Why are we kvetching about something that supposedly happened over a month ago and did not involve classified information?pagerman @ work said:
How about "if this is true, Hegseth is not very bright and needs to go."?
So you are saying this did in fact happen?Ellis Wyatt said:Why are we kvetching about something that supposedly happened over a month ago and did not involve classified information?pagerman @ work said:
How about "if this is true, Hegseth is not very bright and needs to go."?
Yes, IF this is true, fire his ass. But you and the 19 that starred this post so desperately want this to be true for political reasons based on posting history.Pumpkinhead said:
That article says Hegseth brought his WIFE to the PENTAGON and she sat in two meetings there with UK and NATO military officials where work-related conversations were conducted.
That incident alone right there should be easy enough for any investigation to verify and if verified then I'd fire him. That would be amateurish behavior that presumably nobody else in the Pentagon would be allowed to get away with without getting fired. even putting all the 'SignalGate'' stuff aside. Why you'd ever bring your WIFE to the PENTAGON much less sit in on any meeting would be incomprehensible. WTF incomprehensible.
I am pretty sure that they have already admitted that this is true.ttu_85 said:Yes, IF this is true, fire his ass. But you and the 19 that starred this post so desperately want this to be true for political reasons based on posting history.Pumpkinhead said:
That article says Hegseth brought his WIFE to the PENTAGON and she sat in two meetings there with UK and NATO military officials where work-related conversations were conducted.
That incident alone right there should be easy enough for any investigation to verify and if verified then I'd fire him. That would be amateurish behavior that presumably nobody else in the Pentagon would be allowed to get away with without getting fired. even putting all the 'SignalGate'' stuff aside. Why you'd ever bring your WIFE to the PENTAGON much less sit in on any meeting would be incomprehensible. WTF incomprehensible.
However the following cast serious doubt on this leftest wet dream:
"Anonymous Sources",
missing links,
The leftest propensity for witch hunts with minimal or no supporting evidence,
and last of all "The New York Times" as a source which has long been a farce to millions in this country.
The NYT has not been a reputable source for 20 years+
Imagine how much better things would be if we had a media most people trusted. That disappeared decades ago.
Charpie said:I am pretty sure that they have already admitted that this is true.ttu_85 said:Yes, IF this is true, fire his ass. But you and the 19 that starred this post so desperately want this to be true for political reasons based on posting history.Pumpkinhead said:
That article says Hegseth brought his WIFE to the PENTAGON and she sat in two meetings there with UK and NATO military officials where work-related conversations were conducted.
That incident alone right there should be easy enough for any investigation to verify and if verified then I'd fire him. That would be amateurish behavior that presumably nobody else in the Pentagon would be allowed to get away with without getting fired. even putting all the 'SignalGate'' stuff aside. Why you'd ever bring your WIFE to the PENTAGON much less sit in on any meeting would be incomprehensible. WTF incomprehensible.
However the following cast serious doubt on this leftest wet dream:
"Anonymous Sources",
missing links,
The leftest propensity for witch hunts with minimal or no supporting evidence,
and last of all "The New York Times" as a source which has long been a farce to millions in this country.
The NYT has not been a reputable source for 20 years+
Imagine how much better things would be if we had a media most people trusted. That disappeared decades ago.
I guess I don't understand this. The husband and I rarely talk about work via text. I mean, we are married. We talk about it in person. Why would he need to text his wife and brother and attorney anything related to missions. Seems weird.
You guys are so broken its actually hilarious. You're losing so bad that you are now having to try to resusitate someone's drinking to make a half point of moral outrage.Burpelson said:
If true dude is back on the sauce, seriously this dude has something wrong between the ears.
They're polling in the low 20's, of course they're pissed lol. They've latched onto "chaos" and have been workshoping it with their focus groups and hoping one of these hit pieces will finally land.bobbranco said:
The left is truly angry. LOL.
He is?Old McDonald said:
if anything it's almost a blessing he happened to **** up by sharing these details to a journalist so we'd know about it. for all we know hegseth would have spent the entire term blabbing irresponsibly like this if he wasn't caught.
he's obviously unqualified
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
— Sean Parnell (@SeanParnellATSD) April 21, 2025
4/20/25
STATEMENT:
Another day, another old story—back from the dead. The Trump-hating media continues to be obsessed with destroying anyone committed to President Trump’s agenda. This time, the New York Times — and all other Fake News that repeat their…
sounds like OMD's boy Vindman.Ellis Wyatt said:He is?Old McDonald said:
if anything it's almost a blessing he happened to **** up by sharing these details to a journalist so we'd know about it. for all we know hegseth would have spent the entire term blabbing irresponsibly like this if he wasn't caught.
he's obviously unqualified
Of course!!!! It's his WIFE!!!Pumpkinhead said:
That article says Hegseth brought his WIFE to the PENTAGON and she sat in two meetings there with UK and NATO military officials where work-related conversations were conducted.
That incident alone right there should be easy enough for any investigation to verify and if verified then I'd fire him. That would be amateurish behavior that presumably nobody else in the Pentagon would be allowed to get away with without getting fired. even putting all the 'SignalGate'' stuff aside. Why you'd ever bring your WIFE to the PENTAGON much less sit in on any meeting would be incomprehensible. WTF incomprehensible.
BadMoonRisin said:sounds like OMD's boy Vindman.Ellis Wyatt said:He is?Old McDonald said:
if anything it's almost a blessing he happened to **** up by sharing these details to a journalist so we'd know about it. for all we know hegseth would have spent the entire term blabbing irresponsibly like this if he wasn't caught.
he's obviously unqualified

BadMoonRisin said:sounds like OMD's boy Vindman.Ellis Wyatt said:He is?Old McDonald said:
if anything it's almost a blessing he happened to **** up by sharing these details to a journalist so we'd know about it. for all we know hegseth would have spent the entire term blabbing irresponsibly like this if he wasn't caught.
he's obviously unqualified
Actually it has everything to do with Biden. If you make a generalized statement about competence and experience following your deafening silence during the experience and INcompetence of the prior administration, it most certainly should be noted the absolute hypocricy with which you make said generalized statement.Old McDonald said:it has nothing to do with biden, but whataboutism noted. there were any number of competent conservatives with pentagon leadership experience trump could have selected for this role and instead he chose a brown-nosing fox host.mslags97 said:Old McDonald said:
this is what happens when you malign competence and experience as "swamp" and substitute it for sycophants and brown nosers
Is this supposed to be sarcasm? Because anyone trying to say there was any semblance of competence with the Biden/harris catastrophe of an administration needs to be admitted to a mental hospital.
Old McDonald said:
if anything it's almost a blessing he happened to **** up by sharing these details to a journalist so we'd know about it. for all we know hegseth would have spent the entire term blabbing irresponsibly like this if he wasn't caught.
he's obviously unqualified and should step down or be fired but because the trump administration has a terminal case of adolescent oppositional defiant disorder, they'll let him get away with anything rather than admit a mistake. the incompetence is the point.
He would have been impeached AGAIN if he had done anything to Vindman. As you well know. Eric Ciamarella's name could not even be publicly mentioned, even though he was the fake whisteblower who lied to start the ball rolling.Quote:
Good point. What did Trump do to Vindman? I think the answer to that question will provide clarity on what needs to be done with Hegseth.
Old McDonald said:
if anything it's almost a blessing he happened to **** up by sharing these details to a journalist so we'd know about it. for all we know hegseth would have spent the entire term blabbing irresponsibly like this if he wasn't caught.
he's obviously unqualified and should step down or be fired but because the trump administration has a terminal case of adolescent oppositional defiant disorder, they'll let him get away with anything rather than admit a mistake. the incompetence is the point.
Ellis Wyatt said:He would have been impeached AGAIN if he had done anything to Vindman. As you well know. Eric Ciamarella's name could not even be publicly mentioned, even though he was the fake whisteblower who lied to start the ball rolling.Quote:
Good point. What did Trump do to Vindman? I think the answer to that question will provide clarity on what needs to be done with Hegseth.
Vindman is a seditionist, at best.
Did he?rootube said:Ellis Wyatt said:
He would have been impeached AGAIN if he had done anything to Vindman. As you well know. Eric Ciamarella's name could not even be publicly mentioned, even though he was the fake whisteblower who lied to start the ball rolling.
Vindman is a seditionist, at best.
Well Trump fired Vindman so…
Hegseth put men under his command at risk by compromising operational security
What happened?rootube said:
I had to look it up but yes it appears he did.
Some reported and verifiable facts:
— AG (@AGHamilton29) April 21, 2025
DoD hired Dan Caldwell, someone who is very skeptical of any intervention in the ME and has/still openly opposes any aggressive action again at Tehran. He helps push several more non-interventionist hires.
Tucker extensively praised him as…
Ellis Wyatt said:What happened?rootube said:
I had to look it up but yes it appears he did.
While this may be, those that have not regularly handled classified data also are proving they do not understand OpSec and Security classification guides. Just because a program uses a high level encryption does not mean it is appropriate for disseminating sensitive data.Pinochet said:D`Funkaladu` said:Kenneth_2003 said:
It's a FREE app! Heck I used it for a project we did on the border a few years back. You can download it in the app store.
While the DHS guess and the "former" (I know) Marine that worked for us swore by it... I have real doubts
Signal itself is fine. It's secure until you include someone that isn't trustworthy in the chat.
Once again the olds on F16 are proving they don't understand technology. They want to find a boogie man so they'll blame whoever they can without any idea if it even could be true. Signal is E2E encrypted and the keys are not stored anywhere except on your device. The Signal Foundation (yes, it's a nonprofit) can't just read all your chats. That's the point.
Im Gipper said:
Makes sense!Some reported and verifiable facts:
— AG (@AGHamilton29) April 21, 2025
DoD hired Dan Caldwell, someone who is very skeptical of any intervention in the ME and has/still openly opposes any aggressive action again at Tehran. He helps push several more non-interventionist hires.
Tucker extensively praised him as…