Signalgate 2.0

19,543 Views | 251 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by flown-the-coop
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Im Gipper said:

Did you read the article? The source is Ullyot. He says he was not fired. He's very Pro-Trump.
The Pentagon said he was fired. Oops, sorry..."The Pentagon says he was asked to resign."

Who is lying?
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Who at Pentagon said that specifically? All I see are "sources"?

I'm Gipper
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You are really stretching to think he's trying to hurt Trump.

Did you even read the article?

I'm Gipper
Dan Scott
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wasn't it reported the wife was involved already when the first story came out?
Fdsa
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is a lot of unnecessary drama for a relatively quiet month operationally speaking. Classification issues aside, I don't see why he thinks it's necessary to update his friends and family on military strikes. He sounds like a young officer excited to update his chain of command about an operational event with his unit.
Jeeper79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Im Gipper said:

Ullyot likes Trump. He's not saying anything bad about Trump.
But that's doesn't fit the message
Sq 17
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dmart90 said:

IF this is true, Pete is a f****** moron.


True or not I have seen enough of Hegseth's act to be of the opinion he is a F****** moron
esteban
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pentagon seems to confirm that this was leaked by someone recently fired.

Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If there was no classified information, what are y'all sniveling about?

This is a story from a fired employee who's pissed off. It happened over a month ago.
Average Joe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pinochet said:

D`Funkaladu` said:

Kenneth_2003 said:

It's a FREE app! Heck I used it for a project we did on the border a few years back. You can download it in the app store.

While the DHS guess and the "former" (I know) Marine that worked for us swore by it... I have real doubts


Signal itself is fine. It's secure until you include someone that isn't trustworthy in the chat.

Once again the olds on F16 are proving they don't understand technology. They want to find a boogie man so they'll blame whoever they can without any idea if it even could be true. Signal is E2E encrypted and the keys are not stored anywhere except on your device. The Signal Foundation (yes, it's a nonprofit) can't just read all your chats. That's the point.
Except y'all don't know what you're talking about in the least bit. Encryption is just one small piece. There are several other controls that communications apps are supposed to follow to be approved and authorized for use in the DoD, and Signal doesn't meet most of them.

There are logging controls, there are controls like DLP to prevent the exfiltration of sensitive data, there are data classification controls, there are administration controls to allow only authorized users in chats so that chats with the wrong people are not created, and several more. All of these are required by federal law.

It's not even remotely good enough to say it has end to end encryption. Hell, the devices themselves have numerous controls they have to follow in order to use an app that is being used to transmit sensitive data. Does his wife, brother and the media have devices that are managed and monitored by the DoD?

This is a security cluster****.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Im Gipper said:

Who at Pentagon said that specifically? All I see are "sources"?
And all I see for these accusations are "sources".

So, who is full of *****

ETA: From above - Sean Parnell.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Im Gipper said:

You are really stretching to think he's trying to hurt Trump.

Did you even read the article?
Yes.
Artimus Gordon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Looks like Mrs Hegseth can keep quiet about things better than Leftover old fart democrats on the chopping block thanks to Doge and getting rid of DEI. Democrats never miss a chance to find something to menustrate about. Depends people.
Marge Inovera
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag with kids said:

Im Gipper said:


People who got fired don't like getting fired and it also pays well to **** on Trump.

That could also be the situation here.
It is absolutely this. There is no other explanation.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Anna Molly said:

Ag with kids said:

Im Gipper said:


People who got fired don't like getting fired and it also pays well to **** on Trump.

That could also be the situation here.
It is absolutely this. There is no other explanation.
Of course there could be.

I was just providing alternative explanations...

Because we all know the the media will lie like a mother****er...
AggieVictor10
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's interesting to see how the believability of sources changes, based on who is in office.

murphyag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Im Gipper said:

You are really stretching to think he's trying to hurt Trump.

Did you even read the article?
A person can like Trump and think Hegseth is an idiot who needs to be shown the door.
fullback44
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So someone gets fired, then goes to the media (aka Fake news media) and makes up a story and the fake media runs with it . Pete must be over the target with his firings - only diff this round is Trump doesn't really care, he's for cleaning out the refrigerator this time
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Old McDonald said:

this is what happens when you malign competence and experience as "swamp" and substitute it for sycophants and brown nosers
this is what happens when you malign the incompetent swamp and the duplicitous intel weanies take offense and create disinformation

FIFY
ts5641
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Im Gipper said:


I call BS. The chaos is the lefties screaming they can no longer do lefty things.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's pretty sad how attached the lefties are to running the pentagon. And it's not like DOGE has really cut anything there, they just put out a forecast/request for a trillion dollar budget.

That said, Hegseth needs to be smart, and just delete the signal app on his phone, imho. Have a personal device, and don't talk shop on it. This ain't rocket science.
mslags97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Old McDonald said:

this is what happens when you malign competence and experience as "swamp" and substitute it for sycophants and brown nosers


Is this supposed to be sarcasm? Because anyone trying to say there was any semblance of competence with the Biden/harris catastrophe of an administration needs to be admitted to a mental hospital.
agpetz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There is an effort by pissed off fired staff, the media and the left to get Hegseth fired. Hegseth is an idiot. Both can be true.
Pumpkinhead
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Previous admin being incompetent doesn't mean incompetence should ever be tolerated. That is no excuse. The standard should always be competence.

And yes the media (on both sides) which is polarized should always be taken with a grain of salt. It is unfortunate but nowadays whether you are watching something like CNN or Fox News you are only getting a heavily biased picture of 'news'.

If there is no truth to Hegseth engaging in any behaviors that would get anyone else working at the Pentagon fired, then fine. Just political mud slinging noise and move on.

On the other hand If there is truth to it, and it legitimately begins to affect his ability to lead (I.e, is a real concern to other important people at the Pentagon), then I suspect that would eventually bring him down. Political appointee or not.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'd already forgotten about the fallacious (but inevitable) Russian bogeyman the MSM ran with in the 1st signal-gate.

Waiting to hear that Hegseth's wife or something had a friend in Moscow this time.
Old McDonald
How long do you want to ignore this user?
mslags97 said:

Old McDonald said:

this is what happens when you malign competence and experience as "swamp" and substitute it for sycophants and brown nosers


Is this supposed to be sarcasm? Because anyone trying to say there was any semblance of competence with the Biden/harris catastrophe of an administration needs to be admitted to a mental hospital.

it has nothing to do with biden, but whataboutism noted. there were any number of competent conservatives with pentagon leadership experience trump could have selected for this role and instead he chose a brown-nosing fox host.
2000AgPhD
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Can anyone confirm that the Pentagon has dumped Signal, or are they still using it? This story is five weeks old. Funny how it didn't come out until somebody got shown the door.
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Old McDonald said:

mslags97 said:

Old McDonald said:

this is what happens when you malign competence and experience as "swamp" and substitute it for sycophants and brown nosers


Is this supposed to be sarcasm? Because anyone trying to say there was any semblance of competence with the Biden/harris catastrophe of an administration needs to be admitted to a mental hospital.

it has nothing to do with biden, but whataboutism noted. there were any number of competent conservatives with pentagon experience trump could have selected for this role and instead he chose a brown-nosing fox host.

Let me explain. A person who voted for Biden, and then for Harris, doesn't have the first clue about competence. If I think a **** sandwich tastes good, I shouldn't be judging a chili cooking contest. Don't you agree that a person like that is not qualified to make an accurate assessment!? It's not whataboutism to point that out.
lcraggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Old McDonald said:

mslags97 said:

Old McDonald said:

this is what happens when you malign competence and experience as "swamp" and substitute it for sycophants and brown nosers


Is this supposed to be sarcasm? Because anyone trying to say there was any semblance of competence with the Biden/harris catastrophe of an administration needs to be admitted to a mental hospital.

it has nothing to do with biden, but whataboutism noted. there were any number of competent conservatives with pentagon experience trump could have selected for this role and instead he chose a brown-nosing fox host.
You sound bitter in your characterization of Hegseth. He is a Princeton graduate, earned two bronze stars, and he is cutting millions of dollars in waste. He is being targeted from the military industrial complex. Can you provide two names of people you believe would be better suited for the position?

Were you upset about President Kennedy having Robert McNamara as SECDEF at 44 years old? It has been six months yet and he has done more to get the service branches recruiting numbers up than the previous administration. What is his exact leadership challenge you see with Hegseth?
Rangers Lead the Way, NSDQ


4stringAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AggieVictor10 said:

It's interesting to see how the believability of sources changes, based on who is in office.


Why shouldn't it? A large swath of the media has proven it can't be trusted to report accurately on anything related to Trump and when a Democrat is in office, they sugarcoat/omit/lie to cover up for them.
HowdyTexasAggies
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You have been banned before for trolling....you are 100% FOS.

"It gets really hard to show this guy any support when actions like this keep happening."

You never showed him any support, so full of crap.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Old McDonald said:

mslags97 said:

Old McDonald said:

this is what happens when you malign competence and experience as "swamp" and substitute it for sycophants and brown nosers


Is this supposed to be sarcasm? Because anyone trying to say there was any semblance of competence with the Biden/harris catastrophe of an administration needs to be admitted to a mental hospital.

it has nothing to do with biden, but whataboutism noted. there were any number of competent conservatives with pentagon leadership experience trump could have selected for this role and instead he chose a brown-nosing fox host.
Hegseth does not strike me as a brown noser. But we know the Pentagon is full of duplicitous Blue Falcons.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
lcraggie said:

Old McDonald said:

mslags97 said:

Old McDonald said:

this is what happens when you malign competence and experience as "swamp" and substitute it for sycophants and brown nosers


Is this supposed to be sarcasm? Because anyone trying to say there was any semblance of competence with the Biden/harris catastrophe of an administration needs to be admitted to a mental hospital.

it has nothing to do with biden, but whataboutism noted. there were any number of competent conservatives with pentagon experience trump could have selected for this role and instead he chose a brown-nosing fox host.
You sound bitter in your characterization of Hegseth. He is a Princeton graduate, earned two bronze stars, and he is cutting millions of dollars in waste. He is being targeted from the military industrial complex. Can you provide two names of people you believe would be better suited for the position?

Were you upset about President Kennedy having Robert McNamara as SECDEF at 44 years old? It has been six months yet and he has done more to get the service branches recruiting numbers up than the previous administration. What is his exact leadership challenge you see with Hegseth?

Hint: the woke in the military are very angry.
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They're so desperate to "get somebody".
Sad.
Burpelson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If true dude is back on the sauce, seriously this dude has something wrong between the ears.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.