Massie introduces petition to force vote for full release of Epstein files

18,082 Views | 237 Replies | Last: 8 mo ago by Im Gipper
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

Just admit that you got played and move on. Even if they release "the files", you won't be happy with what they release.

If this was directed at me, I am not sure you understand the discussion. How does someone get played by providing a rational opinion based on the available information and their experience?

Release the files. I have no issue with it. I don't think learning the details on the sexual abuse of minors should make anyone happy.

But if they are going to release anything, it should be indictments of the perpetrators of actual crimes. 10,000 pages of false, conjured up evidence and misleading memos only makes podcasters and maddows happy.
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FWTXAg said:

flown-the-coop said:

He is on now with the Bahrain dude and fielding questions by the press. Of course, Epstein is brought up.

As indicated in prior posts, the issue with just releasing a huge file dump is that Wray, Comey and the other Obama led DOJ guys spent years supplementing files with false, inaccurate, misleading information on various people to the point it becomes a very arduous task to sort fact from fiction.

Its a similar scenario regarding the Jan 6th pardons, It became impossible to go case by case and sort out truly bad behaviors from cases involving granny MAGA taking a selfie with buffalo shaman.

If you listen to what Trump says, he is telling you the above and then summarizing it as a "hoax". Its not the best term to use here but it is consistent with what he calls Dem created misinformation on their enemies.

Man give it a rest. Trump is part of the "deep state", maybe not to the extent of other polished politicians, but he is no different than the ones you're describing. The handling and messaging on this Epstein ordeal cost him not all, but the majority of his credibility with his base which is mostly made up of reasonable American people.

I applaud you that you're able to believe in the President so much that you think he is on your team, but he is not and has never been. He is Team Trump, which is okay, so is every other high level politician and business person. But this constant goaltending and justification from both sides in defense of their chosen Actor (which is what every politician is) is the reason we are in the mess that we are in as a Country.

This issue is uniting the Left and Right, when that happens you should just go with it. We get very few opportunities unfortunately.


How is it goal tending to ask for facts rather than opinions?
JohnClark929
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Everyone knows why Trump won't release the investigation. Musk told us.
Bull Meachem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop said:

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

Just admit that you got played and move on. Even if they release "the files", you won't be happy with what they release.

If this was directed at me, I am not sure you understand the discussion. How does someone get played by providing a rational opinion based on the available information and their experience?

Release the files. I have no issue with it. I don't think learning the details on the sexual abuse of minors should make anyone happy.

But if they are going to release anything, it should be indictments of the perpetrators of actual crimes. 10,000 pages of false, conjured up evidence and misleading memos only makes podcasters and maddows happy.


It was directed at anyone that actually thought there was a list and if there was one, it would be released. The elites take care of each other as long as they can.
FIDO_Ags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

I agree. You should try and at least discuss something. Shame on you.


Ok, here is a discussion…it is well known that Bondi, Patel, and Bongino peddled the Epstein story. Now all three of those are in the justice department and decided nothing is there. If you can't see why that's a problem, not sure what else to say.

And when one of those peddlers is asked if client list will be released and she says "it" is on my desk for review, she was either lying or she is stupid. Either way, those three got caught in a storm of their own making and don't have the guts to come out and say ww made a big mistake and were wrong, "BIGLY", or there is something there.

And before you tell me all pols lie, I don't disagree, but they got caught, mostly in their own peddling and rode it to a position of power and influence.
johnnyblaze36
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
whytho987654 said:

PaulsBunions said:



Trump says its all a made up Democrat hoax, sounds like he's doing Trump a favor by forcing the hoax to be exposed

There goes the midterms and 2028, tampons are back in boys bathrooms soon

I'm as pissed about this as anyone but if you really think this will be a midterm issue and also a 2028 Presidential election topic that will swing people back to the left then you're insane.
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
johnnyblaze36 said:

whytho987654 said:

PaulsBunions said:



Trump says its all a made up Democrat hoax, sounds like he's doing Trump a favor by forcing the hoax to be exposed

There goes the midterms and 2028, tampons are back in boys bathrooms soon

I'm as pissed about this as anyone but if you really think this will be a midterm issue and also a 2028 Presidential election topic that will swing people back to the left then you're insane.


Yep.
Ervin Burrell
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Logos Stick said:

Daddy-O5 said:

MouthBQ98 said:

It = the evidence
Or
It = specifically a list?

She doesn't say. Presume what you will, I suppose. The question was the list. The context was the evidence. Which was she referring to?

She quite literally replied directly to a question specifically about the list. There's no presumption of anything here, not even remotely.


I'm out on this one, but...

this thread is enlightening. I have learned that conservatives will spin, obfuscate, and gaslight when it comes to protecting their team, no different than libs. Disappointing.


Imagine having to wait until 2025 before realizing this.
Infection_Ag11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Logos Stick said:

Daddy-O5 said:

MouthBQ98 said:

It = the evidence
Or
It = specifically a list?

She doesn't say. Presume what you will, I suppose. The question was the list. The context was the evidence. Which was she referring to?

She quite literally replied directly to a question specifically about the list. There's no presumption of anything here, not even remotely.


I'm out on this one, but...

this thread is enlightening. I have learned that conservatives will spin, obfuscate, and gaslight when it comes to protecting their team, no different than libs. Disappointing.


Weird takeaway, given the Venn diagram of people still all in on this Epstein thing and the people who supported every disproven 2020 election claim are near perfect overlapping circles.

The issue here isn't that many people treat politics as a team sport, that's always been true and is neither surprising or interesting. The relevant issue here is that a subset of the Trump/republican base values deep state conspiracy theories more than actually accomplishing things in the real world. And when their side aligns itself with reality, they choose the fantasy.

The greatest irony in American political history may end up being that Trump's incredible second term accomplishments will be overshadowed because many of his own supporters were too enthralled with masturbating to internet conspiracy.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
aggiegolfer2012
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump is slowly working to a point that even if he releases all the files, nobody is going to trust that he released everything, if Joe Biden said these things, this board would be up in arms about how he's protecting Hunter and the Clintons.
Francis Macomber
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag with kids said:

Dafuq is giving the right such a huge chubbie over this Epstein *****

It is the most useless thing in any of Trump's promises...

Trump just got the SCOTUS go-ahead to start gutting the Dept. of Education. And MAGA goes BUT EPSTEIN!!!!!!!

And the left and the media is drooling over this new chance to split the MAGA coalition...

JFC...the right couldn't stop stepping on their own dick even if they didn't have feet.


So shield predators and rapists because you gotta do what's best for the party?
Infection_Ag11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Francis Macomber said:

Ag with kids said:

Dafuq is giving the right such a huge chubbie over this Epstein *****

It is the most useless thing in any of Trump's promises...

Trump just got the SCOTUS go-ahead to start gutting the Dept. of Education. And MAGA goes BUT EPSTEIN!!!!!!!

And the left and the media is drooling over this new chance to split the MAGA coalition...

JFC...the right couldn't stop stepping on their own dick even if they didn't have feet.


So shield predators and rapists because you gotta do what's best for the party?


Again, as of this moment there is no actual evidence whatsoever that this is occurring.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Francis Macomber said:

Ag with kids said:

Dafuq is giving the right such a huge chubbie over this Epstein *****

It is the most useless thing in any of Trump's promises...

Trump just got the SCOTUS go-ahead to start gutting the Dept. of Education. And MAGA goes BUT EPSTEIN!!!!!!!

And the left and the media is drooling over this new chance to split the MAGA coalition...

JFC...the right couldn't stop stepping on their own dick even if they didn't have feet.


So shield predators and rapists because you gotta do what's best for the party?

That is not even close to what is happening here.

But we can certainly show absolute examples of the left protecting predators and rapists and think they are fine "citizens" of their local community who should be protected at ALL COSTS, including rioting and assaulting law enforcement.

All some of us are saying is that this should not be the top issue being discussed and the fact the press keeps chomping on this is trying to turn it into something else.
Francis Macomber
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Infection_Ag11 said:

Francis Macomber said:

Ag with kids said:

Dafuq is giving the right such a huge chubbie over this Epstein *****

It is the most useless thing in any of Trump's promises...

Trump just got the SCOTUS go-ahead to start gutting the Dept. of Education. And MAGA goes BUT EPSTEIN!!!!!!!

And the left and the media is drooling over this new chance to split the MAGA coalition...

JFC...the right couldn't stop stepping on their own dick even if they didn't have feet.


So shield predators and rapists because you gotta do what's best for the party?


Again, as of this moment there is no actual evidence whatsoever that this is occurring.


I wouldn't say there is "no evidence." There's a lot of witness statements and circumstantial evidence that makes it very likely there is at least one perpetrator that can be identified in all of those files.

But regardless, MAGA (not saying you) doesn't get to make this type of defense after the last five years of refusing to listen to anything g remotely like reason or logic on issues that they care about. What is good for the goose is good for the gander as they say.
AgDev01
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Daddy-O5 said:

MouthBQ98 said:

It = the evidence
Or
It = specifically a list?

She doesn't say. Presume what you will, I suppose. The question was the list. The context was the evidence. Which was she referring to?

She quite literally replied directly to a question specifically about the list. There's no presumption of anything here, not even remotely.



I guess it just depends on what the definition of "is" is.
El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Infection_Ag11 said:

Logos Stick said:

Daddy-O5 said:

MouthBQ98 said:

It = the evidence
Or
It = specifically a list?

She doesn't say. Presume what you will, I suppose. The question was the list. The context was the evidence. Which was she referring to?

She quite literally replied directly to a question specifically about the list. There's no presumption of anything here, not even remotely.


I'm out on this one, but...

this thread is enlightening. I have learned that conservatives will spin, obfuscate, and gaslight when it comes to protecting their team, no different than libs. Disappointing.


Weird takeaway, given the Venn diagram of people still all in on this Epstein thing and the people who supported every disproven 2020 election claim are near perfect overlapping circles.

Some of us want answers/transparency on the Epstein stuff but acknowledge the PROVEN 2020 election claims (of open FBI and intel interference in the election).

I'm honestly not sure if I will ever waste my time voting again. What's the f-ing point? AT BEST, electing certain republicans just slightly slows down the car headed for the cliff. And we have a multi-tiered justice system...one for powerful politicians and oliugarchs and pregnant woman robbing minorities, and then another for good honest decent Americans who keep this country running.
El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Francis Macomber said:

Infection_Ag11 said:

Francis Macomber said:

Ag with kids said:

Dafuq is giving the right such a huge chubbie over this Epstein *****

It is the most useless thing in any of Trump's promises...

Trump just got the SCOTUS go-ahead to start gutting the Dept. of Education. And MAGA goes BUT EPSTEIN!!!!!!!

And the left and the media is drooling over this new chance to split the MAGA coalition...

JFC...the right couldn't stop stepping on their own dick even if they didn't have feet.


So shield predators and rapists because you gotta do what's best for the party?


Again, as of this moment there is no actual evidence whatsoever that this is occurring.


I wouldn't say there is "no evidence." There's a lot of witness statements and circumstantial evidence that makes it very likely there is at least one perpetrator that can be identified in all of those files.

But regardless, MAGA (not saying you) doesn't get to make this type of defense after the last five years of refusing to listen to anything g remotely like reason or logic on issues that they care about. What is good for the goose is good for the gander as they say.

Give us some examples. And also, please apply those standards to the left...LOL. Those MF'ers think men can get pregnant and that they should be able to compete with women in sport and then shower with them afterwards...among many other wildly insane things.

The modern left is deathly allergic to logic and reason. But keep broadly bashing "MAGA folks".
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


I may be stupid and foolish but I've never played defense for pedophiles!
OPAG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
atmtws said:

Epstein was Mossad. Simple as that.

Or a CIA honey pot. Still we do know that there were a lot of fat cats going to Epstein Island, and if isst is simply a Comey thing then when would their be heavy incriminations of Clinton, Gates and quite a few that were in his camp.

Unless they were seeking to black male them.

There are a lot of things that don't make sense when it comes to 'this is a leftist Comey scam"

I think it more has to do with the previous FBI and CIA (and possibly Mossad) has expunged any really incriminating evidence, have altered it, (Like the JFK and RFK things)

If it came out that Epstien was CIA/Mossad and they were all honeypotted (a very normal spycraft tactic) and Israel was behind it, OH MY we have a big problem.

Especially when you understand that Brennan, Obama, with Soros were totally behind the Arab Spring, Muslim Brotherhood, (Not conspiracy there, that is straight up fact). They want Jihadism, they are behind the mass immigration of poor Catholics and third worlders, They want the destruction of the US and the West, they are Globalists and Malthusians and they want their New World Order, that's why they have pushed this mass immigration of radical Islamic refugees in to the West and as much as they can into the US.

The US middle class, and former US mil are big obstacle to their ultimate goal. the WEF and the UN's agenda 2030. That's why they created the whole "Global Warming" climate scam coming out of the the Club of Rome in 1968>

That's why they created the whole Covid scam. Wake up and smell the coffee bros!

"only one thing is important!"
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Unless they were seeking to black male them.


Ouch! Sounds very painful!

I'm Gipper
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Barry Wood has entered the chat.

Just posted this on the other Epstein thread. Trump hasn't disregarded the Epstein issue, it's just sort of transforming at this point.

I still agree the management and messaging on this has been at best haphazard, but more in line with lacking competence.

https://justthenews.com/accountability/political-ethics/trump-embraces-special-prosecutor-weaponization-probe-and-epstein
Science Denier
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PaulsBunions said:



I may be stupid and foolish but I've never played defense for pedophiles!

If you are on the left, your politicians have.
LOL OLD
Farmer_J
How long do you want to ignore this user?

This is political theater.

Why didn't Massie file this years ago? Why is he waiting till now?

Go look up how many times Massie has mentioned Epstein before this week?

It's all theater folks
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Farmer_J said:


This is political theater.

Why didn't Massie file this years ago? Why is he waiting till now?

Go look up how many times Massie has mentioned Epstein before this week?

It's all theater folks


Trump just told us its a hoax so Massie is simply doing him a favor and exposing the hoax. Remember back in February when the WH gave binders to influencers that said "Epstein part one"? Was it not a hoax back then but it is now?
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm not a leftist but I've got some ocean front property in San Angelo to sell you if you think some Republicans aren't involved lol
Fat Black Swan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MouthBQ98 said:

Epstein being a creep is no hoax. The jury is still out on if he was an extortionist working for some Intel agency, which appears to be the current conspiracy theory: it very well could be a hopeful delusion of those who resent powerful corruption but because the circumstances are so suspicious and you can't disprove the theory for the same reason you can't prove it, people will believe it, and that means people will also exploit that belief.


It's just a weird deal all around. In the 1990's and early 2000's, people might have been ignorant of riding on a plane known as the "Lolita Express". Maybe they were unfamiliar with the reference back then, but he was convicted and jailed through 2010 for Lolita-esque crimes. In most circles, it would be frowned upon to socialize after that, yet he met with a former Israeli PM, a former White House counsel, the acting CIA director, many billionaires, and arranged a meeting with a banking CEO and the current Israeli PM.

It's possible the depraved stuff only involved Epstein, and he was the one being blackmailed with it. Maybe the people involved in these dealings run in such a small circle that there's a ton of overlap in unrelated events, but still crazy that many powerful people would feel comfortable associating with him after 2010 with everything that had been reported at the time. The most likely answer is that the client list is a red herring for why those people maintained a connection with him.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Farmer_J said:


This is political theater.

Why didn't Massie file this years ago? Why is he waiting till now?

Go look up how many times Massie has mentioned Epstein before this week?

It's all theater folks

If you want answers as to why Massie does anything, you have to ask his daddy Rand Paul.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PaulsBunions said:

I'm not a leftist but I've got some ocean front property in San Angelo to sell you if you think some Republicans aren't involved lol

I think making light of the recent floods in San Angelo is a bit out of line.

you may not be a left, but you seem to be thoroughly misunderstand what Trump is referring to regarding hoax, even though its been explained by Trump himself and plenty of others.

But keep repeating the lie. It is what leftists do and that may underly the misidentification.
Science Denier
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PaulsBunions said:

I'm not a leftist but I've got some ocean front property in San Angelo to sell you if you think some Republicans aren't involved lol

1. Trump has been consistent.
2. He's not going to release anything if it's BS.
3. Said that over a year ago and saying it now
4. The "file" is made up garbage by the left
5. He's given many examples of made up garbage by the left. They have a long history of doing this.
6. Russia, Russia, Russia; Hillary emails; Biden's laptop; censoring social media, and on and on and on.

So, do you believe that the left has done what they've done many times, or do you believe that THIS TIME, they left the Epstein files along and they are the absolute truth.

Talk about buying ocean front property.
LOL OLD
agracer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
JohnClark929 said:

Everyone knows why Trump won't release the investigation. Musk told us.

At one point I wanted to believe that Trumps only association was they were both rich and hung out in the same crowd.

But as time goes on I'm starting to thing this is part of the reason along with a lot of other things.
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FIDO_Ags said:

Quote:

I agree. You should try and at least discuss something. Shame on you.


Ok, here is a discussion…it is well known that Bondi, Patel, and Bongino peddled the Epstein story. Now all three of those are in the justice department and decided nothing is there. If you can't see why that's a problem, not sure what else to say.

And when one of those peddlers is asked if client list will be released and she says "it" is on my desk for review, she was either lying or she is stupid. Either way, those three got caught in a storm of their own making and don't have the guts to come out and say ww made a big mistake and were wrong, "BIGLY", or there is something there.

And before you tell me all pols lie, I don't disagree, but they got caught, mostly in their own peddling and rode it to a position of power and influence.


Peddled? No. They were suspicious as many people here were, where the circumstantial elements could be seen and where it seems suspicious. They all voiced those suspicions as OUTSIDERS. Then they became high ranking government justice officials and had full access to the ACTUAL data and records and evidence, or at least what the DOJ currently has.

Maybe they didn't find what they suspected?

I get the feeling Russian and Chinese run AI bot farms are having a great time leading Epstein conspiracy fans around by the nose with social media posts to entice them.


Granted, Bondi doesn't help by throwing gasoline on the fire and and Trump doesn't help by going hard after people who are conditioned to be suspicious of government.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
agracer said:

JohnClark929 said:

Everyone knows why Trump won't release the investigation. Musk told us.

At one point I wanted to believe that Trumps only association was they were both rich and hung out in the same crowd.

But as time goes on I'm starting to thing this is part of the reason along with a lot of other things.

And a bill proposed by Massie changed your mind? And now you think Trump is a pedo?

Interesting.
TexAggie5432
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Science Denier said:

PaulsBunions said:

I'm not a leftist but I've got some ocean front property in San Angelo to sell you if you think some Republicans aren't involved lol

1. Trump has been consistent.
2. He's not going to release anything if it's BS.
3. Said that over a year ago and saying it now
4. The "file" is made up garbage by the left
5. He's given many examples of made up garbage by the left. They have a long history of doing this.
6. Russia, Russia, Russia; Hillary emails; Biden's laptop; censoring social media, and on and on and on.

So, do you believe that the left has done what they've done many times, or do you believe that THIS TIME, they left the Epstein files along and they are the absolute truth.

Talk about buying ocean front property.


No one was talking about Epstein until 2015 when Trump himself brought it up in an interview and speech calling out Clinton and Prince Andrew. Trump was the origin of the "hoax" and is telling you the sky is green.
Science Denier
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BoydCrowder13 said:

Science Denier said:

PaulsBunions said:

I'm not a leftist but I've got some ocean front property in San Angelo to sell you if you think some Republicans aren't involved lol

1. Trump has been consistent.
2. He's not going to release anything if it's BS.
3. Said that over a year ago and saying it now
4. The "file" is made up garbage by the left
5. He's given many examples of made up garbage by the left. They have a long history of doing this.
6. Russia, Russia, Russia; Hillary emails; Biden's laptop; censoring social media, and on and on and on.

So, do you believe that the left has done what they've done many times, or do you believe that THIS TIME, they left the Epstein files along and they are the absolute truth.

Talk about buying ocean front property.


No one was talking about Epstein until 2015 when Trump himself brought it up in an interview and speech calling out Clinton and Prince Andrew. Trump was the origin of the "hoax" and is telling you the sky is green.

Huh? What does Trump bringing up Epstein in 2015 have to do with anything? Do you understand what the actual hoax is?

The hoax is the current file that the operatives created. It's not there. They've deleted anything that they don't want and fabricated what they want to get out. "The List" is gone. Deleted. BLEACHED. THAT IS THE HOAX.

Like they've done time after time after time after time after time.

Who know what else is doctored. Trump said that if the files were BS garbage he would not release. And that's what he's not releasing. The hoax trying to be sprung on the American people.
LOL OLD
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BoydCrowder13 said:

Science Denier said:

PaulsBunions said:

I'm not a leftist but I've got some ocean front property in San Angelo to sell you if you think some Republicans aren't involved lol

1. Trump has been consistent.
2. He's not going to release anything if it's BS.
3. Said that over a year ago and saying it now
4. The "file" is made up garbage by the left
5. He's given many examples of made up garbage by the left. They have a long history of doing this.
6. Russia, Russia, Russia; Hillary emails; Biden's laptop; censoring social media, and on and on and on.

So, do you believe that the left has done what they've done many times, or do you believe that THIS TIME, they left the Epstein files along and they are the absolute truth.

Talk about buying ocean front property.


No one was talking about Epstein until 2015 when Trump himself brought it up in an interview and speech calling out Clinton and Prince Andrew. Trump was the origin of the "hoax" and is telling you the sky is green.

You seem to poorly understand what Trump is referring to as a hoax,

Let me help. He was calling out legit accusations in 2015. Ones based on evidence.



Insinuation that Trump is a pedo based on a plane trip and a cocktail party at M-A-L years ago is the hoax being referred to.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.