big South (High Point, 41) *Bubble at large
37. Big West (UC Santa Barbara, 35) *In as at large today
38. CUSA (Jacksonville State, 28) *At-large lock
39. MAC (Miami (OH), 37) *Bubble at large
40. SoCon (Mercer, 26) *Bubble at large
41. West Coast (Gonzaga, 46) *Bubble at large

That leaves 23 additional at-large spots up for grabs!

2 Seeds (Grouped in pods of four to assign to hosts on a general s-curve)
42. Oregon (17)
(Kansas - 18)
43. Arkansas (19)
44. Wake Forest (20)

45. Coastal Carolina (21)
46. USC (22)
47. Cincinnati (23)
48. Tennessee (24)

(These four most likely to be sent to A&M on the s-curve, Oklahoma not eligible)
49. Oklahoma State (25)
50. Oklahoma (26)
51. UCF (27)
(Jacksonville State - 28)

52. Virginia (29)
53. Boston College (30)
54. Miami (FL) (31)
(UC Santa Barbara - 32)

At large 3 Seeds (The Bubble)
55. Arizona State
56. Missouri State
57. Liberty
58. Kentucky
59. TCU
60. Virginia Tech
61. Texas State
62. Louisiana
63. NC State
64. Michigan

***Bubble Bursts Here***

65.East Carolina
66. South Alabama
67. Kent Staet
68. Purdue
69. UAB
70. Southeast Missouri
71. Troy
72. Cal Baptist
73. Vanderbilt
74. Dallas Baptist
75. La Tech
Detective Jake Peralta
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
For the visual learners:

Seed List:


Potential A&M Path to Omaha (If the season ended today)
Charlie 31
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Thank you for creating this thread!
cs69ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Good info, Nice presentation. No subscription fee!
HeyAbbott
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Good analysis. Thanks
SchizoAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Grouped in pods of four to assign to hosts on a general s-curve


What/how/why...?
Detective Jake Peralta
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That was the short way to explain the new process for the 2-seeds this year. Longer version:

The committee will seed teams 1-32 in order. Teams 17-32 (the 2-seeds in each regional) will be grouped into pods of four (17-20, 21-24, 25-28, 29-32). Those pods of four will be paired up with corresponding pods of four for the one-seeds (I.e. 29-32 with 1-4, 25-28 with 5-8, etc.) on an s-curve. It helps balance out the regionals more so than when they were purely geography based, but they have to leave themselves a little wiggle room to avoid multiple teams from the same conference being in a regional, and (probably) to cherry-pick some interesting matchups.

Clear as mud?
CCAD AG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I really appreciate your information and really only have one observation. With your list of national seeds including 7 SEC teams (4 in 1-8 and 3 more in 9-16), you do not have a single SEC vs SEC matchup at a super regional, potentially allowing all 7 teams to make it to Omaha. I don't see any way that the committee will allow that. They have the opportunity to eliminate 3 SEC teams just by slating 1-16, which gives other conferences a better chance to keep some representation at Omaha.

I certainly don't question your lists based on results, talent, performance, etc, I just question the committee leaving the possibility of so many SEC teams making it to the CWS (I refuse to use MCWS) and cutting out regional interest from other fans in other areas. Unfortunate, but history shows that we won't see SEC vs SEC supers minimized.
Detective Jake Peralta
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That's a great point. You're absolutely right that there's no way the committee would avoid SEC vs SEC super regionals if this is how it shakes out.

Right now though, it's hard to arrange the deck chairs that way. I'm sure they'll miraculously figure out how to avoid an SEC-dominated CWS.
cs69ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wonder if D1 still has our AGS as the no.5 national seed this week?
I am not a subscriber.
RED AG 98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No sub required for their weekly field update. And yes we are still at 5.

https://d1baseball.com/stories/2026-ncaa-field-of-64-projections-april-28/

RED AG 98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
And if you really want to nerd out on this with folks that have been doing so for a long time and have really good insight into the behind the scenes stuff, I highly recommend the NerdCast. It's among my absolute favorite content during this part of the season.

Detective Jake Peralta
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
D1 Nerd Cast is the best.

I try to beat their release each week so I can't cheat...

**Spoiler alert if you want to watch the D1 Video**

This week we ended up with the exact same top 8 and 9-16 (just in a slightly different order), 14/16 on the 2/3-seed line, and just two different at-large decisions. I had Michigan and Kentucky in, the D1 guys swapped them for Texas State and Vanderbilt (my first two teams out).

I love what those guys do!
TempleAg97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I've been addicted to RPI and projections for as long as they've existed so live seeing this thread! Thank you OP!
RED AG 98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Awesome. BTW I love your post. I meant no disrespect to you or your OP with my comment and love that you're here doing this. The Nerdcast comment was more that those guys have 1) incredible connections and 2) volumes of historical spreadsheets because they've been at it a very long time.
Detective Jake Peralta
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
None taken at all. They are what inspired me to try it for myself a few years back. Like I said, love what they do and how they do it!
jsc8116
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
How many wins do we need to be a top 16 ? I live out of state and might want to come down for the 1st round shouod we be hosting.
Detective Jake Peralta
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Three more conference wins, in theory. But I don't want to find out what it looks like if we get there by going 1-2 in our last three series.
RED AG 98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This! Unfortunately it looks like the like OG RPI Needs Report isn't updated. I do find myself going to Nolan more and more so this is my first time looking there this year, but nothing I've seen on Nolan is a direct replacement.

Nolan has us finishing at 18-11 (2-1 v Auburn, 0-3 v Clanga, and 2-1 v Ole Miss). Even with that he has us finishing at RPI 15 which just seems bonkers to me.

Here's my take:

Top 8 - avoid SEC sweeps. Win 2 series

Top 16 - 3 wins is maybe pushing it. I think we're bubble in that case. 4 wins and I think we're comfortably in.
Detective Jake Peralta
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yeah I'm right there with you. Three wins...I still think we're in but we're 15 or 16 and hoping no one gets hot in their conference tournament.

The hosting bubble is SOFT right now though. No one in the 16-24ish range is really playing like they want to host.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So would we be paired with the sips for the super regional?
I don’t get enough credit for the things I manage not to say.
1626
How long do you want to ignore this user?
1st round of CWS.
91AggieLawyer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
For those that want to talk about true "locks" (i.e., lose out and still get whatever -- top 8, national, in, etc.), we probably need to wait until at least this weekend is done. Right now, I think UCLA is truly the only team that is a lock for a Top 8 while UNC, GT, and A&M are locks for a national seed as long as they don't lose their mid-week games. t.u. still has a series with Mizzou (i.e. 3 bad losses), so I can't quite put them in that category. UGa has both Mizzou and LSU (not as bad).

Everyone else would play themselves out due to who they've got on the schedule and potential threats from other teams. Again, that's for now. Sunday we'll know more.

Now, for those analyze predicted/expected results, 4 of the top 8 are all but set: UCLA, GT, UNC, and Georgia. I'm not saying these will be the top 4, but I can't see how any will be lower than 8. Likewise, I think us, Auburn, t.u., MissSt, and OrState are going to be national seeds somewhere. Maybe top 8; maybe not.

Auburn is actually set up as well as anyone for a top 8 as long as they don't get swept twice. They have good opponents left and 2 decent mid-week games. If Auburn wins 8 of their remaining games, I see them as a top 4 regardless of what they do in the tournament. 5 wins still puts them in the top 8.
SchizoAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
91AggieLawyer said:

UNC, GT, and A&M are locks for a national seed as long as they don't lose their mid-week games.

You actually think if we go 0-9 in our remaining conference games that we'll get a national seed?

Or do you just have a different meaning of "lock" than usual?

I actually think in that scenario there's a chance we are sitting out the NCAA tournament altogether. "They just didn't pass the eye test, going into the postseason on a 9-game conference losing streak."
GarryowenAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I was looking at WarrenNolan's prediction (yes I know…) and they have us dropping to around 13 or so with 2-1 series win over Auburn, 2-1 series win against OM, and 1-2 series loss to State. Doesn't seem that bad until you see that Prairie View's RPI is something like 301. Just by playing that game, we're going to drop a good number of points. We really need to quit having them on our schedule, or schedule that as an away game.
threeanout
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GarryowenAg said:

I was looking at WarrenNolan's prediction (yes I know…) and they have us dropping to around 13 or so with 2-1 series win over Auburn, 2-1 series win against OM, and 1-2 series loss to State. Doesn't seem that bad until you see that Prairie View's RPI is something like 301. Just by playing that game, we're going to drop a good number of points. We really need to quit having them on our schedule, or schedule that as an away game.

Yea, I think at a minimum we lose 75 RPI points for playing that game. If we played today, we would drop from #4 to #8.
Adam87inSA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Really incredible how far Natty champ LSU has fallen
McInnis
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They're 4 games above.500, where the Aggies finished last year. Probably a good thing for Jones he won it all last year.
Mr.Ackar07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
threeanout said:

GarryowenAg said:

I was looking at WarrenNolan's prediction (yes I know…) and they have us dropping to around 13 or so with 2-1 series win over Auburn, 2-1 series win against OM, and 1-2 series loss to State. Doesn't seem that bad until you see that Prairie View's RPI is something like 301. Just by playing that game, we're going to drop a good number of points. We really need to quit having them on our schedule, or schedule that as an away game.

Yea, I think at a minimum we lose 75 RPI points for playing that game. If we played today, we would drop from #4 to #8.

Today there are were games between #22 Virginia vs #302 Norfolk State, #27 West Virginia vs #203 Penn State, and #7 North Carolina vs #236 Queens.

Virginia and West Virginia have already canceled their games today (weather related).

North Carolina will lose 24 RPI points today with a win.
Detective Jake Peralta
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ags are up to 4 in the RPI, 3 in the DSR, and held steady at 6 in the KPI after a hard-fought win over Tarleton.

Consider me someone who would like to see the Texans somewhere other than Olsen for a regional, that team will give whatever host draws them all kinds of fits.

Also, as others have mentioned, next week's game against Prairie View is the ultimate lose-lose situation. Currently a 10% chance of rain for next Tuesday, maybe we could leave the sprinklers on Monday night?
TheBonifaceOption
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Detective Jake Peralta said:

Ags are up to 4 in the RPI, 3 in the DSR, and held steady at 6 in the KPI after a hard-fought win over Tarleton.

Consider me someone who would like to see the Texans somewhere other than Olsen for a regional, that team will give whatever host draws them all kinds of fits.

Also, as others have mentioned, next week's game against Prairie View is the ultimate lose-lose situation. Currently a 10% chance of rain for next Tuesday, maybe we could leave the sprinklers on Monday night?

Maybe.

Do you think Tarleton has the arms to go 3-0 or 3-1? I dont know if they could pull themselves out of the losers bracket in a regional.
Detective Jake Peralta
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They probably don't have the arms to win a regional, but they could either beat you or force you to use high leverage arms on Friday. Either way, they throw off the plan and make it a lot more difficult than a typical four.
swc93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I kept scrolling and looking for LSU. I even thought maybe OP put Louisiana State or something.
TheBonifaceOption
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Detective Jake Peralta said:

They probably don't have the arms to win a regional, but they could either beat you or force you to use high leverage arms on Friday. Either way, they throw off the plan and make it a lot more difficult than a typical four.

If we got a 1 seed, I am perfectly happy with Sdao in game 1 vs the 4 seed. Sims gives us the 2/3 match-up with the "harder" opponent.

This avoids the common dilemma teams have to withhold their best starter for the 2nd game, breaking rotation.
jsc8116
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Does the board really think we play that game? Can folks in athletic department legit cancel or are we bound to play the game without a valid excuse(other than RPI drop)?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.