Entertainment
Sponsored by

Accidental shooting on movie set

45,850 Views | 505 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by Decay
Buck Compton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jokershady said:

If you look close at that picture it does look like the gun was just fired as the picture was taken so that may not have been the actual way they were standing prior.

Not defending her experience just saying this might be the equivalent of a random "O" face in a picture where the person was just have a normal conversation
You're right that it isn't ready to fire.

My guess is it's either a staged photo or a decent time after firing, because the hammer is down, but it wasn't the instant it was fired. No smoke, no recoil reaction, etc. Either way, it'd be more than time to correct it the form…
jeffk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I don't think this admission really helps her case.

powerbelly
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Her statement is much better than the headline.


Quote:

Ultimately this set would never have been compromised if live ammo were not introduced. Hannah has no idea where the live rounds came from. Hannah and the prop master gained control over the guns and she never witnessed anyone shoot live rounds with these guns and nor would she permit that. They were locked up every night and at lunch and there's no way a single one of them was unaccounted for or being shot by crew members. Hannah still, to this day, has never had an accidental discharge. The first one on this set was the prop master and the second was a stunt man after Hannah informed him his gun was hot with blanks.

Hannah was hired on two positions on this film, which made it extremely difficult to focus on her job as an armorer. She fought for training, days to maintain weapons, and proper time to prepare for gunfire but ultimately was overruled by production and her department. The whole production set became unsafe due to various factors, including lack of safety meetings. This was not the fault of Hannah.


oragator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The circular recriminations are going to be fascinating. But it does seem to be settling on "generally unsafe workspace, this was a symptom, not a cause". Which is bad news for the producers.
jackie childs
How long do you want to ignore this user?
powerbelly said:

Her statement is much better than the headline.


Quote:

Ultimately this set would never have been compromised if live ammo were not introduced. Hannah has no idea where the live rounds came from. Hannah and the prop master gained control over the guns and she never witnessed anyone shoot live rounds with these guns and nor would she permit that. They were locked up every night and at lunch and there's no way a single one of them was unaccounted for or being shot by crew members. Hannah still, to this day, has never had an accidental discharge. The first one on this set was the prop master and the second was a stunt man after Hannah informed him his gun was hot with blanks.

Hannah was hired on two positions on this film, which made it extremely difficult to focus on her job as an armorer. She fought for training, days to maintain weapons, and proper time to prepare for gunfire but ultimately was overruled by production and her department. The whole production set became unsafe due to various factors, including lack of safety meetings. This was not the fault of Hannah.



jeffk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yeah, I read that, but saying she has no idea where the lethal ammo came from isn't a great excuse when she's basically the only one responsible for knowing what ammo gets loaded into the weapons. If I'm misreading that, feel free to correct me.
powerbelly
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jeffk said:

Yeah, I read that, but saying she has no idea where the lethal ammo came from isn't a great excuse when she's basically the only one responsible for knowing what ammo gets loaded into the weapons. If I'm misreading that, feel free to correct me.
I think the phrasing is poor, but she is basically saying that she didn't bring the live ammo and wasn't aware anyone else had live ammo.

Basically someone, not her, acted outside of established safety procedures.
DannyDuberstein
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Let the finger pointing commence. Gonna get expensive because this basically falls in line with every other story where the set seemed like a safety clusterF
Sea Speed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Her dumbass shouldn't have spoken to the press or anyone else for that matter in the first place. Needed to go Laundries parents and not talk to anyone and direct everything to your lawyer.
powerbelly
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sea Speed said:

Her dumbass shouldn't have spoken to the press or anyone else for that matter in the first place. Needed to go Laundries parents and not talk to anyone and direct everything to your lawyer.
Someone didn't read the article. It was a statement put out through her lawyer.
DannyDuberstein
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This scenario is different though. She's the armorer and the one seen as responsible. Going on the offensive to place blame on others - particularly superiors - is her only move, and they have to talk to do that. Keep your mouth shut and it all lands on you.
Another Doug
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DannyDuberstein said:

This scenario is different though. She's the armorer and the one seen as responsible. Going on the offensive to place blame on others - particularly superiors - is her only move, and they have to talk to do that. Keep your mouth shut and it all lands on you.


Better to just say nothing. When the civil suits start they will be going after the deepest pockets. If she is somehow facing a criminal charge, talking about it can't help her in any way.
Sea Speed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
powerbelly said:

Sea Speed said:

Her dumbass shouldn't have spoken to the press or anyone else for that matter in the first place. Needed to go Laundries parents and not talk to anyone and direct everything to your lawyer.
Someone didn't read the article. It was a statement put out through her lawyer.
ha fair enough. i read a couple excerpts and it sounded like direct quotes from an airheaded 20 something. my B.
LawHall88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sea Speed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Boo ****ing hoo alec
nai06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sea Speed said:

Boo ****ing hoo alec


I don't think leaving him alone when he's with his kids is an unreasonable request. His kids have had no control over being in that sort of environment
powerbelly
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nai06 said:

Sea Speed said:

Boo ****ing hoo alec


I don't think leaving him alone when he's with his kids is an unreasonable request. His kids have had no control over being in that sort of environment


He has control. He can keep his kids completely out lf this. He is using them as a shield. We know how he treats his kids.
90 bull
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sure. Now do the same thing for Sarah Pain.
nai06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Same thing applies. Families should be off limits and left alone. At a certain point he's going to have to be with his kids. I don't know, I think the entire culture around paparazzi is weird and borderline disgusting.
powerbelly
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nai06 said:

Same thing applies. Families should be off limits and left alone. At a certain point he's going to have to be with his kids. I don't know, I think the entire culture around paparazzi is weird and borderline disgusting.


There is no borderline about it.
Sea Speed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I dont buy that his kids are sitting in the car crying, personally. As a parent there's no way I'm getting out if my car to talk to people if they are crying, and certainly not both parents. And if they WERE, id probably lead with that and not use it as the excuse to duck out of the encounter that he admittedly initiated.

Agree about paparazzi, but quite honestly if we are just going off the tmz video, there isn't enough context to make too many judgments either way, except that his wife is obnoxious.
PatAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
THe only certainty in this equation, is that paparazzi are the scum of the Earth
Decay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Baldwin and the paparazzi deserve each other
Mulberrywildman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's so weird that some guy that punched someone over a parking spot could end up in a spot like this...
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's also certain that Baldwin is a jackass as well
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The armorer's lawyers were on GMA this morning and seem to be suggesting that someone else on set snuck a live round into a box marked for dummy in an attempt to either sabotage the set or the Armorer herself.

They said she did leave the gun in question unattended for a period of about an hour and a half and when the reporter asked if she was in charge of keeping chain of custody on the firearm, they admitted that basically she was, however, she was doing two jobs - armorer and also prop specialist or something, so she was doing two roles.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER!
Sea Speed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Boo hoo. I wear several hats at work and I am certain that a load of people here do as well. And yes, if I mess up people can die. No sympathy.
jeffk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If they have proof that someone snuck the live rounds in there, that's pretty interesting. Otherwise they're just making a play for reasonable doubt.
StinkyPinky
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jeffk said:

If they have proof that someone snuck the live rounds in there, that's pretty interesting. Otherwise they're just making a play for reasonable doubt.


I'm not one for conspiracy theories, but this definitely crossed my mind. Hard to imagine how else it would have gotten there. Question is will they ever know for certain.
Another Doug
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Lawyer just being a lawyer. Never underestimate basic human incompetence.
double aught
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bonzer103 said:

jeffk said:

If they have proof that someone snuck the live rounds in there, that's pretty interesting. Otherwise they're just making a play for reasonable doubt.


I'm not one for conspiracy theories, but this definitely crossed my mind. Hard to imagine how else it would have gotten there. Question is will they ever know for certain.
Doesn't seem hard to me. There's stories that these people were being pretty careless and cavalier on set, shooting live rounds. Going from that to getting rounds mixed up isn't a big leap.
oragator
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Bold strategy Cotton….

Alec Baldwin says he did not pull trigger before bullet struck, killed cinematographer

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/12/01/alec-baldwin-says-he-did-not-pull-trigger-before-bullet-killed-cinematographer.html?__source=iosappshare%7Ccom.apple.UIKit.activity.CopyToPasteboard
wangus12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
oragator said:



Bold strategy Cotton….

Alec Baldwin says he did not pull trigger before bullet struck, killed cinematographer

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/12/01/alec-baldwin-says-he-did-not-pull-trigger-before-bullet-killed-cinematographer.html?__source=iosappshare%7Ccom.apple.UIKit.activity.CopyToPasteboard
So we going magic bullet a la JFK huh
Tabasco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://epsteinsblackbook.com/names/alec-baldwin
jackie childs
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oragator said:

Bold strategy Cotton….

Alec Baldwin says he did not pull trigger before bullet struck, killed cinematographer

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/12/01/alec-baldwin-says-he-did-not-pull-trigger-before-bullet-killed-cinematographer.html?__source=iosappshare%7Ccom.apple.UIKit.activity.CopyToPasteboard
somebody far more knowledge about guns than me can weigh in on how possible/plausible that explanation is.

in any event, i'm sure the theory will be tested thoroughly.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.