This is another perfect set up position. Yes, it is 100% warranted, but better than that….let's see if the left tries to protect Antifa. That would be something.
f burg ag said:
This is another perfect set up position. Yes, it is 100% warranted, but better than that….let's see if the left tries to protect Antifa. That would be something.
Central Committee said:
About damn time.
Time to take the gloves off with the Soros brown shirts. Cutting off part of their funding through USAID was a first start. Now go after them and their remains funding sources.
Pylon Cam said:
Ah yes, designating protest groups we don't like as terrorists so we can use deadly force on them. Do y'all seriously not see how this is an issue?
Pylon Cam said:
Ah yes, designating protest groups we don't like as terrorists so we can use deadly force on them. Do y'all seriously not see how this is an issue?
Pylon Cam said:
Ah yes, designating protest groups we don't like as terrorists so we can use deadly force on them. Do y'all seriously not see how this is an issue?
Pylon Cam said:
Ah yes, designating protest groups we don't like as terrorists so we can use deadly force on them. Do y'all seriously not see how this is an issue?
Dr. Mephisto said:
Overdue.
Pylon Cam said:
Ah yes, designating protest groups we don't like as terrorists so we can use deadly force on them. Do y'all seriously not see how this is an issue?
Pylon Cam said:
Ah yes, designating protest groups we don't like as terrorists so we can use deadly force on them. Do y'all seriously not see how this is an issue?
Who?mikejones! said:
Its a lot more organized than you let on
Pylon Cam said:
Ah yes, designating protest groups we don't like as terrorists so we can use deadly force on them. Do y'all seriously not see how this is an issue?
Yukon Cornelius said:
What are the actionable implications of this?
Pylon Cam said:
Ah yes, designating protest groups we don't like as terrorists so we can use deadly force on them. Do y'all seriously not see how this is an issue?